Connect with us

Accounting

Beyond rainmakers: The new face of business development in accounting

Published

1 year ago

on

The rainmaker days are over.

Rainmakers, the select charismatic few — usually partners — who brought in the vast majority of an accounting firm’s clients, are becoming obsolete as firms professionalize business development and shift their reliance off the individual and onto the collective team. Looking ahead, experts say the most successful firms will be those that entrench themselves in a niche and poach clients with their hyperspecialized services.

In the past, firms’ growth strategies were rudimentary and unsophisticated, according to Gale Crosley, CEO of Crosley and Co. Firms relied on the individual contributions of rainmakers to generate the bulk of their revenue while growth strategies remained largely unchanged year to year. Now, especially since the Paycheck Protection Program stimulated growth during the COVID-19 pandemic, “driving demand is on cruise control,” Crosley said.

“The fish are jumping in the boat. They’ve been jumping in the boat for five years, and it’s not a business problem they have to solve right now,” she explained.

Modern rainmaking art.jpg

It’s a straightforward scenario where there is too much work to do and not enough talent or time to do it, meaning strategic growth is on the backburner for many firms as they manage day-to-day business operations.

“Fulfilling the demand side is sucking all the energy out of the firm,” Crosley said. “They’re totally focused on getting the laundry out the door, offshoring and technology.”

“The firms who are on it — the A+ firms who have always been on it — they’re not hitting the pause button,” she continued. “Only firms who always knew that they had to carve out that time and say, ‘We’ve got to look at growth strategies for the future,’ those are the ones who are doing it right.”

Modernizing business development

Firms are now formalizing and structuring the process of finding and bringing in new clients. The first key to modernizing business development is moving the responsibility of client acquisition beyond individual rainmakers.

“It’s taking more of a matrix, relationship-focused approach, instead of a singular source of that rainmaker being out with the client,” said Rebekah Gardner, chief growth officer at Top 25 Firm Wipfli. “You start to identify these segments, these clients and prospects, and then you look at the team that you have on your bench, and you start to match up relationships and skills, and you build that matrix.”

The second key is specialization. Competition for clients is increasing as more firms look to own entire market segments and tailor their services to those select niches. Firms that choose to stay generalists put themselves at risk of losing business.

(Read more: “Pathways to Growth: Strategic client development.“)

“You have got to have industry experts sitting on your team so that you build that ability to have a conversation at their level,” Gardner said. “If you can’t show up like that, I don’t think you belong in the game sometimes.”

“Specialization and niches allow firms to perform a much higher value service to their clients,” said Tim Petrey, CEO of HD Growth Partners, a member firm of private-equity-backed accounting firm platform Ascend. “They can get much deeper with a client than the surface-level tax and compliance work. As a result, you form a higher degree of trust between the accountant that owns the relationship and the client much faster. It can be difficult for a ‘generalist’ style firm to compete with industry experts.”

But it’s easier said than done. Becoming a specialist requires the difficult task of dropping low-profit, time-consuming clients, and focusing resources on high-growth, high-return clients.

“Firms need to improve by looking closely at the clients they best serve and build a marketing strategy around that,” Petrey added. “Treat your firm like a real business and it’s amazing what comes naturally from that. Treating a firm like a partnership often leaves marketing efforts stale because partners can’t agree on the strategy, the ideal client profile, the budget, or even just as simply the contribution of their staff’s time to the efforts.”

The decline of rainmakers

The accounting profession’s ongoing labor shortage impacts everything within a firm, especially business development.

“Finding great accountants is hard enough. Finding great accountants who can sell is like hunting for a unicorn,” Petrey said.

“With one person coming into an industry for every five who are leaving, staff are getting asked to do things earlier on in their careers than their predecessors. Partners and shareholders are getting younger and younger because firms need to find a way to get those great people locked in for years,” Petrey continued. “As a result, most firms never focused on building any real brand loyalty. There is loyalty to an individual but not loyalty to a brand. The rainmakers of the prior generation are still out winning business the old school way, but there aren’t enough of those rainmakers in the next generation.”

“That’s the crux of the problem,” said Bob Lewis, president of The Visionary Group. “Why we have so much M&A going on right now is because of the lack of business development and a lack of networking skills. “

Besides, the traditional rainmaker model isn’t necessarily the best fit for modern firm culture. “When a firm has a great rainmaker that is a poor manager, leader or colleague, they’ll often look past their issues as a leader because they generate so much revenue, which causes firms to further struggle to maintain or improve culture,” Petrey said.

Instead of relying on rainmakers, some firms have turned to the internet and search-engine optimization to supplement client acquisition.

“What they missed is that the activity you generate through SEO is typically the type of clients you don’t want. It’s clients that are searching the internet looking for a new provider,” Lewis said. “The good clients go through the professional network. They go through the bankers, they go through their lawyers, they go through the insurance agencies, and they get referrals into another accounting firm.”

“I can replace the accounting part, the tax part, overnight. I can’t replace the trust part, and that’s what people have learned and figured out how to sell,” Lewis said.

The rise of the CGO

With the sunset of the rainmaker era comes the dawn of the chief growth officer.

CGOs are the newest additions to small and midsized firms’ staff. While mergers and acquisitions certainly fall within a CGO’s remit, they are also focused on trimming clients that don’t fit the firm’s portfolio, upskilling the next generation of partners, adding more advisory services, and expanding relationships with existing clients, Lewis said.

CGOs also need to be “making sure that people inside of the firm are being deployed in their highest and best use,” Wipfli’s Gardner said. “Traditionally we’ve used our own partners, rank and file, to think about these things, but sometimes it takes an outsider perspective to come in and say, ‘Hey, let’s think about this a little bit differently.”

Unlike the average accountant, CGOs specialize in general management. The addition of them into accounting firms is a new trend that has only been accelerated by the wave of private equity investment in the profession.

(Read more: “The rise of the chief growth officer.“)

“Most accounting firms have historically run like a partnership rather than a real business,” Petrey said. “PE will continue to professionalize firms of all sizes to be better and smarter at business development. As a result, non-PE backed firms will need to find ways to make that investment into their firms to remain competitive.”

“​​The preexisting resource constraints and the seasonal nature of the business makes it really hard for anyone to make meaningful progress on a strategic initiative,” said David Wurtzbacher, CEO of Ascend, which is backed by PE firm Alpine Investors. Each of Ascend’s platform firms is required to have a CGO.

“For a long time, the public accounting industry couldn’t and didn’t attract general management type talent — think MBAs — because of the partnership model. It was, ‘We can’t really pay you that much, and we definitely can’t give you equity in these companies, and we’re not really growing that much,’ and so you didn’t have access to the talent markets the way other industries have access to it.”

“But the fact remains, there are people outside the industry who might be better suited for driving growth and transformation and strategic initiatives,” Wurtzbacher said.

Related Topics:
Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

5 days ago

on

August 9, 2026

By

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

1 week ago

on

August 5, 2026

By

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

1 week ago

on

August 5, 2026

By

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending