Connect with us

Accounting

ADM has yet to get a handle on accounting months after scandal

Published

on

Almost 10 months after a scandal that shook Archer-Daniels-Midland Co., the commodity-trading giant is still struggling to sort out its accounting.

ADM, which in March adjusted its financial disclosures going back to 2018, said late Monday that it found more errors in the way it reported transactions between its business units. The crop trader said it will restate results for last year and the first and second quarters of 2024. The move prompted ADM to cancel its quarterly earnings call with analysts only 14 hours before it was due to start. 

The Chicago-based company said it will make the formal corrections “as soon as reasonably practicable,” and it doesn’t expect any material impact from the changes. But even as the financial impact of the errors on consolidated earnings have so far been minor, the broader consequences could be significant as investors lose confidence in the company.

adm-sign.jpg
An Archer Daniels Midland Co. (ADM) logo hangs on a glass partition in the research analytical lab at the James R Randall Research Center in Decatur, Illinois.

Daniel Acker/Bloomberg

ADM has erased almost $12 billion in market value since the accounting issues first became public in January. The stock plunged as much as 12% on Tuesday to the lowest level since December 2020, heading for its worst annual performance in almost a decade. The scandal has drawn investigations by the Department of Justice and Securities & Exchange Commission, and the company removed Vikram Luthar from the Chief Financial Officer role. 

ADM said earlier this year it has identified “material weakness” in its internal controls over financial reporting of transactions between units, which totaled roughly $4.4 billion last year. The newly identified errors were found as the company started testing new controls — a process it said will continue through the end of the year. The decision to formally restate previous financial statements was taken by ADM’s board after discussions with the SEC.

Representatives for ADM and the SEC each declined to comment.

Assessing whether errors are significant requires considering a broad mix of information, not just numbers, according to SEC guidance. A small numerical error can become serious if it affects compliance with loan covenants, changes earnings, or boosts executive pay, among other factors.

“It is entirely possible for something to not be quantitatively material and yet still be qualitatively material,” said Bruce Pounder, founder of GAAP Lab, an accounting advisory firm. 

The restatement of information about the so-called inter-segment transactions raises concerns that profits from the nutrition unit may be lowered further. ADM has spent billions expanding the business since 2014, when it made its biggest-ever acquisition — the $3 billion buyout of European natural ingredient maker Wild Flavors GmbH — in a bid to diversify from row crop grains and oilseeds into processed products. Nutrition companies tend to trade at a premium to commodity traders because of their higher growth potential and increased earnings stability.

ADM also spent about $1.8 billion to buy animal feed maker Neovia from France’s InVivo Group in 2019. But profits have failed to live up to initial expectations due to weakening demand, including for plant-based food.

This isn’t the first scandal involving ADM. Back in the 1990s, it was implicated in a price-fixing conspiracy that later became the basis of the 2009 film “The Informant!” starring Matt Damon. ADM pleaded guilty to the price-fixing charges in 1996. The company has also responded to a lawsuit over allegations of price manipulation involving its trading of ethanol

The renewed accounting issues come at a time when ADM is struggling with a drop in crop prices around the globe and lower profits from processing soybeans into meal and oil — a key earnings driver amid increased crushing capacity in the U.S. A surge in imports of ingredients such as tallow and waste oil has also impacted demand for soybean oil for biofuel production. ADM closed its only soybean crushing facility in Iowa for maintenance during the current harvest of a record U.S. crop, further eroding its ability to gain from processing.

ADM was expected to release its third-quarter financial statement on Tuesday before the start of trading. In the surprise preliminary report late Monday, the company said earnings excluding some items slumped 33% from a year ago to $1.09 per share. That missed even the lowest of analysts’ estimates compiled by Bloomberg. The company also wrote down the value of its investment in Wilmar International Ltd. by $461 million.

The trader slashed its full-year earnings outlook to a range of $4.50 to $5 per share, citing slower market demand, internal operational challenges as well as legislative and regulatory policy uncertainties. The company previously projected a profit between $5.25 and $6.25.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending