Accounting
Auditors navigate a state of ‘permacrisis’
Richard Chambers is seeing a neverending series of crises confronting internal auditors and posing risks to their organizations.
A former chairman of the Institute of Internal Auditors, Chambers currently chairs the UNICEF Audit Advisory Committee and is senior advisor of risk and audit at the audit technology company AuditBoard. His fourth book, “
“The premise behind the book, and it’s something I’ve been talking about now for the better part of the last three years, is that it’s almost like when the 2020s dawned,” he told Accounting Today. “The switch was flipped in terms of risk, volatility and risk velocity.”
With a consequential election approaching, potential risks are top of mind for many voters. “Risks became much more volatile and unpredictable, and the speed with which they emerged became almost unfathomable,” said Chambers. “We’ve lurched from the pandemic to supply chain disruption to macroeconomic turbulence, to wars in Europe, wars in the Middle East. All of this has the combined effect of really challenging even the best risk managers out there, and the idea that risk managers can do their thing off in their silo.”
The election will bring its own set of risks. “Each party has clearly staked out its position on fiscal policies, tax policies and so forth,” said Chambers. “There’s a lot of uncertainty there as to which way it’s going to go, so you’ve kind of got to manage the risks in both directions. You’ve just got to be prepared for the.uncertainty that lies ahead.”
Internal auditors, risk managers and compliance professionals can no longer operate separately. “We are dealing with almost an existential threat to a lot of companies and a lot of industries,” said Chambers. “We’ve seen a lot of companies and industries be decimated in the last five years,” said Chambers. “What I’ve tried to do with the book is to offer a path forward. It’s in some ways a call to action that says, you know you can’t manage risks like you’ve traditionally managed them in the era of ‘permacrisis.'”
He sees it as a permanent state of crisis where everyone needs to get involved. “It’s all hands on deck,” said Chambers. “You’ve got to have the risk managers, the internal auditors, the compliance team, the information security professionals, everybody’s got to be on the same page. And there’s got to be a lot more collaboration, cooperation and communication to help companies manage the risks.”
Chambers experienced his own crisis in 2022 when his home in Florida was badly damaged by Hurricane Ian. He was only able to move back in this past June.
Cybersecurity and artificial intelligence open up a new set of challenges. “If I were to talk about, the top-of-mind risks in 2025, there’s a whole range of IT risks: cybersecurity, data security risks, increasingly AI,” said Chambers. “AI presents extraordinary opportunities, but it also is laced with some really significant risks. That’s going to become even more acute as we see more and more regulations put in place, legislation and regulations coming from governments to try and tie down how AI is used, to make sure it’s not misused.”
In addition, there is economic uncertainty around inflation, while recruiting is still a problem for many companies. “We’re still not out of the woods on talent management, the ability to recruit and retain the talent a company needs or an organization needs, has been in the top five for almost the whole decade so far,” said Chambers.
Internal auditors will be hard pressed to deal with all of these uncertainties. Chambers sees a “risk exposure gap” in the number of risks that are being presented to a limited number of auditors. “We’ve seen the risk continue to mount, but we have not seen a real increase in the resources to tackle those risks,” he said. “Internal audit resources have been stagnant at best. I personally think they’ve been in a modest decline for the last two or three years because they haven’t been keeping pace with inflation. You are seeing a lot of infusion of resources into risk management or into compliance.”
One way to offset some of the risk exposure gap is through better collaboration among various risk management professionals, along with more investment in up-to-date technology. “If everybody’s still trying to track risks and manage risks using spreadsheets, that’s really not going to be very effective in the volatile environment we’re living in,” said Chambers.
He wants to see more collaboration among internal auditors, risk managers, compliance professionals and information security personnel. “I often encourage the internal auditors to be the leaders in this collaboration movement,” said Chambers. “Start working more closely with the risk managers in your organization and with the compliance teams, in making sure that when you all get in front of the board or in front of the executive management, that you have a pretty good understanding of what the others are doing, that you have hopefully been able to align on what the true risk profile is of your company. There’s nothing that frustrates a board more than having two or three different folks come in and tell them that there are different risks that the company’s facing. I’ve had audit committee chairmen say we just throw them out and tell them to come back when they can find some common ground. There’s too much ambiguity out there anyway, and if a board has ambiguity in terms of their different key players coming in and telling them that the company’s facing different risks, it really leads to frustration. The key here is there’s no one player that has to be the one to take the lead. But if somebody’s going to take the lead and get everyone on the same page with risk management, I think internal audit’s a prime candidate.”
He sees the various risks multiplying now. “I’ve been in the profession for 50 years,” said Chambers. “Next year will be my 50th year since I joined internal audit right out of college, and I’ve never seen a period as volatile as these last five years. We have been averaging as many risk disruptive events per year as we used to see in a decade. The time has come for action and the key risk management players — the risk managers, internal auditors, compliance, infosec — the ball is in their court. If companies are going to navigate the second half of this decade with any degree of success, these players have to come together and be a part of it.”
The Internal Revenue Service may be facing steep cuts in its budget with the win on Tuesday night of President-elect Donald Trump.
Funding for the IRS has become a political issue, with Republicans successfully pushing to cut the extra $80 billion funding from the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 already during battles over the debt limit.
“I think IRS funding is at significant risk right now, both the annual appropriation funding as well as the remaining IRA funding,” said Washington National Tax Office principal Rochelle Hodes at the Top 25 Firm Crowe LLP.
Win McNamee/Getty Images
So far, Republicans have mainly called for cuts in the IRS’s enforcement budget. The increase in enforcement is supposed to be used to pay for the cost of the IRA, but the funding increase is also supposed to be used for taxpayer service and technology improvements.
“The only question for me on funding is, will any portion of the funding remain available for taxpayer service-related improvements at the IRS?” said Hodes.
The Direct File free tax prep program that the IRA funded could also be targeted, even as the IRS makes plans to
“I don’t think that will be in the sight line, but the IRA money is part of what’s being used for that,” said Hodes. “As we’ve seen in appropriations bills, there could be language directed at that, that no money can be spent on that initiative.”
A more important priority will be the extension of the expiring provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. “Getting TCJA resolved is going to be the first priority,” said Hodes. “The second question is, how will the cost of that endeavor be determined. If the view that is held by several Senate Republicans wins the day, then the cost of extending the expiring provisions will not be counted under those particular budget rules that are created dealing with extending current policy. If, however, that view is not adopted, then there is a high cost just to TCJA, and so any other provisions with cost will sort of stretch the boundaries of what many in Congress would be comfortable with. I think it will be necessary to see how the scoring goes for extending TCJA provisions.”
Trump has also called for exempting various forms of income, such as tip income, Social Security income and overtime from taxes.
“I also am not sure which of the ideas that were put forward on the campaign trail, other than extending TCJA, are provisions that have true champions who will want to pursue those,” said Hodes.
That may depend on who ends up in Congress, with several important races in the House yet to be decided.
“Although the House remains undecided, the Republicans’ control of the Senate makes it much more likely that Republicans will be able to implement many of Trump’s proposed tax policies, such as making parts of the expiring 2017 TCJA provisions permanent,” said John Gimigliano, principal in charge of the Federal Legislative & Regulatory Services group within KPMG’s Washington National Tax practice, in a statement. “The pressing question now is how the Administration and Congress will fund such an ambitious agenda and what additional measures they might introduce, such as eliminating taxes on tips and overtime. These items will only add to the hefty $4+ trillion price tag they face. Until then, taxpayers should continue to stay apprised of developments and scenario plan for the different outcomes to get ahead.”
Over half of accounting and tax firms plan to increase fees across all services in 2025, according to a new survey.
The
Some 57% of the respondents plan to increase fees across all services. With regard to tax preparation specifically, 90% of the survey respondents plan to increase fees for individual tax returns, and 87% plan to increase fees for business tax returns. In addition, 70% plan to increase fees for tax planning and advisory services;. 85% plan to increase fees for bookkeeping and accounting services; and 76% plan to increase fees for CFO and controller services.
“While accounting firm owners are embracing price increases in 2025, the report shows that the majority (around 58%) cite rising business costs as the main motivator,” said Ignition global president Greg Strickland in a statement. “Only 5% are raising prices to increase revenue, which indicates an opportunity for firms to leverage pricing as a strategic tool to unlock revenue growth.”
The report found a shift from hourly billing to fixed-fee and value-based pricing, with 79% of the survey respondents indicating they use fixed-fee or value-based pricing for bookkeeping and accounting services. Over half (54%) use fixed-fee or value-based pricing for tax preparation services, 67% use fixed-fee or value-based pricing for tax planning and advisory services, and 75% use fixed-fee or value-based pricing for CFO and controller services.
The report benchmarked current fees for tax, accounting and advisory services, which varied based on firms’ annual revenue range. The biggest variation in pricing was for tax planning and advisory services in particular. For firms with revenue of as much as $250,000, approximately 23% said they charge less than $500 for these services, while a nearly equal number (around 21%) indicated they charge more than $2000.
Illinois voters approved a nonbinding proposal to add an extra 3% levy on annual incomes of more than $1 million, which could fuel a new effort to raise taxes on the state’s highest earners.
The ballot measure – which was an advisory
“The vote is a gigantic step in the right direction,” said former Governor Pat Quinn, a supporter of the measure.
Daniel Acker/Bloomberg
While the proposal has no legal effect, the vote opens the door to a new debate over ramping up taxes on the rich even as Illinois and Chicago, its biggest city, contend with population declines and a string of departures by major companies and wealthy residents. In 2020, voters rejected a separate measure backed by Governor JB Pritzker to replace the state’s flat tax on incomes with a graduated system that would raise rates on higher-earners.
The Pritzker plan drew staunch opposition from billionaire financier Ken Griffin, who donated about $50 million to help torpedo the initiative. Griffin then left Chicago for Miami in 2022, moving the headquarters of his Citadel empire there as well. Companies from Caterpillar Inc. to Boeing Co. have also departed amid rising concerns over public safety, regulation and taxes.
This year’s referendum asked voters if the Illinois Constitution should be amended to create the additional tax on income over $1 million. It called for using the proceeds to ease the state’s notoriously high property levies.
Payments giant Adyen reports 21% jump in third-quarter sales
Elf Beauty’s beat-and-raise quarter fuels 7% stock jump
Qualcomm’s rosy forecast sends stock surging, and more buybacks may be on deck
Are American progressives making themselves sad?
U.S. Beneficial Ownership Information Registry Now Accepting Reports
CPA licensure program off to ‘promising’ start
-
Technology4 days agoAI for Business Transformation and its Disruptive Impact in 2025 and Beyond
-
Personal Finance1 week agoInflation is down, but the middle class remains under pressure
-
Accounting1 week agoThomson Reuters makes major investment in AI cross-selling software provider Propense
-
Accounting1 week agoInside ISO 42001 framework on AI management systems
-
Accounting1 week agoUS, Taiwan to begin talks on a deal to address double taxation
-
Economics6 days agoFriday’s jobs report is expected to show the slowest pace of hiring in years
-
Technology10 hours agoHow Small and Midsize Businesses Can Harness AI for Growth
-
Personal Finance1 week agoOnly high earners can ‘easily afford’ holiday spending this year