Connect with us

Accounting

Assessing credit losses in financial statement audits: A guide for auditors

Published

on

Credit losses represent a significant area of focus in financial statement audits. As economic conditions fluctuate and accounting standards evolve, auditors face increasing challenges in evaluating how organizations estimate and report credit losses, and in providing a comprehensive overview of credit loss assessment in financial statement audits. 

This article will explore the concept of credit losses, examine relevant regulatory frameworks, discuss vital challenges auditors encounter, and offer best practices for effectively auditing credit loss estimates. In addition, it will also describe key emerging trends and technologies shaping the future of credit loss auditing.

Credit losses occur when a borrower fails to repay a debt according to the initial agreement. These losses are typically reported as allowances for credit losses or loan loss provisions in financial statements. They represent the estimated amount of debt that may not be collected, reflecting the credit risk associated with a company’s financial assets.

For auditors, understanding how companies calculate and report credit losses is crucial. This process often involves complex estimates and judgments, as companies must forecast future economic conditions and borrower behavior. The shift toward more forward-looking models, such as the Current Expected Credit Loss model in the United States, has further increased the complexity of these estimates.

Auditors must evaluate whether these estimates are reasonable and supported by appropriate evidence, ensuring that financial statements accurately reflect the company’s credit risk exposure.

Regulatory framework and standards

Various standards and regulations govern the accounting for credit losses, which have undergone significant changes in recent years. In the United States, the Financial Accounting Standards Board introduced Accounting Standards Update 2016-13, which implemented the CECL model. Internationally, the International Accounting Standards Board has issued IFRS 9, which includes a similar expected credit loss model.

These standards require companies to recognize expected credit losses over the life of a financial asset rather than waiting for a loss event to occur. This forward-looking approach aims to provide financial statement users with more timely and relevant information about credit risk.

Auditors must stay current with these standards and any related interpretations or guidance issued by regulatory bodies. They must also understand how these standards apply to different types of financial assets and industries to effectively audit credit loss estimates.

Critical challenges in auditing credit losses

Auditing credit losses presents several challenges:

  • Complexity of models: Credit loss models often involve complex statistical techniques and numerous assumptions. Auditors must assess whether these models are appropriate and whether the assumptions used are reasonable.
  • Data quality and availability: The accuracy of credit loss estimates depends heavily on the quality and completeness of historical and current data. Auditors must evaluate the reliability of data sources and the processes used to collect and maintain this information.
  • Judgment and estimation uncertainty: Credit loss estimates involve significant judgment, particularly in forecasting future economic conditions. Auditors must evaluate the reasonableness of these judgments and ensure appropriate disclosure of estimation uncertainty.
  • Rapidly changing economic conditions: Economic volatility can quickly render historical data and assumptions obsolete. Auditors must consider how companies have incorporated recent economic trends and events into their estimates.
  • Internal controls: Assessing the effectiveness of internal controls over the credit loss estimation process is crucial but can be challenging due to the complexity and judgment involved.
  • Potential management bias: Given the subjective nature of credit loss estimates, there’s a risk of management bias. Auditors must remain skeptical and alert to potential manipulations of these estimates.

Best practices for auditors 

To effectively audit credit losses, auditors should consider the following best practices:

  • Develop a thorough understanding: Gain in-depth knowledge of the company’s business model, credit risk management practices and the specific credit loss estimation methodology.
  • Assess model appropriateness: Evaluate whether the credit loss model aligns with accounting standards and suits the company’s specific circumstances. When dealing with complex models, consider involving specialists.
  • Test key assumptions: Critically evaluate the reasonableness of key assumptions used in the credit loss model. This may involve comparing assumptions to industry benchmarks, historical data, and economic forecasts from reliable sources.
  • Perform sensitivity analyses: Assess how changes in key assumptions impact the credit loss estimate to understand the model’s sensitivity and identify potential areas of concern.
  • Evaluate data integrity: Test the completeness and accuracy of data used in the credit loss model. This includes both historical data and current information used to inform forward-looking estimates.
  • Review disclosures: Ensure financial statement disclosures adequately explain the credit loss estimation process, key assumptions and areas of uncertainty.
  • Assess internal controls: Thoroughly evaluate internal controls’ design and operating effectiveness over the credit loss estimation process.
  • Consider management bias: When selecting assumptions or data used in the estimation process, remain alert to potential indicators of management bias.
  • Document thoroughly: Maintain clear and comprehensive documentation of audit procedures performed, evidence obtained, and conclusions regarding credit loss estimates’ reasonableness.
  • Stay updated: Continuously monitor changes in accounting standards, regulatory guidance, and industry practices related to credit loss estimation and auditing.

Emerging trends and technologies

The field of credit loss auditing is evolving rapidly, driven by technological advancements and changing regulatory landscapes. Emerging trends include:

  • Increased use of artificial intelligence and machine learning in credit loss modeling;
  • Greater emphasis on real-time data analysis and continuous auditing techniques;
  • Enhanced data analytics tools for identifying patterns and anomalies in large datasets;
  • Growing focus on climate-related risks and their potential impact on credit losses; and,
  • Increased regulatory scrutiny of credit loss estimates, particularly during economic uncertainty.

The impact of AI on auditing credit losses

Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing how credit losses are estimated and audited. Its ability to quickly process vast amounts of data and identify complex patterns is particularly valuable in this field. 

Here are some key areas where AI is making a significant impact:

1. Enhanced pattern recognition. AI algorithms can analyze historical data to identify subtle patterns indicating increased credit risk. For example, an AI system might detect that customers who make frequent small purchases followed by large purchases are more likely to default. This pattern might need to be more nuanced for traditional analysis methods to catch.

Example: An auditor reviewing a bank’s credit loss estimates could use AI to analyze the transaction patterns of thousands of credit card holders. The AI might identify a correlation between certain spending behaviors and the likelihood of default that the bank’s model hasn’t accounted for, prompting the auditor to question the completeness of the bank’s risk assessment.

2. Improved forecasting. AI models can incorporate a broader range of variables and data sources to improve the accuracy of credit loss forecasts. This includes nontraditional data such as social media posts, online behavior, or macroeconomic indicators.

Example: When auditing a mortgage lender’s expected credit losses, an AI system could analyze not just traditional factors like credit scores and income but also incorporate data on local real estate trends, employment statistics, and even climate change projections for coastal properties. The auditor could assess whether the lender’s forecasting model is sufficiently comprehensive.

3. Real-time risk assessment. AI systems can continuously update risk assessments as new data becomes available, allowing for more dynamic credit loss estimates.

Example: An auditor reviewing a company’s accounts receivable might use an AI tool that continuously monitors customer payment behaviors, news about customer companies, and industry trends. This could help the auditor assess whether the company’s credit loss allowances are updated frequently enough to reflect current risks.

4. Anomaly detection. AI can quickly identify unusual patterns or transactions that might indicate errors in credit loss calculations or potential fraud.

Example: When auditing an extensive portfolio of loans, an AI system could flag individual loans or groups with risk characteristics that don’t align with their assigned risk ratings. This could help auditors focus on areas where the credit loss estimates might need to be more accurate.

5. Automation of routine tasks. AI can automate many routine aspects of auditing credit losses, such as data gathering, reconciliations, and basic calculations. This allows auditors to focus more on complex judgments and risk assessments.

Example: An AI system could automatically gather loan data, calculate expected loss rates based on historical performance, and compare these to the client’s estimates. The auditor could then focus on evaluating the reasonableness of any differences and assessing the qualitative factors that might justify them.

6. Enhanced scenario analysis. AI can rapidly run multiple complex economic scenarios to stress-test credit loss models, providing auditors with a more comprehensive view of potential risks.

Example: When auditing a bank’s loan loss provisions, an AI system could quickly generate and analyze hundreds of potential economic scenarios, considering factors like interest rates, unemployment and GDP growth. This could help the auditor assess whether the bank’s scenario analysis is sufficiently robust and comprehensive.

While AI offers significant benefits, it’s important to note that it also introduces new challenges for auditors. These include ensuring the reliability and appropriateness of AI models, understanding the “black box” nature of some AI algorithms, and maintaining professional skepticism when working with AI-generated insights. Auditors must develop new skills to effectively leverage AI tools while still applying their professional judgment to the audit process.

Auditors should stay informed about these trends and consider how they might impact their audit approaches and methodologies.

Final word

Auditing credit losses remains a complex and challenging task. By staying informed, applying best practices, and leveraging emerging technologies, auditors can enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of their work, ultimately contributing to the reliability and transparency of financial reporting.

Continue Reading

Accounting

House passes tax administration bills

Published

on

The House unanimously passed four bipartisan bills Tuesday concerning taxes and the Internal Revenue Service that were all endorsed this week by the American Institute of CPAs, and passed two others as well.

  • H.R. 1152, the Electronic Filing and Payment Fairness Act, sponsored by Rep. Darin LaHood, R-Illinois, Suzan Delbene, D-Washington, Randy Feenstra, R-Iowa, Brad Schneider, D-Illinois, Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pennsylvania and Jimmy Panetta, D-California. The bill would apply the “mailbox rule” to electronically submitted tax returns and payments to allow the IRS to record payments and documents submitted to the IRS electronically on the day the payments or documents are submitted instead of when they are received or reviewed at a later date. The AICPA believes this would offer clarity and simplification to the payment and document submission process while protecting taxpayers from undue penalties.
  • H.R. 998, the Internal Revenue Service Math and Taxpayer Help Act, sponsored by Rep. Randy Feenstra, R-Iowa, and Brad Schneider, D-Illinois, which would require notices describing a mathematical or clerical error to be made in plain language, and require the Treasury to provide additional procedures for requesting an abatement of a math or clerical error adjustment, including by telephone or in person, among other provisions.
  • H.R. 517, the Filing Relief for Natural Disasters Act, sponsored by Rep. David Kustoff, R-Tennessee, and Judy Chu, D-California. The process of receiving tax relief from the IRS following a natural disaster typically must follow a federal disaster declaration, which can often come weeks after a state disaster declaration. The bill would provide the IRS with authority to grant tax relief once the governor of a state declares either a disaster or a state of emergency and expand the mandatory federal filing extension under Section 7508(d) of the Tax Code from 60 days to 120 days, providing taxpayers with more time to file tax returns after a disaster.
  • H.R. 1491, the Disaster related Extension of Deadlines Act, sponsored by Rep. Gregory Murphy, R-North Carolina, and Jimmy Panetta, D-California, would extend the amount of time disaster victims would have to file for a tax refund or credit (i.e., the lookback period) by the amount of time afforded pursuant to a disaster relief postponement period for taxpayers affected by major disasters. This legislative solution would place taxpayers on equal footing as taxpayers not impacted by major disasters and would afford greater clarity and certainty to taxpayers and tax practitioners regarding this lookback period.

“The AICPA has long supported these proposals and will continue to work to advance comprehensive legislation that enhances IRS operations and improves the taxpayer experience,” said Melanie Lauridsen, vice president of tax policy and advocacy for the AICPA, in a statement Tuesday. “We are pleased to work closely with each of these Representatives on common-sense reforms that will benefit taxpayers, tax practitioners and tax administration and we’re encouraged by their passage in the House. We look forward to continuing to work with Congress to improve the taxpayer experience.”

The bills were also included in a recent Senate discussion draft aimed at improving tax administration at the IRS that are strongly supported by the AICPA.

The House also passed two other tax-related bills Tuesday that weren’t endorsed in the recent AICPA letter. 

  • H.R. 1155, Recovery of Stolen Checks Act, sponsored by Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, R-New York, would require the IRS to create a process for taxpayers to request a replacement via direct deposit for a stolen paper check. If a check is determined to be stolen or lost, and not cashed, a taxpayer will receive a replacement check once the original check is cancelled, but many taxpayers are having their replacement checks stolen as well. Taxpayers who have a check stolen are then unable to request that the replacement check be sent via direct deposit. The bill would require the Treasury to establish processes and procedures under which taxpayers, who are otherwise eligible to receive an amount by paper check in replacement of a lost or stolen paper check, may elect to receive such amount by direct deposit.
  • H.R. 997, National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act, sponsored by Rep. Randy Feenstra, R-Iowa, would prevent IRS interference with National Taxpayer Advocate personnel by granting the NTA responsibility for its attorneys. In advocating for taxpayer rights, the National Taxpayer Advocate often requires independent legal advice. But currently, the staff members hired by the National Taxpayer Advocate are accountable to internal IRS counsel, not the Taxpayer Advocate, creating a potential conflict of interest to the detriment of taxpayers. The bill would authorize the National Taxpayer Advocate to hire attorneys who report directly to her, helping establish independence from the IRS. 

House  Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith, R-Missouri, applauded the bipartisan House passage of the various bills, which had been unanimously passed by the committee.

“President Trump was elected on the promise of finally making the government work better for working people,” Smith said in a statement Tuesday. “This bipartisan legislation helps fulfill that mandate and makes improvements to tax administration that will make it easier for the American people to file their taxes. Those who are rebuilding after a natural disaster particularly need help filing taxes, which is why this set of bills lightens the load for taxpayers in communities struck by a hurricane, tornado or some other disaster. With Tax Day just a few days away, we must look for common-sense, bipartisan ways to make filing taxes less of a hassle.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

In the blogs: Many hats

Published

on

Teaching fraud; easement settlement offers; new blog on the block; and other highlights from our favorite tax bloggers.

Many hats

  • Taxbuzz (https://www.taxbuzz.com/blog): There’s sure an “I” in this “teamwork:” What to know about potential IRS and ICE collaboration.
  • Tax Vox (https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox): How IRS data would likely be unhelpful validating SNAP eligibility.
  • Yeo & Yeo (https://www.yeoandyeo.com/resources): How financial benchmarking (including involving taxes) can help business clients see trends, pinpoint areas for improvement and forecast future performance.
  • Integritas3 (https://www.integritas3.com/blog): One way to take a bite out of crime, according to this instructor blogger: Teach grad students how to detect, investigate and prevent financial fraud.
  • HBK (https://hbkcpa.com/insights/): Verifying income, fairly distributing property, digging the soon-to-be-ex’s assets out of the back of the dark, dark closet: How forensic accounting has emerged as a crucial element in divorces.

Standing out

Genuine intelligence

  • AICPA & CIMA Insights (https://www.aicpa-cima.com/blog): How artificial intelligence and other tech is “Reshaping Finance,” according to this podcast. Didem Un Ates, CEO of a U.K.-based company offering AI advisory services, tackles the topic.
  • Taxjar (https:/www.taxjar.com/resources/blog): How AI and automation can help even the knottiest sales tax obligations and problems.
  • Dean Dorton (https://deandorton.com/insights/): Favorite opening of the week: “The madness doesn’t just happen on college basketball courts — it also happens when your finance team is stuck using a legacy on-premises accounting system.”
  • Canopy (https://www.getcanopy.com/blog): Top client portals for accounting firms in 2025.
  • Mauled Again (https://mauledagain.blogspot.com/): Despite what Facebook claims, dependents have to be human.

New to us

  • Berkowitz Pollack Brant (https://www.bpbcpa.com/articles-press-releases/): This Florida firm offers a variety of services to many industries and has a good, wide-ranging blog. Recent topics include the BE-10, nexus and state and local tax obligations, IRS cuts and what to know about the possible bonus depreciation phase out. Welcome!

Continue Reading

Accounting

Is gen AI really a SOX gamechanger?

Published

on


By streamlining tasks such as risk assessment, control testing, and reporting, gen AI has the potential to increase efficiency across the entire SOX lifecycle.

Continue Reading

Trending