Connect with us

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: Ouch | Accounting Today

Published

on

Carcaught; a big shank; this order’s definitely to go; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

Muskogee, Oklahoma: Michael Anthony Houser, formerly of Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, has been sentenced to 70 months in prison for one count of theft of federal funds and three years for one count of tax fraud, to be served concurrently.

Between July 2016 and February 2024, while manager for the Muscogee (Creek) Nation Gaming Operations Authority Board, he embezzled and obtained by fraud $24,907,436.07. He also failed to disclose the stolen income for filing federal income taxes, causing a loss to the U.S. in 2016 through 2022; in tax year 2022 he also failed to report $7,851,027,28 in income.

In total, his false filings deprived the U.S. Treasury of $8,205,834. 

Houser, who pleaded guilty earlier this year, was also ordered to pay $17,337,949.50 in restitution to the Muscogee Nation and $8,205,834 to the IRS. 

Pembroke, New Hampshire: Business owner Michael Kirouac has pleaded guilty to fraudulently obtaining more than $1 million of federal CARES Act funds.

Kirouac owned or controlled four companies: HK Manchester, HK Loudon, HK Hudson and HK Pelham. He applied for and obtained more than $1 million in economic injury disaster loans for the companies, certified that he would use the money solely as working capital and not for personal expenses or to relocate the businesses from one location to another.

Beginning in 2021, Kirouac looked to purchase a golf course. He was unable to obtain financing from banks and private lenders and instead obtained EIDLs on behalf of HK Manchester and HK Loudon. Kirouac used some $600,000 of loan funds intended for HK Manchester and HK Loudon to help purchase the Angus Lea Golf Course in Hillsborough, New Hampshire. Kirouac also misused EIDL funds he obtained for HK Pelham.

Separately, Kirouac obtained a $260,500 EIDL for HK Hudson. He had already agreed to sell Hudson to a third party when he signed for the loan and did disclose that fact to the SBA.

The charge of wire fraud provides for a sentence of up to 20 years in prison and a fine of $250,000, or twice the gross gain or loss, whichever is greater. 

Sentencing is Jan. 15.

Maylene, Alabama: Chiropractor Gary Forrest Edwards has been sentenced to 78 months for tax evasion and for interfering with the administration of the internal revenue laws.

Edwards, who previously pleaded guilty, admitted that from 2015 to 2023 he tried to evade payment of more than $2.5 million in income taxes and obstructed IRS efforts to collect those taxes.

He owned and operated the chiropractic practice Hoover Health & Wellness Center, and in 2015 agreed to and did file delinquent federal income tax returns for 2009 through 2013. (He later filed an income tax return for 2017.) Despite eventually filing the returns and reporting millions of dollars in taxable income, Edwards never paid the more than $2.5 million in taxes that he admitted he owed, or the nearly $1.9 million in penalties and interest assessed by the IRS.

Edwards admitted several ways he evaded payment of his taxes and obstructed collection, including hiding financial accounts from the IRS, transferring funds from accounts he owned to accounts in only his spouse’s name, filing false court documents to terminate federal tax liens against his property and lying to IRS investigators, among others.

jail2-fotolia.jpg

Philadelphia: Tax preparer James J. Sirleaf, of Darby, Pennsylvania, has been sentenced to year and a day of imprisonment and a year of supervised release for engaging in a multiyear scheme to assist clients with filing false income tax returns to fraudulently inflate refunds, and filing false personal income tax returns for himself.

In May, Sirleaf pleaded guilty to a 15-count indictment of aiding and assisting in the preparation of false income tax returns and three counts of filing false personal income tax returns.

He was the sole owner and operator of the tax preparation firm Metro Financial Services, where he prepared false and fraudulent 1040s for clients from at least 2016 through 2019. Sirleaf included falsities on the returns — including false deductions, fabricated business expenses and phony dependent information — that reduced clients’ taxes. He also filed false returns for himself for tax years 2017 through 2019, failing to fully report his income.

The tax loss totaled $219,622, which he was ordered to repay as well as an $1,800 special assessment.

Cheyenne, Wyoming: Restaurateur Shu Ping Chen has been sentenced to 18 months in prison for filing a false return. 

Chen owned and operated China Buffet restaurant, where she was responsible for the restaurant’s day-to-day operations and financial reporting. From at least 2018, Chen knowingly provided false financial information to her CPA, fully aware that the tax preparer would use this information to prepare and file her returns.

For tax years 2018 through 2022, Chen underreported the restaurant’s gross cash receipts; the underreported amount over the five years totaled $959,693.94, resulting in a tax loss of $293,270 to the IRS and $66,426 to the State of Wyoming.

In January, IRS investigations searched both Chen’s restaurant and her residence. During the search, Chen was caught attempting to destroy business records.

Chen, who pleaded guilty in August, was also ordered to pay $293,270 in restitution to the IRS and $66,426 to the State of Wyoming, a $75,000 fine and $35,000 for prosecution costs.

Sellersburg, Indiana: Tax preparer Anita Marie Rodriguez Perez has been sentenced to 18 months in prison, to be followed by two years of supervised release, after pleading guilty to five counts of aiding in the preparation of false returns. 

Between 2021 and 2023, Perez owned and operated the area tax prep business ChuliTodo. Among other schemes, she submitted returns containing fabricated Schedules C, falsely claiming the taxpayers operated businesses that incurred significant net losses. (None of the taxpayers had operated a business during the periods.) Additionally, many of the fraudulent returns included inflated Schedule A deductions, particularly for medical and dental expenses, creating and inflating refunds.

Between 2020 and 2022, Perez prepared and filed some 463 fraudulent returns, resulting in a tax loss of $1,575,250.

She was also ordered to pay $1,954,673.30 in restitution.

Kingsport, Tennessee: Aylissa Glidewell has been sentenced to 50 months in prison for conspiring to commit wire and mail fraud.

She conspired to file false returns seeking refunds based on the Employee Retention Credit and the Sick and Family Leave Credit. Glidewell and her conspirators created businesses, which lacked any employees or operations, to falsely claim the credits. Glidewell filed numerous false returns for those businesses and directed the refunds to addresses she and conspirators controlled.

In total, the returns claimed more than $3.4 million in refunds, of which the IRS paid $1.8 million.

Glidewell, who previously pleaded guilty, was also ordered to serve three years of supervised release and pay some $1,806,637 in restitution to the United States.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending