Connect with us

Accounting

CAS needs to include client education

Published

on

Firms are hoping to develop enduring client relationships and increase profit by providing client advisory services. To increase the chance of success, there’s a critical piece that needs to be included with those services — client education. 

The amount of value clients receive from CAS offerings is diminished when the client doesn’t understand “the language of business.” Think about the times when someone in a different industry explained a totally foreign concept to you. It likely made sense if they explained it in lay terms. But did you understand it? Probably not. I call it the bobblehead doll syndrome. It’s the same thing with your clients — they hear what you’re saying, but can’t operationalize the guidance because they don’t understand it. 

What do I mean by “client education?” At a minimum, firms should provide basic financial and managerial accounting education — enough for clients to thoroughly understand their own business. 

Business doesn’t operate in a vacuum, so other beneficial offerings could include:

  • Organizational theory/development/structure/culture; 
  • Decision-making, planning, and strategy;
  • External analysis (Porter’s 5 Forces);
  • Governance, ethics, fraud prevention; and,
  • ESG (Scope 3 reporting)

Education can be an e-newsletter, micro-learning, industry-specific training or a series of self-study short courses. Your client education program can be customized in a variety of ways. 
Here are five reasons for adding client education to CAS:

  1. Clients don’t understand accounting and other essential business concepts well enough, which dilutes the value of the services you’re providing. If they don’t see the value of your services, they’re less likely to retain them long-term. 
  2. When clients leverage business knowledge that you provided to grow and become more profitable, the firm wins because the client needs and wants more of your services. 
  3. Implementing client education differentiates you from the competition. 
  4. Firm staff can simultaneously refresh or grow their knowledge of key business concepts. Use the program to enhance and supplement leadership development training.  
  5. If CPA firms don’t educate clients, someone else will. Upskilling is in high demand. Technology will replace a lot over the coming years, but not the need to understand the fundamentals. 

It takes commitment and planning to get client education up and running, but the annual cost can be less than one staff accountant. 
Don’t sell the basic education — include it in your pricing. More in-depth education is beneficial enough to warrant a fee. Many fundamental accounting and management lessons are static (the basic accounting equation has been around since 1494), and easy to reuse. Done correctly, firms can provide a wealth of targeted, custom education to clients and staff for less than the monthly cost per person of the more popular learning subscriptions. Those tools are great (and profitable!), but they can be overwhelming and frustrating. Clients don’t know what they need to learn or where to start. There’re so many options that it can be difficult to find exactly what you need. Firm provided client education is a more personalized, boutique solution. 

I’ve worked in and around accounting long enough to remember CPA firms offering outsourced and back-office type services in the past. It sounds great, but clients who use these services can be messy, inefficient, and time consuming. Engagements that should be profitable become more of a hassle than they’re worth. Unwinding the services is an expensive waste of finite resources, and not a good look for the firm. A small investment in client education reduces time spent on clients, bridges critical knowledge gaps, and helps ensure long-term viability. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending