Connect with us

Accounting

DEI in accounting (and only in accounting)

Published

on

Diversity, equity and inclusion is in the headlines these days, and at the risk of opening an entire can of beans, when all I really want is just one bean (or, at most, a couple), I thought I’d take an opportunity to talk about what DEI means in the accounting space — and also what, specifically, it does not mean.

A couple of caveats: I am going to be talking about DEI only in accounting. Not in government, not in education, not in movies or TV, not in sports, not at the state level and definitely not at the federal level — just in accounting.

Also, if you have strong feelings about DEI in any other area, please do not share them with me. Similarly, if you have strong thoughts about DEI in accounting AND you believe that DEI in accounting involves depriving qualified candidates of jobs in accounting, please do not send me emails about that. Any time we run an article about DEI, I get plenty of emails making the same case.

And it’s because that case is wrong that I’m writing this. DEI in accounting is NOT about depriving qualified candidates of jobs, or hiring unqualified people because of their race or gender. Accounting is in the midst of a truly massive staffing shortage — no one is turning away qualified candidates, no matter their race or gender or anything else. Instead, DEI (in accounting) is about finding new pools of qualified job candidates, drawing them into the profession, and getting them to stay. All the DEI programs that I’ve ever looked at, and all the DEI leaders I’ve ever spoken to — and this is all just in accounting, by the way — are focused on two things.

First, they’re reaching out to groups that haven’t traditionally thought about accounting as a career path, and encouraging them to try it. That means they’re trying to get, say, Black and Latino high school and college students to pursue accounting degrees, with the goal then of hiring those who successfully complete their degrees and guiding them through successfully earning their CPA licenses.

Second, they’re working to make their firms more welcoming and comfortable places for qualified people from underrepresented groups to work in, so that those people stick around.

Are DEI programs keeping track of the numbers? Yes. (It’s accounting, after all.) Are they aiming to up the number of qualified members of underrepresented groups who join the profession? Also yes. Are they not hiring qualified white male job candidates? No. Believe me — if an accounting firm finds a qualified candidate of any race or gender, they’re hiring them. Most firms would hire a qualified wildebeest, if the wildebeest were available and could start before the end of tax season.

So there you have it: what DEI (in accounting) is about, and what it most definitely is not.

Continue Reading

Accounting

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

Published

on

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

In a decisive move toward standardized environmental financial reporting, accounting standards boards issued updated implementation guidance during the week ending July 25, 2026, regarding the formal recognition and valuation of corporate carbon offsets and environmental credits. The revised frameworks establish precise rules for how enterprises must measure, record, and disclose carbon credits on balance sheets, eliminating years of inconsistent reporting practices across public capital markets.

Under the finalized accounting standard, purchased carbon offsets can no longer be categorized under vague administrative expenses or unstandardized intangible asset accounts. Instead, organizations must classify environmental credits based on underlying operational intent—distinguishing between credits held for immediate compliance compliance obligations, long-term offset obligations, or active market trading. Furthermore, companies are required to evaluate carbon holdings for fair value impairment at the end of each reporting period, ensuring that depreciated or low-quality environmental credits do not distort corporate asset values.

The standardized rules carry significant implications for corporate audit committees and chief accounting officers. External audit firms are implementing rigorous verification protocols to validate the physical legitimacy, legal ownership, and scientific permanence of carbon credits claimed on balance sheets. Inaccurate or overstated carbon accounting claims now carry substantial financial litigation risk, alongside potential regulatory enforcement for misleading ESG disclosures.

To remain fully compliant, corporate accounting departments must establish centralized carbon tracking systems integrated into primary standard ERP ledgers. Accounting teams that proactively adopt standardized environmental reporting protocols will build investor credibility, streamline annual audit processes, and insulate their organizations against evolving regulatory scrutiny.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Published

on

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Corporate tax departments reached a critical juncture in automated operational management. With nations worldwide rapidly enacting digital service taxes, localized value-added tax (VAT) mandates, and real-time electronic invoicing requirements, manual tax calculations have become obsolete. Modern corporate tax divisions are aggressively deploying AI-driven tax engine software to automate complex cross-border indirect tax calculations in real time.

The imperative for automated tax compliance stems from the sheer complexity of current trade policies and multi-jurisdictional commerce. E-commerce platforms, software vendors, and global manufacturers face constantly changing regional tax rates, statutory exemption rules, and cross-border tariff structures. Automated tax engines embed directly into enterprise enterprise resource planning (ERP) architectures, automatically applying correct tax codes at the point of sale, calculating real-time withholding amounts, and generating compliant e-invoices.

Automated audit trail generation represents another key advantage of modern tax tech integration. Advanced compliance platforms log every transactional tax determination on immutable digital ledgers, providing tax authorities with transparent, self-verifying audit trails. This capability drastically reduces the operational duration and administrative cost of corporate tax audits, protecting enterprises against severe penalties resulting from calculation errors or missed reporting deadlines.

For chief financial officers and tax directors, investing in automated tax compliance is a vital operational risk mitigation strategy. Automating routine tax calculations frees high-level accounting professionals to focus on strategic tax planning, transfer pricing optimization, and risk management in an increasingly complex global economic environment.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Trending