Connect with us

Accounting

Baker Tilly and Moss Adams: M&A to get better, not bigger

Published

on

baker-tilly-2020-office

While there’s certainly no question that the merger of Top 25 Firms Baker Tilly and Moss Adams will create one of the biggest accounting firms in the country, the role of M&A for the combined organization isn’t about size at all.

“M&A is important going forward in how it makes us better, not how it makes us bigger,” Moss Adams chairman and CEO Eric Miles told Accounting Today, Miles will become CEO of the combined firm on Jan. 1, 2026.

“Our focus from the get-go is, how do we immediately bring more value to our clients?” said Baker Tilly CEO Jeff Ferro, who will continue in his role until the end of the year, and then serve on the firm’s board. “Whether that’s bringing a capability or an industry depth — like bringing the real estate capability Baker Tilly has to the West Coast markets, or Moss Adams’ deep focus on technology to the East Coast and Midwest markets.”

Ferro-Jeff-Baker Tilly

Jeff Ferro

“Second to that, and part and parcel of that, is how do we make this a positive experience?” he continued. “How do we accelerate our people’s careers? Giving them more opportunity, making sure our teams are excited.”

Before the deal was even completed in early June, Baker Tilly had a strong M&A strategy, which will carry over to the combined firm.

“We’ll continue to invest in some of the big major metro money centers,” said Ferro. “I would see New York, Boston, Chicago, the West Coast — specifically San Francisco, Southern California, Los Angeles — and we’ll continue to invest in Texas, and we’ll continue to try to build up in the Southeast where we need to continue to build Atlanta and Southern Florida. So we’ll continue from a geographic perspective in those areas.”

Geography isn’t the only focus, though: “We’ll continue to look at industries — probably smaller organizations; you would refer to them as tuck-ins, we would look at them more as strategic — but on the advisory side I think that we probably haven’t scratched the surface on the types of complementary services that we could bring into our middle-market client base, so we’ll continue to do that,” Ferro explained.  

Living in the middle

More than geography and more than any specific service line, the middle-market client base Ferro mentioned is a critical focus for the firm.

“Our entire strategy revolves around the middle market and revolves around the upper, middle, and lower ends of that market,” he explained. “And we think we have a clear advantage because we’re so heavily in that. We don’t have a lot of distractions related to some of those larger public companies. Not that middle-market companies aren’t public — we have them, but we’re not as concentrated on doing a lot of work for, say, that Fortune 1000, maybe, as I think some other firms are.” 

Prior to the merger, Chicago-based Baker Tilly ranked No. 11 on Accounting Today’s 2025 list of the Top 100 Firms with $1.8 billion in annual revenue, while Seattle-based Moss Adams ranked right below it at No. 12 with $1.3 billion in annual revenue.

Miles-Eric-Moss Adams

Eric Miles

Together, they would have ranked No. 6, right in the midst of the group of four or five firms that form the tier directly below the Big Four — a group they have no intention of leaving.

“Our expectations would be that we could get to the fifth largest firm,” said Ferro, “but we have absolutely zero intention or zero strategy of trying to become part of the Big Five. That’s not our sector. That’s not our client base. That’s not really what we want to do.”

The other firms in that tier — RSM US, BDO USA, CBIZ and Grant Thornton — also serve the middle market, but Baker Tilly is confident in the face of the competition.

Moss Adams' offices
Moss Adams’ Seattle offices

Sean Airhart

“I don’t think it’s a zero-sum game,” said Miles. “The midmarket is a big portion of the economy. Both [Moss Adams and Baker Tilly] think first about, ‘What do our clients need? How do we become most valuable to them?’ And so that’s what drove this, and let me get more specific: Everyone throws around the term economies of scale. This is real when you think about the needs of the midmarket.”

The services middle-market clients need have grown significantly over the past 10 or 15 years, he continued, citing international capabilities and technology as two important areas, and he is confident there’s room for all the large firms in the space, and particularly for Baker Tilly.

“Again, I don’t think it’s zero sum,” Miles said. “I think it’s great for the mid-market if these firms have a real focus and understand the needs of the mid-market. I think we’re being very, very deliberate and clear on what we’re going to say no to, so we can say yes to the mid-markets even better.”

Inside the deal

The merger process began a little over a year ago, after Baker Tilly had signed a deal with private equity firms Hellman & Friedman and Valeas Capital Partners.

Its growth strategy at the time included a “pretty aggressive” M&A component.

“We had categorized that into three different categories — tuck-ins, strategics, and then transformational,” explained Ferro. “And concentrating on the transformational, we looked at probably five firms or so, maybe six, that we looked at as being transformational. And I’ll tell you that, at the onset, we said, ‘Hey, if we ever were fortunate enough to be able to do something with Moss Adams, that would make the most sense from a geographic perspective.”

Moss Adams was going through similar internal discussions in parallel.

“We started looking at the changes occurring in the profession in a really rigorous way maybe over a year and a half ago … and we looked at how can we remain status quo or should we do our own private equity deal or should we merge up, and we reached a conclusion that a merger with a peer is the right path forward,” said Miles. “And then we took probably the same list that Jeff had for transformational M&A, and we looked at five or six peer firms from a lot of different angles, and it was clear to us that by far Baker Tilly is the best fit for Moss Adams. So it was a bit of fate that we both had processes that came together at the same time.”

Just around a year ago, Ferro and Baker Tilly’s COO had lunch in Chicago with Miles and Moss Adams’ COO to open the discussion, according to Ferro, “and by August we were in conversations with them, and we spent about nine or 10 months putting together the deal.”

With Moss Adams’ heavy presence in the West — it has been by far the largest independent firm in the region for some time — and Baker Tilly’s strong representation in the Midwest and the East, the two firms complemented each other geographically, but also in terms of industries served and services offered.

“If you looked at it from just a pure geography perspective I don’t know that you could have drawn it out any better,” said Ferro. “And our industries lined up. We have a lot of similar industries and where we were different, it was a good different — you know, they do things that we don’t do that we’d like to do. We do a few things that they don’t do that they would like to do. So the differences were good.”

Whatever differences they brought, however, there was one immutable commonality, according to Miles: “Both firms were very clear-eyed in that our strategy was the middle market. If we were to do something together and become bigger, it isn’t to necessarily serve a different segment, but is to serve our existing segment, the mid-market, even better. And we understood that the clients in the mid-market are undergoing their own changes that require more from a professional service firm, from a public accounting firm, than in in the past.”

Looking ahead, the two leaders see both challenges and opportunities in integrating their two firms.

“These are two large complex firms that do many, many things well,” said Miles. “We get the opportunity to choose the Baker Tilly legacy way, the Moss Adams legacy way, or design something brand new. That’s a challenge because it can be hard, but it’s an opportunity because we get to rethink everything. And that again comes back to designing for the mid-market, to choose the best processes for what we are and will be in the future.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending