Connect with us

Economics

Fed officials are raising concerns about Trump’s tariffs and inflation

Published

on

Austan Goolsbee speaking at Jackson Hole on August 23, 2024.

David A. Grogan | CNBC

Federal Reserve officials take great pains not to comment on fiscal policy, but the looming threat from tariffs is forcing their hand.

In recent days, multiple central bank policymakers not only have noted the uncertainty surrounding President Donald Trump’s desire to slap broad-ranging duties on products from Canada, Mexico and China — and perhaps the European Union — they also have highlighted the potential impact on inflation.

Any indication that the tariffs are presenting longer-lasting pressure in prices could make the Fed hold interest rates higher for longer.

In remarks at an auto symposium Wednesday in Detroit, Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee cited a number of supply chain threats that include “large tariffs and the potential for an escalating trade war.”

“If we see inflation rising or progress stalling in 2025, the Fed will be in the difficult position of trying to figure out if the inflation is coming from overheating or if it’s coming from tariffs,” Goolsbee said. “That distinction will be critical for deciding when or even if the Fed should act.”

Last week, the Federal Open Market Committee, of which Goolsbee is a voting member, voted to hold its benchmark interest rate steady in a range of 4.25% to 4.50% as it evaluates the evolving set of economic conditions.

The vote came amid a backdrop of gamesmanship between Trump and the largest U.S. trading partners, in which he postponed levies against Canada and Mexico but added 10% in tariffs against China, which retaliated with its own measures.

Economists generally see tariffs as having one-time impacts on prices, affecting particular goods where the duties are targeted but not acting as more widespread and more fundamental drivers of inflation. However, in this case Trump is casting a wide enough net that it could generate the kind of underlying inflation the Fed fears.

A limited road map

In an interview earlier this week with CNBC, Boston Fed President Susan Collins, also an FOMC voter, said she and her staff are studying the potential impact of tariffs, and she noted the unusual nature of the sweeping tariffs Trump has proposed.

“We have limited experience of such large and very broad-based tariffs,” she said. “There are many different dimensions, and there are second-round effects as well, which make it particularly hard to really assess what the amounts would be … We don’t know what the time frame would be that would cause a rise in a price level.”

If the tariffs were short-lived, “you’d expect the Federal Reserve would try to look through. But of course, there are many factors going on from that perspective. So I’ll just say quickly that the underlying trends in inflation in the economy really matter a lot for how, you know, how I think about policy going forward.”

Other Fed officials, such as Philadelphia President Patrick Harker and the Atlanta Fed’s Raphael Bostic, also said they are concerned about potential inflationary effects and said they also will be watching for longer-term impacts.

For his part, Chair Jerome Powell deflected multiple questions about tariffs at his post-meeting news conference last week, saying it’s too early to make judgments about fiscal policy.

“We don’t know what will happen with tariffs, with immigration, with fiscal policy, and with regulatory policy,” he said. “I think we need to let those policies be articulated before we can even begin to make a plausible assessment of what their implications for the economy will be.”

—Reuters contributed to this report.

Economics

Is there a “woke right” in America?

Published

on

Conservatives don’t like being compared to the liberals they despise

Continue Reading

Economics

World Bank cuts 2025 growth outlook to 2.3% as trade tariffs weigh

Published

on

Cargo shipping containers are loaded with cranes on container ships at the Burchardkai container terminal at the harbour of Hamburg, northern Germany, on June 3, 2025.

Fabian Bimmer | Afp | Getty Images

The World Bank sharply cut its global economic growth projections Tuesday, citing disruption from trade uncertainty in particular.

It now expects the global economy to expand by 2.3% in 2025, down from an earlier forecast of 2.7%.

“This would mark the slowest rate of global growth since 2008, aside from outright global recessions,” the Bank said in its Global Economic Prospects report.

Trade uncertainty, especially, has weighed on the outlook, the World Bank suggested.

“International discord — about trade, in particular — has upended many of the policy certainties that helped shrink extreme poverty and expand prosperity after the end of World War II,” Indermit Gill, senior vice president and chief economist of The World Bank Group, said in the report.

It also cut its 2025 growth forecast for the U.S. by 0.9 percentage points to 1.4%, and reduced its euro area GDP expectations by 0.3 percentage points to 0.7%.

The Bank noted that an escalation of trade tensions could push growth even lower, but the picture could improve if major economies strike lasting trade agreements.

“Our analysis suggests that if today’s trade disputes were resolved with agreements that halve tariffs relative to their levels in late May, 2025, global growth could be stronger by about 0.2 percentage point on average over the course of 2025 and 2026,” Gill said.

The U.S. and many of its trading partners are currently in negotiations after U.S. President Donald Trump imposed steep tariffs on numerous countries in April. This week, for example, the U.S. and China are meeting in London after the two countries agreed to temporarily reduce levies following talks in May.

Negotiations are also still ongoing between the U.S. and European Union with less than a month to go before previously announced tariffs are set to come into full force.

In cutting its global growth expectation, the World Bank follows various other bodies, including the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, which also cited the fallout from trade and tariff-related uncertainty as the key factor.

The OECD said earlier this month that it was expecting global growth to slow to 2.9% in 2025, also caveating its forecast with the potential for future tariff developments. It had previously forecast global growth of 3.1% this year.

Continue Reading

Economics

Bulgaria is set to join the euro zone. Its citizens aren’t convinced

Published

on

A person beats a drum with the euro logo crossed out in red on the drumhead during a demonstration against Bulgaria entering the Eurozone in Sofia on May 31, 2025.

Nikolay Doychinov | Afp | Getty Images

Bulgaria is set to become the 21st member of the euro zone after receiving sign off from the European Commission and European Central Bank last week — but not everyone is convinced the move is a good idea.

Bulgaria’s Prime Minister Rosen Zhelyazkov, member of the center-right GERB party, has made joining the euro zone a priority, arguing that it would boost economic stability and growth.

However, fears of higher prices and a loss of independence have stoked nationalist-party fueled protests against the country’s euro ascension. A recent European Union survey showed that half of Bulgaria’s population is against adopting the euro.

Economists and experts weighed in on the potential risks to Bulgaria joining the euro, outlining what the eastern European country could lose and gain from the move.

Inflation and interest rates

“The most immediate concern is a spike in prices during the currency switch, as some businesses may round up prices. Many Bulgarians worry that eurozone membership could erode their purchasing power, especially in poorer rural areas,” Valentin Tataru, an economist at ING who covers Bulgaria, told CNBC.

Nevertheless, he also noted Bulgaria’s currency has long had a fixed exchange rate to the euro and therefore, “the transitional inflation bump should be mild.”

A worker counts Bulgarian Lev banknotes at a store in Sofia, Bulgaria, on Friday, March 29, 2024.

The euro zone is ready for a new member: Bulgaria

The second key concern is what giving up Bulgaria’s currency, the lev, will mean for the country’s independence and sovereignty — ideals for which it has become symbolic according to Andrius Tursa, central and eastern Europe advisor at Teneo.

“Its replacement with the euro may be perceived by parts of the population as a loss of national control,” he told CNBC. In addition there are concerns about relinquishing control of monetary policy as countries in the euro zone are subject to decisions by the ECB, Tursa added.

The Bulgarian National Bank (BNB) would for example no longer solely be responsible for setting the country’s interest rates based only on how its individual economy is developing.

However, “eurozone countries benefit from lower interest rates due to the credibility of the ECB and reduced currency risk,” Tursa pointed out. Lower interest rates typically benefit borrowers as loans and mortgages become more affordable.

Economic stability and power

Joining the euro zone and securing oversight from the ECB could boost economic stability and growth prospects for Bulgaria, Jasmin Groeschl, senior economist for Europe at Allianz SE, told CNBC.

Foreign investment could for example increase, she suggested, and the country’s gross domestic product would be expected to be boosted by euro zone membership.

“Deeper financial integration would strengthen Bulgaria’s financial system under the ECB’s oversight, enhancing monetary stability,” Groeschl explained. “Adopting the euro would strengthen Bulgaria’s ties with the EU, enhancing its influence and credibility,” she added.

Key areas that underpin the economy like trade and tourism could also be supported, Teneo’s Tursa said.

'We are seeing lots of opportunities in Europe,' says Ares co-president

Many of Bulgaria’s key trading partners are in the EU, with most of its exports going to members of the 27-state bloc in 2023 according to data from the country’s statistics office. Key sectors include machinery and transport equipment, manufactured goods and food.

Tourism has meanwhile become a major contributor to the economy as Bulgaria positions itself as both a summer and winter destination. Over 13 million foreigners visited the country in 2024, official statistics showed.

“Bulgaria’s accession to the eurozone would facilitate trade and tourism flows with other eurozone countries by eliminating the costs and burden associated with currency conversion,” Tursa said, adding that this would be particularly important due to Bulgaria’s strong integration into EU supply chains.

Political tensions

One risk flagged by the economists and analysts are the political tensions surrounding Bulgaria’s euro adoption.

“Public opposition to euro adoption has already triggered notable protests, and in the medium term, the issue could become a key driver of rising support for populist and Euroskeptic political movements,” Teneo’s Tursa explained.

But despite local protests and concerns about euro zone ascension, at least in the long term the benefits for the country outweigh any negatives, Allianz SE’s Groeschl argued.

“The trade-off involves losing some economic autonomy in exchange for deeper integration,” she said. “Although Bulgaria would lose some monetary policy control and be subject to strict fiscal rules, the advantages of greater economic stability, reduced transaction costs and stronger integration with the EU market would typically outweigh these disadvantages.”

ING’s Tataru struck a similar tone, saying that because the lev is already tied to the euro, there should not be a major shock.

“Joining the euro is one of the most strategic steps Bulgaria can take to secure long-term prosperity and deeper European integration,” he said.

Continue Reading

Trending