Enjoy complimentary access to top ideas and insights — selected by our editors.
Tax season usually marks the busiest time of the year for IRS professionals, but for the 30,000 staff who have accepted buyouts or been laid off by the agency this year, the calendar has been painfully clear.
Higher-ups have not been immune to the upheaval, with four IRS commissioners and multiple unit chiefs departing. Michael Faulkender, former deputy secretary of the Treasury, was announced as the newest acting commissioner on April 18 — replacing a predecessor who had been in place for less than a week.
“The fight against weaponization and politicization at the IRS is a top-tier priority for the Trump administration, and Deputy Secretary Faulkender will continue to make the needed changes both durable and lasting,” a Treasury spokesperson noted. “We urge Congress to act quickly to confirm permanent leadership at the IRS to ensure its ability to best serve taxpayers going forward.”
The uncertainty surrounding the IRS started on inauguration day, when previous Commissioner Danny Warfel resigned, citing President Trump’s intention to name former congressman Billy Long, R-Missouri, as the next commissioner. Long has yet to be confirmed however, leading to a power vacuum that has been filled by a series of acting commissioners, most recently Faulkender.
As the revolving door at the top of the IRS continues to spin, Elon Musk’s Department of Governmental Efficiency has introduced its own initiatives to the agency. This tax season seemingly saw the end of the government’s Direct File program, after DOGE shut down development work on the project for 2026. This came following a report weeks earlier from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, which claimed that the IRS had underreported the cost of the program by millions of dollars.
“Reported totals did not include an estimated $8.8 million for costs incurred by the Office of Management and Budget for employees detailed to the IRS to help develop and pilot Direct File and costs incurred to create or leverage existing accounts through the IRS’s credential service provider,” said the report regarding the main source of the costs discovered.
Though a significant portion of the funding for enforcement, taxpayer services, and tech modernization are being eliminated by Congress, mass layoffs may be the most salient example of DOGE’s transformation of the IRS.
“My real concern is that anything where you need people at the IRS will take more time,” said David Shapiro, partner and chair of the tax, compensation and benefits practice at law firm Saul Ewing LLP. “That goes for even the most mundane matters. For example, to establish a domestic entity you can just go online and get a tax ID, or do it by phone. A foreign entity can’t do that. So it’s harder for foreigners who want to do business in the U.S. Likewise for low-income taxpayers to resolve an issue through an offer in compromise. This will all go away without agents to help.”
See below for the latest headlines out of the IRS this month at the conclusion of filing season.
The IRS headquarters in Washington.
Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg
Leadership changes and layoffs at the IRS
Tax Day 2025 marked the 70th anniversary of the April 15 filing deadline. As tax season has wound down, the uncertainty at the IRS has not.
Many high-level IRS officials have left or been pushed out in the waning months of the filing period, chief information officer Rajiv Uppal being the most recent on a list that includes four commissioners and former acting chief counsel William Paul.
IRS heads are not the only personnel at risk — 30,000 employees have taken buyouts or been laid off and 7,000 probationary workers have been placed on paid leave. A study by Yale’s Budget Lab concluded that 18,200 employees being cut would lead to a $1.4 billion savings in salaries but a $8.3 billion loss in tax revenue.
After serving as acting commissioner for just three days, Gary Shapley was replaced by Deputy Treasury Secretary Michael Faulkender — the fifth IRS head of the year. Shapley had achieved notoriety as a whistleblower after testifying against Hunter Biden to the House Oversight Committee as an IRS Criminal Investigation special agent in 2023.
Reportedly, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent complained to the Trump administration that Shapley had been appointed without his consultation. Shapley had been named a senior advisor to Bessent last month.
Direct File ending next year after Elon Musk’s IRS reorganization
After Elon Musk posted on X that he had “deleted” the team that built the IRS Direct File system last year, further reporting found that IRS staff had been told to stop preparing the system for 2026. Though tax prep software firms have long opposed the program, former IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel had outlined plans to make the project permanent just last year.
Lobbying group the American Coalition for Taxpayer Rights advocates for nurturing the public-private Free File partnership. In 2025, nonprofit Code For America helped bring the Direct File program to 25 states, up from 12 the year before.
“Direct File was a massive success, saving taxpayers millions in fees, saving them time and cutting out an unnecessary middleman that took money out of Americans’ pockets for no good reason. Trump and Secretary Bessent are robbing regular American families to pay back lobbyists that spend millions to make tax filing more expensive and more difficult,” said Senate Finance Committee ranking member Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, in a statement.
Nametags with the IRS logo in a conference room at the Internal Revenue Service campus in Austin, Texas
Jordan Vonderhaar/Photographer: Jordan Vonderhaar/
DOGE creating super API next step in IRS data deregulation
Elon Musk plans to organize the IRS data system around a single API by early May— possibly with the help of Peter Thiel’s Palantir. APIs are necessary for data to transfer from one computer program to another, and the IRS already has several existing ones that this effort would centralize.
Layoffs and privacy concerns seem to both be impediments to DOGE’s plans. The IRS has announced 20,000 future layoffs, and its 50 senior tech leaders are currently on paid administrative leave. Many special permissions are currently required to access the sensitive data that would be included in this API, and unifying this data would make it all the more a target to bad actors.
The Internal Revenue Service headquarters in Washington, D.C.
Samuel Corum/Bloomberg
Basis shifting crackdown ended by Trump administration
Citing a February executive order from the Trump administration that established the DOGE deregulatory initiative, the Treasury Department and IRS announced plans to stop designating basis-shifting among partnerships and related parties as “transactions of interest.” Previous regulations had imposed possible penalties under Sections 6707A(a), 6707(a), and 6708 as the IRS had seen the practice to be a possible tax avoidance strategy.
After the IRS found tens of billions of dollars in dubious deductions while auditing a group of basis-shifting transactions last year, then-Commissioner Danny Werfel announced a new unit within the Office of Chief Counsel to target such tax loopholes.
“Taxpayers and their material advisors have criticized the Basis Shifting TOI Regulations as imposing complex, burdensome, and retroactive disclosure obligations on many ordinary-course and tax-compliant business activities, creating costly compliance obligations and uncertainty for businesses,” said a notice from the Treasury and IRS.
As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.
Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.
The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.
WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.
The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.
Untested Legal Mechanism
To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.
White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.
Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.
“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.
USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs
Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).
However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:
Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
Potash and critical minerals
Fish and seafood
Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)
Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.
Canadian Response and Market Reaction
Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.
With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.
The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.
The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.
Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.