Connect with us

Accounting

How and why to disclaim an inheritance

Published

on

Not everyone wants an inheritance. 

Popular reasons for rejecting a windfall include avoiding tax hits,  preserving government benefits, managing family dynamics, giving to charitable causes and using generation-skipping estate planning strategies.

Those instances, and the process involved with taking the counterintuitive step of disclaiming assets that might otherwise flow to a surviving spouse or the next generation in an estate plan, require documentation, frequent family discussions and alternatives in the event of an unexpected death or illness, said Miklos Ringbauer, founder of Los Angeles-based MiklosCPA.

But the “why” and “how” of turning down that wealth in order to aid clients’ long-term estate goals often get less attention in the frequently complex planning for their future. If the family and their financial advisors or tax professionals fail to codify their wishes in wills and other estate-planning documents, the wealth could end up stuck in lengthy, expensive probate cases.

While “everybody loves to get stuff,” there are “some unique circumstances where it may not make sense,” Ringbauer said. “What a lot of people don’t talk about is, if you’ve had a chance to discuss the wishes of the decedent and the trust has not been updated.”

READ MORE: Advisors clamor for estate planning tools as attorneys wave red flags

The details behind disclaimers in estate planning

Within the estimated $124 trillion in wealth expected to flow to spouses, heirs and other beneficiaries in coming decades, the avoidance of estate taxes, the implications to family businesses or relatives with varying financial circumstances and some strict guidelines related to government benefits for veterans, student loan recipients, people with disabilities and other groups could loom large. 

But families face an important time crunch, if they’re going to create a disclaimer refusing the inherited asset, according to a guide by advisor lead generation and matchmaking service SmartAsset. Most beneficiaries must disclaim the assets in writing within nine months of the deceased person’s death and understand that, while they will be forfeiting their rights to an inheritance or certain parts of it, they won’t retain the right to say where that wealth ends up.

“Your inheritance disclaimer specifically says that you refuse to accept the assets in question and that this refusal is irrevocable, meaning it can’t be changed,” according to SmartAsset. “Aside from that, you also have to follow any guidelines set by your state to disclaim an inheritance. For example, your state might require that a disclaimer be notarized or witnessed, filed with the probate court or shared with the executor of the deceased person’s estate or the trustee in charge of distributing assets from a trust.”

At a basic level, families must create estate plans reflecting their current state of residency and a “plan B and plan C” in the case that anyone involved dies or suffers debilitating illness, said Ringbauer, who recommended revisiting the documents every three to five years. Many of the problems with inheritances stem from the misperception among clients and even professionals who “think that estate planning is once and then done,” he said.

“All of us and our clients think we will live forever, but the problem is, we wait too long to start planning together,” Ringbauer said, noting that many wait until their 50s and 60s to begin the process. “In some cases, that’s too late and/or they forgot to update the documents.”

READ MORE: How to avoid capital gains taxes with highly appreciated stocks

That could prevent them from preparing adequately for regulatory changes that have affected, say, the timing of required minimum withdrawals of inherited 401(k) accounts and individual retirement accounts or the levels of exemptions from the gift and estate taxes. A strategy aimed at skipping a generation, setting aside assets for a charitable organization or diverting them from one beneficiary in the highest tax bracket to those in another often leads to a requirement that one family member must formally disclaim the assets.

What many high net worth families and their advisors must steer clear from is a “communication breakdown” in which “everything falls apart” with an estate plan, Ringbauer said. And that problem often arises with family businesses in particular.

“The kid says, ‘Dad, I saw you work 12 or 15 hours a day, this is not something I want to do,'” Ringbauer said. “Noncommunication and not understanding the people and the beneficiaries’ wishes and desires will result in disclaiming most of the time as a result.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending