Finance
How BlackRock and Goldman Sachs are bringing Wall Street’s hottest asset class to 401(k)s
Published
8 months agoon
Wall Street’s largest firms are championing a new cause. They are bringing alternative assets — once reserved for the ultra-wealthy — to the portfolios of individual investors. Chief among the proponents are BlackRock and Goldman Sachs. But, as is usually the case in investing, the potential of greater returns comes at a risk. “The alternative market is becoming less alternative,” said Jon Diorio, head of alternatives for wealth at asset management giant BlackRock. Alternatives are assets outside of stocks, bonds, and cash — including private equity, private credit, real estate, infrastructure, cryptocurrencies, and more. “It’s growing very rapidly as public markets are shrinking,” Diorio told CNBC in a recent interview. Interest has been fueled by shrinking public market opportunities and a softening regulatory environment. President Donald Trump signed an executive order earlier this month that paved the way for alternative assets in 401(k) retirement accounts — an idea vehemently opposed by the Biden administration. Diorio, who also leads product strategy for BlackRock’s U.S. wealth advisory business, said that giving more investors exposure to alternatives — which have traditionally been part of the portfolios of ultra high net-worth individuals, hedge funds, and pension funds — can improve returns over the long run. “In some cases, you can get enhanced diversification [and] amplify return streams,” he added. Giving individual investors the same access to different asset classes as the pros has been championed as further democratizing Wall Street. However, it also comes with its own risks. These assets are not publicly traded, which means they are more difficult to value and less liquid. BlackRock’s Diorio and peers at other major financial firms are acutely aware of this and strive to make sure investors are, too, as they challenge the decades-old focus on the traditional retail portfolio split of 60% stocks and 40% bonds. Marc Nachmann, head of the asset and wealth management division at Goldman, explained the risk dynamic in a recent CNBC interview , noting that “you actually get paid for the fact that [these] are illiquid and [that] you can’t take your money out all the time.” The inclusion of alternative assets, he said, is well-suited for investors with longer-time horizons or those who do not need to access their money right away, such as retirement savers. “Think about a 401(k). When you’re 24 years old and you graduate from college and you start your first job and you start putting your first real dollars into a 401(k) fund, those are exactly the dollars that you should put into something that pays you for being locked up for a period of time, for being illiquid. Because at 24, you’re not going to access that liquidity for decades,” Nachmann said. So, it’s no wonder the defined-contribution market has been a key part of Wall Street’s push to make the opaque asset class more accessible. In July, Goldman’s asset-management arm announced a private credit product for retirement plans. The new vehicle is structured to offer exposure to a diverse mix of private investments, which includes North American and European direct lending. The product is set up as a collective investment trust (CIT), which is designed for defined-contribution plans such as 401(k)s. Great Gray Trust, a private equity-backed CIT specialist, and BlackRock will help support these offerings. It’s the natural next step for Goldman in mixing public and private markets, according to Nachmann. After all, many large pension funds are already invested in alternatives. Goldman is starting the effort with target date funds, which manage the risk/reward using an investor’s estimated retirement year to strategically adjust risk allocations. These funds usually start with higher allocations to stocks, but as investors approach retirement, exposure becomes more conservative to protect the nest egg. Before the Goldman announcement, BlackRock was tapped to underpin Great Gray’s first target date retirement fund, which allocates across both public and private markets. BlackRock will help to provide a long-term custom investment strategy that includes private credit and private equity exposure as well. While potentially giving investors a shot at higher returns, the push into alternatives also offers a financial windfall for Goldman and BlackRock over time. The newly announced Goldman product generates fees for the company on the alternative assets that people invest in. The fee structure, expected to be around 1% of assets, will be a consistent source of revenue for Goldman that grows as the effort gains traction and more retirement plans adopt it. The vehicle gives Goldman more room to expand its asset and wealth management division, its second largest by revenue, as well. It does this by tapping into the growing defined contribution market, which already holds trillions and trillions of dollars in assets. By making private credit more accessible to millions of retirement savers through products like target date funds, Goldman is tapping into a wider client base that was once largely limited to institutions and the extremely wealthy. To be sure, Goldman’s crown jewel has long been its investment banking division. However, these revenue streams from advising on initial public offerings (IPOs), as well as mergers and acquisitions (M & A), can be unpredictable depending on the economic backdrop and Wall Street’s dealmaking appetite. Conversely, a lot of revenue streams from asset and wealth management businesses can be recurring as they are a percentage of a firm’s assets under management, which tends to be more stable. The promise of diversifying revenues is a key reason why Goldman and other major financial firms are growing their wealth management divisions. BlackRock’s overall business mix differs from Goldman’s, however, because it does not engage in investment banking. BlackRock is the biggest asset management firm in the world, providing all kinds of investment options — including mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and alternative asset products, just to name a few. Money managers like BlackRock and Goldman’s wealth arm can also typically charge a higher amount to manage alternatives because they’re more complex. “From the economic impact of it, it opens up a massive opportunity for growth, and it should be accretive to their base fee rate,” TD Cowen analyst Bill Katz said of BlackRock, in particular. “It should be very good for their revenues.” We agree. “For BlackRock, alternatives generate higher fees than traditional index funds, which have become commoditized and with expense ratios essentially in a race to the bottom,” said Jeff Marks, the Investing Club’s director of portfolio analysis. Wall Street firms are making alternative assets available through more than just the retirement channel. Apollo Global and State Street Global Advisors , for example, have developed a private-credit ETF that debuted on the New York Stock Exchange back in February. BlackRock is making strides beyond retirement too, specifically within its wealth business, which accounted for a quarter of its overall revenues last year. In March, management unveiled plans to make it easier for advisors to offer their clients exposure to private assets. BlackRock included private credit into its model portfolios business, which Diorio said helps take out the “cumbersome” and “less convenient” parts of allocating to the market. Diorio explained that the announcement addresses a barrier to entry for many investors in private markets because a lot of them invest based on the product itself, rather than considering the entirety of their portfolio. “What I mean by that is somebody would buy a potential non-traded [business development company] private credit fund because it yields 10%, not because it improves the risk-adjusted returns in the portfolio,” he added. “They’re typically choosing it on its product basis, [meaning] who’s the manager, what’s the narrative of the product, and how much does it yield. They’re thinking about it less from a portfolio construction standpoint.” Now, BlackRock advisors can offer clients across the wealth spectrum these model portfolios to choose from, rather than going through the arduous process of selecting individual investments themselves. Private assets account for 15% of the investments in these portfolios on average, according to BlackRock. “We are now delivering basically a whole portfolio where the client can come in and actually choose,” he said. “We have a private equity fund that goes into the equity sleeve of that portfolio. We have a private credit fund that fits into the fixed income sleeve. We make the integration of that easier.” But education around the risk/reward dynamic of investing in alternatives is paramount. Everyone wants to avoid what happened when Blackstone offered a wider client base exposure to alternatives in years past. In 2017, Blackstone rolled out a real-estate fund, which has commonly been geared towards institutions like pension funds, to individual investors for an opportunity to own a piece of assets like warehouses, data centers, and apartment buildings. The fund’s net asset value ballooned and performed extremely well when interest rates were low, but it turned a corner in 2022 once the Federal Reserve started aggressively hiking rates from the near 0% levels of the Covid pandemic-era. Real estate prices fell. Unnerved investors wanted to pull their money out in large swaths as a result, causing management to temporarily limit withdrawals. Blackstone, however, has consistently denied any wrongdoing in the matter. Katz said the debacle provided a “painful” yet “good learning experience” for Blackstone and its peers moving forward. “That created a lot of pressure on Blackstone and the industry at large around this whole construct,” Katz added. “[But], I think the investment community now is far more understanding. The education process is far better as well.” CNBC reporter Hugh Son highlighted a more recent example last week amid the troubles facing startup Yieldstreet, whose stated mission is to democratize access to alternative assets such as real estate, litigation proceeds, and private credit. Yieldstreet told CNBC that some of its real estate funds were “significantly impacted” by rising interest rates and market conditions. According to clients who spoke to CNBC, these investments were much riskier than they thought, leading to huge losses in their portfolios. “If you were to start adding things that are not publicly traded, like private equity, private credit, private real estate, a lot of these things are not marked to market,” said Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at CFRA Research. “You don’t see on a daily basis what they’re worth. When you get your quarterly review statements from your 401(k) administrator, it might be misleading because it could be a quarter behind.” Stovall told CNBC that “having alts available is good, but requiring the investor to fully understand them and their [risk tolerance] is very, very important.” Regardless of the risks, this trend is not expected to die out anytime soon. In fact, Stovall expects the assets under management for alternative assets to “grow dramatically” over the next ten years as individual investors increase their exposure. For his part, Katz described money managers’ offering private assets to more clientele as “more commonplace than not” in the future. (Jim Cramer’s Charitable Trust is long GS, BLK. See here for a full list of the stocks.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust’s portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.
You may like
Finance
Why software stocks, 2026’s market dogs, have joined the rally
Published
2 weeks agoon
April 19, 2026

Cybersecurity and enterprise software stocks have been market dogs in 2026, with fears that AI will wipe out a wide range of companies in the enterprise space dominating the narrative. But they snapped a brutal losing streak this past week, joining in the broader market rally that saw all losses from the U.S.-Iran war regained by the Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500.
Cybersecurity has been “a victim of some of the AI-related headlines,” Christian Magoon, Amplify ETFs CEO, said on this week’s “ETF Edge.”
It wasn’t just niche cybersecurity names. Take Microsoft, for example, which was recently down close to 20% for the year. Its shares surged last week by 13%.
A big driver of the pummeling in software stocks was a rotation within tech by investors to AI infrastructure and semiconductors and some other names in large-cap tech, Magoon said, and since cybersecurity stocks and ETFs are heavily weighted towards software companies, they were left behind even as those businesses continue to grow on a fundamental basis.
But Wall Street now has become more bullish with the stocks at lower levels. Brent Thill, Jefferies tech analyst, said last week that the worst may be over for software stocks. “I think that this concept that software is dead, and then Anthropic and OpenAI are going to kill the entire industry, is just over-exaggerated,” he said on CNBC’s “Money Movers” on Wednesday.
“Big Short” investor Michael Burry wrote in a Substack post on Wednesday that he is becoming bullish about software stocks after the recent selloff. “Software stocks remain interesting because of accelerated extreme declines last week arising from a reflexive positive feedback loop between falling software stocks and changes in the market for their bank debt,” he wrote.
The Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG), is down about 12% since the beginning of the year, with top holdings including Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet, Akamai Technologies and CrowdStrike. But BUG was up 12% last week. The First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) is down 6% for the year, but up 9% in the past week.
Piper Sandler analyst Rob Owens reiterated an “overweight” rating on Palo Alto Networks which helped the stock pop 7% — it is now down roughly 6% on the year. Its peers saw similar moves, including CrowdStrike.
Performance of Global X cybersecurity ETF versus S&P 500 over past one-year period.
Magoon said expectations may have become too high in cybersecurity, and with a crowding effect among investors, solid results were not enough to to push stocks higher. But the down-and-then-back-up 2026 for the sector is also a reminder that when stocks fall sharply in a short period of time, opportunity may knock.
“Once you’re down over 10% in some of these subsectors, you start to see the contrarians start to say, ‘well, maybe I’ll take a look at this,'” Magoon said.
He said AI does add both opportunity and uncertainty to the cybersecurity equation, increasing demand but also introducing new competition. But he added, “I think the dip is good to buy in an AI-driven world,” specifically because the risks to companies may lead to more M&A in cyber names that benefits the stocks.
For now, investors may look for opportunity on the margins rather than rush back into beaten-up tech names. “I think investors are still going to remain underweight software,” Thill said.
But Magoon advises investors to at least take the reminder to keep an eye on niches in the market during pronounced downturns. “The best-performing are often the least bought and do the best over the next 12 months versus late-in-the-game piling on,” he said.
While that may have been a mindset that worked against the last investors into cybersecurity and enterprise software in mid-2025 when the negative sentiment started building, at least for now, it’s started working for the stocks in the sector again.
Meanwhile, this year’s biggest winner is also a good example of what can be an extended trade in either a bullish or bearish direction. Last year, institutional ownership of energy was at multi-year lows, Magoon said, referencing Bank of America data. “Reverse sentiment can be a great indicator,” he said.
But he cautioned that any selective buying of stocks that have dipped does have to contend with the risk that there is a potentially bigger drawdown in the market yet to come in 2026. That is because midterm election years historically have been marked by large drawdowns. “If you think it is bad right now, it could get a lot worse,” Magoon said. But he added that there’s a silver-lining in that data, too, for the patient investor. The market has posted very strong 12-month returns after midterm election drawdowns end. So, for investors with a longer-term time horizon and no need for short-term liquidity, Magoon said, “stick in there.”
Sign up for our weekly newsletter that goes beyond the livestream, offering a closer look at the trends and figures shaping the ETF market.
Finance
Violent downturns could test new ETF strategies, warns MFS Investment
Published
2 weeks agoon
April 17, 2026

New innovation in the exchange-traded fund industry could come at a cost to investors during extreme conditions.
According to MFS Investment Management’s Jamie Harrison, ETFs involved in increasingly complex derivatives and less transparent markets may be in uncharted territory when it comes to violent downturns.
“Those would be something that you’d want to keep an eye on as volatility ramps up,” the firm’s head of ETF capital markets told CNBC’s “ETF Edge” this week. “As innovation continues to increase at a rapid pace within the ETF wrapper, [it’s] definitely something that we advise our clients to be really front-footed about… Lack of transparency could absolutely be an issue if we’re going to start seeing some deep sell-offs.”
His firm has been around since 1924 and is known for inventing the open-end mutual fund. Last year, ETF.com named MFS Investment Management as the best new ETF issuer.
“It’s important to do due diligence on the portfolio,” he said. “Having a firm that has deep partnerships, deep bench of subject matter experts that plays with the A-team in terms of the Street and liquidity providers available [are] super important.”
Liquidity as the real issue?
Harrison suggested the real issue is liquidity, particularly during a steep sell-off.
“We’ve all seen the news and the headlines around potential private credit ETFs. That picture becomes much more murky,” he added. “It’s up to advisors, to investors [and] to clients to really dig in and look under the hood and engage with their issuers.”
He noted investors will have to ask some tough questions.
“What does this look like in a 20% drawdown? How does this liquidity facility work? Am I going to be able to get in? Am I going to be able to get out? And if I’m able to get out, am I able to get out at a price that’s tight to NAV [net asset value], and what’s the infrastructure at your shop in terms of managing that consideration for me,” said Harrison.
Amplify ETFs’ Christian Magoon is also concerned about these newer ETF strategies could weather a monster drawdown. He listed private credit as a red flag.
“If your ETF owns private credit, I think it’s worth taking a look at, kind of what the standards are around liquidity and how that ETF is trading, because that should be a bit of a mismatch between the trading pace of ETFs and the underlying asset,” the firm’s CEO said in the same interview.
Magoon also highlighted potential issues surrounding equity-linked notes. The notes provide fixed income security while offering potentially higher returns linked to stocks or equity indexes.
“Those could potentially be in stress due to redemptions and the underlying credit risk. That’s another kind of unique derivative,” Magoon said. “I would very closely look at any ETF that has equity-linked notes should we get into a major drawdown or there be a contagion in private credit or something related to the banking system.”
Finance
Anthropic Mythos reveals ‘more vulnerabilities’ for cyberattacks
Published
3 weeks agoon
April 15, 2026
Jamie Dimon, chief executive officer of JPMorgan Chase & Co., right, departs the US Capitol in Washington, DC, US, on Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2026.
Graeme Sloan | Bloomberg | Getty Images
JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said Tuesday that while artificial intelligence tools could eventually help companies defend themselves from cyberattacks, they are first making them more vulnerable.
Dimon said that JPMorgan was testing Anthropic’s latest model — the Mythos preview announced by the AI firm last week — as part of its broader effort to reap the benefits of AI while protecting against bad actors wielding the same technology.
“AI’s made it worse, it’s made it harder,” Dimon told analysts on the bank’s earnings call Tuesday morning. “It does create additional vulnerabilities, and maybe down the road, better ways to strengthen yourself too.”
When asked by a reporter about Mythos, Dimon seemed to refer to Anthropic’s warning that the model had already found thousands of vulnerabilities in corporate software.
“I think you read exactly what is it,” Dimon said. “It shows a lot more vulnerabilities need to be fixed.”
The remarks reveal how artificial intelligence, a technology welcomed by corporations as a productivity boon, has also morphed into a serious threat by giving bad actors new ways to hack into technology systems. Last week, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent summoned bank CEOs to a meeting to discuss the risks posed by Mythos.
JPMorgan, the world’s largest bank by market cap, has for years invested heavily to stay ahead of threats, with dedicated teams and constant coordination with government agencies, Dimon said.
“We spend a lot of money. We’ve got top experts. We’re in constant contact with the government,” he said. “It’s a full-time job, and we’re doing it all the time.”
‘Attack mode’
Still, the CEO warned that risks extend beyond any single institution, given the interconnected nature of the financial system.
“That doesn’t mean everything that banks rely on is that well protected,” Dimon said. “Banks… are attached to exchanges and all these other things that create other layers of risk.”
JPMorgan Chief Financial Officer Jeremy Barnum said the industry has long been aware that AI cuts both ways in cybersecurity.
“These tools can make it easier to find vulnerabilities, but then also potentially be deployed by bad actors in attack mode,” Barnum said on the earnings call. Recent advances from Anthropic and others have simply intensified an existing trend, he said.
Dimon also said that while advanced AI tools are important, old-school cybersecurity practices remain essential.
“A lot of it is hygiene… how do you protect your data? How do you protect your networks, your routers, your hardware, changing your passcode?” he said. “Doing all those things right dramatically reduces the risk.”
Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon said Monday during an earnings call that his bank was testing Mythos, though he declined to comment further.
What that means for consumer loans
Checks and Balance newsletter: Of God and MAGA
Why software stocks, 2026’s market dogs, have joined the rally
Armanino adds Strategic Accounting Outsourced Solutions
New 2023 K-1 instructions stir the CAMT pot for partnerships and corporations
