Connect with us

Accounting

Generational Viewpoints: Parsing Gen Z

Published

on

This edition of Generational Viewpoints features two professionals from BSB CPAs + Business Advisors, a 55-employee firm located in Fairfax, Virginia. We asked baby boomer managing partner Debbie Harris, born in 1963, and millennial audit partner Kevin Hamaker, born in 1987, to share their perspectives on the following question:

“What differences have you noticed in the perspectives or motivators of your interns and new hires that likely represent the oldest Gen Zs? How are you adapting or adjusting to those differences?

Deborah Harris of BSB CPAs

Deborah Harris

Harris’ boomer viewpoint

I have been in this business for many years, and so much of my work history has been steeped in traditional accounting firm mindsets. The events of the past few years have forced a change in our thinking. We are all fighting over a reduced number of accounting candidates, and to remain competitive, we need to listen and adapt to the new environment. I am pleased that we have seen so many positive changes in our firm by implementing the ideas of our youngest team members.

Gen Z feels more independent to us than earlier starting classes. They know what they want and how to go about getting it. They want to feel valued, expect greater work/life balance and flexibility, they embrace technology, and want to be part of a culture that allows them to thrive. 

We recognized that our Gen Z team members place great importance on feeling valued, respected and included. We have multiple committees and invite the staff to participate in the ones that interest them. Most notable is our marketing committee, where we have started to deploy TikTok content. Our Gen Zs prepare and post many videos on TikTok as well as our other social media sites. They have also contributed to many changes in our recruiting efforts. We are now using Hubs at our events and have more relevant recruiting materials. 

The changes that they have brought forward have helped us implement a recruiting program that is interesting and applicable to prospective interns and first-year team members. They have a great time generating these ideas and feel they are truly contributing to our team. Gone are the days of the partners sitting in a room producing the content to tell our story — it’s being told in a more impactful way by our people.

Gen Zs value flexibility and work-life balance. The movement for work-life balance has actually been around for some time now, but I believe that Gen Z has helped to bring the value of flexibility to the forefront. Since embracing the remote work environment, the mindset has slowly shifted from believing staff were more productive while in the office to recognizing we are successfully working from anywhere. We have also become more flexible with our schedules. A few years ago, we would ask the staff to work crazy hours during busy season, and it was expected of all staff. We can no longer expect that and have had to look at our business processes to help ensure that balance and flexibility are available to all. We are selective when taking on new clients and make sure our existing clients are a good fit.  

Gen Zs embrace technology in the workplace. They are not afraid to try anything new and they are able to quickly adopt new software. They have become a valuable resource for some of our more experienced staff members. More important, they want to see the firm staying current and investing in our digital strategy. Our firm has tried multiple new programs this year and our younger staff have been a big part of this. Recently, we implemented digital business cards and I relied on the staff to help set up my account and my profile, and teach me what I needed to know about the program. 

It has been challenging to let go of some of the traditional business model constructs to allow for more creativity and involvement by our team members. Still, I believe the Gen Z influence has added valuable perspective, helped change the way we work, and become an important part of our team.

Kevin Hamaker of BSB CPAs

Kevin Hamaker

Hamaker’s Millennial viewpoint

Gen Z has changed our firm for the better. In some respects, the pandemic took the fun out of our profession and Gen Z is bringing it back. They have fresh ideas, are not afraid to participate or help, and they keep us “hip.” In my opinion, this generation has been a much-needed breath of fresh air.

Gen Z grew up in the age of technology, and due to the pandemic, were forced to learn remotely. They embrace digital communication, have high expectations when it comes to technology implementation, and know how to use the technology that is available to them. As a result, this new generation opens our profession to more possibilities. They understand the remote work environment, do not need as much “in-person” learning and training, and know how to quickly adapt to new technologies.

Gen Zs are a very confident generation. Our interns and new hires come in believing they have a greater knowledge of the profession than might be possible for their experience. This summer, several of our interns were shocked at how much they didn’t know coming into the internship program, and exposure to “real” accounting was an eye-opener that many of them needed. During our internship, we made a concerted effort to have them perform client-facing work so they could truly experience the profession. A motivating factor of Gen Z is that they want to feel they are actually contributing, so providing them real work gives them an opportunity to feel included and be part of the bigger picture.

I am a Millennial, and Gen X and Baby Boomers thought we didn’t work as hard and that we overvalued work-life balance. I believe Millennials value work-life balance; however, Gen Z is more committed to this balance than even we are. They hold firm to this belief and will not waver. We offer a completely flexible work environment, and this allows them to balance their time between work and life. Their joys outside of work are important to them, so they are important to us, too. Offering the anytime and anyplace work environment allows them to focus on life, too.

This past year, we offered remote and hybrid internships. This allowed our interns to have the flexibility and work-life balance that is available to the rest of our team. Initially, there was pushback from the more experienced members of our firm. They believed that you could not have inexperienced staff or interns learn in a remote environment while staying focused. I knew this was false, as Gen Z had already performed in this environment in school. I knew our internship program would be successful and it was. Our firm benefited greatly from this success and we were able to extend our reach for talent nationally, even though we are located in the Washington, D.C., area.

Another Gen Z motivating factor is recognition. If they are doing a good job, they want and need to receive this feedback. This contributes to their self-worth and they gain confidence that they are a valuable member of our team. Personally, I have been making a more concerted effort to recognize them. Recognizing that they add value can be done in other ways, as well. Our firm does a great job of providing opportunities to actively include them in various facets of the business. If you want new and innovative ideas, they are a great resource to have. We have put Gen Zs in charge of our firm’s social media team and other marketing initiatives. They have produced great content, and having the older generations get involved with TikTok has brought fun to our firm, and made recruiting very successful. These TikTok videos allow us to be more relatable to our Gen Z recruits because our Gen Z talent is producing the content. It also gives them a chance to brag about our firm’s culture and environment.

We try to get Gen Z involved on the technology front. Gen Z has been instrumental in designing our website and implementing the usage of digital business cards. Again, they embrace, appreciate and use technology in ways that older generations haven’t.

As a profession we must welcome Gen Z with open arms and realize they will make us and the world a better place.

This column is facilitated and edited by Caroline Ready, the millennial marketing and sales coordinator, and Jennifer Wilson, the Baby Boomer co-founder and partner, of ConvergenceCoaching LLC, a leadership and management consulting and coaching firm that helps leaders achieve success. To have your firm’s generational viewpoints considered for a future Accounting Tomorrow column, e-mail them at [email protected].

Continue Reading

Accounting

Jon Voight joins studios, unions to press Trump for film aid

Published

on

President Donald Trump’s Hollywood ambassadors joined studios, labor unions and producers in asking the White House to expand and extend tax incentives as part of an upcoming budget reconciliation bill.

A letter dated Monday asked the president to include three film and TV incentives in the budget bill being drafted by Congress. The coalition includes the Motion Picture Association, which represents Hollywood studios, as well as unions of writers, actors and other trades.

Actor Jon Voight, who was named one of three special ambassadors to Hollywood in January, is leading the effort to obtain assistance from Washington to boost US film and TV jobs. The groups signing the letter represent nearly 400,000 industry professionals. Sylvester Stallone, another Trump ambassador, also signed the letter.

The U.S. film and TV industry has struggled in recent years as entertainment companies reduced their spending and moved production overseas, where cheaper labor and more generous government subsidies make their business more profitable. 

The letter doesn’t mention tariffs on foreign film production, which Trump said he would pursue in a social media post on May 4. His 100% tariff proposal, made after a visit with Voight, sent the shares of studios such as Netflix Inc. and Walt Disney Co. tumbling as investors considered the possibility of rising costs and a trade war in the entertainment business. 

The specific proposals in the new letter involve reviving Section 199 of the tax code, which provided deductions for manufacturing to film and TV production, extending Section 181, which allows for accelerated deductions, and restoring Section 461, which lets businesses use past losses to reduce future taxes.

Continue Reading

Accounting

State AI regulation ban tucked into Republican tax, fiscal bill

Published

on

A powerful House committee has tucked language preventing states from regulating artificial intelligence into President Donald Trump’s massive tax and spending bill, a move that would benefit many of the U.S.’s largest tech and AI companies. 

OpenAI, Meta Platforms Inc., and Alphabet Inc.’s Google are among the firms that have argued that state AI regulations would hamstring the burgeoning technology. Meta in April comments to the White House also said state-level rules would raise compliance costs for AI companies. 

The House Energy and Commerce Committee’s draft bill, which the panel will debate on Tuesday, would place a 10-year moratorium on “any law or regulation regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems,” according to language released late Sunday. 

It’s unlikely the language will meet the strict bar for ultimate inclusion in the tax bill, which is being pushed through Congress with only Republican support using a special parliamentary procedure. Senate rules require that provisions passed using the procedure be primarily fiscal in nature.

But its inclusion signals where key Republicans stand on the matter just one month after tech executives urged Congress to pass federal AI legislation to prevent states from creating their own rules. 

AI safety advocates and critics of big tech on Monday warned that the language, if passed, would hamstring state governments seeking to ensure the technology is deployed safely and ethically.  

Brad Carson, president of the AI safety think tank Americans for Responsible Innovation, called the language a “giveaway to Big Tech that will come back to bite us.”

“Tying the hands of lawmakers when it comes to taking on big tech could have catastrophic consequences for the public, for small businesses, and for young people online,” Carson said. 

Patchwork solution

This year alone, at least 45 states and Puerto Rico introduced at least 550 AI bills, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. And that number is only set to grow in the months ahead. 

California lawmakers’ push last year to pass AI safety laws was opposed by tech companies and venture capital firms, such as OpenAI and Andreessen Horowitz, and ultimately vetoed by California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat. State lawmakers are trying again this year to pass a pared-back bill aimed at holding AI developers accountable for any severe harm caused by their products. 

During an April Energy and Commerce hearing, Scale AI Inc. CEO Alexandr Wang called for “one federal standard” on AI. 

“We cannot afford a patchwork of 50 different state standards that we have to execute against,” Wang said. 

Representative Jay Obernolte, a California Republican on the panel, agreed with Wang, saying Congress has a “limited amount of legislative runway to be able to get that problem solved before the states get too far ahead.” 

But Jan Schakowsky, a senior Democrat on the committee, said the provision would give tech companies “free reign to take advantage of children and families.” 

“This ban will allow AI companies to ignore consumer privacy protections, let deepfakes spread, and allow companies to profile and deceive customers using AI,” she added.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Improper payment rate still too high at IRS

Published

on

The Internal Revenue Service has not yet satisfied the goal of the Payment Integrity Information Act to reduce improper payment rates to less than 10%, according to a new report.

The report, released Monday by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, found the total amount of improper payments for four of its refundable tax credits — Additional Child Tax Credit, American Opportunity Tax Credit, Earned Income Tax Credit and Net Premium Tax Credit — totaled $21.4 billion in fiscal year 2024.

In accordance with the Payment Integrity Information Act of 2019, TIGTA has to annually assess and report on improper payment requirements and determine whether the IRS complained with them. The IRS calculated improper payment estimates for four programs that were considered to be high risk because they have improper payments exceeding $100 million annually.

The four programs and their improper payment rates are:

  • Net Premium Tax Credit (29%);
  • American Opportunity Tax Credit (28%);
  • Earned Income Tax Credit (27%); and,
  • Additional Child Tax Credit (11%).

The Treasury Department attributed the causes behind the errors to factors such as the complexity of the eligibility rules, inability to verify taxpayer-provided information prior to issuing refunds, lack of correctable error authority, and a requirement to issue refunds within 45 days.

“For example, when there are taxpayers who claim the same dependent, the IRS cannot determine which taxpayer is eligible at the time a tax return is filed, and the IRS must process both claims and complete post-filing activities such as issuing notices or conducting audits to determine eligibility,” said the report.

For the 2025 filing season, the IRS made a change in its Identity Protection PIN process that will accept electronically filed individual tax returns when a dependent has already been claimed on another return to reduce the burden on taxpayers and issue their refunds timely. But there was minimal impact of the duplicate dependent condition on total improper payments. 

The IRS isn’t reporting improper payment rates for pandemic-related programs because they believe it would be an inefficient use of resources given the short-term nature of  pandemic programs, according to the report, though the IRS is continuing to assess risks for pandemic-related programs, such as the Employee Retention Credit. 

TIGTA made three recommendations in the report, suggesting the IRS should request additional legislative considerations to help reduce improper payments and analyze the impact of the new processing procedures for returns claiming duplicate dependents. The IRS agreed with all three of TIGTA’s recommendations.

“The refundable tax credit (RTC) programs examined in this report are designed to provide critical financial support to eligible taxpayers,” wrote IRS CFO Teresa Hunter in response to the report. “The IRS is committed to administering these programs effectively, ensuring that eligible taxpayers receive the credits to which they are entitled while maintaining program integrity and compliance with improper payment reporting requirements.”

She argued that the RTC errors are not a result of internal control weaknesses within the IRS’s processes, but the complexity of the eligibility requirements and the IRS’s reliance on taxpayer self-certification of accurate RTC claims put them outside the traditional improper payment framework.

Continue Reading

Trending