Connect with us

Accounting

Chicago passes 2025 budget without property tax hike

Published

on

The Chicago City Council approved an approximately $17 billion budget for 2025 that raises levies and fees by more than $180 million after Mayor Brandon Johnson removed his proposed property tax hike. 

The spending plan comes after weeks of contentious talks between the Johnson administration and aldermen over how to close a nearly $1 billion deficit with higher taxes or cuts. The depth of disagreements had raised concerns about whether a budget would pass by the Dec. 31 statutory deadline. The budget passed 27 to 23 on Monday.

“I know this was a long and arduous process,” Johnson said in remarks in the council chamber after the votes. “The budget we passed today is yet another down payment on securing a better, stronger and a much safer future for the people of this fine city.”

To win approval, the first-term progressive mayor had to revise his plan amid vigorous pushback from council members. His original proposal in October included a $300-million property-tax increase that aldermen unanimously rejected. He scaled that down before nixing it completely to get enough support for passage. 

The spending plan won approval after Johnson and his team used a series of piecemeal items, including other taxes and fees to fill the nearly $1 billion deficit in the city’s more than $5 billion operating fund, known as the corporate fund. That fund pays for public safety, streets and sanitation among other services. The revenue measure also includes $128 million from higher cloud computing levies. 

Before the vote, Alderman Carlos Ramirez-Rosa, an ally of Johnson, said he supported the budget. He highlighted the critical investments in youth employment and mental health services as well as the supplemental pension payment.

Johnson’s budget uses about $54 million in savings from a municipal-bond refinancing earlier this month to help plug the deficit. While officials had considered using those funds to repay debt related to a loan for the 2009 purchase of the former Michael Reese Hospital, the city is now deferring that repayment.

The revised budget also cut vacant positions including positions in the mayor’s office. The budget passed even though some city council members complained about the lack of cuts and transparency. Chicago’s business community has voiced opposition to tax levies as they fear any hikes will curb economic growth and further raise the cost of living in the third-largest U.S. city.

“We cannot continue to spend beyond our means, but we do,” Alderman Marty Quinn said before the vote. “While there’s no longer a property tax increase on the table, there are a number of nickel and dime revenue generators.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Business Transaction Recording For Financial Success

Published

on

Business Transaction Recording For Financial Success

In the world of financial management, accurate transaction recording is much more than a routine task—it is the foundation of fiscal integrity, operational transparency, and informed decision-making. By maintaining meticulous records, businesses ensure their financial ecosystem remains robust and reliable. This article explores the essential practices for precise transaction recording and its critical role in driving business success.

The Importance of Detailed Transaction Recording
At the heart of accurate financial management is detailed transaction recording. Each transaction must include not only the monetary amount but also its nature, the parties involved, and the exact date and time. This level of detail creates a comprehensive audit trail that supports financial analysis, regulatory compliance, and future decision-making. Proper documentation also ensures that stakeholders have a clear and trustworthy view of an organization’s financial health.

Establishing a Robust Chart of Accounts
A well-organized chart of accounts is fundamental to accurate transaction recording. This structured framework categorizes financial activities into meaningful groups, enabling businesses to track income, expenses, assets, and liabilities consistently. Regularly reviewing and updating the chart of accounts ensures it stays relevant as the business evolves, allowing for meaningful comparisons and trend analysis over time.

Leveraging Modern Accounting Software
Advanced accounting software has revolutionized how businesses handle transaction recording. These tools automate repetitive tasks like data entry, synchronize transactions in real-time with bank feeds, and perform validation checks to minimize errors. Features such as cloud integration and customizable reports make these platforms invaluable for maintaining accurate, accessible, and up-to-date financial records.

The Power of Double-Entry Bookkeeping
Double-entry bookkeeping remains a cornerstone of precise transaction management. By ensuring every transaction affects at least two accounts, this system inherently checks for errors and maintains balance within the financial records. For example, recording both a debit and a credit ensures that discrepancies are caught early, providing a reliable framework for accurate reporting.

