Connect with us

Economics

Checks and Balance newsletter: Joe Biden’s state-of-the-union speech

Published

on

This is the introduction to Checks and Balance, a weekly, subscriber-only newsletter bringing exclusive insight from our correspondents in America.

Joe Biden delivered a party-convention (state-of-the-union) speech, writes James Bennet, our Lexington columnist

No one got whacked over the head with a cane, but in other respects Joe Biden’s state-of-the-union speech proved to be one of those moments in which I found myself wondering if American politics is returning to its 19th-century mores—thanks in part to social media and other 21st-century technology. The Progressive era introduced institutions that restrained some of the excesses of partisanship, such as the civil service. It also inculcated ideals of bipartisanship and decorum that are now fading away. They may have been debts vice was paying to virtue—even at its most seemingly decorous, politics is always a rough business—but I think we will miss them if they truly disappear. 

It is a bit melancholy that Mr Biden, with his veneration for the rites of Washington, would find himself compelled to deliver a state-of-the-union address that was in many respects more like a party-convention speech. But this has been coming for years, since even before a Republican congressman shouted “You lie” at President Barack Obama in 2009 during an address to a joint session of Congress. The next year, in a state-of-the-union speech, Mr Obama took the extraordinary step of chiding the Supreme Court, for a decision related to campaign finance—precedent for the shot Mr Biden took Thursday night at the justices for overturning Roe v Wade. In 2020 Nancy Pelosi, then speaker of the House, theatrically tore apart her copy of President Donald Trump’s speech after he finished delivering it.

Mr Trump, with his contempt for what he sees as the pretences of a cynical, transactional business, accelerated the trend towards open partisanship in all aspects of governing. The clownish displays by his minions in the House chamber on Thursday night, with their heckling and their MAGA hats or t-shirts, undermined the subsequent pious outrage of Republicans over Mr Biden’s politicking. 

It is an axiom of American politics that presidential elections are a referendum on the incumbent. But in this campaign Americans have a choice between two presidents, neither of whom they much like. For each man the path to a second term lies through negative partisanship, ie, persuading voters that the other guy is worse. It will be a brutal campaign. 

And that made the more humane moments in the House chamber on Thursday night seem all the more precious, even if they were flashes of old-style senatorial clubbiness. “I know you don’t want to hear any more, Lindsey, but I gotta say a few more things,” Mr Biden said towards the end of his speech, singling out Lindsey Graham, a senator from South Carolina. Mr Graham has remade himself as an acolyte of Mr Trump, but, clearly delighted by the presidential attention, he roared with laughter. 

And Mr Biden drew his most powerful contrast with Mr Trump by closing on a high note. It is another axiom of American politics that presidential campaigns are about the future, and Mr Biden is out to paint Mr Trump as obsessed with grievances from his past. Mr Biden’s refrain at the end of the speech became “I see a future,” as he envisioned more freedom, fairer taxation, less gun violence. “I see a future for all Americans,” he said, and—the partisanship of his speech notwithstanding—he added, “I will always be a president for all Americans.”

Economics

Checks and Balance newsletter: The journalist’s dilemma of covering Trump

Published

on

Checks and Balance newsletter: The journalist’s dilemma of covering Trump

Continue Reading

Economics

Germany’s election will usher in new leadership — but might not change its economy

Published

on

Production at the VW plant in Emden.

Sina Schuldt | Picture Alliance | Getty Images

The struggling German economy has been a major talking point among critics of Chancellor Olaf Scholz’ government during the latest election campaign — but analysts warn a new leadership might not turn these tides.

As voters prepare to head to the polls, it is now all but certain that Germany will soon have a new chancellor. The Christian Democratic Union’s Friedrich Merz is the firm favorite.

Merz has not shied away from blasting Scholz’s economic policies and from linking them to the lackluster state of Europe’s largest economy. He argues that a government under his leadership would give the economy the boost it needs.

Experts speaking to CNBC were less sure.

“There is a high risk that Germany will get a refurbished economic model after the elections, but not a brand new model that makes the competition jealous,” Carsten Brzeski, global head of macro at ING, told CNBC.

The CDU/CSU economic agenda

The CDU, which on a federal level ties up with regional sister party the Christian Social Union, is running on a “typical economic conservative program,” Brzeski said.

It includes income and corporate tax cuts, fewer subsidies and less bureaucracy, changes to social benefits, deregulation, support for innovation, start-ups and artificial intelligence and boosting investment among other policies, according to CDU/CSU campaigners.

“The weak parts of the positions are that the CDU/CSU is not very precise on how it wants to increase investments in infrastructure, digitalization and education. The intention is there, but the details are not,” Brzeski said, noting that the union appears to be aiming to revive Germany’s economic model without fully overhauling it.

“It is still a reform program which pretends that change can happen without pain,” he said.

Geraldine Dany-Knedlik, head of forecasting at research institute DIW Berlin, noted that the CDU is also looking to reach gross domestic product growth of around 2% again through its fiscal and economic program called “Agenda 2030.”

But reaching such levels of economic expansion in Germany “seems unrealistic,” not just temporarily, but also in the long run, she told CNBC.

Germany’s GDP declined in both 2023 and 2024. Recent quarterly growth readings have also been teetering on the verge of a technical recession, which has so far been narrowly avoided. The German economy shrank by 0.2% in the fourth quarter, compared with the previous three-month stretch, according to the latest reading.

Europe’s largest economy faces pressure in key industries like the auto sector, issues with infrastructure like the country’s rail network and a housebuilding crisis.

Dany-Knedlik also flagged the so-called debt brake, a long-standing fiscal rule that is enshrined in Germany’s constitution, which limits the size of the structural budget deficit and how much debt the government can take on.

Whether or not the clause should be overhauled has been a big part of the fiscal debate ahead of the election. While the CDU ideally does not want to change the debt brake, Merz has said that he may be open to some reform.

“To increase growth prospects substantially without increasing debt also seems rather unlikely,” DIW’s Dany-Knedlik said, adding that, if public investments were to rise within the limits of the debt brake, significant tax increases would be unavoidable.

“Taking into account that a 2 Percent growth target is to be reached within a 4 year legislation period, the Agenda 2030 in combination with conservatives attitude towards the debt break to me reads more of a wish list than a straight forward economic growth program,” she said.

Change in German government will deliver economic success, says CEO of German employers association

Franziska Palmas, senior Europe economist at Capital Economics, sees some benefits to the plans of the CDU-CSU union, saying they would likely “be positive” for the economy, but warning that the resulting boost would be small.

“Tax cuts would support consumer spending and private investment, but weak sentiment means consumers may save a significant share of their additional after-tax income and firms may be reluctant to invest,” she told CNBC.  

Palmas nevertheless pointed out that not everyone would come away a winner from the new policies. Income tax cuts would benefit middle- and higher-income households more than those with a lower income, who would also be affected by potential reductions of social benefits.

Coalition talks ahead

Following the Sunday election, the CDU/CSU will almost certainly be left to find a coalition partner to form a majority government, with the Social Democratic Party or the Green party emerging as the likeliest candidates.

The parties will need to broker a coalition agreement outlining their joint goals, including on the economy — which could prove to be a difficult undertaking, Capital Economics’ Palmas said.

“The CDU and the SPD and Greens have significantly different economic policy positions,” she said, pointing to discrepancies over taxes and regulation. While the CDU/CSU want to reduce both items, the SPD and Greens seek to raise taxes and oppose deregulation in at least some areas, Palmas explained.

The group is nevertheless likely to hold the power in any potential negotiations as it will likely have their choice between partnering with the SPD or Greens.

“Accordingly, we suspect that the coalition agreement will include most of the CDU’s main economic proposals,” she said.

Germany is 'lacking ambition,' investor says

Continue Reading

Economics

DOGE attacks a bastion of Republican internationalism

Published

on

Elon Musk has joined a war of ideas under the guise of a budget fight

Continue Reading

Trending