Connect with us

Accounting

Building the profession together | Accounting Today

Published

on

Carla McCall podcast screen

AICPA chair Carla McCall talks about the opportunities and challenges facing the profession, and how accounting firms need to work together so they can all thrive separately. 

Transcription:

Transcripts are generated using a combination of speech recognition software and human transcribers, and may contain errors. Please check the corresponding audio for the authoritative record.

Dan Hood (00:03):

Welcome to On the Air with Accounting. Today, I’m editor-in-chief Dan Hood. With so much change going on in the profession, it’s useful every once in a while to sort of step back and take stock of everything that’s going on in the field and where it’s headed. I’m here to help us do just that today as Carla McCall. She’s the chair of the AICPA, which is so often at the forefront of the profession’s approach to changes like all the ones that we’re facing now. She’s also head of AAFCPAs, a Top 100 Firm based in Massachusetts. Carla, thanks for joining us.

Carla McCall (00:29):

Thanks, Dan. Pleasure to be here.

Dan Hood (00:31):

I want to jump in. Like I said, there’s a lot of changes going on and many of them, it’s always worth pointing out. Many of them are very positive. There’s a lot of opportunities out there for accounts. What are some of the biggest ones you’re looking at?

Carla McCall (00:43):

Yeah, there’s a lot of change happening in our profession right now, and I think it’s all for the better. Quite frankly. We are in a period of significant transformation with new technology. Our artificial intelligence now gen AI automation. And so we have a real opportunity today to change the way we work and work in a much smarter way. And a lot of my focus has been leading innovation and change when it comes to technology. In my own firm. I’m a big proponent about sharing what we’re doing and having firms share with one another with how we’re approaching this opportunity. And I also think it will play a role in attracting the next generation of talent because they grow up with technology, and so they expect us to be at the highest and best use of it. And so this really gives us an opportunity to think about our businesses, our business model, and how we can evolve with everything that’s coming at us today. So I’m really excited about it.

Dan Hood (01:56):

Awesome. Well, last thing, I mean, they’re amazing that you listed a bunch of the different ones that are coming in and making it easier for accounting firms to do their work. And also, as you say, to change though, change can be difficult. So I’m going to pivot a little bit. I like to start with the positive, with the opportunities. What’s going on there? It’s too easy to get mired down in the challenges, but there are challenges, and many of them are the flip side of the opportunities. You talk about AI and the many technological innovations that are coming along, but right. The flip side of those is you’ve got to figure out how they work in your firm and you’ve got to implement them, and you’ve got to train people on them. Similarly, there’s tremendous opportunities for people joining the profession, right? There’s never been a better time to be an accountant in the sense of there’s lots of cool things you can do, lots of more service areas you could be involved in. There’s more money coming around, which is always nice. But on the other hand, the profession is facing some challenges in terms of pipeline and so on. What are some of the challenges you look at?

Carla McCall (02:49):

Yeah, I mean, certainly pipeline is a challenge. I think there’s multiple reasons for that. Some of it is just sheer hard trends like demographics. I do think that there’s ways that we could be better at attracting the next generation, really talking about what we do as accountants. So you said it’s an exciting time. There’s lots of exciting time to be an accountant. There’s lots coming at us or use of technology, but we’re not good promoters of that. So one of my platforms is promoting the value of sustainability of the profession, not just in how we work today, but the opportunities for young professionals to lead in a lot of these areas. And they can be leaders in all of this change that we’re going on. A challenge is change management with all of this transformation going on. Change management is a real issue inside companies, but I do think it gives us this opportunity to promote ourselves, to help the pipeline challenge in value sustainability.

(03:49):

What’s our image? How do we really work? What are the problems that we solve? And the diversity of work and entrepreneurship. I don’t think that we’ve talked about that enough historically in our profession, in public accounting. And I’m coming from a public accounting lens because I’m managing partner of one. You can be an entrepreneur inside a firm. You’re building a business inside a business. There’s a lot of power in that because you’re around bright minds. You have an infrastructure, but you’re building a reputation, a practice, clients developing people, and there’s also opportunities in matching accounting with other skill sets. So you have account accounting and financial planning, accounting and technology. There’s all of these different paths that you can take, and I think we could promote that in a much smarter way.

Dan Hood (04:40):

Absolutely. Absolutely. And there’s so many more of them now. It used to be there was pretty much you could be, could be in audit, you could be in tax, you could be in, but really those, if you wanted to go into bookkeeping, you could, but I don’t know. But now, as you say, there’s a million other places you can be involved in forensic accounting and wealth management and all those other sorts of things you mentioned. So there’s a lot to promote, but as you say, the trick is to promote it. And it seems like that’s, I don’t want to say difficult, but it’s something, as you say, the profession doesn’t do enough since you’re talking about your role as the leader of a firm. I wanted to sort of narrow down on that. And what are the specific things that you think firm leaders should be doing or can be doing to help with the pipeline challenge?

Carla McCall (05:23):

Well, one of the biggest focus areas I have is in our own business models. I mean, the world of work has changed. The expectations of human capital have changed, especially in the last four years. So how we have worked, which is beholden to the billable hour, is not attractive. So we’re smart people. Our focus here at a EF, we have written in our vision plan that it’s our goal to not rely on the billable hour. We want to get to a point where we are pricing differently. We’re managing productivity differently. We are relying on different KPIs because billable hours is an input on an output. You have inefficient hours, efficient hours. You have too low hours because people don’t put ’em in. You have people who, pat, I mean, they’re never real. So we’re running all our businesses on a statistic that is almost never accurate.

(06:15):

And so how do we get to the point where we are looking at profit per person and productivity? And what is someone contributing to the value of the firm that is beyond the billable hour? And how can we be better at building our muscle of pricing and pricing based on value? And then how do we build our muscle on understanding how to scope work so we can manage that without an hours report telling us that? So there’s a lot to be done here, but I’ve met other firms who are on this similar journey. And the nice part is I think we’re in an environment now where firms are more open to sharing with one another and collaborating on things like this. And so in my role as chair of the A CP, I have an opportunity to encourage that. I share liberally what we are doing, what we’re building. I share what we’ve created, and I encourage others to share with one another so we can really make change in the profession.

Dan Hood (07:15):

That’s the thing. It seems like to reap the value of all these things, to build the pipeline by changing the way the value is measured, it is going to involve some change management going on there. You’ve got to actually make, it’s not an easy, it’s not an on off switch.

Carla McCall (07:33):

No, there’s definitely change management, and it’s not just one thing. And we could talk about the business model and everything, but we do need to increase our starting salaries. Our firm is modeling that. Now, what does that look like? What’s it going to cost the firm? We were to sort start at a higher to salary, and then the trickle up effect from that. What does that look like? What do we need to do? I mean, every company’s goal should be how do we make more money and less time? So if I was going to boil it down, Dan, that’s how it would be. How do we make more money and less time, right? Yeah.

Dan Hood (08:07):

Well, and it’s funny because that’s exactly the opposite of the bill of hour. I want a six minute increment that’s worth a hundred thousand dollars. I don’t need 40 hours that are worth 150 hours each. I need that six minute to make somebody a hundred thousand dollars.

Carla McCall (08:22):

Yeah. It’s just finding that balance. Because we live or die by productivity of our people. It’s our biggest cost labor. So how we utilize our team members, we got to get that right. And so you can’t flip a switch, in my opinion, on how to manage that productivity. We need to figure out, okay, what are the drivers? What does that look like? Let’s pilot it in a group. Let’s test it before we have wholesale change. So it’s going to take some time, but I think the more that we talk about it, the more that we collaborate with one another and we share results. I think the more successful the profession is to evolve. And I’m a firm believer that we have to all be strong in order for the profession to be strong. Our profession is not run by the big four. It’s not run by just the top 100, I dunno, 44,000 firms in the United States or something. We all need to be strong and do well.

Dan Hood (09:19):

And definitely the sharing thing is crucial there because one of the things I’ve noticed over time is that accounting firms, you can tell ’em they should do something and that you can give ’em all layout, all the most compelling arguments for, but really what they want to see is some other accounting firm has done it. They want to be sure that some other accounting firm has done it and it worked for them, which makes perfect sense. You’re not going to tear up a business plan based on me telling them to do it. But if you see three, four, or five a dozen other accounting firms that are doing it and being very successful, then you start to say, aha, these guys think like me. They know what I know. They understand my business the way I understand my business, and if it works for them, then it could work for me.

Carla McCall (09:54):

I mean, you have people all over the spectrum of change. You have the early adopters, you have the leaders, and you have the laggards on the other end, and where do you want to be? The one thing that I’ve learned is if in this evolution of change, I am not sure the laggard will be that successful. I mean, yes, you want to see that it’s successful, but to wait until it’s actually in practice for a period of time, it feels a little late to me. That’s why I’m encouraging this collaboration so people could sort of work together. And it’s not just falling on one firm to figure it out, but people are sharing ideas. We’re going to move much quicker if we’re aligned in the same goal and we’re sharing with each other along the way. At least that’s my belief as a leader, and I practice with our

Dan Hood (10:42):

Makes perfect sense. And I would throw out that it’s also important because you can take all the time you want to adopt to this change, but there’s another change coming behind it and another one behind that and another one behind that. It seems like change these days is now constant new things are popping up all the time. So if you’re still stuck on a change that was up three changes ago, you’re just getting further and further behind.

Carla McCall (11:02):

Oh, for sure. And things are moving quick, right? I mean, I talk about blockchain, right? Five years ago, I would’ve been telling you blockchain is going to, we heard from Barry it’s going to change the audit. It’s real time verified ledgers. They won’t need to rely on the audit report anymore. And here we are in a hockey stick curve up on gen AI and ai that there’s a spectrum of ai. We probably do a whole podcast on that. But for gen ai, yes, it has a lot of power and it has a lot of good, but it also can be used by bad actors. So we have to be careful. We need responsible policies, and we also need to then think about what that new technology also does for risk within our firms and how are we managing that risk. Right.

Dan Hood (11:45):

I’m glad you sort of brought us back beautifully to my next question, which was you talked about innovation and technology at the start of our conversation, but I wanted to dive a little bit more into it, and you’ve done a little bit there telling us about how things will work with AI and the need to be careful with it. But I sort of wanted to ask you a little more broadly about innovation and technological transformation broadly. How can accounting firms make sure they’re making the most of the new technologies, the new innovations, the new things that are coming along? How can they position themselves to make the most of those?

Carla McCall (12:18):

Yeah, that’s a very good question. And I think it depends on the size of the firm. I think smaller firms are going to have to probably lean on their associations that they belong to or their state societies and things to sort of help them along with that. I think larger firms that have more resources are probably going to be leading this effort, but it’s really about strategy in my opinion. I mean, if I had a nickel for every email or LinkedIn paying of the next software that’s going to change my life, I could retire Dan. And so it’s a combination of creating, it’s an investment. It’s an investment in creating the right diverse team inside your firm or your company that can look at the solutions. And you have to look at, okay, what’s the problem we’re trying to solve? And what does the future hold depending on where we sit in the profession?

(13:14):

What’s our book of business? What’s our people? What market are we in? What’s focus? It’s going to look a little bit different for everybody, but you also need people in the user community as well as the technologists in the room together. The technologists are not going to lead change here because they don’t know all the time how we do our work. So you kind of need that diverse skillset along with leadership that sort of has the vision of where we’re going. And you all need to be around the table, but you need this group to have some, you have some leeway. And so we just talked about the billable hour. They can’t be straddled with a billable hour requirement because evolution and technology takes r and d. You need ability to fail and learn. And so their focus really should be on that transformation. And so you need a group that’s really focused on that with a strategy.

(14:04):

Where are we going to start? What does that look like? Do we need, because you want to build a culture around this transformation and technology, especially ai. When I sat in on the cpa.com, ai, cpa, AI symposium in December, what really stood out to me was the speaker that they had that came in that talked about developing a responsible AI policy. So not just, yes, you can use it. No, you can’t. It’s really about how do we create cultures where we’re all aligned on the definition of it, when we use it, how do we implement it, how do we govern it? How do we have accountability and monitoring and all of this, the bigger the firm, the more effort that it’s going to take to have us all aligned around that. So we’re using it in a responsible way.

Dan Hood (14:58):

There’s a lot of group efforts going to, we need to go on there. And a lot of thinking behind the thinking. I think that, which is fascinating, but it’s going to take, as you say, it’s an investment. It’s really an investment of time, curiosity, and interest and a lot of laying groundwork.

Carla McCall (15:14):

And I do think that everybody in the firm needs to know what’s possible with technology today, including gen ai because they have to understand the power. So just, they don’t have to be experts in it, but understand the power so they can connect the dots within their own practice areas. What we have our internal team do is track, well, they do a lot of, when they’re developing use cases, they’re sharing them, they have monthly meetings, anybody can join. So they’re sharing sort of use cases where other people might think, oh, we could use that over here. What does this look like? But they’re also trained to look at what’s the highest and best use, where’s the biggest bang for our buck? So you could do a lot of things, but you want to make sure what you’re focused on first as priority is going to have the biggest bang for the buck for success of the firm. So we’ve sort of put together a template with them of how they manage that. So you never want to say no to somebody when they’re all excited and they want this really good idea, but you need to sort of build that into your strategy. You can’t do everything at once. Where do we start? What does it look like? Who are the stakeholders at the table and how do we understand how to prioritize? Because there’s a lot that we could do.

Dan Hood (16:24):

And in the end, it’s about the success of the firm, not the success of the technology. You can implement something that’s great and we could work perfectly, but if it’s not driving us forward as a firm, that’s not, shouldn’t be our focus.

Carla McCall (16:36):

Yes. And it’s funny, I always wonder why firms individually spend all their money creating something and every firm replicates it, and they don’t join forces more together because clients don’t buy our services for the technology we use. It’s a relationship business. We’re a trust business. It’s about the relationship. And so we really should sort of break down those walls and collaborate more on this evolution, which is why the dynamic audit solution that cpa.com and AI CPA is putting together is great because it is going to be available for the profession, which I think is really important.

Dan Hood (17:17):

Well, and it That’s a perfect example. I was thinking about that when you’re talking about why has everyone reinventing the wheel, right? It was, I want to say 60 or 70 firms working on, I mean, actually they were reps from all those firms or a lot of those firms in on the planning sessions and coming up with features and stuff like that. So it’s a perfect example to sort of collaboration you’re talking about. We can obviously dive a lot more deeply into this and it would be great, but unfortunately we have to take a quick break.

(17:48):

Alright. And we’re back with talking with Carla McCall of AAFCPAs and also chair of the AICPA. And I want to pivot a little bit. Like I said, we could keep talking about innovation and technological transformation, but I want to pivot a little bit to talk about a little something about the AICPA. It’s in the midst of a major transition with the impending retirement of Barry Melancon who’s led the AICPA and really the profession for three decades. So this is a major issue to change. I think for most people. He’s been the only head of the AICPA they’ve ever known sort of thing. What do you think his legacy is going to look like?

Carla McCall (18:24):

I don’t know.

Dan Hood (18:26):

I realize this comes as news to a lot of people now.

Carla McCall (18:29):

Yeah. So Barry’s legacy, listen, I credit a lot of the success of our firm from me sitting in council, having a front row seat, to listening to him talk about the future. He is anticipatory. He can connect the dots with what’s happening outside of our industry, understanding the impact of our industry or how we can harness the power of it in order to be at the leading edge. It’s a skillset, right? But when I think about the broader part of his legacy, it really is about his, it is anticipatory, but the way he brought public accounting and management accounting together through the AICPA and CIMA, joining forces to really be the leading accounting body in the world and promoting our profession and thinking about our profession on a global stage as a gift to the profession. I mean, it couldn’t have, I think his doing this several years ago was sort of setting us up for everything that we’re facing today and where public trust is at the center, and it’s so important that we get it right in all of the aspects that we do. So to have alignment between public accounting and management accounting, I think is really valuable and very powerful. And for me, that is huge and such a gift to the profession, in my opinion.

Dan Hood (19:59):

Yeah, I should say they sort of broadened everybody’s horizons to the whole world in a way that maybe they hadn’t had before and set us up for the much more global world we live in now. Yeah. Very cool. You talked about his anticipatory skills and his ability to look to the future. Are there any other characteristics of his or that you think will be important in the candidates that people are looking at for his, I won’t say replacement, he can’t be replaced, but for his successor,

Carla McCall (20:33):

He has, he’s strong in leadership and vision. I think if you’re looking at any leader of any organization, they have to be a visionary. They have to be strong leaders. In order to be strong leaders, you have to build influence and you have to inspire other people. And I think he has influence on a global stage. I think he has inspired countless people. Those are really specific skills, vision, strategy, influence, inspiring others. Those are really important when it comes to leadership. Now, it’s super helpful that he let us stay society. He understood our profession. He was in a firm. So understanding our profession I think was really important. But what sort of rises to the top for me are those intangibles in leadership that you earn, quite frankly. Yeah, you earn those.

Dan Hood (21:27):

And a lot of those are the hallmarks of a great leader, as you said, sort of in any organization, but also specifically in accounting firms, right?

Carla McCall (21:34):

And in firms, because a lot of large firms are more than just compliance firms. They have other practice areas, wealth management and outsource account and technology. They all work differently. And I think what Barry has done as a leader is he’s always so cognizant, admire this, and then balancing the views of all the stakeholders. So we have this sort of stakeholder visual that we use, and he may have seen it in some of the presentations, but there’s a lot of stakeholders around the table, public accounting, private, nonprofit, government, academia, students. I mean, you could go on and on. And anytime that we are leading change or conversations, he is so astute about making sure he is thinking about all the stakeholders around the table. And it really just takes that kind of mind to really think that way in such quick way.

Dan Hood (22:33):

And to have a big part of it is the depth of knowledge of all the different stakeholders. I mean, when you even went through that list, I was like, oh, I forgot them. I forgot them. I forgot that. So I mean, it’s to bear those in mind and have that broader picture of the whole equation of the accounting universe is pretty rare. We hope they can find someone with an approximation of it for, yeah,

Carla McCall (22:54):

And he’s pretty good about, because I’m the chair of the AICPA, but my world is public accounting, and he’s really good about making sure I’m not just solely focused on public accounting. We have so many stakeholders, and he’s very kind about it, but they’re very good lessons. So still in leadership, I’m learning from him. Good.

Dan Hood (23:15):

Well, at no point should a leader stop learning, no matter who they are. That’s got to be a clear thing, but very cool. Excellent. Unfortunately, as he said, all of these topics would be worth four or five hour long podcast, but we have to limit ourselves. I’d like to just, we had talked about what a great time it is to be an accountant and the opportunities that are available to everyone in the profession, whether you’re an individual or a firm. But I’m just curious about, for people looking to enter the profession, what sort of advice would you give someone who’s looking to make a career in accounting? Just as a sort of a sign off?

Carla McCall (23:49):

Yes. So I would say, I tell our new, we hire, I dunno, 25 to 35 people a year. I talk to everybody who enters our firm no matter at what level. I have a meeting with them. And the one thing I said, it’s to say to the new people, entering accounting is where you start. Might not be where you end up and grant yourself some grace to find your meaningful work because there’s so much diversity. You can be in audit or tax or tech or accounting or wealth. And then there’s, so there’s services, forensics and advisory, but then there’s also an

Dan Hood (24:23):

ESG. The list goes on. It’s amazing.

Carla McCall (24:25):

Yeah, the new services coming up. And then there’s industry specialists. We have healthcare and education and real estate. So it’s really allowing yourself to explore the profession. And you could be in public, private, nonprofit, government, academia. I mean, there’s so much choice. Allow yourself, grant yourself some grace to explore a little bit, try different things and really find the work that you’re connected to. And I tell everybody the work that you really connected to, try and isolate those moments where you’re working and your adrenaline is up. You’re enjoying it, you’re having fun. Try and pause and reflect. Is it because I’m working in a team individual with a particular client? I solved a problem? Try and isolate those moments and then try and do more of whatever that is.

Dan Hood (25:14):

Excellent. Fantastic advice. Carla McCall of the AICPA and AAFCPAs, thank you so much for joining us.

Carla McCall (25:21):

Thanks, Dan. Pleasure.

Dan Hood (25:22):

This episode of On the Air was produced by Accounting Today with audio production by Kelly Maloney. Ready to review us on your favorite podcast platform and see the rest of our content on accounting today.com. Thanks again to our guest, and thank you for listening.

Continue Reading

Accounting

If you’re thinking of offering financial advisory services, don’t overlook estate planning

Published

on

It’s no secret that more and more CPAs are offering financial services to their clients. 

In fact, financial planning questions now have a greater emphasis on the CPA exam than ever before. I find that encouraging. But if you think true financial planning is all about investments and annual returns, think again. 

Financial advisors are no longer hanging their hats on portfolio performance. They’re moving toward the holistic approach to wealth management, an approach that goes beyond financial services to account for any factor that touches a client’s financial life. The holistic approach recognizes that financial health is closely intertwined with physical, emotional, mental and social wellbeing. I’m guessing this wasn’t covered in your accounting school curriculum.

To move into this area successfully, you’ll have to do more than crunch the numbers and plug in investments. Clients and strategic partners will evaluate you based on how well you can really listen to clients and empathize with them. Those attributes are now more important than your advanced math skills, technical skills, and knowledge of the Tax Code.As Clayton Oates, founder of QA Business, wrote in the foreword of my new book Holistic Guide to Wealth Management (CPA Trendlines), “Empathy is an area we have only just begun to explore in our profession. It’s about the art of asking questions and listening. It’s about discovering new circumstances in your client’s business and personal life that were previously not discussed. Shared discovery helps create a genuine and lasting connection with your clients.”

