Connect with us

Accounting

Why AI tools won’t replace financial advisors

Published

on

Will AI ultimately supplant financial advisors? We certainly see headlines hinting at such a fate, including one in Financial Planning: “Don’t think AI will replace you? That’s this CEO’s goal.”

Ronak Amin

Ronak Amin, vice president of customer success, Aidentified

In the October article by FP reporter Rob Burgess, Fahad Hassan, head of RIA Range Advisory, likened the future of his firm to ride-hailing service Waymo and predicted a future of fully “driverless” wealth management firms.

Let me be clear: That’s not going to happen. Hassan’s vision misunderstands both technology and human behavior. AI will absolutely transform how advisors work, but it will not replace them in our lifetimes.

READ MORE: The unexpected ways AI note-takers ‘accelerate’ client connections

At its core, AI is just another tool in the advisor’s toolbox. True, it can aggregate information, analyze data and surface opportunities faster and more efficiently than humans. My firm uses AI to assess client prospects for RIAs by connecting hundreds of data points from career changes to property purchases to predict intent. That enables an advisor to make an informed decision about their approach when prospecting.

Could a financial services professional do the same research manually? Yes, if given enough time. What AI does is give that time back, freeing human advisors to do what only they can: listen, empathize and guide people through life’s biggest financial decisions. 

The idea of a nonhuman entity taking my financial information and executing decisions on my behalf isn’t just unrealistic, it’s unsettling. Viral examples of AI writing songs or mimicking voices may grab attention. But in financial planning — a profession built on trust, accountability and emotional intelligence — that only goes so far.  

It’s also important to recognize that while AI itself may not have human biases, the data it’s trained on can introduce systemic ones. Even well-intentioned models may steer clients toward proprietary or higher-revenue products. The SEC’s 2023 proposal addressing predictive analytics reflects growing concern that AI could prioritize firm profits over investor interests.

AI vs. advisor misses the point

I didn’t choose my own financial advisor, Patrick, on the basis of analytics or algorithms, it was because he gave me a sense of security — I trust that my family’s financial future is safe in his hands. I value his insight not for the math, but for the experience and perspective behind it. That’s not something I’d ever outsource to a machine.

READ MORE: Despite AI’s allure, client relationships remain the crux of advisors’ work

Building real trust depends on understanding lived experience. AI can recognize sentiment, but it can’t interpret cultural nuance, emotional subtext or the values that drive human decision-making. A recent study found that investors perceive AI-generated forecasts as less credible than those from human analysts. 

These findings are a reminder that credibility isn’t just about accuracy, it’s about connection.

That’s why the self-driving car analogy misses a key distinction. When you call an Uber, you already know your destination. In financial planning, most people don’t. The journey is iterative. Goals change, markets shift, life happens. You can’t auto-navigate a family’s financial future.

And when the unexpected occurs — a market crash, a health scare or a job loss — who do you want guiding the next steps — a chatbot? The best advisors don’t just interpret data, they steady people in moments of uncertainty.

Artificial intelligence and advisors can, do and will continue to work together. Unfortunately, the zero-sum narrative pitting the two against each other gets more attention. As Caesar Sengupta, CEO of AI-driven digital wealth platform Arta Finance, put it in a recent interview: It’s not about automating empathy. It’s about creating more space for it.

Across every industry that’s been disrupted by technology, the winners aren’t the ones who resist, they’re the ones who embrace it to elevate what’s uniquely human. Financial advice will be no different.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending