Connect with us

Accounting

Crunching the right numbers | Accounting Today

Published

on

Dobek on KPIs screen.jpg

Too many accounting firms are relying on outdated or inappropriate data to measure their success, and Sarah Dobek of Inovautus Consulting lays out a much more forward-looking set of data for them to work with.

Transcription:

Transcripts are generated using a combination of speech recognition software and human transcribers, and may contain errors. Please check the corresponding audio for the authoritative record.

Dan Hood (00:04):

Welcome to here with Accounting. Today, I’m editor-in-chief Dan Hood. How do you know if your firm is growing? Well, hopefully you’re measuring it — and you’re measuring the right things.

Here to talk about the key performance indicators that you should be looking at for growth is Sarah Dobek, the president and founder of Inovautus Consulting, a well-known consultant to accounting firms. Sarah, thanks for joining us.

Sarah Dobek (00:23):

Thanks Dan for having me.

Dan Hood (00:25):

Alright, well let’s just jump right in. Are they looking at the right KPIs, particularly for growth? There are other KPIs one might want to look at, but let’s talk specifically about the ones for growth. Are they looking at the right ones?

Sarah Dobek (00:35):

I think it depends on the firm. I would say that by and large, this is one of those things that firms evolve in. I think data has become much more important to accounting firms and the evolution of business intelligence, analytics and power bi. All of those things are enhancing this conversation, but I still think there’s a lot of room. So I think a lot of firms are still relying on historical information. What business did we close and where did our leads come from? If we’re even tracking that along with what I would call to be kind of historical and standard profitability metrics, like billable hours and realization. And I’m not going to say that those are wrong numbers. There’s a place for some of those numbers, but I think that if we’re looking at evaluating growth, there is a much larger spectrum of KPIs that firms should really be looking at today.

Dan Hood (01:31):

And it sounds like one of those things there is that they should be looking at current numbers as supposedly historical things. We’re talking more about a dashboard than about a report that you get out at the end of the month.

Sarah Dobek (01:41):

Yeah, I mean, absolutely. I mean, to some level, analytics are always going to be historical in nature, but if you can get them more real time, they become more valuable. I think part of the challenge is that we wait usually until the end of the year to look at our numbers, or many firms have historically done that or quarter end. And it’s hard to make changes when we start talking about growth if we don’t know where we’re going to be. And so being able to start to look at information that is more real time becomes really important. A question that we get all the time, we’re sitting in the middle of the year as we record this podcast. And a question I get, are we going to hit our numbers? Are we going to hit our growth goals for the year? And being able to answer that question is really important. Firm leadership because it impacts investments and staffing and so many other things. And so we can’t do that if we say, well, we got to wait till the end of the year and see what our billable numbers are at.

Dan Hood (02:38):

Yes, by that point it’s a little late. Well, let’s talk about, you’ve mentioned some of the numbers that might not be what they should be paying attention to. We’re not getting rid of them, we’re not throwing them out entirely. Know some of them maybe. But what are the numbers that on a daily basis you should be looking at going forward? You would just say you want to know now whether you’re going to be in a good shape to hit on third the quarter or the year. What should be looking on a day-to-day basis?

Sarah Dobek (03:06):

So let’s start with sales metrics. I think those are really important. When we start answering the question, are we going to hit our goals for the year? One of the places we start firms is understanding what’s going on in their sales process. And so that’s going to look like progress against our goals. And there’s a lot of places that we generate new revenue inside of the firm. And historically firms have looked at what new business has been brought in, but they can’t answer, is it business that’s going to happen this year is a business that’s going to happen next year? Which is a highly relevant question in any accounting profession because sometimes we’re closing tax work that we won’t begin until next year or an audit or something along those lines. The other is what’s the average deal size of what we’re closing to? What are our win rates look like?

(03:54):

Because those allow us to be able to start to forecast whether or not we’re going to hit our goals. And if we aren’t tracking a lot of this information and this data, it becomes really hard to answer that question. Usually in year one, we can’t very accurately predict whether we’re going to hit our goals, but if we know what our conversion rates are, if we have an idea of what all of this looks like, we have a better idea of confidently saying, yes, we are on track to hit that, or no, we aren’t on track to hit, that becomes important. The other is what’s happening with our marketing. Marketing plays a really important role in growth, and if we have a marketing function in the firm, they should be paying attention to what’s happening. If marketing is expected to do lead generation and we’re doing anything around inbound strategy, what does that lead qualification look like? What do our conversion rates look like? What’s happening with that information? And I will honestly say, Dan, that there’s a lot of firms that are not prepared for this. They’d either don’t have the software and the tracking mechanisms to be able to answer those questions or they’re not being expected to. The firms are managing their bandwidth and saying, we really just want to focus on referrals. They’re still a lot of accounting firms that sit primarily in that bucket, but those marketing metrics are as important. That leads into your sales pipeline.

Dan Hood (05:16):

Right?

Sarah Dobek (05:18):

Go ahead.

Dan Hood (05:19):

No, there’s so many things going on. We need a much longer, we need a to three day long podcast to talk about a lot of these things. But at some point I want to talk about different roles, KPIs, that different roles should be just touched on it there. Marketing, the marketing people, salespeople or business owner. The people will be looking at the pipeline in a way that, I mean that maybe the leadership of the firm is, right? They’re relying on the sales team, marketing team, biz team to tell them, Hey, our pipeline’s fine, or Oh no, our pipeline’s there or everyone, we’ve got enough people at enough of the stages that we need to be to know that they’re going to fill into the next number that maybe the leaders are looking at, which is new business. But Joel, well actually let’s go there. I mean, let’s talk about different levels of the firm. How different are the KPIs that different people at the firm are going to be looking at and that different levels of the firm are going to be looking at? Yeah,

Sarah Dobek (06:12):

That’s a great question. So I think that as a firm leader, we’re looking holistically at how the firm is tracking against their goals. And there’s a couple of important things that I would think that we want to look at it as a leader. One is, are we on track and are we growing? And what does that look like month over month? There can be a little bit of ebb and flow in public accounting around when billings go out and things like that, but we should be tracking up. We shouldn’t be far behind more than 30 days on some of our goals unless we know there’s a significant reason or there’s a deal out there. The other thing that I think is really important is what type of work are we bringing in? A big focus for firms in the last couple of years has been what is our average deal size and is that going up?

(07:02):

We really have to protect all this work firms have been doing to size their client bases. And so that’s a core metric and KPI that we look at across the board. And if that number is going down, huge red flag, that number should be going up. It should be staying somewhat consistent around the average size of the deals and even paying attention the granularity of that, which is who are we bringing into the firm? Is it aligned with our industry focus or size of firm that we’re looking for? And if it doesn’t, then we need to figure something out really quickly there and put a stop to that for some of those metrics. The other thing that we need to be looking at is our client retention. Attrition is a big factor in growth, and we’ve not paid enough attention to that. And there’s attrition for a lot of reasons.

(07:50):

There’s a ton of consolidation going on in the market, and I think that looking at the current client base and what that typically looks like, but also looking at m and a transactions, I just had this conversation with a client the other day, which is we have a lot of clients that are going through deals and we’re going to have to replace that revenue next year. And that is fairly significant revenue for this client. They’re all really good clients, but they have very high priced average size client relationships. And so that’s become a factor in our forecasting. And so part of the exercise that we take them through in the fall is anticipating out who’s told you they’re in the middle of a transaction or looking at a valuation. And while the firm can help leading up to that, and there’s some great dollars that they’ll do, they’ll get a little bit of work on the backend, but that relationship’s going to change and that’s going to go from maybe a client to a B or a C client, just if you’re purely looking at revenue.

Dan Hood (08:48):

So get as much out, at least you can,

(08:50):

But then get ready to know that. I mean, you hear different numbers, but generally people say somewhere between 10 and 15% of the average firm’s clients will turn it over in any given year. And as you said, there’s a lot of m and a going on, not just in the profession but outside it. That’s got to have an impact. A lot of business owners and clients are retiring. That’s all changes. What kind of services are going to need from each? So all things you need to be paying attention to, much more important than your average number of billable hours. For instance. There’s a couple of questions here about different KPIs that I wanted to get into. And one of them is, do you find that for firms at different stages of their growth, Guilford say a very small firm versus a firm that’s going from five to 10 million to 10 to $20 million, really making that big leap to a new sort of governance level, do you find that the KPIs are different for all of them or is it it’s pretty much the same kind of things as everybody needs to be paying attention to?

Sarah Dobek (09:48):

Yeah, we’re first growing something. It’s all about how are we getting in front of people? My age old for 23 years, I’ve been saying, people don’t know you exist. They can’t buy your services. It’s like having a business out there without a business sign. And I always joke with my clients, they’re the best kept in secret when they come to us. And our goal is not to make them the best kept in secret anymore. This isn’t a club that you get into and then you find out about what we do. And so on the early stage growth of any practice area or new service line, our goal is brand awareness. So we need to figure out how do we reach that brand awareness and what does market penetration look like? This is a term that accounting firms are like, excuse me, what? But it’s really like, how much of the market are we taking, right? We’re never going to own a hundred percent of a market

(10:39):

And what does that look like? And when we’re opening up, it’s a wide open field, but what does that look like and how are we bringing in clients and how are we getting in front of them? And so all of our metrics are about brand awareness typically. And then what does our client acquisition costs look like? Because usually investing heavily into that brand awareness, once we get into a growth stage, it’s more about scalability. We start looking at client retention numbers. We’re looking at average size of engagement. What does our operational piece look like? We need to make sure that we’re profitable and sometimes in early stage growth, we’re not yet profitable in the way that we want to be. How are we expanding in services? What does adoption of those services look like? And that’s when we tend to get into more of the sales metrics and the sales pipeline data is when we’re in a growth stage, and then when we’re mature, we’re looking back at market saturation and what our expansion strategy is, we’re typically bringing in a lot more innovation. And there’s not always as many metrics around that, but it’s more about market leadership and what are we doing? And oftentimes our pricing model changes. We’re in demand when we’re in more of a mature stage for that, and we’re really dialed into our profit margins and our industry recognition looks a lot different, our PR and publicity. So at each one of these stages and maturity level on our marketing, we’ll be looking at different metrics. And some of them are more important than others in some of these stages,

Dan Hood (12:16):

But you can definitely tie them into what stage you in terms of how well you’re known and where your clients are coming from and et cetera, et cetera. Absolutely. Yes. Very cool. Excellent. Alright, we’re going to take a quick break, but when we come back, I want to talk about some other KPIs that people might be looking at and how firms might be thinking about gathering all this information and then presenting it and make sure that the right people get it at the right times. But for now, like I said, we’re take a quick break.

(12:44):

Alright, and we’re back with Sarah Doak about consulting, talking about key performance indicators, particularly around growth. So far most of our focus has been on KPIs for growth and how you should measure them and the different measurements you’re going to make at different stages of your growth as a firm and your maturity as a firm. But I want to just take a step aside and say, are there other KPIs that you think firms should be looking at beyond just the ones related to growth or they’re the ones that you think are relevant that maybe they’re not paying as much attention to us, they should.

Sarah Dobek (13:12):

Yeah, so I think not necessarily, it doesn’t always translate into a number, but the answers we want to be able to, or the things we want to be able to answer related to marketing. So for our marketing leaders is what’s working and what’s not working. And this is a question leaders ask all the time. As we look at marketing budgets and we invest in things, and oftentimes our practice leaders don’t get involved other than asking the question. And as marketers and leaders in our marketing teams, we have to be able to address that, right? And we need to know what’s moving the needle and what’s not moving the needle because we all have limited resources. And this is a really hard thing in accounting firms, a lot of sacred cows. And part of our job as marketers is sometimes to unearth those sacred cows and it’s icky, sticky work that isn’t fun.

(14:03):

And quite honestly, it challenges people’s identity because we think we’re doing something really well. And then we come to find out there’s not really a return on that investment that we’re making on the sales side, our sales leaders and people, we have to be able to project and forecast what we’re doing to answer that question for our leaders. Are we going to hit our goals? And how are people performing and where are their issues? The biggest thing that sales data does is brings a line of sight for us on where we need to be working on things. We sometimes have this human perception that we’re doing better than we are, and unfortunately data has this way of bringing to light when we’re not doing that and it’s a benefit and a curse. And then the other is just for our larger leaders, the typical things that you would be looking at, but also how are we innovating? Innovation should be part of everything we’re doing, and I don’t have a magical number for innovation, but if we aren’t evolving our operations, if we are not figuring out how to use technology to do something, if we aren’t improving our infrastructure, if we aren’t doing a better job of delegating, man, that’s what I would be all over as a leader. And there’s not a magic number for that other than I would say it probably shows up in profitability and bandwidth resources.

Dan Hood (15:25):

Yeah. Well, I mean, yeah, I suppose to go back to the sales, the things you’re tracking about sales and new clients and so on. One thing you might be tracking is how many new engagements are for new services, how many new engagements are for new things you’re doing? What percentage of our businesses from stuff we were in offering last year, I always come back to three MI think has a number, something like 20 or some ridiculous percentage, 20 to 25% of their products needed to be new every year, which led to make a lot of total unnecessary products, but they worked for them. I’m not going to quibble, but so it’s fascinating because there is that to say it’s a difficult thing to measure that innovation. It’s also there’s all kinds of other KPIs people talk about in terms of mentoring and staff development and career development for your staff and recruiting, retention. That all could be sort of difficult to measure, but at least need to be born in mind

Sarah Dobek (16:19):

As we go forward. Well, my definition of innovation, Dan, is just a little bit different than maybe the rest of the markets. A lot of times we think of innovation as something that is brand new. I think of innovation as small baby steps towards refinement around what we’re doing. And so innovation could be something as simple. I remember when we rolled out our AI note taker, like what a game changer that was for our team to be able to shave off 10 or 15 minutes in handling recaps that we do for our clients and the detail that was needed. I can’t tell you how many times our team goes back to the notes that we use in our a I note taker from client meetings and how powerful that’s been for the work that we do. And to me, it wasn’t a large budget increase. It didn’t require a huge change in the process of what we do, but man, what an impact. And so I considered that an innovation when we rolled that out last year, and it’s been great. And so when we think about innovation, I want us to think about those small little things that impact our growth that can really make a big difference in our practice. And that can happen in a lot of sales and marketing in what we’re doing to grow our firms.

Dan Hood (17:33):

And as you say, very hard to measure, right? How do you measure if every task takes you 30 seconds less? How are you measuring that, right? And still it’s half the time you to spend, so Excellent. Well, let’s talk a little bit about all this information. One of the things people talk about routinely within accounting firms is the difficulty of getting information from one system to another. Or as we’ve talked about, the difficulty of actually putting numbers to a thing that you want to measure. There may be many KPIs that you want that are difficult to find within your systems if they can exist at all. How do you look at or who should be gathering all this information and how should it be being shared with the appropriate decision makers going to lead aside who the appropriate decision makers are? That’s a totally different discussion, but who should be gathering this information and how should they be sharing it?

Sarah Dobek (18:18):

It’s probably going to be a mix of people, Dan, inside of the firm, you’re going to be pulling on data that’s going to be coming out of the practice management system. So whoever in the firm is responsible or can be responsible for pulling the reporting data that’s needed out of there is important. There’s usually a big cleanup exercise that we watch firms go through when we start pulling metrics like this because we find a lot of data that just hasn’t been cleaned in a while or maintained in the way that it should have been. So we’re missing industry data, so we can’t segment by industry or our billing codes might be a mess. And that needs to be aligned so that we’re really clear what billing codes line up to tax or audit or cas to get the granularity that we want around the decisionmaking and the numbers that we’re looking for.

(19:03):

And so usually when we’re doing this, there’s some level of reporting coming from there. If we have a CRM system, a lot of the sales data is going to come out of the CRM system and in fact, that can be merged with some of the practice management data in some instances. And so dashboard reporting can be created. And then on the marketing side, all of it’s going to come out of the marketing technology that’s being used. And again, sometimes that links in with the sales data. If you’re on something like a HubSpot that has marketing automation and A CRM for firms that use different systems like a Salesforce or whatever, they have different plugins and software that will go along with those. So it’s going to come from a lot of different places. I think the key is to understand with each one of these functions, what do we need to know?

(19:46):

What are we looking at? And start with where you’re at. I have firms that we still use Excel spreadsheets for because we have stuff in constant contact and we’ve got stuff in Google Analytics and we have to bring that together. And I have firms that we have dashboards for that sit on a marketing automation platform. And so there’s no right or wrong other than to say, start with where you’re at, begin pulling what you can, and then eventually over time you’ll evolve it to where you want it to be. And we’ve got lots of firms that are building all those disparate resources into dashboards in their firms too when they’re kind of broken up, like tons of firms that have Power BI dashboards or Tableau where you name the branded software for it that are putting these types of things together.

Dan Hood (20:29):

I want to ask you one last quick question about that. Do you find generally speaking that that cleanup, the sort of massive cleanup that goes into getting the data is that most often, I think you think do it once and then you’re generally, you’re good going forward, as long as you maintain it properly? Or is it the kind of thing you’re doing every month or every week to do? I never say many different

Sarah Dobek (20:47):

Varieties. I encourage firms to learn from the cleanup process and put processes in place to maintain the data because if you are doing the dashboard reporting, like I talked about, whether that’s living in a CRM system or living in a BI system or whatever it looks like, I encourage there to be a process around it. And when firms are using that data, I often find that the management of the quality of data becomes easier because there’s a line of sight on where there’s discrepancies and when we have a line of sight, we can quickly fix it. The challenge with data in accounting firms is that we never had a line of sight. We didn’t know when data changed between one system and another, so we couldn’t update it. There was no notifications. We’d have to do these massive exports and match data. Dan, I can’t even tell you what I did early in my career and how many hours I spent matching accounting from data to get to some of these reports all summer. The first job that I worked in all summer, I spent doing this and today clicks of a button and it’s there. It’s amazing to

Dan Hood (21:46):

Me. Well, I mean, that’s one nice thing, right? Is the systems for doing this, for measuring these KPIs, for gathering them, for disseminating them, for being able to analyze them, they’re all getting better. Pretty costly, almost on a regular basis every week here about a new recording system with new capabilities. AI is obviously going to be making huge changes in here for all of us, but hopefully at the very least, it’ll get easier. It’ll certainly be more useful and more powerful. Very cool. Sarah Beck of Nevada Consulting, thank you so much for joining us.

Sarah Dobek (22:16):

All right, thanks, Dan for having me.

Dan Hood (22:18):

Thank you all for listening. This episode of On Air was produced by a Accounting Today with audio production by Wen-Wyst Jeanmary. Rate or review us on your favorite podcast platform and see the rest of our content on Accountingtoday.com. Thanks again to our guest and thank you for listening.

Continue Reading

Accounting

How to Create an Effective Invoice Process for Small Businesses

Published

on

How to Create an Effective Invoice Process for Small Businesses

A well-designed invoice is crucial to ensuring timely payments, maintaining consistent cash flow, and building strong client relationships. Invoicing is more than just paperwork—it plays a key role in the financial health and professional image of a business. When invoices are clear and professional, they encourage prompt payments and minimize disputes. Poorly constructed invoices, however, can result in delays, misunderstandings, and even missed payments.

The Basics of Professional Invoicing

Crafting a professional invoice begins with the basics. Essential elements should include the business name, logo, and contact information. Each invoice should be assigned a unique invoice number—using a format like “2024-01-001” (year-month-number) helps in keeping them easily organized. Additionally, clearly stating the issue date and due date is vital for clarity.

Creating Clear Service Descriptions

A detailed service or product description is the core of an effective invoice. Specificity is key—list the quantities, rates, and applicable taxes for each item. Assuming that clients recall the details of a service can lead to confusion; clarity prevents disputes. Invoices should include subtotals for each category and a bold final amount due, ensuring that the payment amount is easily identifiable. Additionally, it’s crucial to outline accepted payment methods and provide clear instructions for how payments should be made.

Avoiding Common Invoicing Mistakes

Sending invoices to the wrong contact is a common error that can lead to unnecessary payment delays. Maintaining an up-to-date database of client billing contacts and payment preferences can prevent these issues. Confirming who is responsible for accounts payable before sending invoices is a prudent practice.

————————————————————————————————-

Stanley Quencher H2.0 FlowState Stainless Steel Vacuum Insulated Tumbler with Lid and Straw for Water, Iced Tea or Coffee, Smoothie and More, Peony, 30oz

>>> Order Your Stanley Quencher Now<<<

Paid ads at no cost to buyer

————————————————————————————————–

Importance of Timing and Payment Options

The timing of invoice issuance can impact payment speed and client relations. Invoices should be sent promptly upon project completion to ensure timely payments. Establishing and adhering to a regular invoicing schedule fosters consistency and reduces delays.

Offering multiple payment options can further expedite payments. Clients often expect flexible and convenient payment methods. While digital payments like ACH transfers and credit cards may incur small fees, the benefits of faster payments usually outweigh the costs. Many businesses have seen significant reductions in average payment times by offering online payment solutions.

Leveraging Technology for Invoicing

Technology can greatly enhance the invoicing process. Reliable invoicing software can automate routine tasks such as issuing recurring invoices, sending payment reminders, and tracking outstanding payments. However, it is important to remember that technology is not infallible. Regular human oversight is necessary to identify potential errors that automated systems might overlook.

Essential Checklist for Invoice Accuracy

Consistency in the invoicing process is critical. Creating a checklist for invoice preparation can help maintain accuracy. Key items to verify include:

  • Confirming correct client details.
  • Checking all calculations for accuracy.
  • Ensuring the stated payment terms align with agreements.
  • Reviewing client preferences for invoice delivery.
  • Double-checking the applicable tax rates.

This checklist serves as a final review before sending any invoice to ensure it meets professional standards.

Implementing Effective Follow-up Procedures

Prompt follow-up on overdue payments is a necessary component of an effective invoicing system. Sending a gentle reminder around 15 days after the due date, followed by a firmer notice at 30 days, can often encourage payment without damaging client relationships. Maintaining a record of all communications related to payments is essential for clarity and documentation.

Conclusion

An efficient invoicing process not only facilitates timely payments but also reinforces professionalism, showing respect for both the business’s work and the client’s time. A clear, consistent, and well-maintained invoicing system directly impacts financial stability and client satisfaction. By focusing on accuracy, timing, and communication, businesses can significantly improve their cash flow and strengthen professional relationships with clients.

A successful invoicing strategy lies in keeping the process simple, ensuring consistency, and always maintaining a professional standard. This disciplined approach to invoicing contributes to better financial outcomes and more enduring client partnerships.

Continue Reading

Accounting

PCAOB calls off NOCLAR standard for this year

Published

on

Facing a backlash from audit firms over its proposal to toughen the standards for failing to detect noncompliance with laws and regulations, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board has decided to delay action on the standard this year.

The PCAOB proposed the so-called NOCLAR standard in June, with the goal of strengthening its requirements for auditors to identify, evaluate and communicate possible or actual noncompliance with laws and regulations, including fraud. However, the proposed standard provoked resistance from a number of auditing firms and state CPA societies like the Pennsylvania Institute of CPAs and spurred a comment letter-writing campaign organized by the Center for Audit Quality and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce that was supported by prominent business trade groups like the American Bankers Association, the Business Roundtable, the Retail Industry Leaders Association and more. 

Earlier this week, the PCAOB issued staff guidance outlining the existing responsibilities of auditors to detect, evaluate and communicate about illegal acts. The PCAOB was slated to finalize the NOCLAR standard by the end of this year, but after the election it has put the standard on hold for now, anticipating the upcoming change in the administration in Washington, D.C.

“Following the recent issuance of staff guidance, the PCAOB will not take additional action on NOCLAR this year,” said a PCAOB spokesperson. “We will continue engaging with stakeholders, including the SEC, as we determine potential next steps. As our process has demonstrated, the PCAOB is committed to listening to all stakeholders and getting it right.”

PCAOB logo - office - NEW 2022

One reason for the change of plans is that the PCAOB anticipates changes in the regulatory environment under the Trump administration, especially in the Securities and Exchange Commission, which would have to approve the final standard before it could be adopted. The Trump administration is likely to replace SEC chairman Gary Gensler, who has spearheaded many of the increased regulatory efforts at the Commission and encouraged the PCAOB to update its older standards and take a tougher stance on enforcement and inspections. President-elect Trump, in contrast, has promised to eliminate regulations, and Gensler’s push for increased regulation has attracted the ire of many in the financial industry.

According to a person familiar with the PCAOB process, no further action is expected until further consultation with the SEC under the incoming administration can take place. 

Questions have arisen over whether the PCAOB might decide to repropose the standard with modifications given the amount of opposition it has attracted. That is to be determined pending review of the comment letters that have been received, as well as a roundtable from earlier this year, along with responses from targeted inquiries from firms in their approach relating to NOCLAR. 

PCAOB board members Christina Ho and George Botic were asked about the NOCLAR proposal on Wednesday at Financial Executives International’s Current Financial Reporting Insights Conference, and Ho acknowledged the pushback. 

“We’ve heard strong opposition from the auditing profession, public companies, audit committees, investors, academics and others,” said Ho. “The PCAOB has received 189 individualized comments to date on that proposal. This proposal now has the third highest number of comment letters in the history of PCAOB. That did get a lot of attention. Commenters overwhelmingly called for a reproposal or withdrawal of the proposed standard so that that is definitely something that I am looking at a lot, and I also voted against the proposal. I have spoken to various stakeholders, including investors, audit committee chairs and members, and some preparers as well. The question I got asked repeatedly was, what problem is PCAOB trying to solve? And the people I spoke to believe that there have been improvements in financial reporting quality over the past 20 years, and that obviously is consistent with the CAQ study noting a consistent decline in restatements. While there’s always room for improvement, they noted that a balance is necessary between increased investor protection and increased auditor implementation costs that are ultimately passed on to issuers, and that the NOCLAR proposal lacks such a balance. That is what I have heard from the comment letters, so that pretty much summarizes what I have seen, and I’m still obviously thinking about it.”

Botic noted that the proposal came before he joined the board, but he referred to the staff guidance that had been issued earlier in the week by the PCAOB on the existing requirements.

Last week, the PCAOB updated its standard-setting and rulemaking agendas before the outcome of the election was known. Now with the uncertainty over the regulatory environment, the PCAOB is mindful of the difficulty of having the SEC decide on whether to approve it, especially if the five-member commission becomes evenly split among two Republican members and the two Democrats if Gensler departs or is ousted. The PCAOB feels the SEC needs adequate time to review and educate itself on the proposed standard, rather than having to jam it through a two-two commission, especially with the amount of engagement that will need to take place given such an important standard, according to a person familiar with the matter.

The PCAOB expects it to remain on the docket for 2025 but doesn’t want to try to jam it through this year. However, the PCAOB announced Friday that it has scheduled an open board meeting next Thursday, Nov. 21, on another proposed standard on firm and engagement metrics, which has also provoked pushback from many commenters, but is still slated to be finalized this year.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Accountants eye sustainable business management

Published

on

Accountants are increasingly being asked to deal with sustainability issues as more businesses are called upon by investors to report on how they are dealing with issues like climate change and carbon emissions.

