Connect with us

Accounting

FASB proposes to improve interim reporting

Published

on

The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued a proposed accounting standards update Wednesday that aims to improve the navigability of the disclosures that need to be provided for interim reporting periods and clarify both when that guidance is applicable and which disclosures are required in interim reporting periods. 

The proposed ASU is described as “narrow scope improvements” and it’s not supposed to change the fundamental nature of interim reporting or expand or reduce the current interim disclosure requirements. Instead, the proposed ASU would offer greater clarity about the current interim reporting requirements.

The amendments in the proposed ASU would clarify that the guidance in Topic 270, the part of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification on interim reporting, applies to all entities that provide interim financial statements and notes in accordance with GAAP. The amendments would also create a comprehensive list in Topic 270 of interim disclosures that are required in interim financial statements and notes in accordance with GAAP.

The proposed amendments incorporate a disclosure principle, modeled after a previous SEC principle, that would require entities to disclose events and changes that occur after the end of the most recent fiscal year that have a material impact on the entity. The proposed ASU would also improve the guidance about information included in and the format of interim financial statements.

“One of the benefits of the [Codification] was it brought all this disparate accounting guidance into one location, and tried to make it much easier, so that if you were working on a topic, you could find it,” said FASB chair Richard Jones during a session at Financial Executives International’s Current Financial Reporting Insights Conference on Tuesday. “But then we had this chapter on interim reporting. And to be fair, when you looked at it, it probably didn’t do a very good job of explaining when someone prepares interim financial statements, what disclosures are required on an interim basis. And so what we did was we spent a lot of time going through all of our old board memos, through the Codification, the predecessor to the Codification. And what we’ve attempted to do is to bring together into one place required interim disclosures, as well as adding in the disclosure principle that many of you are familiar with from prior SEC guidance related to material changes from the information in the annual report, and when you have to supplement that on an interim basis. And that’s our objective. We had some board members who wanted to greatly expand interim reporting. We had other board members who said, ‘Let’s delete all the requirements and just go with the principle.’ But ultimately, what we decided was we needed to clarify exactly what our standards did and didn’t require, and that’s what we’re focused on.”

jones-richard-fasb-fei-cfri-2024.jpg

FASB chair Richard Jones speaking at FEI CFRI virtual conference

FASB is asking for comments on the proposed ASU by March 31, 2025. Jones encouraged members of the audience of the virtual FEI CFRI conference who do quarterly reporting at least three times a year to take a look at the proposed ASU. “We think we’re in a pretty good spot, but to the extent that you think we’ve included something or excluded something, that it’s different from what was intended when the standards were issued, we’d be very interested,” he said,

Jones said FASB expects to issue one additional final standard, six exposure drafts and three invitations to comments before the end of the year, and this would be one of those exposure drafts. 

During a press conference following the session, Accounting Today asked if FASB had been receiving much feedback yet on some of its recent standards on crypto assets and income tax reporting.

“I would say on the crypto standard, we haven’t really heard a lot,” said Jones. “Moving into fair value was pretty well received by all of our stakeholder groups. On income taxes, we’ve done a lot of outreach, and what we were talking about was expansion of disclosures currently required. I think those were pretty well understood. It’s possible we’ll get more questions before adoption next year, but as of now, we’re not really getting a huge volume of inquiries.”

Accounting Today also asked about FASB’s plans to offer more guidance on key performance indicators. Later this week, FASB plans to send out an invitation comment on financial key performance indicators, Jones said during the session, and it will ask a series of questions about whether there’s a role for FASB to play in standardizing financial KPIs such as EBITDA, funds from operation, free cash flow or an adjusted earnings measure. Accounting Today asked Jones whether this guidance might address some of the concerns the Securities and Exchange Commission has expressed about the use of non-GAAP measures.

“Whether they’re concerned about them and which ones they are and aren’t, I’ll leave to them,” said Jones. “We have heard from some stakeholders that we should be considering whether there are certain financial KPIs that should be brought into the financial statements. Now, what does that mean? For some that might mean, are there some financial KPIs that could benefit with a standardized definition, say a single definition of EBITDA, and what goes into that? For others, it may simply mean, what industries does it make sense to provide a KPI in the financial statements? Alternatively, some look at it and say, ‘Well, maybe there are KPIs that the company’s already using. Is there a way under a management type approach to bring them into the financial statements, or should potentially, they not be included in the financials?’ So it’s really us getting input on all those issues. Depending on what we hear from that ITC, we’ll bring that back to our board, and our board will be able to make decisions on [whether] there’s a need for standard-setting in this area.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Instead adds AI-driven tax reports

Published

on

Tax management platform Instead launched artificial intelligence-driven tax reports, harnessing AI to analyze full tax returns to glean tax strategies and missed opportunities.

The San Francisco-based company’s reports, which are designed for clarity and compliance, include:

  • Tax Return Analysis Report, which reveals tax-saving opportunities in tax returns for individuals (1040) and businesses (Schedule C, E, F, 1120, 1120S, 1065).
  • Tax Plan Report, which provides a real-time summary and action list of all tax strategies across all entities in a tax year and includes potential and actual savings, summaries for each tax strategy, and IRS and court case references.
  • Tax Strategy Reports for every tax strategy, with detailed calculations of deductions and credits, supporting documentation, and an actionable plan.

Instead users can collaborate with their tax professionals on the platform or search the Instead directory of firms that support the platform and offer tax planning and advisory services. 

Andrew Argue

Andrew Argue

“We are excited to bring our users the future of smart, effective decisions when it comes to filing taxes,” said Andrew Argue, co-founder of Instead, in a statement. “With Instead, users can easily uncover and implement tax strategies and opportunities that will save them money and have the transparent calculations to support a tax return. And this is just the beginning…we have some exciting things on our roadmap and look forward to sharing them very soon!”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Half of accountants expect firms to shrink headcount by 20%

Published

on

Fifty-two percent of accountants expect their firms to shrink in headcount by 20% in the next five years, according to a new report.

The Indiana CPA Society, in collaboration with CPA Crossings, released today a 2025 Workforce Transformation report. Paradoxically, while it found that most respondents anticipate their firms to reduce headcount, 75% said that their firms will need the same amount or more staff to meet future client demand. 

Sixty percent of respondents said that entry-level professionals are the role they anticipate needing fewer employees in the future due to automation. Nearly half as many responded saying experienced professionals (approximately 33%) and manager-level roles (approximately 25%). 

The report highlights the weaknesses of the pyramid-shaped practice structure that is the basis for most firm’s current talent management and workforce development systems. One challenge is the pyramid’s low retention design. 

“The pyramid practice structure was not designed to retain staff. It actually does the opposite. Upward mobility is statistically difficult to attain,” the report reads. “Firms have a lot of requirements for entry-level staff, but there is a lot less need for experienced staff. Firms eventually have a lot of entry-level professionals qualified to become experienced staff but only a few openings. It only gets more difficult as staff try to move from experienced staff to managers. For those who want to move from managers to owners, the wait could be 15 years or more — or maybe never.”

The report discussed the dwindling pipeline of incoming talent, saying, “Currently, there are not enough qualified staff to maintain a bottom layer that is wide enough,” and generational preferences, saying, “Gen Zers are looking for meaning and emotional connection. If they cannot find these connections in their work, it won’t take much for them to decide to move on.”

The final weakness of the pyramid model the report highlighted was advances in technology, particularly automation and artificial intelligence. 

“Advances in technology, especially with automation and artificial intelligence, could obliterate the work being done by the bottom of the pyramid,” the report reads. “This impact is beginning to be seen in accounting firms across the country as manual and time-consuming data entry and reconciliation tasks, once assigned to entry-level staff, are being automated. Firms are already seeing great benefits from this transfer, such as faster and more accurate data processing.”

The report suggests that firms take on a new practice structure that focuses on precision hiring, proactive retention, practical technology implementation, pricing expertise, practice area expansion or focus, and people acceleration. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

Senate Republicans plan major revisions to Trump tax bill

Published

on

The U.S. Capitol

Senate Republicans intend to propose revised tax and health-care provisions to President Donald Trump’s $3 trillion signature economic package this week, shrugging off condemnations of the legislation by Elon Musk as they rush to enact it before July 4. 

The Senate Finance Committee’s plan to extract savings from the Medicaid and — perhaps — Medicare health insurance programs could depart in key respects from the version of the giant bill that narrowly passed the US House in May. The release of the panel’s draft will likely touch off a new round of wrangling between fiscal conservatives and moderates. 

As the debate unfolds, businesses in the energy, health care, manufacturing and financial services industries will be watching closely.  

SALT dilemma

A crucial decision for Majority Leader John Thune, Committee Chairman Mike Crapo and other panel members will be how to handle the $40,000 limit on state and local tax deductions that was crucial to passage of the bill in the House. 

Senate Republicans want to scale back the $350 billion cost of increasing the cap from $10,000 to $40,000 for those making less than $500,000.   

House Speaker Mike Johnson and a group of Republican members from high-tax states have warned that any diminishing of the SALT cap would doom the measure when it comes back to the House for a final vote. At the same time, so-called pass-through businesses in the service sector are pushing to remove a provision in the House bill that limits their ability to claim SALT deductions. 

(Read more:What the House gave the Senate: Inside the ‘Big Beautiful’ bill.“)

The Senate Finance Committee is widely expected to propose extending three business tax breaks that expire after 2029 in the House version to order to make them permanent. They are the research and development deduction, the ability to use depreciation and amortization as the basis for interest expensing and 100% bonus depreciation of certain property, including most machinery and factories.  

Manufacturers and banks are particularly eager to see all of them extended. 

To pay for the items, which most economists rank as the most pro-growth in the overall tax bill, senators may restrict temporary breaks on tips and overtime, which Trump campaigned on during last year’s election in appeals to restaurant and hospitality workers. The White House wants to keep those provisions as is.

White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett said Trump “supports changing” the SALT deduction and it’s up to lawmakers to reach a consensus.

“It’s a horse trading issue with the Senate and the House,” Hassett said Sunday on CBS’s Face the Nation. “The one thing we need and the president wants is a bill that passes, and passes on the Fourth of July.”

The committee will also face tough decisions on green energy tax credits. Scaling those back generates nearly $600 billion in savings in the House bill. 

On Friday, rival House factions released dueling statements. 

The conservative House Freedom Caucus warned that any move to restore some of the credits would prompt its members to vote against the bill. “We want to be crystal clear: If the Senate attempts to water down, strip out, or walk back the hard-fought spending reductions and IRA Green New Scam rollbacks achieved in this legislation, we will not accept it,” the group said. 

In contrast, a group of 13 Republican moderates, led by Pennsylvania’s Brian Fitzpatrick and Virginia’s Jen Kiggans, urged senators to make changes that would benefit renewable energy projects, many in Republican districts, that came about through President Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act. 

(Listen:The state of the ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ and more.“)

“We remain deeply concerned by several provisions, including those which would abruptly terminate several credits just 60 days after enactment for projects that have not yet begun construction,” the lawmakers said in a letter to the Senate. 

Banks are especially interested to ensure that tax credits on their balance sheets as part of renewable energy financing aren’t rendered worthless by the bill. 

Health-care perils

Medicaid and Medicare cuts present the most daunting challenge in the committee’s draft. While Republicans are generally in favor of new work requirements for able-bodied adults to be insured by Medicaid, some moderates like Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska have expressed concern over giving states just a year and a half to implement the requirement.  

Senator Lisa Murkowski House provisions instituting new co-pays for Medicaid recipients and limits on the ability of states to tax Medicaid providers in order to increase federal reimbursement payments are more disputed. 

Senators Josh Hawley of Missouri and Jim Justice of West Virginia have said they oppose these changes.  

To find savings to make up for removing these provisions, Republicans said last week that they are examining whether to put new restrictions on billing practices in Medicare Advantage. Large health insurers that provide those plans would be most affected by such changes. 

Yet overall, GOP leaders say the tax bill remains on schedule and they expect much of the House bill to remain intact. 

The Senate’s rules-keeper is in the process of deciding whether some provisions are not primarily fiscal in nature. Provisions that restrict state regulations on artificial intelligence, ending some gun regulations and putting new limits on federal courts are seen as most vulnerable to being stripped under Senate budget rules. 

Lawmakers are largely taking their cues from Trump and sticking by the $3 trillion bill at the center of the White House’s economic agenda. 

Musk, the biggest political donor of the 2024 campaign, has threatened to help defeat anyone who votes for the legislation, but lawmakers seem to agree that staying in the president’s good graces is the safer path to political survival.

“We are already pretty far down the trail,” Thune told reporters on Thursday afternoon as his colleagues left for the weekend.

Continue Reading

Trending