Connect with us

Accounting

How OBBBA changes gambling income taxes

Published

on

It’s a decent bet: Professional gamblers will become the first taxpayers ever to pay Uncle Sam for unrealized or “phantom” income in 2026.

That’s because, barring changes to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, one provision in the vast legislation cuts the deductibility of gambling losses to no more than 90% of winnings, beginning next year. That means that breaking even will come with a tax bill. Hobbyists who itemize will also see an impact to their federal taxes and, possibly, their state taxes. 

Experts say the changes make it even more important for gamblers to keep careful records of their wins and losses. Bipartisan lawmakers have introduced bills in both houses of Congress to tweak the provision, but whether they might pass in time to alter the rules for 2026 is unclear.

The new law may spur more itemizers who previously placed bets as a hobby to gamble instead as a business venture, in order to count expenses such as hotel stays and flights against their earnings, according to Kevin Thompson, an enrolled agent and certified financial planner who is the CEO of Fort Worth, Texas-based registered investment advisory firm 9I Capital Group. Though a congressional committee projected that limiting the deductibility of gambling losses would generate around $1 billion over the next eight years, Thompson predicted federal revenue from the change would fall far short of that.

“I don’t understand what they’re trying to accomplish with this,” Thompson said. “People are going to gamble. It’s an addiction, it’s something people want to do.”

READ MORE: Caps, credits, contributions: Tax planning for parents under OBBBA

Taxing the pros

OBBBA’s adjustments to taxes on gambling income will “not only discourage people from bettering themselves in their trade” by playing in the toughest tournaments, but they could further be “pushing people offshore or underground” with their bets, said certified public accountant Miklos Ringbauer of Los Angeles-based MiklosCPA.

“We’ve had clients and prospective clients reaching out to us and saying, ‘What are we going to do?'” he said. “It’s going to be very hard decisions that professional players are going to have to make for their careers and for their business activities.”

chart visualization

For example, star poker player Daniel Negreanu’s take-home winnings after taxes at the 2025 World Series of Poker would plummet by 42% to roughly $66,000 under the new rules, according to a calculation by the nonpartisan, nonprofit Tax Foundation using the highest federal bracket rate and numbers that Negreanu has shared publicly. The provision creates “a unique precedent of taxing unrealized income” that could carry effective rates above 100% in some cases and situations in which gamblers whose winnings are zero will be booking “a net loss after paying taxes on money they never made,” experts at the foundation wrote in the blog post. Senate rules for the budget reconciliation process that require only a simple majority to pass legislation likely caused the writers of the legislation to insert the provision.

“The OBBBA provision limiting the deduction of gambling losses might cause individuals to owe taxes on imaginary income, incentivizing gamblers succeeding on thin margins to exit the U.S. or participate in illicit markets,” they wrote. “While the Joint Committee on Taxation estimated that the deduction limit would generate $1.1 billion in tax revenue over eight years, behavioral responses and tax avoidance could quickly reverse that effect. If only a fraction of professional gamers take their bets outside of legal U.S. markets, the effect will be a net loss to tax collections and an increase in illegal activity.”

READ MORE: The big changes to HSAs and what they mean for planning

The importance of keeping close track of winnings

With illegal betting amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars per year and legal gambling in casinos, sports books and online platforms reaching the tens of billions annually, the shift poses implications for financial advisors, tax professionals and their clients, according to a blog by accounting firm Withum.

“For those who treat gambling as a trade or business, operating through a legal entity can offer greater flexibility in managing expenses,” the blog said. “This is particularly relevant for costs not directly tied to wagering, such as research tools, data subscriptions, travel and professional services. While the 90% limitation on deducting gambling losses still applies, properly categorizing and documenting these ancillary expenses could help reduce taxable income more effectively. Maintaining thorough records and assessing whether such expenses qualify as ordinary and necessary business deductions will be essential steps for those looking to optimize their tax position.”

Even casual gamblers — whether or not they itemize — should take steps to document their winnings such as signing up for casino loyalty programs that track them easily, Ringbauer said. And, at the state level, many jurisdictions have gambling tax regulations that conform to the federal standards, so bettors could be facing another layer of bills in some places.

“It will result in a very uncertain world for a lot of tournaments,” Ringbauer said. “It’s going to be very, very scary how the industry is going to be impacted by an unintended procedural rule in the Senate.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending