Enjoy complimentary access to top ideas and insights — selected by our editors.
Private equity’s growing presence in the accounting landscape has given rise to a substantial inflow of capital opportunities, empowering firms seeking to expand into new markets or deepen their presence in existing ones. Despite all the up-front benefits of non-bank lending, accountants can’t help but wonder about the true cost of going down this road.
Firms like Top 25 Firm Armanino LLP and Top 50 Firm Cohen & Co. have recently joined the ranks of the many who have taken on PE investments since 2021, when the deal between Top 25 Firm EisnerAmper LLP and PE firm TowerBrook Capital Partners set the stage for other investments to follow suit. While the idea of such a deal had been mulled over for several years beforehand, the investment in EisnerAmper is generally understood to be the first of its kind to come to fruition.
Philip Whitman, CPA and CEO of advisory firm Whitman Transition Advisors LLC, said PE activity has only grown since that first investment, with 2024 being the year that investors have become more eager to invest in or partner with CPA firms.
“To date, our team has met with over 150 private-equity groups that have a desire to find foundational firms in the accounting/CPA firm arena. … Not a week goes by that I am not hearing a pitch or new thesis by at least three or four private-equity groups that are considering entering the accounting-firm space,” Whitman said.
While the money itself is a welcome addition for firms of various sizes, the conditions it could bring are less so — independence being the first such condition that could change following PE investments.
1/2
Examples of various deals between CPA firms and private equity investors broken down by transformation type. (Allan Koltin)
2/2
More examples of various deals between CPA firms and private equity investors broken down by transformation type. (Allan Koltin)
Firms that provide attest services must be majority-owned by licensed CPAs, but still allow for a minority stake to be owned by non-CPA entities. New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed a non-CPA ownership bill into law late last year, making New York the most recent state to allow “public accounting firms with minority ownership by individuals who are not CPAs to incorporate in New York State,” according to a press release.
As is often the case, PE transactions will result in a firm being divided into two entities, one owned by CPAs to oversee attest services, and the other wholly or part-owned by non-CPA private-equity partners that provide non-attest services such as tax, technology or consulting services.
Experts stress the importance of a clear distinction between which parts of a firm are owned by CPAs and which are not, both from a legal standpoint and a client relationship perspective.
“My understanding is that the PE firms have a bit of a workaround, with those employees and transferring income, but I feel that could be a very fine line or walking on thin ice,” said Stephen Mankowski, owner of the Pennsylvania-based accounting firm Mankowski Associates CPA. “Firms need to be independent both in fact and appearance. … The PE firms cannot have a relationship with any clients of the CPA firm.”
Even with those divisions, PE groups “putting tens or hundreds of millions of dollars into an organization will want a say” in how the broader organization is run, said Mark Masson, managing partner and head of the professional services at the Chicago-based Lotis Blue Consulting.
“It may look collaborative at first, but what does it look like six to 18 months in when you hit a bumpy patch?” Masson said.
Firms that can navigate those dilemmas gain access to a pool of investors hungry to dive into the world of accounting, promising vast funding for M&A strategies, technology investments, and.
“PE has raised the ‘performance bar’ for CPA firms by moving them from a ‘country club’ culture to a ‘country’ culture. … Specifically, they have instilled a culture of greater accountability (less autonomy) and hence a higher-performing firm over the ‘hold’ period,” said Allan Koltin, CPA and CEO of Koltin Consulting Group.
Read on to learn more about the growing presence of PE in the accounting profession, and how experts are keeping a close eye on the promises and pitfalls of new investment activity.
Allan Koltin at the 2024 PE Summit
The unequal impact of private equity in accounting
The influence of private equity and the much-needed capital it brings has been steadily growing across the accounting profession over the last few years. But seasoned professionals say that while it works for some, it’s not a cure-all.
“Private equity is not a silver bullet,” Allan Koltin of the Koltin Consulting Group told attendees at Accounting Today’s inaugural PE Summit, held in late November. “If you don’t do PE, that doesn’t mean you won’t be successful. But you do need to figure out what you’re going to do” to solve the issues of access to capital and resources that PE deals help with.
The values of PE are seemingly only an option for the higher-earning firms, Koltin explained, as the scrutiny of PE firms where earnings reviews are concerned is a high bar to clear.
“It seems like a lot of deals have happened, but believe me, the same number or more have died,” Koltin explained.
The private equity changeup in accounting career pathing
Private-equity investments, outside the obvious capital benefits, are repathing traditional career tracks across the accounting profession, according to a recent report.
The Accounting MOVE Project says PE is “challenging long-established firm structures” and “raising significant questions about the future of ownership models and their impact on career development,” according to a report it recently published. The report was co-sponsored by the Accounting & Financial Women’s Alliance and Top 100 Firm Moss Adams.
Career pathing has been a particular point of contention for many firms seeking to enlist fresh talent amid a growing shortage of new graduates. The report goes on to explain how PE buyers use structured opportunities for advancement within firms to incentivize retention.
