Connect with us

Accounting

CPA Success Index ranks top collegiate accounting programs

Published

on

The CPA Success Index was created in 2020 as a more comprehensive metric to evaluate how well collegiate accounting programs prepare students to pass all four sections of the CPA exam within the critical 18-month window. Unlike NASBA’s single-section pass rate, the CPA Success Index estimates students’ likelihood of completing the entire exam based on first-time section pass rates, adjusted for the 18-month timeframe. The CPA Success Index is computed using the number of sections candidates passed on the first attempt in the preceding 12 months, grossing up that value to 18 months using the school’s average first-time pass rate, and then dividing that value by the total number of sections, four.

Over the years, this index has become a trusted benchmark for identifying programs that consistently produce CPA-ready graduates. This updated ranking incorporates data from the 2023 edition of NASBA’s Candidate Performance on the Uniform CPA Examination book, which was released in late 2024. As with previous rankings, our analysis only reviews programs with greater than 20 candidates to ensure enough data points to adequately evaluate program performance. 

Current top 10 CPA Success Index rankings

Based on NASBA’s most recently reported data from 2023, the top 10 accounting programs in the CPA Success Index are:

  1. University of Northern Iowa – Success Index: 1.000 (51 candidates)
  2. Texas A&M University – Success Index: 0.802 (369 candidates)
  3. University of Texas – Austin – Success Index: 0.722 (340 candidates)
  4. University of Virginia – Success Index: 0.718 (71 candidates)
  5. Brigham Young University – Success Index: 0.716 (285 candidates)
  6. Washington and Lee University – Success Index: 0.716 (22 candidates)
  7. University of Wisconsin – Madison – Success Index: 0.688 (187 candidates)
  8. Baylor University – Success Index: 0.686 (240 candidates)
  9. University of Kansas – Success Index: 0.680 (134 candidates)
  10. Georgetown University – Success Index: 0.653 (27 candidates)

Programs with consistent success over time

When comparing the latest rankings to previous reports, several programs stand out for their consistent performance. These four programs appear in the Top 10 in each of our CPA Success Rankings: 

  • Texas A&M University: A recurring top performer, Texas A&M benefits from its five-year integrated Professional Program in Accounting. 
  • University of Texas – Austin: This program has consistently ranked among the top schools, reflecting its robust accounting curriculum and exam preparation. 
  • University of Northern Iowa: Northern Iowa offers a unique and integrated faculty-led and for-credit CPA review program. 
  • University of Kansas: Kansas demonstrates sustained excellence through integrated coursework and focused CPA exam strategies.

The CPA Success Index continues to highlight institutions that not only prepare students academically but also provide the necessary support to ensure they succeed in passing the CPA exam. These institutions serve as examples of how academic structure, focused preparation and student support can bridge the CPA gap and help graduates successfully navigate the CPA exam. The average CPA Success Index for the 529 universities with greater than 20 candidates is .33 (the index is .30 for all schools in the NASBA report). For prospective accounting students and employers, these rankings offer valuable insights into programs that deliver on their promise of CPA readiness. As the accounting profession continues to face workforce shortages, the success of candidates remains essential for addressing the CPA pipeline challenges of the future.

The top 40

To be consistent with NASBA’s annual ranking of the top 40 universities on the single-part pass rate, we list the top 40 schools for CPA success in the table for all programs with greater than 20 candidates and split by program size, medium and large.  

cpa-success-index-table-2024.png

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending