Connect with us

Personal Finance

DOGE purge at FDIC threaten nation’s banking system

Published

on

U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) speaks to a crowd gathered in front of the U.S. Treasury Department in protest of Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency on Feb. 4, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Anna Rose Layden | Getty Images

In response to a request from Sen. Elizabeth Warren, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. will review President Donald Trump‘s recent move to lay off more workers at the watchdog agency.

Backed by the Trump administration, Elon Musk and his advisory group, the Department of Government Efficiency, reduced the FDIC staff by around 1,000 employees so far this year through buyout offers and the layoffs of probationary employees, according to reports. The additional firings were part of a larger effort to shrink the federal bureaucracy.

The FDIC is already severely understaffed, which “threatens the stability of the banking system,” Warren, D-Mass., said in a letter sent on Feb. 10 to Inspector General Jennifer Fain and shared exclusively with CNBC. Senators Raphael Warnock, D-Ga., Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., and Lisa Blunt Rochester, D-Del., also signed the letter.

More from Personal Finance:
Top-rated charities in jeopardy amid DOGE cuts to foreign aid
DOGE cuts focus on people over 100 receiving Social Security
Trump’s second term could mean the downfall of the FDIC

Fain responded to the lawmakers in a letter dated Feb. 19, which was also shared exclusively with CNBC, saying “the full effect and impact on the structure and mission of the FDIC due to the hiring freeze, deferred resignations, and any reshaping and restructuring remain to be seen.”

Further, Fain said, “we will be adapting our oversight work to better understand and determine the effect of recent changes and their impact on the FDIC to maintain stability and confidence in nation’s banking system.”

In a statement Thursday, Warren said she was “pleased that the FDIC Inspector General will review the threats to the stability of the banking system caused by the Trump Administration’s recent buyouts, terminations, and job rescissions to bank examiners and other FDIC staff.”

“These cuts threaten the reliability and integrity of federal deposit insurance and inhibit the FDIC’s capacity to ensure the stability and confidence that underpin our nation’s banking system,” she said.

Risks of ‘a shortage of cops on the beat’

In the initial letter to Fain, the senators said staffing shortages directly contributed to Signature Bank‘s failure in March 2023.

The lack of examiners “led to a series of supervisory delays, canceled or postponed exams, and quality control issues in the supervision of Signature,” the letter said.

Former FDIC chair Sheila Bair: Eliminating the FDIC would be a mistake

“The lesson learned in this case was that a shortage of cops on the beat can threaten the safety and soundness of the banking system and pose risks to the Deposit Insurance Fund,” the letter stated.

The incident marked the largest U.S. banking failure since the 2008 financial crisis, and one of the biggest bank failures in U.S. history. The unexpected shutdown also caused widespread concern among consumers about their deposits, their bank and the banking system.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Student loan repayment tips amid challenging times for borrowers

Published

on

Sdi Productions | E+ | Getty Images

It’s a challenging time for many federal student loan borrowers just trying to find ways to pay off their debt.

Millions of borrowers who enrolled in the Biden administration-era Saving on a Valuable Education plan are now in limbo after the program was blocked by Republican-led legal challenges.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration has changed the terms on several other repayment plans.

To successfully keep up with your student loan payments and eventually emerge debt-free, borrowers should explore their options and understand the terms of their repayment plan. Here’s what you need to know amid major challenges to the lending system.

How the SAVE plan got blocked

A U.S. appeals court in February blocked the Biden administration’s student loan relief plan known as SAVE.

The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the seven Republican-led states that filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Education’s plan. The states had argued that former President Joe Biden, with SAVE, was essentially trying to find a roundabout way to forgive student debt after the Supreme Court struck down his sweeping debt cancellation plan in June 2023.

SAVE came with two key provisions that the lawsuits targeted: It had lower monthly payments than any other federal student loan repayment plan, and it led to quicker debt erasure for those with small balances.

Forbearance has no clear end date

When its SAVE plan got tied up in legal challenges, the Biden administration put millions of borrowers who’d enrolled in the plan in an interest-free forbearance. Borrowers, if they wish, can still remain in that payment pause.

There’s no specific end date to that forbearance as of now, said Scott Buchanan, executive director of the Student Loan Servicing Alliance, a trade group for federal student loan servicers.

More from Personal Finance:
Stock volatility poses an ‘opportunity’
How tariffs fuel higher prices
The ‘danger zone’ for retirees when stocks dip

But unlike the Covid-era pause on student loan bills, this forbearance does not give borrowers credit toward debt forgiveness under an income-driven repayment plan or Public Service Loan Forgiveness.

Historically, at least, IDR plans limit borrowers’ monthly payments to a share of their discretionary income and cancel any remaining debt after a certain period, typically 20 years or 25 years. PSLF, which President George W. Bush signed into law in 2007, allows certain not-for-profit and government employees to have their federal student loans wiped away after 10 years of payments.

Borrowers have other options

Some borrowers who are in the SAVE program’s forbearance might want to sit tight, said higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz. Not having to make payments might be a relief to those who are experiencing any financial struggles.

Another benefit of remaining in the payment pause is that interest isn’t accumulating on your debt, like it would under other IDR plans, Buchanan explained.

“But months in SAVE forbearance do not count toward loan forgiveness, so both those considerations need to be weighed when thinking about switching plans,” Buchanan said.

If you do decide to switch out of the now-blocked SAVE plan, the Trump administration says that the other IDR plans now open are: Income-Based Repayment, Pay As You Earn and Income-Contingent Repayment.

The Education Department recently reopened those IDR plan applications, following a period during which the plans were unavailable. (The Trump administration said it was updating the plans’ applications to make them comply with the recent court order over SAVE.)

Borrowers should know that the automatic loan forgiveness after 20 or 25 years is not available at the moment under ICR or PAYE “since the courts have questioned that permissibility under statute,” Buchanan said.

How Wall Street trades student loans

Still, if a borrower enrolled in ICR or PAYE, then switches to IBR, their previous payments made under the other plans will count toward loan forgiveness under IBR, as long as they meet the plan’s other requirements, Buchanan said.

Meanwhile, borrowers in any of the three IDR plans can get credit toward PSLF.

If you’re on strong financial footing and not seeking loan forgiveness, the Standard Repayment Plan is a smart option for borrowers, experts say. Under that plan, the payments will usually be larger than on an IDR plan, but they’re fixed and borrowers are typically debt-free after just a decade.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Here’s why ‘dead’ investors outperform the living

Published

on

Andrew Fox | The Image Bank | Getty Images

“Dead” investors often beat the living — at least, when it comes to investment returns.

A “dead” investor refers to an inactive trader who adopts a “buy and hold” investment strategy. This often leads to better returns than active trading, which generally incurs higher costs and taxes and stems from impulsive, emotional decision-making, experts said.

Doing nothing, it turns out, generally yields better results for the average investor than taking a more active role in one’s portfolio, according to investment experts.

The “biggest threat” to investor returns is human behavior, not government policy or company actions, said Brad Klontz, a certified financial planner and financial psychologist.

“It’s them selling [investments] when they’re in a panic state, and conversely, buying when they’re all excited,” said Klontz, the managing principal of YMW Advisors in Boulder, Colorado, and a member of CNBC’s Advisor Council.

“We are our own worst enemy, and it’s why dead investors outperform the living,” he said.

Why returns fall short

Spring cleaning your finances

The average U.S. mutual fund and exchange-traded fund investor earned 6.3% per year during the decade from 2014 to 2023, according to Morningstar. However, the average fund had a 7.3% total return over that period, it found.

That gap is “significant,” wrote Jeffrey Ptak, managing director for Morningstar Research Services.

It means investors lost out on about 15% of the returns their funds generated over 10 years, he wrote. That gap is consistent with returns from earlier periods, he said.

“If you buy high and sell low, your return will lag the buy-and-hold return,” Ptak wrote. “That’s why your return fell short.”

Wired to run with the herd

Emotional impulses to sell during downturns or buy into certain categories when they’re peaking (think meme stocks, crypto or gold) make sense when considering human evolution, experts said.

“We’re wired to actually run with the herd,” Klontz said. “Our approach to investing is actually psychologically the absolute wrong way to invest, but we’re wired to do it that way.”

Market moves can also trigger a fight-or-flight response, said Barry Ritholtz, the chairman and chief investment officer of Ritholtz Wealth Management.

More from Personal Finance:
Investors will be ‘miles ahead’ if they avoid these 3 things
Stock volatility poses an ‘opportunity’
How investors can ready their portfolios for a recession

“We evolved to survive and adapt on the savanna, and our intuition … wants us to make an immediate emotional response,” Ritholtz said. “That immediate response never has a good outcome in the financial markets.”

These behavioral mistakes can add up to major losses, experts say.

Consider a $10,000 investment in the S&P 500 from 2005 through 2024.

A buy-and-hold investor would have had almost $72,000 at the end of those 20 years, for a 10.4% average annual return, according to J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Meanwhile, missing the 10 best days in the market during that period would have more than halved the total, to $33,000, it found. So, by missing the best 20 days, an investor would have just $20,000.

Buy-and-hold doesn’t mean ‘do nothing’

Of course, investors shouldn’t actually do nothing.

Financial advisors often recommend basic steps like reviewing one’s asset allocation (ensuring it aligns with investment horizon and goals) and periodically rebalancing to maintain that mix of stocks and bonds.

There are funds that can automate these tasks for investors, like balanced funds and target-date funds.

These “all-in-one” funds are widely diversified and take care of “mundane” tasks like rebalancing, Ptak wrote. They require less transacting on investors’ part — and limiting transactions is a general key to success, he said.

“Less is more,” Ptak wrote.

(Experts do offer some caution: Be careful about holding such funds in non-retirement accounts for tax reasons.)

Routine also helps, according to Ptak. That means automating saving and investing to the extent possible, he wrote. Contributing to a 401(k) plan is a good example, he said, since workers make contributions each payroll period without thinking about it.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

As recession risk jumps, top financial pros share their best advice

Published

on

Fg Trade | E+ | Getty Images

There is at least a 60% chance of recession if Trump's tariffs stick, says JPMorgan's David Kelly

Meanwhile, J.P. Morgan raised its odds for a U.S. and global recession to 60%, by year end, up from 40% previously.

“Disruptive U.S. policies has been recognized as the biggest risk to the global outlook all year,” J.P. Morgan strategists said in a research note on Thursday.

Allianz’s Chief Economic Advisor Mohamed El-Erian also warned on Friday that the risk of a U.S. recession “has become uncomfortably high.”

‘There is some nervous energy’

“There is some nervous energy there,” said certified financial planner Douglas Boneparth, president of Bone Fide Wealth in New York, of the conversations he is having with his clients.

Even though stocks took a beating on Friday, “we advise them to focus on fundamentals and what they can control, which means maintaining a strong cash reserve and discipline around cash flow so that they can stay in the market and feel confident about taking advantage of buying opportunities,” said Boneparth, a member of the CNBC Financial Advisor Council.

More from Personal Finance:
Tariffs are ‘lose-lose’ for U.S. jobs and industry
Why uncertainty makes the stock market go haywire
Americans are suffering from ‘sticker shock’ — how to adjust

Recession or not, maintaining a consistent cash flow and investment strategy is key, other experts say.

“The best way to manage these moments is to maximize your current and future selves is to block out noise that doesn’t apply to your plan,” said CFP Preston Cherry, founder and president of Concurrent Financial Planning in Green Bay, Wisconsin.

Letting emotions get in the way is one of “the greatest threats to life and money plans,” said Cherry, who is also a member of the CNBC Advisor Council.

When it comes to volatility tolerance, sharp drops in the market are to be expected, the advisors say.

“The stock market is unpredictable, but historically, there’s a trend in how the market recovers,” Cherry said.

“In years with market corrections and pullbacks, these are the worst days, which are followed by the best days,” he added.

In fact, the 10 best trading days by percentage gain for the S&P 500 over the past three decades all occurred during recessions, often in close proximity to the worst days, according to a Wells Fargo analysis published last year.

“Being out of the market and missing the best days and cycles after recessions significantly hurt portfolios in the long run,” Cherry said.

Boneparth said his clients also “know volatility and uncertainty is part of the game and, most importantly, know not to sell into chaos.”

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Continue Reading

Trending