Sherwood Tax and Accounting owner Kristen Keats was no stranger to outsourcing when she co-founded a Guadalajara, Mexico-based accounting staffing agency about four years ago to help supplement and support her home team in Oregon.
Having previously worked for a firm that outsourced to a team in India, Keats understood the benefits of outsourcing. She also understood the challenges that can arise.
“We had heard that Guadalajara was a great place as far as the number of universities that are there and just the number of people. It is called ‘the Silicon Valley of Mexico,’ so we were excited that it has more of a technology [focus]. So, we looked at expanding into Mexico,” said Keats. “In 2021, I, with my partner, started Cadencia, the outsourcing firm that now has staffed for our firm but we also work with other accounting firms as well.”
Today, Cadencia employs 45 associates, of whom four are dedicated to supplementing the staff at Sherwood Tax and Accounting in Sherwood, Oregon.
Vitalii Vodolazskyi – stock.adob
Establishing an outsourced staffing agency like Cadencia may not be the preferred route for many U.S.-based accounting firms; however, there is no denying that more and more firms are exploring how outsourcing in some capacity, whether domestically or overseas, can help them broaden bandwidth and better serve clients.
“[Outsourcing] was almost like a dirty word, I would say, like five years ago,” said Keats. “It was always thought of in a bad light, in my opinion. And now I definitely feel like that has shifted. I feel like it has become more accepted and there is more understanding, more openness to thinking about it, I think, in the industry. If nothing else, out of sheer necessity.”
Laurence Whittam, founder of South Amboy, N.J.-based Impact Global Solutions, which provides outsourcing-related consulting and implementation services, agreed and said, “[Outsourcing] is definitely a moving area. A lot more firms are really interested in it and moving on it. They are investing quite heavily in it, which is great. Even private equity is getting involved in it. I’m seeing outsourcing firms now even being acquired by both private equity and firms as well.”
Further highlighting the growing interest in outsourcing, the American Institute of CPAs’ 2023 National Management of an Accounting Practice survey found that roughly 40% of respondents said they planned to outsource work domestically, and 35% planned to use offshore talent in the future. Among the top-performing firms, 52% said they planned to use offshore talent and half were looking to outsource work domestically.
Finding an outsourcing model
The findings come as little surprise given the staffing constraints that are facing the profession due in part to seasoned professionals eyeing retirement and a dwindling pipeline of new accounting majors and graduates entering the profession.
That being said, it is important to keep in mind that outsourcing entails more than simply broadening the talent pool. To achieve success, firms must have a strategy in place and be aware of the outsourcing models that are gaining traction.
1. Onshoring model. Onshoring is essentially outsourcing work domestically. Onshore outsourcing can be achieved by collaborating with a local entity to handle specific tasks or using gig workers. Some firms may also turn to a contracting vendor to find U.S.-based contractors who can work closely with the firm.
Onshore outsourcing can ease compliance concerns as the talent is well-versed in U.S. regulations and has a clearer understanding of U.S. business practices. However, firms may find there are limitations to the availability of qualified candidates in today’s competitive labor market.
2. Nearshoring model. Nearshoring is outsourcing work to a nearby country, such as Mexico or Canada. One of the biggest advantages is the close proximity of the outsourced talent. This makes in-person meetings easier, if needed, and the time difference minimal — maybe only an hour or two, if any at all. And compared with domestic outsourcing, it may be easier for firms to find available talent.
3. Offshoring model. Offshoring is similar to nearshoring; however, the talent is located much farther away, typically on a different continent. With that can come significant differences in time zones, cultural differences, and perhaps language barriers — all of which must be considered by a firm looking at offshoring.
India has emerged as one of the most popular countries for offshoring due in part to the lower labor costs, strong English proficiency, and expertise in tax, accounting and audit services. The Philippines is also a popular choice for outsourcing accounting services, and South America is rising up on the list.
However, the differences do not stop there. As Whittam explained, there are “a spectrum” of approaches when it comes to outsourcing.
For instance, some firms may opt to build their own captive, while other firms may choose to work with a business process outsourcing services provider to handle certain business functions or processes. There’s also the employer-of-record model, which is when a firm contracts with a third party to hire talent on their behalf and the third party handles payroll, compliance, and perhaps infrastructure like office space and equipment; or a firm may want to leverage a traditional full-time employee outsourcing model, in which the candidate will work for only the contracting accounting firm.
“[Firms] have generally heard the options, but I think the differences between the models that are available is very important for them to understand because outsourcing comes in a bit of a spectrum,” Whittam said.
Hitendra Patil, CEO of Miami-based consulting firm Accountaneur, agreed, and said it is important that firms first determine what it is they are looking to achieve. “What is the purpose of outsourcing? Is it just an inability to hire locally and volume is growing and you need to make sure that you have enough people, hence, you are outsourcing? So there are multiple ways in which a firm decides on how to create that capacity. Ultimately, outsourcing or not is technically a decision of capacity planning,” he said.
As outlined by Patil, firms that are trying to determine if it is time to outsource may want to ask themselves such questions as:
Is the firm consistently missing deadlines? If yes, this can be a sign that staff is stretched too thin.
Is it hard to hire new staff and is staff turnover on the rise? If so, staff may be overworked, overwhelmed, and becoming disillusioned with the profession.
Does the firm lack capital for growth? Outsourcing can save firms money and time, enabling them to fuel profitability.
Is the firm turning down new clients or not getting new clients? If yes, outsourcing can help expand capacity so the firm can provide more competitive, value-added services.
Employ best practices
As previously noted, outsourcing involves more than simply expanding the talent pool. To help firms achieve success, there are several important best practices to consider before diving into the outsourcing waters.
Kane Polakoff, a principal and CAS practice leader at New York-based Top 100 Firm CohnReznick, suggested talking with peers who are outsourcing to better understand the lessons learned. “Don’t just jump in to jump in,” he said. “Take the time before you go ahead and start that process. Start small. Of course, determining whether you want to do a captive, or you want to do a third party, or you want to do both. You need to have those discussions too, and then determine what that roadmap is. You definitely want to come up with a good plan and then execute on that.”
According to sources, steps to consider when embarking on the outsourcing journey include, but are not limited to:
Define the firm’s objectives.
Assess internal processes and take steps to improve efficiencies.
Establish and maintain comprehensive process documentation to help ensure consistency and compliance.
Establish strong lines of communication and foster relationship-building between the firm’s home team and the outsourced talent. For instance, conduct regular video conferences and/or on-site visits.
Invest in training to help the outsourcing team enhance their skills and gain a better understanding of the firm’s processes.
Ensure the necessary technology infrastructure and software is in place, such as a project management system to help track projects, tasks and schedules.
Successful outsourcing also involves making sure the right security protocols are in place. This means, for instance, ensuring the secure transmission of data and using two-factor authentication to authenticate users, and limiting access control so only authorized individuals and devices can gain access to the appropriate network resources.
“I know that it feels scarier to have that [talent] located outside of the U.S., but in reality, I believe, it is really no different than having a remote employee in the U.S.,” Keats said.
Embrace transparency
Some accounting firms that outsource work may have clients who are concerned about data security, compliance issues, lack of expertise, and language barriers (when offshoring), among other potential issues. The key, according to sources, is to be fully transparent.
“Today, we are very transparent. … We have a global capacity, a global operation, and here’s what we do and here’s how we do it. So that is an expectation that we set with our clients from the beginning and it’s understood. We really don’t have much of any push back on that,” Polakoff said.
Added Polakoff, “I think the worst thing that you can do is to go ahead and do it but you don’t share that with the client, because that will come back and haunt you.”
Keats agreed: “When we initially started working with the [outsourced] team, I did a video that got sent out to all of the clients. We were extremely transparent about it. … In the beginning, we actually allowed clients to opt out of it. We said, ‘You can opt out of it but you have to pay a higher fee,’ and some folks chose to do that. There were some folks that left us. There were some people that just were not comfortable with it at all.”
Today, the firm no longer allows clients to opt out of outsourcing the work, as it became too difficult to segment the client base. All existing clients have transitioned and new clients are informed during the first phone call to ensure full transparency.
“Just remember that these are human beings. I think sometimes firms tend to think of outsourcing as this monolithic strategy or solution for things. It is good to be reminded that the individuals that you will be interacting with — whoever you go with, wherever they are in the world — are people who are all learning, want to do a good job, and want to advance; they want all the same things that we all do,” said Keats. “So I think that is a good thing to keep in mind — to keep the humanity at the forefront when you are thinking about outsourcing.”
Jody Padar, an author and speaker known as “The Radical CPA,” and Katie Tolin, a growth strategist for CPAs, together launched a training and technology platform called XcelLabs.
XcelLabs provides solutions to help accountants use artificial technology fluently and strategically. The Pennsylvania Institute of CPAs and CPA Crossings joined with Padar and Tolin as strategic partners and investors.
“To reinvent the profession, we must start by training the professional who can then transform their firms,” Padar said in a statement. “By equipping people with data and insights that help them see things differently, they can provide better advice to their clients and firm.”
Jody Padar
The platform includes XcelLabs Academy, a series of educational online courses on the basics of AI, being a better advisor, leadership and practice management; Navi, a proprietary tool that uses AI to help accountants turn unstructured data like emails, phone calls and meetings into insights; and training and consulting services. These offerings are currently in beta testing.
“Accountants know they need to be more advisory, but not everyone can figure out how to do it,” Tolin said in a statement. “Couple that with the fact that AI will be doing a lot of the lower-level work accountants do today, and we need to create that next level advisor now. By showing accountants how to unlock patterns in their actions and turn client conversations into emotionally intelligent advice, we can create the accounting professional of the future.”
Katie Tolin
“AI is transforming how CPAs work, and XcelLabs is focused on helping the profession evolve with it,” PICPA CEO Jennifer Cryder said in a statement. “At PICPA, we’re proud to support a mission that aligns so closely with ours: empowering firms to use AI not just for efficiency, but to drive growth, value and long-term relevance.”
The accountant the world urgently needs has evolved far beyond the traditional role we recognized just a few years ago.
The transformation of the accounting profession is not merely an anticipated change; it is a pressing reality that is currently shaping business decisions, academic programs and the expected contributions of professionals. Yet, in many areas, accounting education stubbornly clings to outdated, overly technical models that fail to connect with the actual demands of the market. We must confront a critical question: If we continue to train accountants solely to file tax reports, are we truly equipping them for the challenges of today’s world?
This shift in mindset extends beyond individual countries or educational systems; it is a global movement. The recent announcement of the CIMA/CGMA 2026 syllabus has made it unmistakably clear: merely knowing how to post journal entries is insufficient. Today’s accountants are required to interpret the landscape, anticipate risks and act with strategic awareness. Critical thinking, sustainable finance, technology and human behavior are not just supplementary topics; they are essential components in the education of any professional seeking to remain relevant.
The CIMA/CGMA proposal for 2026 is not just a curriculum update; it is a powerful manifesto. This new program positions analytical thinking, strategic business partnering and technology application at the core of accounting education. It unequivocally highlights sustainability, aligning with IFRS S1 and S2, and expands the accountant’s responsibilities beyond mere numbers to encompass conscious leadership, environmental impact and corporate governance.
The current changes in the accounting profession underscore an urgent shift in expectations from both educators and employers. Today, companies of all sizes and industries demand accountants who can do far more than interpret balance sheets. They expect professionals who grasp the deeper context behind the numbers, identify inconsistencies, anticipate potential issues before they escalate into losses, and act decisively as a bridge between data and decision making.
To meet these expectations, a radical mindset shift is essential. There are firms still operating on autopilot, mindlessly repeating tasks with minimal critical analysis. Likewise, many academic programs continue to treat accounting as purely a technical discipline, disregarding the vital elements of reflection, strategy and behavioral insight. This outdated approach creates a significant mismatch. While the world forges ahead, parts of the accounting profession remain stuck in the past.
The consequences of this shift are already becoming evident. The demand for compliance, transparency and sustainability now applies not only to large corporations but also to small and mid-sized businesses. Many of these organizations rely on professionals ill-equipped to drive the necessary changes, putting both business performance and the reputation of the profession at risk.
The positive news is that accountants who are ready to thrive in this new era do not necessarily need additional degrees. What they truly need is a commitment to awareness, a dedication to continuous learning, and the courage to step beyond their comfort zones. The future of accounting is here, and it is firmly rooted in analytical, strategic and human-oriented perspectives. The 2026 curriculum is a clear indication of the changes underway. Those who fail to think critically and holistically will be left behind.
In contrast, accountants who see the big picture, understand the ripple effects of their decisions, and actively contribute to the financial and ethical health of organizations will undeniably remain indispensable, anywhere in the world.
Congressional Republicans are siding with Donald Trump in the messy divorce between the president and Elon Musk, an optimistic sign for eventual passage of a tax cut bill at the root of the two billionaires’ public feud.
Lawmakers are largely taking their cues from Trump and sticking by the $3 trillion bill at the center of the White House’s economic agenda. Musk, the biggest political donor of the 2024 cycle, has threatened to help primary anyone who votes for the legislation, but lawmakers are betting that staying in the president’s good graces is the safer path to political survival.
“The tax bill is not in jeopardy. We are going to deliver on that,” House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters on Friday.
“I’ll tell you what — do not doubt, don’t second guess and do not challenge the President of the United States Donald Trump,” he added. “He is the leader of the party. He’s the most consequential political figure of our time.”
A fight between Trump and Musk exploded into public view this week. The sparring started with the tech titan calling the president’s tax bill a “disgusting abomination,” but quickly escalated to more personal attacks and Trump threatening to cancel all federal contracts and subsidies to Musk’s companies, such as Tesla Inc. and SpaceX which have benefitted from government ties.
Republicans on Capitol Hill, who had — until recently — publicly embraced Musk, said they weren’t swayed by the billionaire’s criticism that the bill cost too much. Lawmakers have refuted official estimates of the package, saying that the tax cuts for households, small businesses and politically important groups — including hospitality and hourly workers — will generate enough economic growth to offset the price tag.
“I don’t tell my friend Elon, I don’t argue with him about how to build rockets, and I wish he wouldn’t argue with me about how to craft legislation and pass it,” Johnson told CNBC earlier Friday.
House Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington told reporters that House lawmakers are focused on working with the Senate as it revises the bill to make sure the legislation has the political support in both chambers to make it to Trump’s desk for his signature.
“We move past the drama and we get the substance of what is needed to make the modest improvements that can be made,” he said.
House fiscal hawks said that they hadn’t changed their prior positions on the legislation based on Musk’s statements. They also said they agree with GOP leaders that there will be other chances to make further spending cuts outside the tax bill.
Representative Tom McClintock, a fiscal conservative, said “the bill will pass because it has to pass,” adding that both Musk and Trump needed to calm down. “They both need to take a nap,” he said.
Even some of the House bill’s most vociferous critics appeared resigned to its passage. Kentucky Representative Thomas Massie, who voted against the House version, predicted that despite Musk’s objections, the Senate will make only small changes.
“The speaker is right about one thing. This barely passed the House. If they muck with it too much in the Senate, it may not pass the House again,” he said.
Trump is pressuring lawmakers to move at breakneck speed to pass the tax-cut bill, demanding they vote on the bill before the July 4 holiday. The president has been quick to blast critics of the bill — including calling Senator Rand Paul “crazy” for objecting to the inclusion of a debt ceiling increase in the package.
As the legislation worked its way through the House last month, Trump took to social media to criticize holdouts and invited undecided members to the White House to compel them to support the package. It passed by one vote.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune — who is planning to unveil his chamber’s version of the bill as soon as next week — said his timeline is unmoved by Musk.
“We are already pretty far down the trail,” he said.