Allan Koltin (middle) at the 2024 AICPA Executive Roundtable
Private equity is the beginning of a new era. Is it a good one?
Accounting has undergone numerous changes over the last four years, as private-equity firms have continued to grow in scale and number throughout the profession. Experts like Matthew Marinaro, a principal at PE firm Red Iron Group, say if this trend were likened to a baseball game, “We’re in the second or third inning.”
These partnerships have become prevalent in various forms, according to Allan Koltin, speaking at the AICPA Executive Roundtable in New York in September.
Models include instances of PE firms acquiring a piece of a Top 25 Firm to then provide capital for buying up smaller Top 500 firms, as well as more broad purchases of Top 30 to Top 100 accounting firms by middle-weight PE players.
Those at the heart of the growing trend of M&A in accounting say recurring revenue is an important factor in any private-equity deal, but it’s revenue quality over quantity that will win out in the end.
While speaking at the Scaling New Heights conference in Orlando, Florida, this year, Slivka explained that his “holistic” approach to evaluating possible acquisitions starts with culture, then works its way outwards towards financial metrics.
“We will want to understand how they have managed their business throughout its course, so we can understand its culture and people,” he said.
Private equity is having its moment in wealth management and accounting, following a significant drop off in deal activity by volume and value in 2023 when compared to the prior year. Experts remain wary, however, that capital options from nonbank entities could yield unforeseen risks.
In Top 100 Firm Cherry Bekaert’s most recent annual report on leveraged buyout deals, experts highlight how the higher interest rate environment present over the last few years drove up capital costs and pushed many towards alternative funding sources. This growth in the private-credit market has positioned PE firms as “the primary drivers of private credit consumption” but haven’t alleviated concerns of a growing PE bubble, the report said.
“As investments have begun to take shape and private equity demonstrates its ability to drive transformational growth and improve financial performance in people-heavy businesses, the hesitation has become less concerning,” the report said. “CPA, consulting and wealth management firms appear to be in the midst of a private equity-backed revolution.”
Tax management platform Instead launched artificial intelligence-driven tax reports, harnessing AI to analyze full tax returns to glean tax strategies and missed opportunities.
The San Francisco-based company’s reports, which are designed for clarity and compliance, include:
Tax Return Analysis Report, which reveals tax-saving opportunities in tax returns for individuals (1040) and businesses (Schedule C, E, F, 1120, 1120S, 1065).
Tax Plan Report, which provides a real-time summary and action list of all tax strategies across all entities in a tax year and includes potential and actual savings, summaries for each tax strategy, and IRS and court case references.
Tax Strategy Reports for every tax strategy, with detailed calculations of deductions and credits, supporting documentation, and an actionable plan.
Instead users can collaborate with their tax professionals on the platform or search the Instead directory of firms that support the platform and offer tax planning and advisory services.
Andrew Argue
“We are excited to bring our users the future of smart, effective decisions when it comes to filing taxes,” said Andrew Argue, co-founder of Instead, in a statement. “With Instead, users can easily uncover and implement tax strategies and opportunities that will save them money and have the transparent calculations to support a tax return. And this is just the beginning…we have some exciting things on our roadmap and look forward to sharing them very soon!”
Fifty-two percent of accountants expect their firms to shrink in headcount by 20% in the next five years, according to a new report.
The Indiana CPA Society, in collaboration with CPA Crossings, released today a 2025 Workforce Transformation report. Paradoxically, while it found that most respondents anticipate their firms to reduce headcount, 75% said that their firms will need the same amount or more staff to meet future client demand.
Sixty percent of respondents said that entry-level professionals are the role they anticipate needing fewer employees in the future due to automation. Nearly half as many responded saying experienced professionals (approximately 33%) and manager-level roles (approximately 25%).
The report highlights the weaknesses of the pyramid-shaped practice structure that is the basis for most firm’s current talent management and workforce development systems. One challenge is the pyramid’s low retention design.
“The pyramid practice structure was not designed to retain staff. It actually does the opposite. Upward mobility is statistically difficult to attain,” the report reads. “Firms have a lot of requirements for entry-level staff, but there is a lot less need for experienced staff. Firms eventually have a lot of entry-level professionals qualified to become experienced staff but only a few openings. It only gets more difficult as staff try to move from experienced staff to managers. For those who want to move from managers to owners, the wait could be 15 years or more — or maybe never.”
The report discussed the dwindling pipeline of incoming talent, saying, “Currently, there are not enough qualified staff to maintain a bottom layer that is wide enough,” and generational preferences, saying, “Gen Zers are looking for meaning and emotional connection. If they cannot find these connections in their work, it won’t take much for them to decide to move on.”
The final weakness of the pyramid model the report highlighted was advances in technology, particularly automation and artificial intelligence.
“Advances in technology, especially with automation and artificial intelligence, could obliterate the work being done by the bottom of the pyramid,” the report reads. “This impact is beginning to be seen in accounting firms across the country as manual and time-consuming data entry and reconciliation tasks, once assigned to entry-level staff, are being automated. Firms are already seeing great benefits from this transfer, such as faster and more accurate data processing.”
The report suggests that firms take on a new practice structure that focuses on precision hiring, proactive retention, practical technology implementation, pricing expertise, practice area expansion or focus, and people acceleration.
Senate Republicans intend to propose revised tax and health-care provisions to President Donald Trump’s $3 trillion signature economic package this week, shrugging off condemnations of the legislation by Elon Musk as they rush to enact it before July 4.
The Senate Finance Committee’s plan to extract savings from the Medicaid and — perhaps — Medicare health insurance programs could depart in key respects from the version of the giant bill that narrowly passed the US House in May. The release of the panel’s draft will likely touch off a new round of wrangling between fiscal conservatives and moderates.
As the debate unfolds, businesses in the energy, health care, manufacturing and financial services industries will be watching closely.
SALT dilemma
A crucial decision for Majority Leader John Thune, Committee Chairman Mike Crapo and other panel members will be how to handle the $40,000 limit on state and local tax deductions that was crucial to passage of the bill in the House.
Senate Republicans want to scale back the $350 billion cost of increasing the cap from $10,000 to $40,000 for those making less than $500,000.
House Speaker Mike Johnson and a group of Republican members from high-tax states have warned that any diminishing of the SALT cap would doom the measure when it comes back to the House for a final vote. At the same time, so-called pass-through businesses in the service sector are pushing to remove a provision in the House bill that limits their ability to claim SALT deductions.
The Senate Finance Committee is widely expected to propose extending three business tax breaks that expire after 2029 in the House version to order to make them permanent. They are the research and development deduction, the ability to use depreciation and amortization as the basis for interest expensing and 100% bonus depreciation of certain property, including most machinery and factories.
Manufacturers and banks are particularly eager to see all of them extended.
To pay for the items, which most economists rank as the most pro-growth in the overall tax bill, senators may restrict temporary breaks on tips and overtime, which Trump campaigned on during last year’s election in appeals to restaurant and hospitality workers. The White House wants to keep those provisions as is.
White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett said Trump “supports changing” the SALT deduction and it’s up to lawmakers to reach a consensus.
“It’s a horse trading issue with the Senate and the House,” Hassett said Sunday on CBS’s Face the Nation. “The one thing we need and the president wants is a bill that passes, and passes on the Fourth of July.”
The committee will also face tough decisions on green energy tax credits. Scaling those back generates nearly $600 billion in savings in the House bill.
On Friday, rival House factions released dueling statements.
The conservative House Freedom Caucus warned that any move to restore some of the credits would prompt its members to vote against the bill. “We want to be crystal clear: If the Senate attempts to water down, strip out, or walk back the hard-fought spending reductions and IRA Green New Scam rollbacks achieved in this legislation, we will not accept it,” the group said.
In contrast, a group of 13 Republican moderates, led by Pennsylvania’s Brian Fitzpatrick and Virginia’s Jen Kiggans, urged senators to make changes that would benefit renewable energy projects, many in Republican districts, that came about through President Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act.
“We remain deeply concerned by several provisions, including those which would abruptly terminate several credits just 60 days after enactment for projects that have not yet begun construction,” the lawmakers said in a letter to the Senate.
Banks are especially interested to ensure that tax credits on their balance sheets as part of renewable energy financing aren’t rendered worthless by the bill.
Health-care perils
Medicaid and Medicare cuts present the most daunting challenge in the committee’s draft. While Republicans are generally in favor of new work requirements for able-bodied adults to be insured by Medicaid, some moderates like Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska have expressed concern over giving states just a year and a half to implement the requirement.
Senator Lisa Murkowski House provisions instituting new co-pays for Medicaid recipients and limits on the ability of states to tax Medicaid providers in order to increase federal reimbursement payments are more disputed.
Senators Josh Hawley of Missouri and Jim Justice of West Virginia have said they oppose these changes.
To find savings to make up for removing these provisions, Republicans said last week that they are examining whether to put new restrictions on billing practices in Medicare Advantage. Large health insurers that provide those plans would be most affected by such changes.
Yet overall, GOP leaders say the tax bill remains on schedule and they expect much of the House bill to remain intact.
The Senate’s rules-keeper is in the process of deciding whether some provisions are not primarily fiscal in nature. Provisions that restrict state regulations on artificial intelligence, ending some gun regulations and putting new limits on federal courts are seen as most vulnerable to being stripped under Senate budget rules.
Lawmakers are largely taking their cues from Trump and sticking by the $3 trillion bill at the center of the White House’s economic agenda.
Musk, the biggest political donor of the 2024 campaign, has threatened to help defeat anyone who votes for the legislation, but lawmakers seem to agree that staying in the president’s good graces is the safer path to political survival.
“We are already pretty far down the trail,” Thune told reporters on Thursday afternoon as his colleagues left for the weekend.