Vice President Kamala Harris has gone silent on Democrats’ bid to tax unrealized investment gains — casting doubt on how strongly she’d push for a key plank of the party’s efforts to raise taxes on billionaires.
Harris, who has already pledged to scale back one of President Joe Biden’s key policies on capital gains taxation, is declining to give specifics about her support for other pillars of the administration’s vision to raise taxes on businesses and the wealthy. That includes a White House plan to tax unrealized gains, a major proposed Internal Revenue Code change designed to increase levies on the richest Americans who are often able to avoid taxes under the current rules.
The Democratic nominee still supports a billionaire minimum tax, a campaign official said in a brief statement, speaking on condition of anonymity. Her team declined to provide specifics about that proposal or comment directly on how unrealized gains would be treated.
U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris
Hannah Beier/Photographer: Hannah Beier/Bloom
Harris’ campaign also declined to say if she supports the specific parameters of the minimum tax on billionaires included in Biden’s annual budget request to Congress, which — despite the name — would apply a 25% minimum levy to income of those with at least $100 million in assets. Her campaign has been mum about whether she would seek to change a provision in the tax code that allows many wealthy individuals to avoid capital gains taxes entirely when they pass assets onto their heirs.
The move to tax unrealized gains was one of the more polarizing features of Biden’s budget proposal — critics saw it as murky to enforce and a disincentive for growth, while advocates cheered it as an innovative way to tax the rich more.
Harris’ silence comes as she’s bolstered her pro-business rhetoric and tacked her policy agenda to the middle to woo Republican and independent voters with polls showing her deadlocked against Republican rival Donald Trump. She described herself as a “pragmatic capitalist” in an interview with Telemundo Tuesday, saying she is part of a new generation of leadership that “actively works with the private sector to build up the new industries of America.”
Days after Harris replaced Biden as the Democratic presidential nominee in late July, her campaign said she supports the revenue measures in the president’s budget request, though she’s since broken with him on the scope of a capital gains tax increase, calling for a top rate hike from 20% to 28%, instead of the 39.6% that Biden has embraced.
Capital gains taxes are generally paid when an asset is sold, which means that people who hold an asset that has appreciated considerably don’t immediately pay taxes on the increase. In some cases, the wealthy simply borrow money against the gains rather than having to sell. Some of the richest people owe relatively few taxes in comparison to their overall wealth because they hold onto their assets indefinitely, vastly growing their personal fortunes through unrealized gains, but rarely recording any income on paper, which would trigger an IRS bill.
The ambiguity on unrealized gains could be strategic — by avoiding taking a position, Harris is able to give herself room to negotiate in the future on a portion of her tax agenda that is closely scrutinized by Wall Street and Silicon Valley.
Billionaire investor Mark Cuban, a Harris ally, predicted over the weekend that a tax on unrealized gains would not be enacted. “That’s an economy killer. Kamala knows that,” Cuban said at an event Saturday in Arizona, according to NBC. “You haven’t heard her talk about it.”
The debate is, in some ways, theoretical, with polls showing Republicans on track to take control of the Senate even if Harris wins the presidency. A divided government dims her hopes of passing the fresh taxes she’s seeking, and may pressure her to avoid digging in on proposals with slim chances of success.
Harris is grappling with how strongly to break from Biden in the race against Trump, where his campaign has said a tax on unrealized gains would “kill 75,000 jobs, reduce investment incentives, hurt long-term economic growth, and target family farms and family-owned small businesses the most.” Trump, for his part, has campaigned on a long list of politically-targeted tax breaks, which economists have warned would add trillions to the national debt.
The Biden budget, which has proposed including unrealized gains when calculating income for the 25% billionaire minimum tax, has also raised concerns from tax professionals.
The plan “would be a departure from the way we’re treating capital gains under current law and how we treat it historically,” Garrett Watson, a senior policy analyst at the right-leaning Tax Foundation, said in an interview. “We’re generally more skeptical of this kind of approach.”
Harris has also campaigned on a slew of other tax measures, including higher corporate tax rates, an expanded child tax credit and expanded deductions for startup businesses.
As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.
Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.
The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.
WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.
The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.
Untested Legal Mechanism
To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.
White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.
Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.
“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.
USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs
Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).
However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:
Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
Potash and critical minerals
Fish and seafood
Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)
Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.
Canadian Response and Market Reaction
Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.
With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.
The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.
The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.
Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.