Connect with us

Accounting

Donor advised funds’ tax benefits shown by client scenarios

Published

on

Financial advisors and charitable-minded clients can tap into tax savings through donor-advised funds when balancing portfolios, making regular gifts and after windfalls, according to an expert.

Those three scenarios show in part why donor-advised funds have amassed around $230 billion in assets — with another trillion dollars in growth expected for the next decade, according to a presentation at this week’s Future Proof conference by Adam Nash, an angel investor and former Wealthfront CEO who’s now CEO of Daffy, a donor-advised funds service. 

The other reasons for that rising popularity include the flexibility with an upfront deduction for the donation that doesn’t require a grant to be allocated immediately and the ability to send charities other types of assets besides cash such as appreciated stock or other securities, Nash noted.

In his presentation, Nash compared donor-advised funds to other types of tax-advantaged accounts that have evolved into pivotal roles as part of clients’ long-term financial plans over recent decades, like individual retirement accounts, 401(k) plans and 529 college savings plans.

“A donor-advised fund is basically the perfect account for putting money aside for charity,” Nash said. “You can put money or assets into the account, and you get an immediate tax deduction this year against income when you put the assets in the account. The accounts have investment options — some more than others — but your money is invested tax-free for as long as you want it to compound. And then any time you want to give money to an operating charity — it could just be a few clicks and that money gets sent off and taken care of. 

“And it’s not surprising that, even at the very high end, a lot of people are thinking about,” Nash added, “‘Do I really need to set up a foundation? Do I really need to set up a trust? I can just use a donor-advised fund to handle the philanthropy needs, the back end and the back office for my clients.”

READ MORE: IRS donor-advised fund proposal could have ‘chilling effect’

The three examples Nash laid out in his talk displayed the possible role of donor-advised funds in a client’s portfolio.

The sale of a stock that has risen in value or the spinoff of a part of a small business or another “positive event” can bring capital gains and income — along with accompanying taxes in a particular year, he noted. The donor-advised fund can help advisors and their clients offset those gains.

“If you have a windfall, you can immediately say, ‘Hey, put that money, put some of those assets into a donor-advised fund and take your time evaluating organizations and thinking about who you want to give that money to,” Nash said. “Maybe you can put aside money that’s good enough to support your giving, not just for one year, five years, 10 years — build a real legacy for you and your family or for your business. And so this is the most common reason that advisors fall in love with donor-advised funds.”

Regular gifts of assets to donor-advised funds at any time can bring a bigger tax advantage than donating cash, and the structure enables advisors and their clients to send stocks, ETFs or even digital holdings like cryptocurrency to organizations that may not have the capacity to receive non-cash contributions directly.

“Let’s say they give $30,000 to charity every year,” Nash said. “If you can just tell them, instead of taking that cash and giving it to the charity, to actually put the stock in a donor-advised fund, get those tax benefits, then they can give that cash to those charities, the same as they always did, but save money on taxes. And here’s the kicker, for people who care about this stuff, there is no wash-sale rule with donations, right? You can donate the shares out of their account to the donor-advised fund that had the lowest cost basis and then, literally, a millisecond later, you can take the cash that they would have given to charity and use it instead to replenish their investment account with higher cost-basis shares. So you permanently eliminate that tax liability.”

READ MORE: You’re doing it wrong: Annual portfolio rebalancing isn’t enough

Portfolio rebalancing may also present some “unforgiving” numbers when it comes to the “tax draft” of selling off one category of assets that took on unexpectedly high values in order to buy more investments in a lower-valued type of security, Nash pointed out.

“What if, instead of selling those appreciated shares, you actually donate some of those shares to a donor-advised fund, and then you use the cash that you would have used to rebalance the portfolio to buy up the underrepresented asset in the portfolio,” he said. “So you’re just moving the same amount of money around, but by having a donor-advised fund to capture that tax benefit of those appreciated securities, you just eliminate that liability.”

Advisors and their clients can choose among many donor-advised fund providers that are operating in the space, but Nash’s firm is making its pitch based on newer technology tools, the capacity for clients to add other family members and advisors to their accounts and flat-fee price points between $3 and $20 a month. 

