If you want to access investments typically reserved for the wealthy, regulators may someday let you — provided you can pass a test.
That in itself may not be easy, considering that many consumers can’t pass a basic financial literacy quiz. But coming up with an exam that helps protect investors is also more difficult than it sounds, experts say.
Lawmakers and regulators have for years kicked around the idea of a knowledge test to become a so-called accredited investor. Accredited investors are allowed to invest in a wider range of assets, including pre-IPO companies, private credit and equity, venture capital and hedge funds.
The latest effort, which the U.S. House of Representatives approved last month, proposeshaving the Securities and Exchange Commission devise a test to determine if an investor has the knowledge and sophistication to understand the valuation and risk of these investments.
It comes amid a broader push to make private-market assets — that is, investments that are not publicly traded — available to more investors.
Private-market investments can be debt or equity in early-stage companies or startups, or private equity deals. Private investors owned Figma before its IPO, for example. These types of investments may offer higher returns, experts say, but they are also higher risk.
The risks to investors can be systemic issues, like a lack of regulatory guardrails in private markets, and also unique to each individual. That’s hard to test for.
“The devil is in the details,” said James Andrus, a member of the SEC’s investor advisory committee. “It’s incredibly difficult to create such a test, and it’s unclear whether it offers substantial investor protection.”
How investors become accredited now
Currently, to qualify as accredited, investors generally need an annual earned income of $200,000 for individuals, or $300,000 for married couples. Individuals or couples can also qualify with a total net worth of at least $1 million, not including the value of their primary residence.
Those wealth test thresholds are not pegged to inflation and haven’t changed since they were first developed in the 1980s. As a result, more households have become accredited over the years as wealth and incomes grow.
Licensed investment professionals can also qualify as accredited, having passed either the Series 7, 65 or 82 exams. Those tests are aimed at ensuring professionals understand how to comply with securities laws and regulations.
Designing an investor test could be tricky
Financial advisors and other experts say a test for becoming an accredited investor would need to gauge understanding of different types of securities as well as the risks associated with private assets, including their limited liquidity and disclosures, subjective valuations and longer investment horizons.
“The test would essentially need to assess whether this person has that knowledge and understanding to manage investments that do not come with a layer of professional oversight or regulatory protections to rely on,” said Yanely Espinal, a director of educational outreach at Next Gen Personal Finance.
More from Your Money:
Here’s a look at more stories on how to manage, grow and protect your money for the years ahead.
Pre-IPO, venture capital deals typically require minimums that can reach six figures. So an understanding of diversification, risk and how this type of investment should fit into a portfolio should be required knowledge, experts say. But it could be difficult to test for that understanding, they say.
“We’ve been blessed with a lot of bull markets and high growth recently, but these things can go down and potentially default,” said certified financial planner Chelsea Ransom-Cooper, chief financial planning officer at Zenith Wealth Partners in Philadelphia. “I would just hope that whatever exams or structures are put in place are there to protect the end investor.”
Think about what it would mean to lose $20,00 in cash savings if your annual income is $80,610 (the median in the U.S.), said Espinal, a member of the CNBC Global Financial Wellness Advisory Board.
“That would represent nearly a quarter of your annual income being lost to one investment,” she said. “That’s drastic.”
Cryptocurrency adds another wrinkle. Crypto and private market assets are both considered alternative investments, and having a test for one but not the other may offer mixed messages for investors.
“You cannot invest in a real company that happens to be private, but you can invest in something equally risky, crypto, because you don’t have the same accredited investor requirement,” said Andrus.
Even basic financial literacy quizzes stump many
Depending on how it’s written, an SEC knowledge test on private markets could be challenging for many people, if broader financial literacy tests are any indication.
Take the FINRA Investor Education Foundation, which has a seven-question financial knowledge multiple-choice quiz, with questions about “fundamental concepts” including interest rates, inflation, debt and risk. More than 25,000 U.S. adults took the quiz as part of a broader financial capability study in 2024.
Only 4% of respondents answered all seven questions correctly. Less than half, 46%, answered at least four correctly, little changed from 2021.
For example, when asked what happens to bond prices when interest rates increase — do they rise, fall or stay the same? — 42% of respondents said they didn’t know, while another 33% answered incorrectly. The correct answer is fall.
Some accredited investors have ‘no freaking clue’
Even investors who already qualify as accredited could welcome, and benefit from, such a test, experts say.
“A lot of people with a lot of money do these deals and have no freaking clue what they’re getting into,” said Rich Diemer, the managing director of CAV Angels, a non-profit club housing an angel investment group catering to University of Virginia alumni. “They get in these deals because they know someone who’s in, or they know a group that’s in, or they heard of this unicorn or that unicorn.”
The CAV Angels club does a lot of work educating members, he said, helping them understand how to do due diligence and assess market potential, as well as what it takes to support an early-stage company. In the case of angel investing, companies often need additional funding.
“It’s not like a one-and-done thing, said Diemer. “It’s a nursing along an early-stage company to a point where they then get handed off to VCs [venture capital firms].”
Diemer said he supports the idea of a test to help younger people, who can demonstrate the knowledge but who haven’t built enough wealth, to qualify as accredited.
In the macroeconomic environment of late July 2026, personal cash management requires an active, structured approach to wealth preservation. With central bank benchmark rates remaining elevated to ensure long-term disinflation, conservative yield-bearing vehicles—such as short-term U.S. Treasury bills, money market funds, and high-yield savings accounts (HYSAs)—continue to offer reliable nominal returns between 4% and 5%. For individual investors, maximizing net returns requires moving beyond passive checking accounts and executing a disciplined cash laddering strategy.
Leaving substantial liquid capital in traditional bank deposits creates an invisible drag on personal net worth due to ongoing inflation. By implementing a tiered liquidity framework, individuals can split emergency cash reserves and short-term capital allocations across rolling maturities. Allocating cash into 4-week, 8-week, and 13-week Treasury bills creates a continuous cycle of maturing liquidity, allowing investors to continuously reinvest capital at prevailing market yields while maintaining immediate access to emergency funds.
Tax efficiency represents a critical dimension of high-yield cash optimization. For high-earning individuals residing in states with substantial local income taxes, direct holdings in short-term U.S. Treasury instruments often deliver superior net post-tax yields compared to standard commercial bank HYSAs. Because interest earned on federal Treasury bills is strictly exempt from state and local taxation, investors can retain a larger portion of their compounding interest gains without taking on additional credit or market risk.
Ultimately, personal wealth accumulation in mid-2026 relies on intentional capital deployment. Cash should be managed as a productive asset class that generates consistent, risk-free returns. Regularly auditing account yield terms, automating recurring transfers, and leveraging tax-advantaged fixed-income instruments ensures that personal liquidity remains fully optimized against macroeconomic fluctuations.
The personal finance industry in July 2026 is experiencing a technological evolution, driven by the wide deployment of next-generation algorithmic wealth management tools. Modern digital financial platforms have expanded far beyond basic automated index investing; today’s robo-advisors utilize real-time tax-loss harvesting, dynamic portfolio rebalancing, and hyper-personalized spending analysis to optimize retail investor outcomes. However, as these digital solutions become ubiquitous, investors face the crucial challenge of balancing automated execution with human strategic judgment.
The core advantage of automated financial planning platforms lies in their ability to remove emotional bias from investment execution. During periods of market volatility or localized sector realignments, automated algorithms systematically rebalance portfolios back to target asset allocations without falling victim to panic selling or speculative enthusiasm. Furthermore, integrated cash-flow monitoring algorithms analyze individual spending patterns in real time, automatically sweeping surplus income into designated retirement or debt-liquidation accounts to accelerate net worth accumulation.
Despite these operational advantages, algorithmic tools have inherent structural limitations when addressing complex, highly personalized financial life events. Decisions involving multi-generational estate planning, highly complex tax strategies, small business exits, or nuanced real estate transactions require contextual human judgment that software models cannot replicate. Relying solely on automated models without periodic human professional review can result in misaligned risk profiles or overlooked tax liabilities during major life transitions.
The optimal approach for personal financial planning in late 2026 is a hybrid advisory model. Individuals should utilize automated platforms for routine asset allocation, continuous tax optimization, and low-cost passive index tracking, while engaging qualified human financial advisors for periodic strategic planning, estate structuring, and qualitative risk evaluations. This dual approach ensures maximum cost efficiency and disciplined execution while retaining essential strategic guidance.
In the financial environment of mid-2026, personal cash management has re-emerged as a vital component of holistic wealth building. With central bank policy rates holding firm to maintain long-term price stability, yield-bearing instruments such as money market funds, high-yield savings accounts (HYSAs), and short-term Treasury bills continue to offer compounding returns around 4% to 5%. For individual investors, effectively structuring cash reserves requires shifting away from passive bank deposits toward active yield optimization.
A frequent pitfall in personal asset management is leaving substantial liquid capital in traditional checking or low-yield savings accounts, where real returns are continuously eroded by baseline inflation. By implementing a disciplined ‘cash ladder’ strategy—allocating liquid funds across tiered maturities using ultra-short Treasury instruments and FDIC-insured high-yield accounts—individuals can secure maximal yields while retaining immediate liquidity for emergency expenses or tactical investment opportunities.
Simultaneously, investors must evaluate the tax efficiency of their cash holdings based on their tax bracket and geographic location. For high earners situated in states with high local income taxes, direct holdings in short-term U.S. Treasury bills often yield a higher net post-tax return than standard high-yield savings accounts, as Treasury interest is strictly exempt from state and local taxation. Understanding these nuanced tax distinctions allows individuals to capture significant incremental gains without taking on additional market risk.
Ultimately, personal financial health in late 2026 hinges on intentional liquidity management. Cash reserves should not be viewed merely as static emergency funds, but as a dynamic asset class that contributes positively to net worth growth. Regularly auditing yield terms, automating cash transfers, and optimizing for post-tax efficiency ensures that personal capital remains fully productive across all economic conditions.