In the introduction, Seth Fineberg, founder of Accountants Forward, explained that as a CPA, you are your clients’ most trusted guide. “You are the one who has been helping them in their financial lives the longest,” he wrote. “And even if your client tells you they already have a financial planner, it’s worth reaching out to that planner and potentially collaborating with them as part of your service to ensure that your client is getting the best possible advice. That’s because every single year, you know what they owe in taxes and why.” 

According to Fineberg, accountants know intimately where their clients’ spending goes and may already offer basic ways for them to save on taxes. In short, “the trust is there. The data is there. Why aren’t you helping them more?” he askedI began to ask myself the same thing as I started making deeper inroads into the accounting profession. Thanks to advances in technology and increasing affordability of a virtual family office model, you can provide your clients with access to a wide range of services. Experts can be brought in as needed to provide specialized knowledge about accounting, tax, estate planning, insurance, legal, philanthropic planning, investment and administrative matters. Best of all, the experts don’t have to be in-house on your full-time payroll. Again, as the client’s CPA and most trusted advisor, you direct the relationship and remain the central point of contact. 

Estate planning to cement client relationships

When it comes to providing the family office level of care, estate planning comes top of mind. On a recent podcast I hosted, Andreas Mazabel, head of advisor sales at Trust & Will said firms that are proactively adopting estate planning are finding it a powerful way to deepen relationships and better connect with their clients’ values and the extended family’s values. He believes advisors who are not incorporating estate planning into their practice are losing clients to firms that do.

“One thing we continue to see is that clients looking for advisors want complete holistic planning,” said Mazabel. “They tell us: ‘I don’t want to go to three or four different offices to get all of my stuff done. I want to go to one trusted source who really understands my goals and my gaps and can help me build a complete plan around that.” 

Mazabel said that for many years as an advisor, his focus was on building up a client’s assets. There wasn’t much emphasis on protecting those assets or transferring them tax-efficiently to NextGen or the causes they believed in, he noted. Like Mazabel, I’ve long believed you can connect generations with estate planning. It’s a great retention tool as well as a great prospecting tool. And thanks to online estate planning tools like Trust & Will, technology streamlines the process for clients. In the past, advisors would refer clients to an estate attorney and hope they’d show up. Once there, clients would have to endure uncomfortable conversations about health care directives, powers of attorney, and death. Now they can do it from the comfort of home and have an advisor walking them through the process. By making it easier for the advisor to be involved directly in the estate planning process, Mazabel says it’s much easier to hold clients accountable for following through. 

Trust & Will’s research has found that when a person comes to set up an estate plan on the platform without a financial advisor, there’s about a 25% chance they’ll go through the process and complete it. But when they come through a financial advisor, the completion rate goes up to 75%. That’s one of the many advantages of having a trusted advisor. 

When you consider that 55% of Americans don’t have any estate documents and only 31% have a basic will, according to Trust & Will’s 2025 Estate Planning Report, I can’t think of a better argument for the power of accountability.

Speaking of statistics, my good friend Michael DiJoseph, a senior strategist at Vanguard Investment Advisor Research Center, has long studied and quantified the value that a skilled advisor brings to clients vs. clients who don’t use financial advisors. Vanguard celebrated the 25th anniversary of its Advisor Alpha Study, which has consistently shown that skilled advisors add a full 3% (300 basis points) annually to a client’s portfolio. How? By holding them accountable to their plan and helping them avoid rash, wealth-eroding decisions during times of market volatility or personal stress. Over those 300 basis points, Vanguard believes 200 of that “alpha” comes from behavioral coaching, which could include trust-building activities such as estate planning. 

According to DiJoseph, the higher the level of trust a client has in their advisor, the more likely they are to make a referral. DiJoseph’s team has taken it a step further and looked into the three main components of trust. Emotional trust was by far the most important component:

  • 17% of respondents rated “functional trust” (building portfolios, doing financial planning, etc. as the single most important type of trust. 
  • 30% of respondents rated “ethical trust” (advisors’ interests are aligned with theirs vs. trying to sell them something) as the single most important type of trust.
  • 53% of respondents rated “emotional trust” (softer skills: actively listening; asking good questions; treating clients like people, not portfolios) as the single most important type of trust.

From my standpoint, these stats are very welcoming for a profession that hangs its hat on trust. As I discuss throughout my book, working toward that ROR (Return on Relationship) is about developing emotional trust with clients and having a greater connection with them. That’s how you can introduce estate planning into your holistic type of offering to clients. Even better, it can increase revenue and provide clients with much appreciated peace of mind.

For forward-thinking CPAs, estate planning isn’t just an add-on service; it’s a cornerstone of relationship-centered wealth management that clients increasingly expect from their most trusted advisor. Build your ROR today!

Continue Reading

Accounting

IRS plans to bring back fired probationary employees

Published

on

The Internal Revenue Service reportedly intends to reinstate thousands of probationary employees who were fired after two courts ordered it to do so.

IRS acting commissioner Melanie Krause announced in a conference call Wednesday that approximately 7,0000 fired employees would be able to return to work by April 14, a day before the end of tax season, according to the Federal News Network. The IRS also sent out an email to the employees, who the Trump administration began firing in February.

“You are receiving this email as one of approximately 7,000 probationary employees who were separated from service and have been reinstated in compliance with recent court orders,” said the email. “At this time, while you remain on administrative leave, you will soon receive instructions for how to return on full-time duty by April 14.”

The employees will be able to get back their identity badges, computer equipment and workspace assignments and will be allowed to temporarily take advantage of telework if office space isn’t available for them. However, employees are also being given the option to not return to work at all.

“If you wish to not return and voluntarily resign from federal service, you should send an email to [email protected] as soon as possible,” said the email. Please know that outside employment does not necessarily prevent you from returning to work. If you have secured outside employment and wish to continue with the outside employment while re-employed with the IRS, you must submit an outside employment request to your manager.”

The IRS had placed many of the fired employees on paid administrative leave in order to comply with a federal judge’s order in California requiring employees at the Treasury Department and five other government agencies to be reinstated. However, the judge later ruled that putting the fired employees on paid administrative leave wasn’t enough to comply with his preliminary injunction. Another judge in Maryland on Tuesday ordered 18 federal agencies to reinstate workers in 19 states and the District of Columbia. The National Treasury Employees Union and other unions have filed lawsuits against the Trump administration over the firings and an executive order eliminating collective bargaining rights.

Some IRS employees have reportedly been using the time on paid administrative leave to search for other jobs, which could help fill the ranks of accounting firms and other businesses searching for talent.

Joseph Perry, national tax leader and managing director at the accounting and professional services firm CBIZ, has been seeing more resumes coming in from IRS employees.

“We actually have an uptick in resumes,” he recently told Accounting Today. “In fact, I was connected by a business leader to somebody that is still working for the IRS, but is not going to be there too much longer, and he’s exploring other options. So there is going to be, I think, an uptick in many companies. The IRS has really good, talented people that are going to come back into industry, that are going to be very useful to firms like our firm, CBIZ, to bolster our ability to service our clients in an effective way and be able to do that. It’s pretty interesting, right? We’re one of the top 10 firms. As it relates to firms that may be in the top 25, I would tend to think it’s a unique opportunity for them to pick up somebody that they otherwise wouldn’t have been able to pick up, somebody with talent and experience, and that probably would lead to them providing services that they otherwise wouldn’t have.”

Staffing companies have seen some interest, but the uncertain state of the various federal court cases may have been keeping people on the sidelines. “It’s still a bit early to tell if there’s been a significant increase in interest from former federal employees in the private sector accounting and tax space,” said Brandi Britton, executive director of finance and accounting practice at the staffing company Robert Half. “While we do see candidates with federal experience, it’s difficult to immediately distinguish between those transitioning directly from federal roles and those who have federal experience as part of their broader career background. What we do know is that finance and accounting leaders are facing ongoing skills gaps and are actively seeking candidates to fill in-demand roles. A few notable skills gaps include finance and FP&A, financial reporting and tax expertise.” 

Continue Reading

Accounting

Tax Strategy: Updates on the Clean Vehicle Tax Credit

Published

on

The requirements for the Clean Vehicle Credit seemed a little complicated when they were introduced in the Inflation Reduction Act in 2022, and they are proving to be a little difficult in practice. 

There were restrictions based on where the vehicle was assembled and where the critical minerals and battery components originated. Then there were limits on the manufacturer’s suggested retail price for the vehicle and the income of the purchaser. The manufacturer was required to have vehicles pre-approved for a given level of credit and the dealer was required to be registered.

Some provisions were phased in over time, including the option to transfer the credit to the dealer, which became effective for 2024. The Internal Revenue Service then added certain compliance requirements, including filing a time of sale report (the Clean Vehicle Seller Report (Form 15400)) within 72 hours of the vehicle being placed in service and submitting information through an Energy Credits Online portal.

Plug-in vehicle parking spot

Some of these provisions were designed to simplify the process. When a potential purchaser entered the showroom, the purchaser would be able to find out in real time what amount of credit was associated with a particular vehicle. A time-of-sale report could be filed with the IRS electronically via the portal to determine even before the sale was finalized if the vehicle qualified for the credit. 

Unfortunately, things have not worked out quite so well in practice. 

The more simplified requirements in place for purchases in 2023 appear to have lulled dealers into the belief that the same practices would be fine for 2024. Some dealers, far from using the time-of-sale reports to make sure the credit was cleared for approval at the time of sale, failed even to prepare the reports. Purchasers, unaware of the new requirement, failed to demand a copy at the time of sale. In those instances where the purchaser retained entitlement to the credit, rather than transferring it to the dealer, the purchaser found that, when they filed their 2024 tax return in 2025, the IRS rejected the claim for the credit. When the purchaser contacted the dealer about the problem, the dealer found they were unable to correct the issue because the time-of-sale report had not been filed within the required 72-hour period and any late submission was rejected as untimely. 

Only 7% of purchasers in 2024 retained their entitlement to the credit. The rest of the purchasers transferred entitlement to the credit to the dealer, resulting in a price rebate on the vehicle purchase. However, again, when the dealer sought to claim the credit transferred from the purchaser, the dealer encountered the same problem of an untimely time-of-sale report, which could not be corrected because the 72-hour time period had expired.

This glitch in the system impacted dealers even more than purchasers and got the attention of the National Automobile Dealers Association, which immediately started pressuring the IRS and Congress to find a solution to the problem. In response, the IRS has informed NADA that it is waiving the 72-hour requirement and is accepting late time-of-sale reports into the Energy Credits Online portal. The IRS has set no time limits so far on the submission of late reports.

Corrective action

Dealers will want to refile all rejected time-of-sale reports that had been rejected as untimely. Dealers will also want to make sure they are registered with the IRS and notify any purchasers that the credit has now been approved. 

Purchasers will want to contact the dealer for a copy of the time-of-sale report and make sure the dealer is resubmitting the report or submitting it for the first time. Purchasers will need to file a Form 8936, “Clean Vehicle Credits,” to be used for the Clean Vehicle Credit, the Previously Owned Clean Vehicle Credit and the Qualified Commercial Clean Vehicle Credit. Form 8936 is required to be filed either when the purchaser is claiming the credit on the purchaser’s tax return or when the purchaser has transferred the credit to the dealer. 

In some cases, where the purchaser had already filed a tax return where the credit was rejected by the IRS, the purchaser will be required to file an amended tax return to claim the credit once the time-of-sale report has been accepted.

Termination of the Clean Vehicle Credit

While under current law, the Clean Vehicle Credit is scheduled to continue until 2032, Congress is working on tax legislation expected to be enacted this year that might repeal the credit. President Trump has expressed his opposition to many of the clean energy credits included in the Inflation Reduction Act enacted in 2022, and in particular opposition to the Clean Vehicle Credit. 

Congress is still in the early stages of working on this legislation, and it is not clear to what extent this provision might be included in the final legislation. If enacted at all, it is likely that the legislation would not be enacted until later in 2025. This makes it unlikely that any repeal of the Clean Vehicle Credit would be made retroactive to the beginning of 2025. However, it is possible repeal could be effective as of the enactment date of the legislation. 

Taxpayers considering the purchase of an electric vehicle in 2025 may want to monitor the progress of this tax legislation through Congress and whether a repeal of the clean vehicle credit appears to be included. Purchase of the vehicle before enactment of the legislation may preserve the credit for the taxpayer. 

Tariffs

The limit on the manufacturer’s suggested retail price for electric vehicles could become more difficult for manufacturers and dealers to stay under if the tariffs on imported automobiles and auto parts force manufacturers to raise prices. The MSRP limit for vans, SUVs and pick-ups is $80,000 and for other vehicles $55,000. If the electric vehicle currently under consideration for purchase is close to these price limits, a taxpayer might want to consider purchasing the vehicle sooner, before these tariffs achieve their full impact.

Continue Reading

Trending