Its name, Daffy, stands for “donor-advised funds for you,” Nash noted. Last year, the firm launched a tool for matching campaigns, such as one that Nash shared with Future Proof attendees in which a widower started a fund in honor of his late wife.      

“It’s very personal, and the organizer, the person running the campaign, can pick up to six charities to support and let their donors pick amongst them, and then the matching just automatically happens within minutes every time someone makes a donation in a campaign,” Nash said. “They’re not just giving to the organization. They’re supporting the organization, and they bring new people into the community — which is what the charities really want, is more and more exposure to people who care about their cause.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

PwC funds AI in Accounting Fellowship at Bryant University

Published

on

PwC made a $1.5 million investment to Bryant University, in Smithfield, Rhode Island, to fund the launch of the PwC AI in Accounting Fellowship.

The experiential learning program allows undergraduate students to explore AI’s impact in accounting by way of engaging in research with faculty, corporate-sponsored projects and professional development that blends traditional accounting principles with AI-driven tools and platforms. 

The first cohort of PwC AI in Accounting Fellows will be awarded to members of the Bryant Honors Program planning to study accounting. The fellowship funds can be applied to various educational resources, including conference fees, specialized data sheets, software and travel.

PwC sign, branding

Krisztian Bocsi/Bloomberg

“Aligned with our Vision 2030 strategic plan and our commitment to experiential learning and academic excellence, the fellowship also builds upon PwC’s longstanding relationship with Bryant University,” Bryant University president Ross Gittell said in a statement. “This strong partnership supports institutional objectives and includes the annual PwC Accounting Careers Leadership Institute for rising high school seniors, the PwC Endowed Scholarship Fund, the PwC Book Fund, and the PwC Center for Diversity and Inclusion.”

Bob Calabro, a PwC US partner and 1988 Bryant University alumnus and trustee, helped lead the development of the program.

“We are excited to introduce students to the many opportunities available to them in the accounting field and to prepare them to make the most of those opportunities, This program further illustrates the strong relationship between PwC and Bryant University, where so many of our partners and staff began their career journey in accounting” Calabro said in a statement.

“Bryant’s Accounting faculty are excited to work with our PwC AI in Accounting Fellows to help them develop impactful research projects and create important experiential learning opportunities,” professor Daniel Ames, chair of Bryant’s accounting department, said in a statement. “This program provides an invaluable opportunity for students to apply AI concepts to real-world accounting, shaping their educational journey in significant ways.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

The clock is ticking for cheap EV leases after Trump’s win

Published

on

If the incoming Trump administration eliminates $7,500 federal tax credits for electric vehicles, that would mean the end of popular leases that allow U.S. consumers to sidestep restrictions on which EV models qualify for incentives.

President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team intends to revoke the tax credit for purchasing an EV, Reuters reported last week. Whether and when that could happen remains uncertain. A companion EV-leasing credit in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act would have to be dealt with separately but is widely seen as vulnerable. So people hoping to acquire an electric car might want to act soon.

“If you’re on the fence, right now is probably going to be one of your better opportunities to buy or lease an EV at a good price, at least for a few years,” said Chris Harto, a senior policy analyst at Consumer Reports. “Some of the cheapest ways to get into an electric vehicle over the past year has been an EV lease.”

electrify-charging-staion.jpg
A driver unplugs their vehicle at an Electrify America electric vehicle charging station in Atlanta.

Megan Varner/Bloomberg

In October, leases accounted for 79% of EV sales at dealerships, according to Jessica Caldwell, executive director of insights at automotive research firm Edmunds.com Inc. “When you see the tax credit applied to a three-year lease combined with some of the generous incentives the automakers themselves are offering, the EV deals are pretty compelling,” she said.

This week, for instance, you can drive home a luxury electric BMW i4 for $460 a month, about the same price as leasing a middle-of-the-road gasoline Toyota Camry. Hyundai, meanwhile, is currently offering its sporty electric Ioniq 5 for $199 a month on a two-year lease.

Edmunds’ numbers don’t include automakers such as Tesla and Rivian that sell directly to consumers and that don’t release the percentage of their customers who opt for leases. 

The IRA limits the purchase tax credit to electric vehicles assembled in North America and requires a percentage of battery components and critical minerals to originate there or in countries that have signed a free-trade agreement with the U.S.

But the sticker price can’t exceed $55,000 for a car or $80,000 for an SUV, and only households earning up to $300,000 annually and individuals making up to $150,000 can claim the tax credit. EVs such as the Chevrolet Equinox, Honda Prologue and Volkswagen ID.4 get the green light, but if buyers have their eye on models like the Hyundai Ioniq 5 or a Polestar 2 — which aren’t assembled in North America and don’t meet the battery and critical mineral requirements — they’re out of luck.

Unless they lease. Those restrictions don’t apply to the federal government’s commercial clean vehicle credit program, which allows fleet owners like automakers’ finance arms to claim the tax credit. That lets manufacturers entice customers by passing on the $7,500 savings in the form of lower lease payments.

Caldwell said leasing is also attractive to prospective EV drivers worried about the risk of purchasing a $50,000 car only to have its technology become outdated while still owing payments. “We’ve also seen pretty heavy depreciation for electric vehicles, so if you lease you’re not left holding the bag if the vehicle declines rapidly in value after three years,” she said.

If the lease loophole is closed, “EVs are going to have to sell on their own merit, which we know is always tough when there is a new technology and people still have concerns about battery longevity, range and infrastructure,” said Caldwell.

Congress would need to pass legislation to kill the EV tax credits, according to Romany Webb, deputy director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia University. But absent Congressional action, she said Trump could order the IRS to revamp its guidance on how they are used.

The agency “could, for example, revise the list of vehicles that are eligible for the tax credits or add new procedures for claiming the credits,” said Webb. “That could make it more practically challenging for people to take advantage of the credits and, generally, introduce a lot of uncertainty and confusion that could make people less willing to purchase or lease EVs.”

Consumers aren’t the only ones who would feel the impact if the credits are tightened or repealed. “These tax credits are for consumers, but they’re also really for automakers so that they can scale up the production of electric vehicles and can remain competitive,” said Harto. “So while repealing the tax credit will hurt consumers, it probably hurts automakers even more.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

IFRS Foundation offers sustainability risk guide

Published

on

The International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation and its International Sustainability Standards Board released a new sustainability guide Tuesday.

The guide can help companies identify and disclose material information about sustainability-related risks and opportunities that could reasonably be expected to affect their cash flows, their access to finance or cost of capital over the short, medium or long term.

Investors and global capital markets are increasingly requesting such information to inform investment decision making. The guide focuses on helping companies understand how the concept of sustainability-related risks and opportunities is described in IFRS S1, the ISSB’s sustainability disclosure standard, including how these can come from a company’s dependencies and impacts. Those dependencies and impacts on resources and relationships can lead to sustainability-related risks and opportunities that could reasonably be expected to affect its prospects.

ifrs-foundation-iasb-sign.jpg

The guide discusses how companies applying ISSB standards can benefit from the process they might already follow in making materiality judgments when preparing financial statements, particularly when applying IFRS accounting standards. The IFRS Foundation oversees both the ISSB and the International Accounting Standards Board.

The guide describes the process a company can follow which is closely aligned with the four-step process illustrated in the IASB’s IFRS Practice Statement 2: Making Materiality Judgments. As a result, although the ISSB standards can be used with any generally accepted accounting principles, those companies already applying IFRS accounting standards — in over 140 jurisdictions worldwide — as well as those such as in the U.S. where there is strong alignment with a focus on providing material information to investors, will be particularly well prepared to apply the concept of materiality using ISSB standards.

The guide also discusses some of the considerations a company might make to drive connectivity between sustainability-related financial disclosures and a company’s financial statements. For those looking to meet the information needs of a wider set of stakeholders, it provides considerations for those applying ISSB standards alongside European Sustainability Reporting Standards or Global Reporting Initiative standards.

Continue Reading

Trending