This week, amid the United Nations COP29 climate change conference in Azerbaijan, business leaders have been playing a larger role, including fossil fuel companies, prompting an open letter on Friday from environmental groups calling for reforms in the COP process. 

ESG standard-setters have also been playing a role at COP, with groups like the Global Reporting Initiative and the Carbon Disclosure Project signing a memorandum of understanding to deepen their collaboration on making their standards interoperable as the International Sustainability Standards Board reported progress on growing acceptance of its standards by 30 jurisdictions around the world.

Last month, the Institute of Management Accountants released a report on why business sustainability depends on the competencies of management accountants. The report discusses the critical areas in which management accountants are crucial to ensuring sustainability within their organizations, along with how existing accounting capabilities support sustainable business.

Institute of Management Accountants headquarters in Montvale, N.J.

“The main focus and the main attention right now in the ESG field is going to compliance, to the reporting parts,” said Brigitte de Graaff, who chaired the IMA committee that authored the report. “There are a lot of rules and regulations out there.” 

For right now, those rules and regulations are mostly voluntary in the U.S., especially with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s climate disclosure rule on hold. But in the European Union, where de Graaff is based in Amsterdam, companies have to comply with the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive. 

“In Europe, of course, there is not a lot of voluntary reporting for the larger companies anymore, but it’s all mandatory with a huge amount of data points and aspects that they need to report, so there’s a lot of focus right now on how to comply with these rules and regulations,” said de Graaff. “However, there’s also a lot of discussion going on about whether it should be about compliance. What’s the reason for reporting all these aspects? For us what was really important was that there is a lot of opportunity for management accountants to work with this kind of information.”

She sees value beyond purely disclosing ESG information. “If you use this information, and you integrate this in your organization, there’s much more value that you can get out of it, and it’s also much more part of what kind of value you are creating as an organization, and it’s much more aligned with what you were doing,” said de Graaff. 

The report discusses the benefits of the information, and how management accountants can play an important role. “You can use and integrate this in your FP&A and your planning processes,” said de Graaff. “You can integrate this kind of information in your strategy, something that management accountants are very well equipped for, but also to track performance and see how you’re actually achieving your goals, not only on financial aspects, but also on these nonfinancial aspects that are much broader than the E, S and G factors.”

The report discusses how to go beyond the generic environmental, social and governance parts of ESG to understand how they relate to a business’s core operations and make it more sustainable.

Management accountants can even get involved in areas such as biodiversity. “Even though, as a management accountant, you might not be an expert on marine biology and what the impact of your organization is underwater, you are able to tell what are the checks that have been performed on this,” said de Graaf. “Is this a common standard? Is this information that is consistently being monitored throughout the organization? Or is it different and what are the benchmarks? What are the other standards? These kinds of processes are something that management accountants are well aware of, and how they can check the quality of this information without being a subject matter expert on every broad aspect that may entail in this ESG journey that an organization is on.”

ESG can become part of the other work that management accountants are already involved in performing for their organizations.

“Ultimately there are a lot of competencies that management accountants were already doing in their organization, and ESG might sometimes seem unrelated, but it basically ties in into the competencies that we already know,” said de Graaff. “I hope that with this report, we can also show that the competencies that we are so familiar with, that we’ve been dealing with other strands of financial information, that you can basically also use these competencies in the ESG arena. Even though there’s a lot that seems very new, if you are aware of how you can tie that in, you can use the skills that you already have, the skill set that you have as a management accountant, to really improve your risk management processes, your business acumen, your operational decision making, etc. I hope that with this publication, we can also take away a little bit of the big fear that might be around a huge topic, as ESG is now. This is actually just a very interesting and exciting way to look at this kind of information, and we are very well equipped to help organizations navigating through this changing ESG regulation world.”

Continue Reading

Trending