Enjoy complimentary access to top ideas and insights — selected by our editors.
Private equity’s growing presence in the accounting landscape has given rise to a substantial inflow of capital opportunities, empowering firms seeking to expand into new markets or deepen their presence in existing ones. Despite all the up-front benefits of non-bank lending, accountants can’t help but wonder about the true cost of going down this road.
Firms like Top 25 Firm Armanino LLP and Top 50 Firm Cohen & Co. have recently joined the ranks of the many who have taken on PE investments since 2021, when the deal between Top 25 Firm EisnerAmper LLP and PE firm TowerBrook Capital Partners set the stage for other investments to follow suit. While the idea of such a deal had been mulled over for several years beforehand, the investment in EisnerAmper is generally understood to be the first of its kind to come to fruition.
Philip Whitman, CPA and CEO of advisory firm Whitman Transition Advisors LLC, said PE activity has only grown since that first investment, with 2024 being the year that investors have become more eager to invest in or partner with CPA firms.
“To date, our team has met with over 150 private-equity groups that have a desire to find foundational firms in the accounting/CPA firm arena. … Not a week goes by that I am not hearing a pitch or new thesis by at least three or four private-equity groups that are considering entering the accounting-firm space,” Whitman said.
While the money itself is a welcome addition for firms of various sizes, the conditions it could bring are less so — independence being the first such condition that could change following PE investments.
1/2
Examples of various deals between CPA firms and private equity investors broken down by transformation type. (Allan Koltin)
2/2
More examples of various deals between CPA firms and private equity investors broken down by transformation type. (Allan Koltin)
Firms that provide attest services must be majority-owned by licensed CPAs, but still allow for a minority stake to be owned by non-CPA entities. New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed a non-CPA ownership bill into law late last year, making New York the most recent state to allow “public accounting firms with minority ownership by individuals who are not CPAs to incorporate in New York State,” according to a press release.
As is often the case, PE transactions will result in a firm being divided into two entities, one owned by CPAs to oversee attest services, and the other wholly or part-owned by non-CPA private-equity partners that provide non-attest services such as tax, technology or consulting services.
Experts stress the importance of a clear distinction between which parts of a firm are owned by CPAs and which are not, both from a legal standpoint and a client relationship perspective.
“My understanding is that the PE firms have a bit of a workaround, with those employees and transferring income, but I feel that could be a very fine line or walking on thin ice,” said Stephen Mankowski, owner of the Pennsylvania-based accounting firm Mankowski Associates CPA. “Firms need to be independent both in fact and appearance. … The PE firms cannot have a relationship with any clients of the CPA firm.”
Even with those divisions, PE groups “putting tens or hundreds of millions of dollars into an organization will want a say” in how the broader organization is run, said Mark Masson, managing partner and head of the professional services at the Chicago-based Lotis Blue Consulting.
“It may look collaborative at first, but what does it look like six to 18 months in when you hit a bumpy patch?” Masson said.
Firms that can navigate those dilemmas gain access to a pool of investors hungry to dive into the world of accounting, promising vast funding for M&A strategies, technology investments, and.
“PE has raised the ‘performance bar’ for CPA firms by moving them from a ‘country club’ culture to a ‘country’ culture. … Specifically, they have instilled a culture of greater accountability (less autonomy) and hence a higher-performing firm over the ‘hold’ period,” said Allan Koltin, CPA and CEO of Koltin Consulting Group.
Read on to learn more about the growing presence of PE in the accounting profession, and how experts are keeping a close eye on the promises and pitfalls of new investment activity.
The unequal impact of private equity in accounting
The influence of private equity and the much-needed capital it brings has been steadily growing across the accounting profession over the last few years. But seasoned professionals say that while it works for some, it’s not a cure-all.
“Private equity is not a silver bullet,” Allan Koltin of the Koltin Consulting Group told attendees at Accounting Today’s inaugural PE Summit, held in late November. “If you don’t do PE, that doesn’t mean you won’t be successful. But you do need to figure out what you’re going to do” to solve the issues of access to capital and resources that PE deals help with.
The values of PE are seemingly only an option for the higher-earning firms, Koltin explained, as the scrutiny of PE firms where earnings reviews are concerned is a high bar to clear.
“It seems like a lot of deals have happened, but believe me, the same number or more have died,” Koltin explained.
The private equity changeup in accounting career pathing
Private-equity investments, outside the obvious capital benefits, are repathing traditional career tracks across the accounting profession, according to a recent report.
The Accounting MOVE Project says PE is “challenging long-established firm structures” and “raising significant questions about the future of ownership models and their impact on career development,” according to a report it recently published. The report was co-sponsored by the Accounting & Financial Women’s Alliance and Top 100 Firm Moss Adams.
Career pathing has been a particular point of contention for many firms seeking to enlist fresh talent amid a growing shortage of new graduates. The report goes on to explain how PE buyers use structured opportunities for advancement within firms to incentivize retention.
Private equity is the beginning of a new era. Is it a good one?
Accounting has undergone numerous changes over the last four years, as private-equity firms have continued to grow in scale and number throughout the profession. Experts like Matthew Marinaro, a principal at PE firm Red Iron Group, say if this trend were likened to a baseball game, “We’re in the second or third inning.”
These partnerships have become prevalent in various forms, according to Allan Koltin, speaking at the AICPA Executive Roundtable in New York in September.
Models include instances of PE firms acquiring a piece of a Top 25 Firm to then provide capital for buying up smaller Top 500 firms, as well as more broad purchases of Top 30 to Top 100 accounting firms by middle-weight PE players.
Those at the heart of the growing trend of M&A in accounting say recurring revenue is an important factor in any private-equity deal, but it’s revenue quality over quantity that will win out in the end.
While speaking at the Scaling New Heights conference in Orlando, Florida, this year, Slivka explained that his “holistic” approach to evaluating possible acquisitions starts with culture, then works its way outwards towards financial metrics.
“We will want to understand how they have managed their business throughout its course, so we can understand its culture and people,” he said.
Private equity is having its moment in wealth management and accounting, following a significant drop off in deal activity by volume and value in 2023 when compared to the prior year. Experts remain wary, however, that capital options from nonbank entities could yield unforeseen risks.
In Top 100 Firm Cherry Bekaert’s most recent annual report on leveraged buyout deals, experts highlight how the higher interest rate environment present over the last few years drove up capital costs and pushed many towards alternative funding sources. This growth in the private-credit market has positioned PE firms as “the primary drivers of private credit consumption” but haven’t alleviated concerns of a growing PE bubble, the report said.
“As investments have begun to take shape and private equity demonstrates its ability to drive transformational growth and improve financial performance in people-heavy businesses, the hesitation has become less concerning,” the report said. “CPA, consulting and wealth management firms appear to be in the midst of a private equity-backed revolution.”
In the world of financial management, accurate transaction recording is much more than a routine task—it is the foundation of fiscal integrity, operational transparency, and informed decision-making. By maintaining meticulous records, businesses ensure their financial ecosystem remains robust and reliable. This article explores the essential practices for precise transaction recording and its critical role in driving business success.
The Importance of Detailed Transaction Recording At the heart of accurate financial management is detailed transaction recording. Each transaction must include not only the monetary amount but also its nature, the parties involved, and the exact date and time. This level of detail creates a comprehensive audit trail that supports financial analysis, regulatory compliance, and future decision-making. Proper documentation also ensures that stakeholders have a clear and trustworthy view of an organization’s financial health.
Establishing a Robust Chart of Accounts A well-organized chart of accounts is fundamental to accurate transaction recording. This structured framework categorizes financial activities into meaningful groups, enabling businesses to track income, expenses, assets, and liabilities consistently. Regularly reviewing and updating the chart of accounts ensures it stays relevant as the business evolves, allowing for meaningful comparisons and trend analysis over time.
Leveraging Modern Accounting Software Advanced accounting software has revolutionized how businesses handle transaction recording. These tools automate repetitive tasks like data entry, synchronize transactions in real-time with bank feeds, and perform validation checks to minimize errors. Features such as cloud integration and customizable reports make these platforms invaluable for maintaining accurate, accessible, and up-to-date financial records.
The Power of Double-Entry Bookkeeping Double-entry bookkeeping remains a cornerstone of precise transaction management. By ensuring every transaction affects at least two accounts, this system inherently checks for errors and maintains balance within the financial records. For example, recording both a debit and a credit ensures that discrepancies are caught early, providing a reliable framework for accurate reporting.
The Role of Timely Documentation Prompt transaction recording is another critical factor in financial accuracy. Delays in documentation can lead to missing or incorrect entries, which may skew financial reports and complicate decision-making. A culture that prioritizes timely and accurate record-keeping ensures that a company always has real-time insights into its financial position, helping it adapt to changing conditions quickly.
Regular Reconciliation for Financial Integrity Periodic reconciliations act as a vital checkpoint in transaction recording. Whether conducted daily, weekly, or monthly, these reviews compare recorded transactions with external records, such as bank statements, to identify discrepancies. Early detection of errors ensures that records remain accurate and that the company’s financial statements are trustworthy.
Conclusion Mastering the art of accurate transaction recording is far more than a compliance requirement—it is a strategic necessity. By implementing detailed recording practices, leveraging advanced technology, and adhering to time-tested principles like double-entry bookkeeping, businesses can ensure financial transparency and operational efficiency. For finance professionals and business leaders, precise transaction recording is the bedrock of informed decision-making, stakeholder confidence, and long-term success.
With these strategies, businesses can build a reliable financial foundation that supports growth, resilience, and the ability to navigate an ever-changing economic landscape.
Easing restrictions, sharpening personal attention and clarifying denials are among the aims of three pilot programs at the Internal Revenue Service that will test changes to existing alternative dispute resolution programs.
The programs focus on “fast track settlement,” which allows IRS Appeals to mediate disputes between a taxpayer and the IRS while the case is still within the jurisdiction of the examination function, and post-appeals mediation, in which a mediator is introduced to help foster a settlement between Appeals and the taxpayer.
The IRS has been revitalizing existing ADR programs as part of transformation efforts of the agency’s new strategic plan, said Elizabeth Askey, chief of the IRS Independent Office of Appeals.
“By increasing awareness, changing and revitalizing existing programs and piloting new approaches, we hope to make our ADR programs, such as fast-track settlement and post-appeals mediation, more attractive and accessible for all eligible parties,” said Michael Baillif, director of Appeals’ ADR Program Management Office.
Among other improvements, the pilots:
Align the Large Business and International, Small Business and Self-Employed and Tax Exempt and Government Entities divisions in offering FTS issue by issue. Previously, if a taxpayer had one issue ineligible for FTS, the entire case was ineligible.
Provide that requests to participate in FTS and PAM will not be denied without the approval of a first-line executive.
Clarify that taxpayers receive an explanation when requests for FTS or PAM are denied.
Another pilot, Last Chance FTS, is a limited scope SB/SE pilot in which Appeals will call taxpayers or their representatives after a protest is filed in response to a 30-day or equivalent letter to inform taxpayers about the potential application of FTS. This pilot will not impact eligibility for FTS but will simply test the awareness of taxpayers regarding the availability of FTS.
A final pilot removes the limitation that participation in FTS would preclude eligibility for PAM.
The traditional appeals process remains available for all taxpayers.
Inquiries can be addressed to the ADR Program Management Office at [email protected].
The Internal Revenue Service has updated and added new guidance for taxpayers claiming the Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit and the Residential Clean Energy Property Credit.
The updated Fact Sheet 2025-01 includes a set of frequently asked questions and answers, superseding the fact sheet from last April. The IRS noted that the updates include substantial changes.
New sections have been added on how long a taxpayer has to claim the tax credits, guidance for condominium and co-op owners, whether taxpayers who did not previously claim the credit can file an amended return to claim it, and a series of questions on qualified manufacturers and product identification numbers. Other material has been added on how to claim the credits, what kind of records a taxpayer has to keep for claiming the credit, and for how long, and whether taxpayers can include financing costs such as interest payments in determining the amount of the credit.
The IRS states that “financing costs such as interest, as well as other miscellaneous costs such as origination fees and the cost of an extended warranty, are not eligible expenditures for purposes of the credit.”