Connect with us

Personal Finance

Federal minimum wage has been $7.25 for 15 years. How that may change

Published

on

Activists demonstrate in support of a $15-per-hour minimum wage and tips for restaurant workers in Washington, D.C. on Feb. 8, 2022.

Mandel Ngan | AFP | Getty Images

The federal minimum wage recently marked a new anniversary. But for affected workers, that may not be something to celebrate.

The federal minimum wage has now been stuck at $7.25 per hour for 15 years.

On the campaign trail, Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris recently suggested that should change.

“When I am president, we will continue our fight for working families of America, including to raise the minimum wage and eliminate taxes on tips for service and hospitality workers,” Harris said at an Aug. 10 Nevada campaign event.

More from Personal Finance:
Trump and Harris both want no taxes on tips. Experts don’t like the idea
Walz vs. Vance: What candidates could mean for your wallet
Trump doubles down on call for presidential influence on Fed policy

Many states have enacted minimum hourly pay rates that are higher than the federal minimum wage. Yet 20 states have wages that are no higher than the federal level, according to Business for a Fair Minimum Wage. They include Alabama, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Hampshire, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

The federal minimum wage for tipped workers is $2.13 per hour, provided their tips bring them to the $7.25 per hour federal minimum wage. Michigan recently became the first state in more than four decades to eliminate the subminimum wage for tipped workers.

Harris has not said how high she wants to raise the minimum wage, though she has praised states that have raised the rate to at least $15 per hour.

The Harris campaign did not return a request for comment by CNBC.

Fast-food minimum wage hits $20 in California

Congressional Democrats in 2021 tried to raise the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour as part of a broader Covid relief package. However, those efforts failed after it was determined the change could not be included in legislation handled through a one-party majority.   

During a 2020 debate, then President Donald Trump expressed concerns about whether raising the federal pay threshold would hurt small businesses.

“How are you helping your small businesses when you’re forcing wages?” Trump said during the 2020 debate. “What’s going to happen and what’s been proven to happen is when you do that these small businesses fire many of their employees.”

Trump’s campaign did not respond a request for comment by CNBC.

A CNBC survey from earlier this year found a majority of small business owners — 61% — support raising their state’s minimum wage, though half said such a change could make it difficult to be able to afford to pay workers who are critical to their businesses.

One point that tends to get lost in the minimum wage debate is the connection between a higher wage and stronger consumer buying power, according to Holly Sklar, CEO of advocacy group Business for a Fair Minimum Wage.

“When you lose minimum wage buying power, it means you’re losing customer buying power,” Sklar said.

Once workers earn higher minimum wages, they will be more likely to spend that money, which will help businesses, she said.

Raising today’s federal minimum wage would help low-wage workers who are trying to earn a living and have a sense of economic security, said Ben Zipperer, senior economist at the Economic Policy Institute, a Washington, D.C., think tank that provides economic research.

“The minimum wage has basically lost, 29%, 30% of its purchasing power over the last 15 years, simply because Congress has failed to update it,” Zipperer said.

Lifting the minimum wage threshold to $15 per hour would increase the incomes of about 20 million workers, Zipperer said. That would include people who are low-wage workers who may be earning hourly pay that is slightly more than the federal minimum wage threshold.

“Changes in wages don’t necessarily result in big changes in employment,” Zipperer said.

“When you raise wages at a particular workplace, that makes it a lot easier to recruit and retain workers,” he said.

Some companies, such as Target and Walmart, have set their own higher minimum pay thresholds, at $15 and $14 per hour, respectively, in response to tight retail labor market conditions.

Still, advocates hope for a broader change at the national level.

“We look forward to supporting efforts to raise the minimum wage in the next White House, in the next Congress, and showing that there’s a very good business case for that,” Sklar said.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Student loan repayment tips amid challenging times for borrowers

Published

on

Sdi Productions | E+ | Getty Images

It’s a challenging time for many federal student loan borrowers just trying to find ways to pay off their debt.

Millions of borrowers who enrolled in the Biden administration-era Saving on a Valuable Education plan are now in limbo after the program was blocked by Republican-led legal challenges.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration has changed the terms on several other repayment plans.

To successfully keep up with your student loan payments and eventually emerge debt-free, borrowers should explore their options and understand the terms of their repayment plan. Here’s what you need to know amid major challenges to the lending system.

How the SAVE plan got blocked

A U.S. appeals court in February blocked the Biden administration’s student loan relief plan known as SAVE.

The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the seven Republican-led states that filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Education’s plan. The states had argued that former President Joe Biden, with SAVE, was essentially trying to find a roundabout way to forgive student debt after the Supreme Court struck down his sweeping debt cancellation plan in June 2023.

SAVE came with two key provisions that the lawsuits targeted: It had lower monthly payments than any other federal student loan repayment plan, and it led to quicker debt erasure for those with small balances.

Forbearance has no clear end date

When its SAVE plan got tied up in legal challenges, the Biden administration put millions of borrowers who’d enrolled in the plan in an interest-free forbearance. Borrowers, if they wish, can still remain in that payment pause.

There’s no specific end date to that forbearance as of now, said Scott Buchanan, executive director of the Student Loan Servicing Alliance, a trade group for federal student loan servicers.

More from Personal Finance:
Stock volatility poses an ‘opportunity’
How tariffs fuel higher prices
The ‘danger zone’ for retirees when stocks dip

But unlike the Covid-era pause on student loan bills, this forbearance does not give borrowers credit toward debt forgiveness under an income-driven repayment plan or Public Service Loan Forgiveness.

Historically, at least, IDR plans limit borrowers’ monthly payments to a share of their discretionary income and cancel any remaining debt after a certain period, typically 20 years or 25 years. PSLF, which President George W. Bush signed into law in 2007, allows certain not-for-profit and government employees to have their federal student loans wiped away after 10 years of payments.

Borrowers have other options

Some borrowers who are in the SAVE program’s forbearance might want to sit tight, said higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz. Not having to make payments might be a relief to those who are experiencing any financial struggles.

Another benefit of remaining in the payment pause is that interest isn’t accumulating on your debt, like it would under other IDR plans, Buchanan explained.

“But months in SAVE forbearance do not count toward loan forgiveness, so both those considerations need to be weighed when thinking about switching plans,” Buchanan said.

If you do decide to switch out of the now-blocked SAVE plan, the Trump administration says that the other IDR plans now open are: Income-Based Repayment, Pay As You Earn and Income-Contingent Repayment.

The Education Department recently reopened those IDR plan applications, following a period during which the plans were unavailable. (The Trump administration said it was updating the plans’ applications to make them comply with the recent court order over SAVE.)

Borrowers should know that the automatic loan forgiveness after 20 or 25 years is not available at the moment under ICR or PAYE “since the courts have questioned that permissibility under statute,” Buchanan said.

How Wall Street trades student loans

Still, if a borrower enrolled in ICR or PAYE, then switches to IBR, their previous payments made under the other plans will count toward loan forgiveness under IBR, as long as they meet the plan’s other requirements, Buchanan said.

Meanwhile, borrowers in any of the three IDR plans can get credit toward PSLF.

If you’re on strong financial footing and not seeking loan forgiveness, the Standard Repayment Plan is a smart option for borrowers, experts say. Under that plan, the payments will usually be larger than on an IDR plan, but they’re fixed and borrowers are typically debt-free after just a decade.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Here’s why ‘dead’ investors outperform the living

Published

on

Andrew Fox | The Image Bank | Getty Images

“Dead” investors often beat the living — at least, when it comes to investment returns.

A “dead” investor refers to an inactive trader who adopts a “buy and hold” investment strategy. This often leads to better returns than active trading, which generally incurs higher costs and taxes and stems from impulsive, emotional decision-making, experts said.

Doing nothing, it turns out, generally yields better results for the average investor than taking a more active role in one’s portfolio, according to investment experts.

The “biggest threat” to investor returns is human behavior, not government policy or company actions, said Brad Klontz, a certified financial planner and financial psychologist.

“It’s them selling [investments] when they’re in a panic state, and conversely, buying when they’re all excited,” said Klontz, the managing principal of YMW Advisors in Boulder, Colorado, and a member of CNBC’s Advisor Council.

“We are our own worst enemy, and it’s why dead investors outperform the living,” he said.

Why returns fall short

Spring cleaning your finances

The average U.S. mutual fund and exchange-traded fund investor earned 6.3% per year during the decade from 2014 to 2023, according to Morningstar. However, the average fund had a 7.3% total return over that period, it found.

That gap is “significant,” wrote Jeffrey Ptak, managing director for Morningstar Research Services.

It means investors lost out on about 15% of the returns their funds generated over 10 years, he wrote. That gap is consistent with returns from earlier periods, he said.

“If you buy high and sell low, your return will lag the buy-and-hold return,” Ptak wrote. “That’s why your return fell short.”

Wired to run with the herd

Emotional impulses to sell during downturns or buy into certain categories when they’re peaking (think meme stocks, crypto or gold) make sense when considering human evolution, experts said.

“We’re wired to actually run with the herd,” Klontz said. “Our approach to investing is actually psychologically the absolute wrong way to invest, but we’re wired to do it that way.”

Market moves can also trigger a fight-or-flight response, said Barry Ritholtz, the chairman and chief investment officer of Ritholtz Wealth Management.

More from Personal Finance:
Investors will be ‘miles ahead’ if they avoid these 3 things
Stock volatility poses an ‘opportunity’
How investors can ready their portfolios for a recession

“We evolved to survive and adapt on the savanna, and our intuition … wants us to make an immediate emotional response,” Ritholtz said. “That immediate response never has a good outcome in the financial markets.”

These behavioral mistakes can add up to major losses, experts say.

Consider a $10,000 investment in the S&P 500 from 2005 through 2024.

A buy-and-hold investor would have had almost $72,000 at the end of those 20 years, for a 10.4% average annual return, according to J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Meanwhile, missing the 10 best days in the market during that period would have more than halved the total, to $33,000, it found. So, by missing the best 20 days, an investor would have just $20,000.

Buy-and-hold doesn’t mean ‘do nothing’

Of course, investors shouldn’t actually do nothing.

Financial advisors often recommend basic steps like reviewing one’s asset allocation (ensuring it aligns with investment horizon and goals) and periodically rebalancing to maintain that mix of stocks and bonds.

There are funds that can automate these tasks for investors, like balanced funds and target-date funds.

These “all-in-one” funds are widely diversified and take care of “mundane” tasks like rebalancing, Ptak wrote. They require less transacting on investors’ part — and limiting transactions is a general key to success, he said.

“Less is more,” Ptak wrote.

(Experts do offer some caution: Be careful about holding such funds in non-retirement accounts for tax reasons.)

Routine also helps, according to Ptak. That means automating saving and investing to the extent possible, he wrote. Contributing to a 401(k) plan is a good example, he said, since workers make contributions each payroll period without thinking about it.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

As recession risk jumps, top financial pros share their best advice

Published

on

Fg Trade | E+ | Getty Images

There is at least a 60% chance of recession if Trump's tariffs stick, says JPMorgan's David Kelly

Meanwhile, J.P. Morgan raised its odds for a U.S. and global recession to 60%, by year end, up from 40% previously.

“Disruptive U.S. policies has been recognized as the biggest risk to the global outlook all year,” J.P. Morgan strategists said in a research note on Thursday.

Allianz’s Chief Economic Advisor Mohamed El-Erian also warned on Friday that the risk of a U.S. recession “has become uncomfortably high.”

‘There is some nervous energy’

“There is some nervous energy there,” said certified financial planner Douglas Boneparth, president of Bone Fide Wealth in New York, of the conversations he is having with his clients.

Even though stocks took a beating on Friday, “we advise them to focus on fundamentals and what they can control, which means maintaining a strong cash reserve and discipline around cash flow so that they can stay in the market and feel confident about taking advantage of buying opportunities,” said Boneparth, a member of the CNBC Financial Advisor Council.

More from Personal Finance:
Tariffs are ‘lose-lose’ for U.S. jobs and industry
Why uncertainty makes the stock market go haywire
Americans are suffering from ‘sticker shock’ — how to adjust

Recession or not, maintaining a consistent cash flow and investment strategy is key, other experts say.

“The best way to manage these moments is to maximize your current and future selves is to block out noise that doesn’t apply to your plan,” said CFP Preston Cherry, founder and president of Concurrent Financial Planning in Green Bay, Wisconsin.

Letting emotions get in the way is one of “the greatest threats to life and money plans,” said Cherry, who is also a member of the CNBC Advisor Council.

When it comes to volatility tolerance, sharp drops in the market are to be expected, the advisors say.

“The stock market is unpredictable, but historically, there’s a trend in how the market recovers,” Cherry said.

“In years with market corrections and pullbacks, these are the worst days, which are followed by the best days,” he added.

In fact, the 10 best trading days by percentage gain for the S&P 500 over the past three decades all occurred during recessions, often in close proximity to the worst days, according to a Wells Fargo analysis published last year.

“Being out of the market and missing the best days and cycles after recessions significantly hurt portfolios in the long run,” Cherry said.

Boneparth said his clients also “know volatility and uncertainty is part of the game and, most importantly, know not to sell into chaos.”

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Continue Reading

Trending