The Role of Timely Documentation
Prompt transaction recording is another critical factor in financial accuracy. Delays in documentation can lead to missing or incorrect entries, which may skew financial reports and complicate decision-making. A culture that prioritizes timely and accurate record-keeping ensures that a company always has real-time insights into its financial position, helping it adapt to changing conditions quickly.

Regular Reconciliation for Financial Integrity
Periodic reconciliations act as a vital checkpoint in transaction recording. Whether conducted daily, weekly, or monthly, these reviews compare recorded transactions with external records, such as bank statements, to identify discrepancies. Early detection of errors ensures that records remain accurate and that the company’s financial statements are trustworthy.

Conclusion
Mastering the art of accurate transaction recording is far more than a compliance requirement—it is a strategic necessity. By implementing detailed recording practices, leveraging advanced technology, and adhering to time-tested principles like double-entry bookkeeping, businesses can ensure financial transparency and operational efficiency. For finance professionals and business leaders, precise transaction recording is the bedrock of informed decision-making, stakeholder confidence, and long-term success.

With these strategies, businesses can build a reliable financial foundation that supports growth, resilience, and the ability to navigate an ever-changing economic landscape.

Continue Reading

Accounting

IRS to test faster dispute resolution

Published

on

Easing restrictions, sharpening personal attention and clarifying denials are among the aims of three pilot programs at the Internal Revenue Service that will test changes to existing alternative dispute resolution programs. 

The programs focus on “fast track settlement,” which allows IRS Appeals to mediate disputes between a taxpayer and the IRS while the case is still within the jurisdiction of the examination function, and post-appeals mediation, in which a mediator is introduced to help foster a settlement between Appeals and the taxpayer.

The IRS has been revitalizing existing ADR programs as part of transformation efforts of the agency’s new strategic plan, said Elizabeth Askey, chief of the IRS Independent Office of Appeals.

IRS headquarters in Washington, D.C.

“By increasing awareness, changing and revitalizing existing programs and piloting new approaches, we hope to make our ADR programs, such as fast-track settlement and post-appeals mediation, more attractive and accessible for all eligible parties,” said Michael Baillif, director of Appeals’ ADR Program Management Office. 

Among other improvements, the pilots: 

  • Align the Large Business and International, Small Business and Self-Employed and Tax Exempt and Government Entities divisions in offering FTS issue by issue. Previously, if a taxpayer had one issue ineligible for FTS, the entire case was ineligible. 
  • Provide that requests to participate in FTS and PAM will not be denied without the approval of a first-line executive. 
  • Clarify that taxpayers receive an explanation when requests for FTS or PAM are denied.

Another pilot, Last Chance FTS, is a limited scope SB/SE pilot in which Appeals will call taxpayers or their representatives after a protest is filed in response to a 30-day or equivalent letter to inform taxpayers about the potential application of FTS. This pilot will not impact eligibility for FTS but will simply test the awareness of taxpayers regarding the availability of FTS. 

A final pilot removes the limitation that participation in FTS would preclude eligibility for PAM. 

The traditional appeals process remains available for all taxpayers. 

Inquiries can be addressed to the ADR Program Management Office at [email protected].

Continue Reading

Accounting

IRS revises guidance on residential clean energy credits

Published

on

The Internal Revenue Service has updated and added new guidance for taxpayers claiming the Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit and the Residential Clean Energy Property Credit.

The updated Fact Sheet 2025-01 includes a set of frequently asked questions and answers, superseding the fact sheet from last April. The IRS noted that the updates include substantial changes.

New sections have been added on how long a taxpayer has to claim the tax credits, guidance for condominium and co-op owners, whether taxpayers who did not previously claim the credit can file an amended return to claim it, and a series of questions on qualified manufacturers and product identification numbers. Other material has been added on how to claim the credits, what kind of records a taxpayer has to keep for claiming the credit, and for how long, and whether taxpayers can include financing costs such as interest payments in determining the amount of the credit.

The IRS states that “financing costs such as interest, as well as other miscellaneous costs such as origination fees and the cost of an extended warranty, are not eligible expenditures for purposes of the credit.” 

Continue Reading

Trending