Connect with us

Accounting

How secure are your communications?

Published

on

We cover security fairly often here at Accounting Today, but most of the time, it’s about securing data. But data isn’t the only element of your and your client’s information that needs to be locked down as much as reasonably possible.

Communications between you and your clients can also contain sensitive information that neither of you would want distributed to others. There are a few things to keep in mind when it comes to communications security. One is the old saying attributed to Ben Franklin that “Three can keep a secret if two of them are dead.” While I’m sure that you probably don’t wish this on anyone, keep in mind that there is no such thing as perfect security, and if there was such a thing, you wouldn’t be able to afford it. And while the one person keeping a secret may be hyperbole, the greatest risk to sensitive information being breached is people. I’m pretty sure there have been instances when someone shared a secret with “don’t tell anyone I told you, but…”.

Another thing to keep in mind is that all parties to a sensitive communication need to be using the same level of security. It doesn’t offer any protection using an encrypted secure phone app or other device if only one party is using it.

Finally, you also have to realize that security has a monetary price. If price were no object, you would be using a SCIF for sensitive conversations. A SCIF, or Secure Compartmentalized Information Facility, is used mostly (but not exclusively) by the government and military. It consists of an air-gapped room that is also surrounded by a Faraday Cage that prevents radio waves from escaping the room. SCIFs are pretty good at keeping conversations from being bugged or overheard, but even this is only as good as the people involved in the conversations. If someone leaves the SCIF and decides to share the information, the entire purpose of the SCIF is undermined. But the primary reason SCIFs aren’t more popular in business situations is that they are very expensive to construct.

While there are way too many applications, services and products to detail here, here are a few suggestions to get you started. If you video chat using Zoom or Teams, both offer encryption. Teams uses multi-factor authentication plus rest and in-transit encrypted data, while Zoom uses 256-bit TLS and AES-256 encryption. End-to- end encryption is offered in Teams Premium (for business) and only for one-to-one calls, while Zoom has end-to-end encryption that needs to be enabled, but when activated, encrypts end-to-end on all participants in the call. The point is that if more advanced security is available, it doesn’t make sense not to use it.

It may be obvious, but ensuring that your video connection is encrypted is only one part of securing the communication. The other is making sure you have physical privacy when calling. What comes immediately to mind is the video several years ago of a father on a video call when the kids sneak in unnoticed while he’s talking. Maybe no harm will be done if it’s the kids who walk (or crawl) in while you’re on a sensitive video chat. But if you’re in an office, discussing things that you wish to keep confidential, it doesn’t hurt to remember that physical security is important as well.

Can you hear me now?

While video chats are extremely popular these days, most of us still communicate with cell phones, whether for voice or text. There are more than a few applications that can provide security for this kind of communication. There are two popular approaches to providing cellular security. One is software. There are a fair number of apps that offer secure text and voice. A few of the most popular are WhatsApp, Signal and Telegram, but there are plenty of others if you feel none of these will meet your needs. These three are free, but may have gaps in their offering that might not sit well. For example, the very popular WhatsApp provides end-to-end encryption of text and voice and doesn’t store messages on its servers. On the downside, it’s owned by Meta, and WhatsApp may share information with other Meta companies such as Facebook. 

Signal is also popular, and its encryption protocols are secure enough that other apps including WhatsApp and Facebook use them as well. You can enable disappearing messaging, and it’s open source, not privately owned, funded by donations and grants. The end-to-end encryption is engaged by default, and Signal allows transmission of voice, video chats, and file and photo sharing. The major downside is that Signal requires a phone number to sign up. This can be bypassed using a second number. You can, however, and should secure the app with a password.

A third app is Telegram, which offers capabilities similar to the other two mentioned here. It’s multiplatform and free, but there are some downsides that might put you off. End-to-end encryption is not enabled by default, but can be enabled by using the “secret chats” mode. It’s also cloud based, and stores your messages and images on a secure server. Of course, cloud-based server security has been breached many times, so you might not have the same comfort level as having these stored locally on the devices being used. Though if you use “secret chat” mode, Telegram will not store your data on its servers. Telegram has had some notoriety lately with its CEO arrested.

There are also physical encrypted cell phones. Some of the most popular are the Purism Librem 5, K-iPhone, Blackphone PRIVY 2.0, Bittium Tough Mobile 2 and others. These have two major downsides. Number one is that all parties to the conversation need to have the same phones, and these must be using the same encryption modes. Downside number two is that most of these phones are really expensive, ranging from about $700 to $1,500 or more. 

I’m really just offering a primer here. If you’re serious about communication security, your best bet is to use a consultant knowledgeable in this area. 

Finally, you might want to take a look at the course that the Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency offers on how to communicate securely on your mobile device.

Continue Reading

Accounting

XcelLabs launches to help accountants use AI

Published

on

Jody Padar, an author and speaker known as “The Radical CPA,” and Katie Tolin, a growth strategist for CPAs, together launched a training and technology platform called XcelLabs.

XcelLabs provides solutions to help accountants use artificial technology fluently and strategically. The Pennsylvania Institute of CPAs and CPA Crossings joined with Padar and Tolin as strategic partners and investors.

“To reinvent the profession, we must start by training the professional who can then transform their firms,” Padar said in a statement. “By equipping people with data and insights that help them see things differently, they can provide better advice to their clients and firm.”

Padar-Jody- new 2019

Jody Padar

The platform includes XcelLabs Academy, a series of educational online courses on the basics of AI, being a better advisor, leadership and practice management; Navi, a proprietary tool that uses AI to help accountants turn unstructured data like emails, phone calls and meetings into insights; and training and consulting services. These offerings are currently in beta testing.

“Accountants know they need to be more advisory, but not everyone can figure out how to do it,” Tolin said in a statement. “Couple that with the fact that AI will be doing a lot of the lower-level work accountants do today, and we need to create that next level advisor now. By showing accountants how to unlock patterns in their actions and turn client conversations into emotionally intelligent advice, we can create the accounting professional of the future.”

Tolin-Katie-CPA Growth Guides

Katie Tolin

“AI is transforming how CPAs work, and XcelLabs is focused on helping the profession evolve with it,” PICPA CEO Jennifer Cryder said in a statement. “At PICPA, we’re proud to support a mission that aligns so closely with ours: empowering firms to use AI not just for efficiency, but to drive growth, value and long-term relevance.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Accounting is changing, and the world can’t wait until 2026

Published

on

The accountant the world urgently needs has evolved far beyond the traditional role we recognized just a few years ago. 

The transformation of the accounting profession is not merely an anticipated change; it is a pressing reality that is currently shaping business decisions, academic programs and the expected contributions of professionals. Yet, in many areas, accounting education stubbornly clings to outdated, overly technical models that fail to connect with the actual demands of the market. We must confront a critical question: If we continue to train accountants solely to file tax reports, are we truly equipping them for the challenges of today’s world? 

This shift in mindset extends beyond individual countries or educational systems; it is a global movement. The recent announcement of the CIMA/CGMA 2026 syllabus has made it unmistakably clear: merely knowing how to post journal entries is insufficient. Today’s accountants are required to interpret the landscape, anticipate risks and act with strategic awareness. Critical thinking, sustainable finance, technology and human behavior are not just supplementary topics; they are essential components in the education of any professional seeking to remain relevant. 

The CIMA/CGMA proposal for 2026 is not just a curriculum update; it is a powerful manifesto. This new program positions analytical thinking, strategic business partnering and technology application at the core of accounting education. It unequivocally highlights sustainability, aligning with IFRS S1 and S2, and expands the accountant’s responsibilities beyond mere numbers to encompass conscious leadership, environmental impact and corporate governance. 

The current changes in the accounting profession underscore an urgent shift in expectations from both educators and employers. Today, companies of all sizes and industries demand accountants who can do far more than interpret balance sheets. They expect professionals who grasp the deeper context behind the numbers, identify inconsistencies, anticipate potential issues before they escalate into losses, and act decisively as a bridge between data and decision making. 

To meet these expectations, a radical mindset shift is essential. There are firms still operating on autopilot, mindlessly repeating tasks with minimal critical analysis. Likewise, many academic programs continue to treat accounting as purely a technical discipline, disregarding the vital elements of reflection, strategy and behavioral insight. This outdated approach creates a significant mismatch. While the world forges ahead, parts of the accounting profession remain stuck in the past. 

The consequences of this shift are already becoming evident. The demand for compliance, transparency and sustainability now applies not only to large corporations but also to small and mid-sized businesses. Many of these organizations rely on professionals ill-equipped to drive the necessary changes, putting both business performance and the reputation of the profession at risk. 

The positive news is that accountants who are ready to thrive in this new era do not necessarily need additional degrees. What they truly need is a commitment to awareness, a dedication to continuous learning, and the courage to step beyond their comfort zones. The future of accounting is here, and it is firmly rooted in analytical, strategic and human-oriented perspectives. The 2026 curriculum is a clear indication of the changes underway. Those who fail to think critically and holistically will be left behind. 

In contrast, accountants who see the big picture, understand the ripple effects of their decisions, and actively contribute to the financial and ethical health of organizations will undeniably remain indispensable, anywhere in the world.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Republicans push Musk aside as Trump tax bill barrels forward

Published

on

Congressional Republicans are siding with Donald Trump in the messy divorce between the president and Elon Musk, an optimistic sign for eventual passage of a tax cut bill at the root of the two billionaires’ public feud.

Lawmakers are largely taking their cues from Trump and sticking by the $3 trillion bill at the center of the White House’s economic agenda. Musk, the biggest political donor of the 2024 cycle, has threatened to help primary anyone who votes for the legislation, but lawmakers are betting that staying in the president’s good graces is the safer path to political survival.

“The tax bill is not in jeopardy. We are going to deliver on that,” House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters on Friday.

“I’ll tell you what — do not doubt, don’t second guess and do not challenge the President of the United States Donald Trump,” he added. “He is the leader of the party. He’s the most consequential political figure of our time.”

A fight between Trump and Musk exploded into public view this week. The sparring started with the tech titan calling the president’s tax bill a “disgusting abomination,” but quickly escalated to more personal attacks and Trump threatening to cancel all federal contracts and subsidies to Musk’s companies, such as Tesla Inc. and SpaceX which have benefitted from government ties.

Republicans on Capitol Hill, who had —  until recently — publicly embraced Musk, said they weren’t swayed by the billionaire’s criticism that the bill cost too much. Lawmakers have refuted official estimates of the package, saying that the tax cuts for households, small businesses and politically important groups — including hospitality and hourly workers — will generate enough economic growth to offset the price tag.

“I don’t tell my friend Elon, I don’t argue with him about how to build rockets, and I wish he wouldn’t argue with me about how to craft legislation and pass it,” Johnson told CNBC earlier Friday.

House Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington told reporters that House lawmakers are focused on working with the Senate as it revises the bill to make sure the legislation has the political support in both chambers to make it to Trump’s desk for his signature. 

“We move past the drama and we get the substance of what is needed to make the modest improvements that can be made,” he said.

House fiscal hawks said that they hadn’t changed their prior positions on the legislation based on Musk’s statements. They also said they agree with GOP leaders that there will be other chances to make further spending cuts outside the tax bill. 

Representative Tom McClintock, a fiscal conservative, said “the bill will pass because it has to pass,” adding that both Musk and Trump needed to calm down. “They both need to take a nap,” he said.

Even some of the House bill’s most vociferous critics appeared resigned to its passage. Kentucky Representative Thomas Massie, who voted against the House version, predicted that despite Musk’s objections, the Senate will make only small changes.

“The speaker is right about one thing. This barely passed the House. If they muck with it too much in the Senate, it may not pass the House again,” he said.

Trump is pressuring lawmakers to move at breakneck speed to pass the tax-cut bill, demanding they vote on the bill before the July 4 holiday. The president has been quick to blast critics of the bill — including calling Senator Rand Paul “crazy” for objecting to the inclusion of a debt ceiling increase in the package.

As the legislation worked its way through the House last month, Trump took to social media to criticize holdouts and invited undecided members to the White House to compel them to support the package. It passed by one vote.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune — who is planning to unveil his chamber’s version of the bill as soon as next week — said his timeline is unmoved by Musk. 

“We are already pretty far down the trail,” he said.

Continue Reading

Trending