Connect with us

Accounting

CFOs plan to cut jobs, overhead with AI, but not revenues

Published

on

Chief financial officers hope to control costs in 2026 while still expanding revenue, according to a new survey.

The survey, released last week by Gartner, indicated CFOs are entering the 2026 budget cycle with the goal of balancing their companies’ growth ambitions with disciplined cost management amid economic uncertainty.

Gartner polled a group of 142 CFOs and senior finance leaders in August and September and found 64% of them are planning for their selling, general and administrative budgets to grow more slowly next year than their 2026 revenue growth rate. Over half (54%) of the respondents anticipate SG&A growth to be one to five percentage points below revenue growth, pointing to a strong intention to contain overhead costs while still striving for revenue expansion.

chart visualization

“CFOs are signaling that operational efficiency, not just revenue growth, will define success in the coming year,” said Randeep Rathindran, distinguished vice president of research in the Gartner finance practice, in a statement. “A focus on SG&A discipline reflects a concerted effort to right size overheads even as organizations pursue top-line expansion.”

CFOs are leveraging SG&A expense discipline as their main lever to drive operating expense savings and are setting explicit operating expense savings targets. While 37% of CFOs are aiming for modest OPEX savings of 1% to 2%, a slightly larger share, 42%, is pursuing more substantial savings of 3% to 5% of overall OPEX. CFOs are calibrating their approach, trying for incremental cost containment that preserves essential capabilities and drives productivity improvements, as opposed to implementing broad, across-the-board cuts, 

CFOs are focusing their SG&A reductions on functions where technology, automation or process redesign can lead to efficiency gains. The most cited areas by the respondents for budget reductions next year include:

  • Human resources (57%);
  • Corporate IT (53%);
  • Legal and compliance (40%);
  • Corporate finance (36%); and,
  • Marketing (27%).

These priorities indicate an increasing willingness to re-examine their traditional support functions while mulling more conservative hiring plans and AI-driven transformation. The increased use of artificial intelligence will likely result in job losses, as 42% of CFOs anticipate some level of AI-driven headcount reduction across SG&A or support functions, with 33% expecting reductions between 1% to 5%. These modest headcount reduction assumptions are expected given AI’s improving effectiveness at performing rule-based and judgment-based SG&A work.

Aside from SG&A, CFOs are planning to leverage product-mix optimization and headcount discipline to protect profit margins despite increasing costs. For next year, 51% of CFOs expect the contribution margin for core products or services to increase, and 44% anticipate a shift of one to five percentage points toward higher-margin offerings in their product mix. This indicates a deliberate effort to protect profitability through product mix optimization instead of relying on cost-cutting alone.

CFOs are also assuming personnel costs will increase in 2026. Nearly half of organizations anticipate a year-over-year increase in direct labor rates of over 4%, given labor scarcity and stricter enforcement of immigration restrictions in the U.S., for example. Close to three out of four CFOs assume annual average merit increases of 3% in workforce compensation.

Even though financial leaders are staying cautious about overall headcount increases at their organizations next year, they’re also counting on the likelihood of bigger costs for salaries and third-party spending, adding to the pressure of achieving better operational efficiency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending