Connect with us

Accounting

Charitable deduction gets caps, floors and haircuts in OBBBA

Published

on

Just in time for Giving Tuesday, there’s some good news for charities. The tax deduction for charitable giving is undergoing some changes next year thanks to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, with a new above-the-line deduction for cash donations that may encourage some donations, but also new caps and limits that may discourage others.

For tax years starting after Dec. 31, 2025, there’s a $1,000 above-the-line deduction for single filers, or $2,000 for married couples filing jointly, who don’t itemize. However, the provision isn’t indexed for inflation and it’s not available for donor-advised funds or private foundations, or for those who itemize. 

For those who do itemize, there’s a deduction floor allowing itemizers to only deduct 0.5% of their adjusted gross income. For taxpayers in the highest tax bracket of 37%, there’s also a deduction cap, capping the value of all itemized deductions, including charitable contributions, at 35%. However, the OBBBA’s “haircuts” on SALT and charitable deductions can result in both constraints and opportunities.

“With these new charitable deduction limitations, when you stack them on top of the new overall limitation on itemized deductions, it really makes sense for people to evaluate their charitable giving before the end of this year,” said Damien Martin, a partner in EY’s private tax and financial services organization. “All things being equal, you’re maybe better off doing next year’s giving this year from a tax deduction standpoint.”

He noted that the limitation on the percentage of one’s income that can qualify for a charitable deduction is changing. “There’s a limitation that we’ve always had around percentage of your modified adjusted gross income that you can give away and be able to get a charitable deduction in any given year,” said Martin. “That percentage for cash to 501(c)3 organizations is 60% of your income since the change in the tax law. It would have gone back down to 50%. All that means is you just carry forward the excess for a couple years, five to be specific, but you would eventually get it another year. That’s beneficial. The other thing they did is they said, if you aren’t itemizing your deductions, we’ll allow you an above the line deduction for $1,000, or $2,000 married filing joint, as a charitable contribution deduction, even if you don’t itemize, which is beneficial.”

For those who do itemize deductions, there are also changes. “Effective next year, in 2026, there’s a floor similar to what we have for medical, where you have a percentage of income that you have to exceed before you get the benefit of a deduction for that amount,” said Martin. “It’s 0.5% of AGI is the limit, or the floor. For example, if I have a million dollars of income, the first $5,000 that I get for the charitable contribution, if I’m itemizing my deductions, will now be nondeductible, so I lose that $5,000 deduction.”

Another change involves a kind of “haircut.”  “The other thing that happens is, to the extent that you are in the top tax bracket, there’s now going to be a new overall limitation on itemized deductions, which is similar to the Pease limitation that we previously had before the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act,” said Martin. “There’s a limitation that would kick in and limit the overall amount of all your itemized deductions. Well, that limitation’s formally gone. Basically 5.14% is the haircut that you get.”

Taxpayers may want to evaluate their long-term philanthropy planning and accelerate some of their charitable giving for 2025 if necessary. One strategy is to bunch deductions by itemizing several years’ worth of charitable contributions into one year, and then taking the standard deduction in the other years.

“With the charitable giving changes that are going into effect next year, depending on the taxpayer situation, they’re either going to be helpful and beneficial or they’ll be harmful,” said. Brian Schultz, leader of the Plante Moran Wealth Management tax practice. “Whether someone falls in camp A or camp B depends on their situation. They’ve now brought back this above the line deduction for charitable contributions, so even if someone does not itemize, they can still at least get a deduction for charitable contributions they’re making. And the maximum limit of that is $1,000 per single filer, or $2,000 for married filing joint. That’s going into effect next year.”

He also pointed to new restrictions for those who do itemize, either on how much of your charitable contributions you can still deduct, or the maximum value that they can provide to you tax wise. “In 2026 they have instituted a brand new adjusted gross income floor, so the first one half of 1% of your income worth of charitable contributions, you’ll no longer be able to benefit from starting in 2026,” said Schultz. “So if I have a $500,000 adjusted gross income, then the first $2,500 of charity that I make donations, I will not get a tax benefit for. That’s harmful if someone itemizes and they’re given to charity. And then the other restriction for charitable is they implemented a restriction on the maximum tax savings you can get from your charity. So the top tax rate was extended. It’s still 37% for federal taxes for ordinary income, but the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act basically capped the maximum tax savings you get for charitable contributions to 35%. So depending on someone’s situation, they could get kind of double restricted. They could lose some of their charitable deductions next year because of the AGI floor, and then also the deductions to charity.” 

He noted that the maximum tax savings could be reduced as well. “For year end, if I don’t expect to itemize my deductions in 2025 and 2026 and I’m making charitable contributions, it may be beneficial if I’m looking to make some donations before year end, that instead of making those at the end of December, I might wait till the very beginning of January, wait a couple weeks, push those donations into early 2026 so they help me qualify for the $1,000 or $2,000 deduction I can take, even if I don’t itemize next year for charity,” said Schultz. “For clients that could be harmed by the AGI limitation or that maximum 35% tax savings, they probably have a strong incentive to look to accelerate some charitable contributions and make them before the end of this year, because those two changes that would hurt the tax benefit for charitable don’t kick in until 2026.”

For clients who don’t want to double the amount of their donations to charity, but still want to get the charitable deduction for 2025 and support those charities in 2026, they may want to contribute to a donor advised fund. 

“We’re seeing our clients contemplating creating a donor-advised fund, or contributing additional assets to an existing donor-advised fund by year end,” said Schultz. “That way they get the deduction when those donations go into the donor advised fund, they might dole those proceeds out throughout the year in 2026 because that might be more consistent with their typical giving schedule, you know, to the charities that they care to support. So depending on where they fall, they might want to really make a concerted effort to accelerate charity before yearend, or maybe postpone. It just depends on which of those tax rules might be most relevant to them.” 

There are changes for corporate philanthropy side as well as individuals. “The OBBBA has given and taken away at the same time in my opinion,” said Joe Phoenix, co-founder and CEO of Givinga, a financial technology company. “The new law is affecting how corporations give money away. It’s affecting how individuals give money away. The giving side of the OBBBA is against people who are not itemizing. For the first time ever, they now have the ability to take a universal deduction against contributions of either $1,000 or $2,000, depending on whether they’re filing individually or jointly. That’s a net positive for the charitable world. On the individual side, there’s a new half percent floor that people are trying to figure out, and there’s a new corporate floor of 1% that the markets are trying to figure out. Initially, when you look at something, that feels like a negative. I think that it’s more of an annoyance than really a negative. It’s a new law. People are going to have to calculate things. But in the grand scheme of how companies and individuals give, it’s almost a rounding error in their overall calculations, but it’s something that they’ll have to start thinking about.” 

He too sees advantages in donor advised funds this year. “The donor advised fund plays a very prominent role, specifically in 2025 because it allows people to take advantage of the existing tax laws and bunch a bunch of years forward and put it in a vehicle that allows them to carry that forward and use that throughout multiple years in the future,” said Phoenix. “Donor advised funds also give you the advantage of being able to take securities that are appreciated and donate those as well, so there’s huge tax advantages for individuals to act now as they’re assessing what’s going to happen in 2026.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending