Connect with us

Accounting

DOGE downsizing, IRS commissioner switch complicate tax season

Published

on

Complimentary Access Pill

Enjoy complimentary access to top ideas and insights — selected by our editors.

Tax season usually marks the busiest time of the year for IRS professionals, but for the 30,000 staff who have accepted buyouts or been laid off by the agency this year, the calendar has  been painfully clear. 

Higher-ups have not been immune to the upheaval, with four IRS commissioners and multiple unit chiefs departing. Michael Faulkender, former deputy secretary of the Treasury, was announced as the newest acting commissioner on April 18 — replacing a predecessor who had been in place for less than a week.

“The fight against weaponization and politicization at the IRS is a top-tier priority for the Trump administration, and Deputy Secretary Faulkender will continue to make the needed changes both durable and lasting,” a Treasury spokesperson noted. “We urge Congress to act quickly to confirm permanent leadership at the IRS to ensure its ability to best serve taxpayers going forward.”

Read more: Treasury union asks for relief as IRS plans more layoffs

The uncertainty surrounding the IRS started on inauguration day, when previous Commissioner Danny Warfel resigned, citing President Trump’s intention to name former congressman Billy Long, R-Missouri, as the next commissioner. Long has yet to be confirmed however, leading to a power vacuum that has been filled by a series of acting commissioners, most recently Faulkender. 

As the revolving door at the top of the IRS continues to spin, Elon Musk’s Department of Governmental Efficiency has introduced its own initiatives to the agency. This tax season seemingly saw the end of the government’s Direct File program, after DOGE shut down development work on the project for 2026. This came following a report weeks earlier from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, which claimed that the IRS had underreported the cost of the program by millions of dollars. 

“Reported totals did not include an estimated $8.8 million for costs incurred by the Office of Management and Budget for employees detailed to the IRS to help develop and pilot Direct File and costs incurred to create or leverage existing accounts through the IRS’s credential service provider,” said the report regarding the main source of the costs discovered.

Though a significant portion of the funding for enforcement, taxpayer services, and tech modernization are being eliminated by Congress, mass layoffs may be the most salient example of DOGE’s transformation of the IRS.

“My real concern is that anything where you need people at the IRS will take more time,” said David Shapiro, partner and chair of the tax, compensation and benefits practice at law firm Saul Ewing LLP. “That goes for even the most mundane matters. For example, to establish a domestic entity you can just go online and get a tax ID, or do it by phone. A foreign entity can’t do that. So it’s harder for foreigners who want to do business in the U.S. Likewise for low-income taxpayers to resolve an issue through an offer in compromise. This will all go away without agents to help.”

Read more: Tennessee, Arkansas weather victims get tax relief

See below for the latest headlines out of the IRS this month at the conclusion of filing season.

The IRS headquarters in Washington
The IRS headquarters in Washington.

Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg

Leadership changes and layoffs at the IRS

Tax Day 2025 marked the 70th anniversary of the April 15 filing deadline. As tax season has wound down, the uncertainty at the IRS has not.

Many high-level IRS officials have left or been pushed out in the waning months of the filing period, chief information officer Rajiv Uppal being the most recent on a list that includes four commissioners and former acting chief counsel William Paul.

IRS heads are not the only personnel at risk — 30,000 employees have taken buyouts or been laid off and 7,000 probationary workers have been placed on paid leave. A study by Yale’s Budget Lab concluded that 18,200 employees being cut would lead to a $1.4 billion savings in salaries but a $8.3 billion loss in tax revenue. 

Read more: IRS marks Tax Day amid layoffs, cutbacks

Michael Faulkender
Michael Faulkender

Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg

New acting commissioner appointed

After serving as acting commissioner for just three days, Gary Shapley was replaced by Deputy Treasury Secretary Michael Faulkender — the fifth IRS head of the year. Shapley had achieved notoriety as a whistleblower after testifying against Hunter Biden to the House Oversight Committee as an IRS Criminal Investigation special agent in 2023. 

Reportedly, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent complained to the Trump administration that Shapley had been appointed without his consultation. Shapley had been named a senior advisor to Bessent last month.

Read more: Acting IRS commissioner replaced by Treasury official

direct-file-pilot.png

Direct File ending next year after Elon Musk’s IRS reorganization

After Elon Musk posted on X that he had “deleted” the team that built the IRS Direct File system last year, further reporting found that IRS staff had been told to stop preparing the system for 2026. Though tax prep software firms have long opposed the program, former IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel had outlined plans to make the project permanent just last year. 

Lobbying group the American Coalition for Taxpayer Rights advocates for nurturing the public-private Free File partnership. In 2025, nonprofit Code For America helped bring the Direct File program to 25 states, up from 12 the year before. 

“Direct File was a massive success, saving taxpayers millions in fees, saving them time and cutting out an unnecessary middleman that took money out of Americans’ pockets for no good reason. Trump and Secretary Bessent are robbing regular American families to pay back lobbyists that spend millions to make tax filing more expensive and more difficult,” said Senate Finance Committee ranking member Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, in a statement.

Read more: IRS Direct File reportedly ending next year 

irs-nametags.jpg
Nametags with the IRS logo in a conference room at the Internal Revenue Service campus in Austin, Texas

Jordan Vonderhaar/Photographer: Jordan Vonderhaar/

DOGE creating super API next step in IRS data deregulation

Elon Musk plans to organize the IRS data system around a single API by early May— possibly with the help of Peter Thiel’s Palantir. APIs are necessary for data to transfer from one computer program to another, and the IRS already has several existing ones that this effort would centralize. 

Layoffs and privacy concerns seem to both be impediments to DOGE’s plans. The IRS has announced 20,000 future layoffs, and its 50 senior tech leaders are currently on paid administrative leave. Many special permissions are currently required to access the sensitive data that would be included in this API, and unifying this data would make it all the more a target to bad actors. 

Read more: DOGE to centralize IRS data under one API

irs-building-engraving.jpg
The Internal Revenue Service headquarters in Washington, D.C.

Samuel Corum/Bloomberg

Basis shifting crackdown ended by Trump administration

Citing a February executive order from the Trump administration that established the DOGE deregulatory initiative, the Treasury Department and IRS announced plans to stop designating basis-shifting among partnerships and related parties as “transactions of interest.” Previous regulations had imposed possible penalties under Sections 6707A(a), 6707(a), and 6708 as the IRS had seen the practice to be a possible tax avoidance strategy.

After the IRS found tens of billions of dollars in dubious deductions while auditing a group of basis-shifting transactions last year, then-Commissioner Danny Werfel announced a new unit within the Office of Chief Counsel to target such tax loopholes.

“Taxpayers and their material advisors have criticized the Basis Shifting TOI Regulations as imposing complex, burdensome, and retroactive disclosure obligations on many ordinary-course and tax-compliant business activities, creating costly compliance obligations and uncertainty for businesses,” said a notice from the Treasury and IRS.

Read more: IRS proposes to end crackdown on basis-shifting transactions

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending