Connect with us

UNCATEGORIZED

Ex-IRS Agent Accused of Filing Error-Filled Returns, Costing $42M in Lost Taxes

Published

on

By Annette Cary, Tri-City Herald, Kennewick, Wash. (TNS)

A Kennewick tax preparer cost the United States $42 million in lost tax revenue between 2017 and 2020 after filing tax returns that were riddled with errors, fabrications and fraudulent entries, alleges the Department of Justice.

The Department of Justice filed a civil complaint in Eastern Washington District U.S. Court on Tuesday asking a judge to ban Donald J. Taylor from preparing federal tax returns or owning or operating a tax return preparation business.

“Many customers now face large income tax deficiencies and may be liable for sizable penalties and interest,” after Taylor understated their tax liability or inflated their refunds, according to a court document.

The IRS is identifying his customers, determining their correct tax liabilities, pursuing refunds that were erroneously issued and collecting additional taxes and penalties, according to a court document.

The complaint also asks that U.S. Judge Stanley Bastian require Taylor to pay the U.S. government fees and payments he received from customers for whom he prepared tax returns with false or fraudulent claims.

If Taylor is not barred from preparing tax returns or doing related business, he is likely to continue his behavior, the Department of Justice said in the complaint.

It pointed out that Taylor was issued penalties totaling $62,250 for reckless or willful understatement of tax liability on the returns or refund claims of his customers from 2007 to 2010, but it said that did not deter him from continuing to prepare tax returns with allegedly fraudulent claims.

“Taylor’s conduct is more serious because he was previously employed by the IRS,” said the court complaint. “As part of his training, he would have known of a return preparer’s duty of due diligence, and the consequences of failing to discharge that obligation.”

He worked for the IRS investigating and auditing taxpayers from 2002 through 2008, according to a court document.

In 2009 he entered the private accounting practice of Thomas M. Owen, CPA, at 100 N. Morain St., Kennewick. As a tax manager and tax preparer he prepares tax returns without supervision or review there, according to a court document.

The Department of Justice accuses Taylor of taking advantage of the differences between running a business as a sole proprietorship and an S corporation.

A sole proprietor reports any income and expenses on their individual tax returns, while an S corporation reports income, deductions and loss on a corporate tax return and includes separate forms for shareholders in the company to report income and losses on their own tax returns.

He abused the S corporation requirements to reduce customers’ tax liabilities, according to the Department of Justice.

That included decreasing the amount of wages that employees received and reporting the money as corporation distributions to them to reduce their tax liability, according to the Department of Justice. He also fabricated business deductions and reported improper deductions, the Department of Justice said.

Accusations of fraudulent tax deductions

The complaint filed against Taylor details issues with tax returns he prepared for 10 businesses.

Among the many allegations in the complaint are:

  • Claiming unsubstantiated business deductions for one business that owns no vehicles or assets, including $6,710 in vehicle expenses, $29,186 for repairs and maintenance, and $22,366 for insurance.
  • Claiming $3,557 in office expenses for two years for a business, when the tax preparation customer said only $76 was spent.
  • Expensing $67,471 in depreciation for three vehicles, knowing that the vehicles were privately owned rather than owned by the company.
  • Reporting that a business owned a building and land worth $90,000 and had a mortgage of nearly that much, then taking a depreciation deduction of $2,545, and also claiming a $17,577 deduction for a new roof. However, he knew the company did not own the business or land and had no mortgage, according to the customer who hired him for tax preparation.

Taylor prepared 779 returns for S corporations between tax years 2017 and 2020.

The Department of Justice concluded there was a 96% error rate on those returns to reach its conclusion of $42 million in tax harm to the federal government, according to a court document.

His alleged conduct also harmed the public by undermining public confidence in the federal tax system an encouraging widespread violations of tax laws, according to the complaint.

“Taylor’s illegal conduct also causes intangible harm to honest tax return preparers, because by preparing returns that falsely or fraudulently inflate the customers’ refunds, Taylor gains an unfair competitive advantage over tax return preparers who prepare returns in accordance with the law and who as a result may have fewer customers,” the complaint said.

Federal court documents do not yet list an attorney for Taylor.

______

(c)2024 Tri-City Herald (Kennewick, Wash.). Visit Tri-City Herald (Kennewick, Wash.) at www.tri-cityherald.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Continue Reading

UNCATEGORIZED

Hardware Rally Diverges From Software Stocks

Published

on

Hardware Rally Diverges From Software Stocks

As midyear earnings reports flood Wall Street during the week of July 21, 2026, a sharp performance divergence has emerged within the technology sector. Equity indices reflect robust institutional buying in semiconductor manufacturers, data center infrastructure providers, and specialized power equipment suppliers. Conversely, enterprise Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) equities are facing notable valuation pressure as institutional investors demand clear, high-margin top-line revenue growth to justify elevated price-to-earnings multiples.

The sustained momentum in hardware equities is anchored in massive, multi-billion-dollar capital expenditure budgets allocated by mega-cap technology corporations. Demand for next-generation computing architectures, high-density server hardware, and specialized cooling infrastructure remains unyielding as enterprises globally build out localized computing clusters. Semiconductor foundries and equipment manufacturers continue to report record order backlogs, granting these companies exceptional pricing power and revenue visibility despite broader macroeconomic uncertainty.

In contrast, the enterprise software segment is navigating a rigorous fundamental reassessment. While software vendors have aggressively integrated automated digital features across their applications, enterprise customers are closely scrutinizing software licensing expenditures. Corporate IT departments are demanding verifiable productivity metrics before expanding user licenses, leading to extended sales cycles for software providers. Firms that fail to demonstrate direct, measurable return on investment are experiencing sharp post-earnings corrections.

For equity portfolio managers, navigating the midyear technology landscape requires strict balance sheet analysis and disciplined stock selection. Investors should focus on hardware leaders with defensible technological moats and enterprise software firms featuring deep workflow integration and proven monetization models. Maintaining a balanced, highly selective exposure protects capital while capturing structural technological growth.

Continue Reading

UNCATEGORIZED

Hardware vs. Software Divergence: Navigating Midyear 2026 Tech Sector Earnings

Published

on

Hardware vs. Software Divergence: Navigating Midyear 2026 Tech Sector Earnings

As the midyear 2026 earnings season accelerates through the week of July 20, the technology sector is displaying a notable operational split between hardware infrastructure providers and enterprise software-as-a-service (SaaS) platforms. Market indices reflect strong institutional demand for companies supplying core computing hardware, advanced power management systems, and specialized optical networking components. Conversely, software providers are facing intense margin scrutiny as Wall Street demands concrete, high-margin revenue growth to justify elevated software valuations.

The sustained outperformance of hardware equities is anchored in ongoing, multi-billion-dollar global capital investments into data center infrastructure, grid capacity expansion, and high-performance chip architecture. Semiconductor foundries and specialized component suppliers have consistently reported robust order backlogs, driven by enterprise commitments to build out secure, localized computing clusters. Investors have rewarded these companies due to their tangible, order-backed revenue visibility and strong pricing power in a constrained supply environment.

On the other hand, the software sector is navigating a transition phase. While enterprise software vendors have heavily invested in integrating automated AI capabilities across their product suites, corporate clients are scrutinizing software licencing costs and requiring clear return-on-investment metrics before expanding enterprise seat licenses. Consequently, software vendors that rely on generic feature upgrades without demonstrable productivity improvements are seeing extended sales cycles and valuation compression during quarterly earnings calls.

For equity investors, navigating the tech market for the remainder of 2026 requires rigorous fundamental analysis focused on capital efficiency and cash flow generation. Strategic focus should be directed toward hardware leaders with unassailable technological moats and enterprise software companies possessing deep workflow integration and proven monetization models. Maintaining a balanced, selective exposure ensures participation in technological growth while hedging against localized valuation corrections.

Continue Reading

UNCATEGORIZED

Utilities Re-Valuation: How Industrial Power Demand Driven by AI Upgrades Sector Equities

Published

on

How Industrial Power Demand Driven by AI Upgrades Sector Equities

Traditionally viewed as defensive, low-growth dividend plays, utility equities are undergoing a remarkable structural re-valuation across major stock exchanges in July 2026. Driven by an unprecedented surge in industrial power requirements—stemming from high-density data centers, advanced domestic manufacturing plants, and widespread electrification initiatives—utility providers are presenting revenue growth profiles historically reserved for growth sectors. This transition has repositioned power and energy infrastructure equities into prime targets for institutional capital.

The driver of this market shift is the long-term contractual nature of commercial energy demand. Tech giants and industrial manufacturers are entering into multi-decade power purchase agreements (PPAs) with utility operators to secure guaranteed baseload power. To meet this demand, utility companies are undertaking massive capital expenditure programs to modernize electrical transmission networks, integrate next-generation nuclear and renewable power facilities, and enhance regional grid resilience. Regulated utility models allow these companies to earn predictable returns on these substantial capital investments.

Furthermore, equity analysts highlight that the sector offers an attractive blend of growth potential and downside protection in a sustained high-interest-rate environment. While elevated capital costs increase borrowing expenses for grid infrastructure upgrades, the sheer volume of new industrial power demand provides strong top-line revenue expansion that offsets debt-servicing expenses. Investors seeking reliable yield combined with structural capital appreciation are increasingly allocating capital to regulated electric utilities and independent power producers.

Moving through the second half of 2026, portfolio managers recommend evaluating utility equities based on regional regulatory environments and capital execution track records. Companies operating in regions with streamlined permitting processes, supportive state regulatory commissions, and direct proximity to expanding industrial corridors are best positioned to deliver superior long-term shareholder value.

Continue Reading

Trending