Connect with us

Personal Finance

How is Social Security funded? Political debate resurfaces question on program

Published

on

Richard Stephen | Istock | Getty Images

New leadership has yet to be sworn in, in Washington, D.C. Yet Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, ignited a debate this week on the future of Social Security with a series of posts on social media platform X.

The program, which provides monthly checks to more than 65 million beneficiaries, faces funding issues that may prevent the program from paying full benefits in as soon as nine years.

“We were sold a dream, but received a nightmare,” Lee stated in the X thread on Monday. “It’s time for a wake-up call. We need real reform.”

More from Personal Finance:
Student loan borrowers may find bankruptcy harder under Trump
College enrollment falls 5% for 18-year-old freshmen
‘Dynamic pricing’ was a top contender for word of the year

Experts on both sides of the aisle generally agree it’s better to address Social Security’s funding woes sooner rather than later.

“It’s a system that requires a fix,” said Charles Blahous, senior research strategist at George Mason University’s Mercatus Center and former public trustee for Social Security. “Acting like everything is fine and that we can just ignore it for a few years would not serve the public well.”

Meanwhile, Lee’s post on Social Security — in which he said it is “almost fair to compare it to a Ponzi scheme that’s running out of new investors” — prompted mixed responses.

Elon Musk, who has been tasked with cutting government spending under President-elect Donald Trump, shared Lee’s post while calling it “interesting.” Yet Social Security advocacy groups were quick to defend the program they said has never missed a benefit payment in nearly 90 years.

Among the issues Lee identified is the mechanism for holding money used to pay benefits, commonly known as the “trust funds.”

“This money doesn’t sit in a nice, individual account with your name on it,” Lee stated in his X thread. “No, it goes into a huge account called the ‘Social Security Trust Fund.'”

What are Social Security’s trust funds?

Social Security mostly relies on payroll taxes paid by both workers and their employers for funding, according to a recent Congressional Research Service report.

But the program also receives money from other sources, including federal income taxes some Social Security beneficiaries pay on their benefits, reimbursements from the Treasury’s general fund and interest income from investments held in its trust funds.

That latter source — the trust funds — hold money that is not needed in the current year to pay benefits and administrative costs, according to the Social Security Administration. The money in the trust funds is invested in special Treasury bonds that are guaranteed by the U.S. government.

The interest on those securities is tied to market rates. The trust fund’s bonds are redeemed when they either are needed to pay benefits or they expire.

“The trust funds basically keep track of what workers have paid into the system,” Blahous said.

Social Security’s trust funds prompt headlines each year when Social Security’s trustees release their annual report on the program’s financial outlook.

President George W. Bush is shown paper evidence of US Treasury Bonds in the Social Security trust funds by Susan Chapman, director of the Division of Federal Investments, during a tour of the Bureau of Public Debt in Parkersburg, West Virginia on April 5, 2005. 

Luke Frazza | Afp | Getty Images

The program’s two trust funds are legally distinct and generally do not have the authority to borrow from each other.

The trust fund used to pay benefits to retired workers — as well as their spouses, children and survivors, should they die — faces the soonest estimated depletion date of 2033, when just 79% of those benefits will be payable if Congress does not act before that.

Lee is not the first politician to question Social Security’s trust fund structure. In 2005, then President George W. Bush said the trust funds are the equivalent of government IOUs in a four-drawer filing cabinet. More recently, during a 2023 Budget Committee Senate hearing, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisconsin, held up a photo of a filing cabinet when discussing the program’s funding.

“This is the Social Security trust fund,” Johnson said. “It’s a four-drawer file in Parkersburg, West Virginia.”

In response, Stephen Goss, chief actuary at the Social Security Administration, said at the time that the funds are “all electronic.”

By pointing to filing cabinets, the politicians imply the trust funds aren’t real, said Andrew Biggs, senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and former principal deputy commissioner of the Social Security Administration. Yet if someone has a retirement account with Vanguard or a defined benefit pension, it would also be represented with a paper document, he said.

“These trust fund bonds are real,” Biggs said.

Experts say the trust funds are misunderstood

During a July 2023 Senate hearing on protecting Social Security, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisconsin, describes the program’s trust funds as a “four-drawer file.”

Source: U.S. Senate Floor

If Social Security has a surplus, they’re required to invest it with the federal government, according to Biggs. That means the federal government is required to borrow it, he said.

However, that borrowing mostly stopped 15 years ago, since Social Security no longer has surpluses, Biggs said.

In his X post, Lee also focused on the extra interest Social Security’s investments could earn if the money were invested more aggressively in stocks. Sen Bill Cassidy, R-Louisiana, has also called for investing in stocks on the program’s behalf.

But rather than talking about Social Security as an investment, we should be focusing on it as a social insurance program that’s funded by a payroll tax, said the Bipartisan Policy Center’s Fichtner.

The program provides both retirement and disability benefits and is designed to be progressive, so Americans with lower lifetime earnings get a higher income replacement rate. Focusing on the income replacement the program provides can help identify which reform proposals are helpful and necessary, Fichtner said.

“In general, we should be having an open, honest discussion about Social Security and the important role plays in the foundation of retirement security for Americans,” Fichtner said.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Student loan delinquencies risk ‘spillovers’ to other debts, NY Fed

Published

on

Student loan default collection restarting

The Trump administration’s resumption of collection efforts on defaulted federal student loans has far-reaching consequences for delinquent borrowers.

For starters, borrowers who are in default may have wages, tax returns and Social Security payments garnished.

But involuntary collections could also have a “spillover effect,” which puts consumers at risk of falling behind on other debt repayments, according to a recent report from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York,

As collection activity restarts, disposable income falls

‘It’s just money that can’t go to other financial things’

Until earlier this month, the Department of Education had not collected on defaulted student loans since March 2020. After the Covid pandemic-era pause on federal student loan payments expired in September 2023, the Biden administration offered borrowers another year in which they would be shielded from the impacts of missed payments. That on-ramp officially ended on Sept. 30, 2024, and the Education Department restarted collection efforts on defaulted student loans on May 5.

Whether borrowers face garnishment, or opt to resume payments to get current on their loan, that’s likely to have a significant impact on their wallet.

“It’s just money that can’t go to other financial things,” said Matt Schulz, chief credit analyst at LendingTree. 

After the five-year pause ended and collections are resumed, the delinquency rate for student loan balances spiked, the New York Fed found. Nearly 8% of total student debt was reported as 90 days past due in the first quarter of 2025, compared to less than 1% in the previous quarter.

Currently, around 42 million Americans hold federal student loans and roughly 5.3 million borrowers are in default, according to the Education Department. Another 4 million borrowers are in “late-stage delinquency,” or over 90 days past due on payments.

Among borrowers who are now required to make payments — not including those who are in deferment or forbearance or are currently enrolled in school — nearly one in four student loan borrowers are behind in their payments, the New York Fed found.  

As borrowers transition out of forbearance and into repayment, those borrowers may also face challenges making payments, according to a separate research note by Bank of America. “This transition will likely drive delinquencies and defaults on student loans higher and could have further knock-on effects for consumer finance companies,” Bank of America analyst Mihir Bhatia wrote to clients on May 15.

In a blog post, the New York Fed researchers noted that “it is unclear whether these penalties will spill over into payment difficulties in other credit products, but we will continue to monitor this space in the coming months.”

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

3 red flags to avoid

Published

on

South_agency | E+ | Getty Images

‘People don’t know a lot about tariffs’

Tariffs are taxes on goods imported from other countries, paid by the entity importing those goods. Businesses in turn often pass the cost of tariffs along to consumers in the form of higher prices.

In April, U.S. President Donald Trump enacted sweeping tariffs of varying rates affecting more than 180 countries and territories. Last week, the U.S. and China struck a deal to temporarily suspend most tariffs on each other’s goods. The U.S. also recently unveiled a trade agreement with the United Kingdom. 

Despite the recent trade agreements and deals, consumers still face an overall average effective tariff rate of 17.8%, the highest since 1934, according to a recent report by the Yale Budget Lab. 

James Lee, president of the Identity Theft Resource Center, said it’s not unusual for scammers to take a government action — whether that’s a new program or policy — and use it for the basis of a scam.

Scammers “will use the fact that people don’t know a lot about tariffs,” Lee said.

AI generated deepfake scam is 'phishing with a twist', says Fortalice Solutions CEO Theresa Payton

The PreCrime Labs team at BforeAI, a cybersecurity company, discovered about 300 domain registrations from cybercriminals related to tariffs in the first few months of the year. Some spread misinformation while others are financial scams aimed at businesses and consumers.

One site the company found was a newly registered phishing domain positioned to lead consumers to believe they are required to make payments to a legitimate governmental entity.

“Such payment requests are likely to be spread using email or messaging campaigns with a theme of urgent, pending payments, directing victims to the fraudulent site where their actions will result in financial losses,” researchers noted.

Some package payment requests are real

There are some cases where consumers might legitimately pay for products purchased from another country, namely, customs duties. Sometimes the U.S. Customs and Border Protection will charge consumers a processing fee in order to release an imported good. 

“That’s not common, but it’s also not unusual,” said Lee. “It really does depend on what it is, where it’s coming from.”

Some consumers have also recently reported receiving legitimate payment requests from carrier companies after a purchase in order to receive their shipments, the Washington Post reports.

Some carriers are acting as the importer of record, meaning they are responsible for any duties, taxes and fees that are applied to the delivery, said Bernie Hart, vice president of customs of Flexport, a logistics firm.

If the carrier did not collect those additional fees for the product up front, the carrier will charge the end consumer those additional costs through a follow-up bill, he said.

This tactic might not last, because it creates a lot of inconvenience for both companies and shoppers, Hart said: “It’s not good for anybody in this process to give somebody a surprise bill.”

Tariff scam red flags

It’s easy for anyone to fall victim to a fraud scheme, said Ruth Susswein, director of consumer protection at Consumer Action. 

If tariff policies continue to be in flux for longer, criminals will have more time to craft sophisticated attacks on consumers, said the ITRC’s Lee. 

Your top priority is to avoid sharing personal information like Social Security numbers, bank details or account login credentials, especially under the guise of “tariff processing,” said Payton.

Here are three red flags to watch out for, according to scam experts:

1. Unsolicited and urgent messages

2. Suspicious site links, emails

Scammers will create fake websites, emails and phone numbers to mimic retailers or government agencies, Payton said. If you receive a message, check for misspellings and URLs or email addresses that don’t match that of the supposed company or entity — say, a message from a “U.S. government official” that does not come from a dot-gov email.

You can use tools like WHOIS, a database that stores information about registered domain names and IP addresses, to authenticate the website and confirm registration details, she said.

3. Lack of transparency

Reputable merchants would clearly label tariff-related fees at checkout and provide contact information for inquiries, Payton said. Otherwise, the “lack of transparency is a red flag.”

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

What Moody’s downgrade of U.S. credit rating means for your money

Published

on

A woman shops at a supermarket on April 30, 2025 in Arlington, Virginia.

Sha Hanting | China News Service | Getty Images

Moody’s decision to downgrade the U.S. credit rating may have consequences for your money, experts say.

The debt downgrade put immediate pressure on bond prices, sending yields higher on Monday morning. The 30-year U.S. bond yield traded above 5% and the 10-year yield topped 4.5%, hitting key levels at a time when the economy is already showing signs of strain from President Donald Trump’s unfolding tariff policy.

Treasury bonds influence rates for a wide range of consumer loans like 30-year fixed mortgages, and to some extent also affect products including auto loans and credit cards.

“It’s really hard to avoid the impact on consumers,” said Brian Rehling, head of global fixed income strategy at Wells Fargo Investment Institute.

Moody’s lowers U.S. credit rating

The major credit rating agency cut the United States’ sovereign credit rating on Friday by one notch to Aa1 from Aaa, the highest possible.

In doing so, it cited the increasing burden of the federal government’s budget deficit. Republicans’ attempts to make President Donald Trump’s 2017 tax cuts permanent as part of the reconciliation package threaten to increase the federal debt by trillions of dollars.

More from FA Playbook:

Here’s a look at other stories impacting the financial advisor business.

“When our credit rating goes down, the expectation is that the cost of borrowing will increase,” said Ivory Johnson, a certified financial planner and founder of Delancey Wealth Management in Washington, D.C.

That’s because when “a country represents a bigger credit risk, the creditors will demand to be compensated with higher interest rates,” said Johnson, a member of CNBC’s Financial Advisor council.

‘Downgrades can raise borrowing costs over time’

Americans struggling to keep up with sky-high interest charges aren’t likely to get much relief any time soon amid Moody’s downgrade.

“Economic uncertainty, especially regarding tariff policy, has the Fed — and a lot of businesses — on hold,” said Ted Rossman, a senior industry analyst at Bankrate.

Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic said on CNBC’s “Squawk Box” Monday that he now sees only one rate cut this year as the central bank tries to balance inflationary pressures with worries of a potential recession. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell also recently noted that tariffs may slow growth and boost inflation, making it harder to lower the central bank’s benchmark as previously expected

Moody's U.S. downgrade may be politically driven: Standard Chartered

Douglas Boneparth, another CFP and the president of Bone Fide Wealth in New York, agreed that the downgrade could translate to higher interest rates on consumer loans.

“Downgrades can raise borrowing costs over time,” said Boneparth, who is also on CNBC’s FA council.

“Think higher rates on mortgages, credit cards, and personal loans, especially if confidence in U.S. credit weakens further,” he said.

Which consumer loans could see higher rates

Some loans could see more direct impacts because their rates are tied to bond prices.

Since mortgage rates are largely tied to Treasury yields and the economy, “30-year mortgages are going to be most closely correlated, and longer-term rates are already moving higher,” Rehling said.

The average rate for a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage was 6.92% as of May 16, while the 15-year, fixed-rate is 6.26%, according to Mortgage News Daily. 

Although credit cards and auto loan rates more directly track the federal funds rate, the nation’s financial challenges also play a key role in the Federal Reserve’s stance on interest rates. “The fed funds rate is higher than it would be if the U.S. was in a better fiscal situation,” Rehling said.

Since December 2024, the overnight lending rate has been in a range between 4.25%-4.5%. As a result, the average credit card rate is currently 20.12%, down only slightly from a record 20.79% set last summer, according to Ted Rossman, a senior industry analyst at Bankrate. 

Credit card rates tend to mirror Fed actions, so “higher for longer” would keep the average credit card rate around 20% through the rest of the year, Rossman said.

‘We’ve been through this before’

Before its downgrade, Moody’s was the last of the major credit rating agencies to have the U.S. at the highest possible rating.

Standard & Poor’s downgraded the nation’s credit rating in August 2011, and Fitch Ratings cut it in August 2023. “We’ve been through this before,” Rehling said.

Still, the move highlights the country’s fiscal challenges, Rehling said: “The U.S. still maintains its dominance as the safe haven economy of the world, but it puts some chinks in the armor.”

Continue Reading

Trending