The field of environmental, social and governance reporting and assurance is a natural opportunity for accountants, and one that’s ripe for the taking. But they risk losing the opportunity if they don’t move more quickly.
Incoming and evolving regulation from the European Union and in some U.S. states means more companies will be looking for attestation that their climate and other initiatives are actually effective. Accounting firms are at varying stages with ESG, with the biggest firms having invested billions in this area and smaller firms just getting started. However, there’s still hesitancy among many firms.
There are three key areas of regulations to watch: the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive in the EU, the proposals from the Securities and Exchange Commission in the U.S., and American state regulation, specifically from California.
Naiyana – stock.adobe.com
With the new presidential administration, experts anticipate that the SEC will table or even rescind its proposed regulation. But EU regulations are expected to impact as many as 3,000 private and public U.S. companies, and proposed regulation in California will impact all companies that do business in the Golden State.
“What we always talked about previously was, ‘We have this alphabet soup of standards and frameworks and nobody knows what to do,'” KPMG US sustainability leader Maura Hodge said. “But what we’re actually finding is that it’s creating a patchwork of complexity, so while it’s more organized, it is still very complicated.”
“I think that there is a desire on the preparers’ part to continue to pump the brakes on this and say, ‘We don’t want to go all in because everything keeps changing and we aren’t sure if it’s going to be required or mandated or not,'” Hodge said. “But what we have been advising and the reality is that this needs to happen. Most of these companies have been reporting voluntarily historically anyway, and I think there’s a recognition and a realization that transparency and accountability in that reporting is what is desired.”
“At a minimum, shifting what you’ve done in the past to get to this regulatory baseline is a no-regrets move that you kind of keep working forward to,” she added.
Highly transferable skills
Accountants are well-suited to performing this service as ESG reporting and assurance moves away from the marketing and investor relations side of companies and becomes a financial function with regulation and standards.
Though accountants may need upskilling in specific sustainability topics, Ami Beers, senior director of the assurance and advisory innovation team at the American Institute of CPAs, says the foundational processes and skills are highly transferable, like understanding different standards and frameworks, gathering data from multiple sources, pulling together reports, and implementing processes and controls and governance.
“We have been collectors of data and auditing of that data for millennia now. We’ve been doing it with financial data. It only makes sense that we could do it with nonfinancial data. We already have frameworks set up that we adhere to for really high-quality work and high-integrity work, which ESG is in general,” said Jennifer Harrity, ESG and sustainability leader at Top 100 Firm Sensiba.
“Accounting firms are very good with the quantifiable data, but the qualitative data is scarier for them because that’s not normally where they live,” Harrity said. “But when you look at it, this is data that you look at opportunities and risks and that’s what accountants have been really good at for a very long time — looking at the numbers and having it tell a story, being able to tell that story to the clients in order to see what is opportunities and risks for an organizations. When paired with the financial data, it’s an extremely impactful forecast, and it’ll allow you to forecast for your clients with a much longer look into the future than just financial data alone.”
Where to start with ESG
With an ongoing talent shortage, firms may feel at a loss on how to start a whole new practice when they still have their traditional compliance work to complete. Starting with a materiality assessment using the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board’s framework is a good place to start, Harrity said.
“Don’t just jump into the practice. Figure out what you want to help your clients with in the ESG space and run through it yourself as a firm,” Harrity said. “One of the things that we did is we said we’re not going to offer any services or tools to our clients that we have not put ourselves through, and I think once you start doing that, you start to really see the value of ESG from an owner standpoint and from an organizational standpoint.”
Establishing good governance practices cannot be overlooked, either. Oftentimes, standard operating procedures aren’t written down — they live in an individual employee’s or a collective’s head.
“If the person who’s responsible for collecting this data were to wake up tomorrow and not be able to come to work, would somebody else be able to know what they were doing and be able to recreate that information?” Hodge said.
After ensuring there is solid governance, then firms can layer controls on top.
“What’s really important to remember — we talk about this all the time with controls on the financial reporting side — is that the company needs to be doing that before their assurance providers come in,” said KPMG’s Hodge. “Because while we perform some of the same procedures, you don’t want the assurance provider to find those mistakes. You want to have identified them and resolved them prior to the assurance provider coming in, or else it just makes the process longer.”
As the profession moves from a compliance to an advisory model, with developing technology like artificial intelligence taking over the compliance side, ESG is an opportunity for firms to add a revenue-generating service to their consulting and advisory arsenals. But this opportunity won’t be around for long.
“There are a lot of sustainability consulting firms, not accounting firms, that are chomping at the bit for this work. If accounting does not get their butts together, it’s ours to lose,” Harrity said. “This business and this niche could be a really powerful additive to our firms, but if we linger, those sustainability firms are going to swoop in and really dominate the space, and it’s going to be hard for us to come back in.”
In a decisive move toward standardized environmental financial reporting, accounting standards boards issued updated implementation guidance during the week ending July 25, 2026, regarding the formal recognition and valuation of corporate carbon offsets and environmental credits. The revised frameworks establish precise rules for how enterprises must measure, record, and disclose carbon credits on balance sheets, eliminating years of inconsistent reporting practices across public capital markets.
Under the finalized accounting standard, purchased carbon offsets can no longer be categorized under vague administrative expenses or unstandardized intangible asset accounts. Instead, organizations must classify environmental credits based on underlying operational intent—distinguishing between credits held for immediate compliance compliance obligations, long-term offset obligations, or active market trading. Furthermore, companies are required to evaluate carbon holdings for fair value impairment at the end of each reporting period, ensuring that depreciated or low-quality environmental credits do not distort corporate asset values.
The standardized rules carry significant implications for corporate audit committees and chief accounting officers. External audit firms are implementing rigorous verification protocols to validate the physical legitimacy, legal ownership, and scientific permanence of carbon credits claimed on balance sheets. Inaccurate or overstated carbon accounting claims now carry substantial financial litigation risk, alongside potential regulatory enforcement for misleading ESG disclosures.
To remain fully compliant, corporate accounting departments must establish centralized carbon tracking systems integrated into primary standard ERP ledgers. Accounting teams that proactively adopt standardized environmental reporting protocols will build investor credibility, streamline annual audit processes, and insulate their organizations against evolving regulatory scrutiny.
Corporate tax departments reached a critical juncture in automated operational management. With nations worldwide rapidly enacting digital service taxes, localized value-added tax (VAT) mandates, and real-time electronic invoicing requirements, manual tax calculations have become obsolete. Modern corporate tax divisions are aggressively deploying AI-driven tax engine software to automate complex cross-border indirect tax calculations in real time.
The imperative for automated tax compliance stems from the sheer complexity of current trade policies and multi-jurisdictional commerce. E-commerce platforms, software vendors, and global manufacturers face constantly changing regional tax rates, statutory exemption rules, and cross-border tariff structures. Automated tax engines embed directly into enterprise enterprise resource planning (ERP) architectures, automatically applying correct tax codes at the point of sale, calculating real-time withholding amounts, and generating compliant e-invoices.
Automated audit trail generation represents another key advantage of modern tax tech integration. Advanced compliance platforms log every transactional tax determination on immutable digital ledgers, providing tax authorities with transparent, self-verifying audit trails. This capability drastically reduces the operational duration and administrative cost of corporate tax audits, protecting enterprises against severe penalties resulting from calculation errors or missed reporting deadlines.
For chief financial officers and tax directors, investing in automated tax compliance is a vital operational risk mitigation strategy. Automating routine tax calculations frees high-level accounting professionals to focus on strategic tax planning, transfer pricing optimization, and risk management in an increasingly complex global economic environment.
As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.
Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.
The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.