Connect with us

Accounting

How OBBBA changes gambling income taxes

Published

on

It’s a decent bet: Professional gamblers will become the first taxpayers ever to pay Uncle Sam for unrealized or “phantom” income in 2026.

That’s because, barring changes to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, one provision in the vast legislation cuts the deductibility of gambling losses to no more than 90% of winnings, beginning next year. That means that breaking even will come with a tax bill. Hobbyists who itemize will also see an impact to their federal taxes and, possibly, their state taxes. 

Experts say the changes make it even more important for gamblers to keep careful records of their wins and losses. Bipartisan lawmakers have introduced bills in both houses of Congress to tweak the provision, but whether they might pass in time to alter the rules for 2026 is unclear.

The new law may spur more itemizers who previously placed bets as a hobby to gamble instead as a business venture, in order to count expenses such as hotel stays and flights against their earnings, according to Kevin Thompson, an enrolled agent and certified financial planner who is the CEO of Fort Worth, Texas-based registered investment advisory firm 9I Capital Group. Though a congressional committee projected that limiting the deductibility of gambling losses would generate around $1 billion over the next eight years, Thompson predicted federal revenue from the change would fall far short of that.

“I don’t understand what they’re trying to accomplish with this,” Thompson said. “People are going to gamble. It’s an addiction, it’s something people want to do.”

READ MORE: Caps, credits, contributions: Tax planning for parents under OBBBA

Taxing the pros

OBBBA’s adjustments to taxes on gambling income will “not only discourage people from bettering themselves in their trade” by playing in the toughest tournaments, but they could further be “pushing people offshore or underground” with their bets, said certified public accountant Miklos Ringbauer of Los Angeles-based MiklosCPA.

“We’ve had clients and prospective clients reaching out to us and saying, ‘What are we going to do?'” he said. “It’s going to be very hard decisions that professional players are going to have to make for their careers and for their business activities.”

chart visualization

For example, star poker player Daniel Negreanu’s take-home winnings after taxes at the 2025 World Series of Poker would plummet by 42% to roughly $66,000 under the new rules, according to a calculation by the nonpartisan, nonprofit Tax Foundation using the highest federal bracket rate and numbers that Negreanu has shared publicly. The provision creates “a unique precedent of taxing unrealized income” that could carry effective rates above 100% in some cases and situations in which gamblers whose winnings are zero will be booking “a net loss after paying taxes on money they never made,” experts at the foundation wrote in the blog post. Senate rules for the budget reconciliation process that require only a simple majority to pass legislation likely caused the writers of the legislation to insert the provision.

“The OBBBA provision limiting the deduction of gambling losses might cause individuals to owe taxes on imaginary income, incentivizing gamblers succeeding on thin margins to exit the U.S. or participate in illicit markets,” they wrote. “While the Joint Committee on Taxation estimated that the deduction limit would generate $1.1 billion in tax revenue over eight years, behavioral responses and tax avoidance could quickly reverse that effect. If only a fraction of professional gamers take their bets outside of legal U.S. markets, the effect will be a net loss to tax collections and an increase in illegal activity.”

READ MORE: The big changes to HSAs and what they mean for planning

The importance of keeping close track of winnings

With illegal betting amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars per year and legal gambling in casinos, sports books and online platforms reaching the tens of billions annually, the shift poses implications for financial advisors, tax professionals and their clients, according to a blog by accounting firm Withum.

“For those who treat gambling as a trade or business, operating through a legal entity can offer greater flexibility in managing expenses,” the blog said. “This is particularly relevant for costs not directly tied to wagering, such as research tools, data subscriptions, travel and professional services. While the 90% limitation on deducting gambling losses still applies, properly categorizing and documenting these ancillary expenses could help reduce taxable income more effectively. Maintaining thorough records and assessing whether such expenses qualify as ordinary and necessary business deductions will be essential steps for those looking to optimize their tax position.”

Even casual gamblers — whether or not they itemize — should take steps to document their winnings such as signing up for casino loyalty programs that track them easily, Ringbauer said. And, at the state level, many jurisdictions have gambling tax regulations that conform to the federal standards, so bettors could be facing another layer of bills in some places.

“It will result in a very uncertain world for a lot of tournaments,” Ringbauer said. “It’s going to be very, very scary how the industry is going to be impacted by an unintended procedural rule in the Senate.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending