Connect with us

Accounting

How the 2024 election and Congress will decide taxes

Published

on

With next month’s election looming as a referendum on so many issues, the recent history of Congress offers a few hints on what may happen to taxes, according to legislative experts.

Financial advisors, tax professionals and their clients trying to prepare for changes to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ahead of the sunset date for many provisions in the law at the end of next year may want to read up on the Senate procedure known as “budget reconciliation” — a complicated means of passing a bill that doesn’t require a 60-vote supermajority in the chamber. Veteran Washington insiders speaking in a virtual panel held last month by law firm K&L Gates’ Public Policy and Law practice described the possible tax policy implications of that process. 

K&L Gates is one of the top lobbying firms with more than $47.8 million worth of business in the last three years per the Open Secrets database, and the roundtable shed light on how the next Congress and administration led by either former President Donald Trump or Vice President Kamala Harris will move forward with taxes next year. That process will bring potential shifts in estate taxes, federal income brackets and the deduction for qualified business income — to name only a few policies hanging in the balance.

READ MORE: Economists want to trash the QBI deduction. What will voters say?

The upcoming deadline at the end of 2025 presents many different scenarios, according to Mary Burke Baker, a government affairs advisor who is the leader of the tax policy practice in the Washington, D.C. office of K&L Gates and a onetime 28-year veteran IRS staff member.

“Once there’s a tax title moving, then everybody wants to throw their thing at the wall and see if it sticks,” Baker said. “And, as we also all know, for better or worse, the tax code is seen as the solution by both parties for everything — whether it’s U.S. competitiveness, jobs, supply chain or social policies. So that’s going to put a lot of pressure on tax legislation next year.”

Advisors and their clients aiming to understand how the process will play out under either party should likely consult the recent history of budget reconciliation bills used by both Republicans and Democrats in the past 20 years or so and an aspect of the procedure called the “Byrd Rule,” said Mike Evans, a partner in the Washington office’s public policy and law practice who was formerly chief counsel to Democrats on two different Senate committees.

The Byrd Rule forbids the Senate from using the reconciliation process for any bills that raise the deficit beyond 10 years or make any changes to Social Security. That latter “fairly obscure” aspect of Byrd likely rules out any provisions “exempting Social Security benefits from income tax,” Evans said.

“That’s why the TCJA stuff expires now, because it had to, under the Byrd Rule, limit the duration of the bill,” he said. “It limits the scope of the bill. The Byrd Rule comes into effect, and that limits the scope of the bill. Obviously, things that are not budget related are not to be included. You have big debates about whether something is really incidental to the budget or not. But we have seen proposals regarding abortion, proposals regarding minimum wage and proposals regarding immigration reform excluded from the scope of the budget reconciliation bill because of the Byrd Rule.”

Even if former President Trump wins, Republicans are still “going to be very conscious of adding to the debt,” according to Ryan Carney, a government affairs advisor and member of the office’s public policy and law practice who was once chief of staff to two GOP members of Congress. He predicted that a Republican-led White House and Congress would consider how to address research and development tax credits, deductions for state and local duties and the child tax credit. The fact that the government’s debt has risen so sharply since 2017 “means that a full-on extension is going to be challenging,” Carney said.

“There’s some knowledge of how he would govern and what his tax priorities would be,” Carney said of Trump. “At the same time, his signature legislation from his first term is expiring, so, unsurprisingly, a big priority — should Republicans win and get the trifecta of the House, Senate and the White House — would be to extend the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, probably using the reconciliation vehicle. They would want to include bonus and research expensing into that 10-year extension as well. But 2025 is going to be a very different debt environment from 2017.”

READ MORE: Why tax-related services drive business for RIAs  

The question of whether one party will sweep Congress and the White House will decide whether the expiration of the laws provides “an opportunity with a capital ‘O’ or an opportunity with a small-case ‘O,'” according to Bruce Heiman, a partner in the public policy practice who was the legislative director and trade counsel to the late Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan, a Democrat from New York. If the Democrats use reconciliation, the legislation will “be partisan” and “move fast,” Heiman said.

“If not, I think you’re going to have a lot more negotiation and compromise,” he said. “Whoever controls, there are going to be slim majorities. And so you’re going to have to be working with both sides. Second, Harris has just less experience working with Congress than Biden did, necessarily. She’s been newer to Congress, and she also has fewer personal relationships with members in a more polarized environment, too. All of which means it’s harder to get things done, a greater need for compromise and more pushing toward the middle.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

XcelLabs launches to help accountants use AI

Published

on

Jody Padar, an author and speaker known as “The Radical CPA,” and Katie Tolin, a growth strategist for CPAs, together launched a training and technology platform called XcelLabs.

XcelLabs provides solutions to help accountants use artificial technology fluently and strategically. The Pennsylvania Institute of CPAs and CPA Crossings joined with Padar and Tolin as strategic partners and investors.

“To reinvent the profession, we must start by training the professional who can then transform their firms,” Padar said in a statement. “By equipping people with data and insights that help them see things differently, they can provide better advice to their clients and firm.”

Padar-Jody- new 2019

Jody Padar

The platform includes XcelLabs Academy, a series of educational online courses on the basics of AI, being a better advisor, leadership and practice management; Navi, a proprietary tool that uses AI to help accountants turn unstructured data like emails, phone calls and meetings into insights; and training and consulting services. These offerings are currently in beta testing.

“Accountants know they need to be more advisory, but not everyone can figure out how to do it,” Tolin said in a statement. “Couple that with the fact that AI will be doing a lot of the lower-level work accountants do today, and we need to create that next level advisor now. By showing accountants how to unlock patterns in their actions and turn client conversations into emotionally intelligent advice, we can create the accounting professional of the future.”

Tolin-Katie-CPA Growth Guides

Katie Tolin

“AI is transforming how CPAs work, and XcelLabs is focused on helping the profession evolve with it,” PICPA CEO Jennifer Cryder said in a statement. “At PICPA, we’re proud to support a mission that aligns so closely with ours: empowering firms to use AI not just for efficiency, but to drive growth, value and long-term relevance.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Accounting is changing, and the world can’t wait until 2026

Published

on

The accountant the world urgently needs has evolved far beyond the traditional role we recognized just a few years ago. 

The transformation of the accounting profession is not merely an anticipated change; it is a pressing reality that is currently shaping business decisions, academic programs and the expected contributions of professionals. Yet, in many areas, accounting education stubbornly clings to outdated, overly technical models that fail to connect with the actual demands of the market. We must confront a critical question: If we continue to train accountants solely to file tax reports, are we truly equipping them for the challenges of today’s world? 

This shift in mindset extends beyond individual countries or educational systems; it is a global movement. The recent announcement of the CIMA/CGMA 2026 syllabus has made it unmistakably clear: merely knowing how to post journal entries is insufficient. Today’s accountants are required to interpret the landscape, anticipate risks and act with strategic awareness. Critical thinking, sustainable finance, technology and human behavior are not just supplementary topics; they are essential components in the education of any professional seeking to remain relevant. 

The CIMA/CGMA proposal for 2026 is not just a curriculum update; it is a powerful manifesto. This new program positions analytical thinking, strategic business partnering and technology application at the core of accounting education. It unequivocally highlights sustainability, aligning with IFRS S1 and S2, and expands the accountant’s responsibilities beyond mere numbers to encompass conscious leadership, environmental impact and corporate governance. 

The current changes in the accounting profession underscore an urgent shift in expectations from both educators and employers. Today, companies of all sizes and industries demand accountants who can do far more than interpret balance sheets. They expect professionals who grasp the deeper context behind the numbers, identify inconsistencies, anticipate potential issues before they escalate into losses, and act decisively as a bridge between data and decision making. 

To meet these expectations, a radical mindset shift is essential. There are firms still operating on autopilot, mindlessly repeating tasks with minimal critical analysis. Likewise, many academic programs continue to treat accounting as purely a technical discipline, disregarding the vital elements of reflection, strategy and behavioral insight. This outdated approach creates a significant mismatch. While the world forges ahead, parts of the accounting profession remain stuck in the past. 

The consequences of this shift are already becoming evident. The demand for compliance, transparency and sustainability now applies not only to large corporations but also to small and mid-sized businesses. Many of these organizations rely on professionals ill-equipped to drive the necessary changes, putting both business performance and the reputation of the profession at risk. 

The positive news is that accountants who are ready to thrive in this new era do not necessarily need additional degrees. What they truly need is a commitment to awareness, a dedication to continuous learning, and the courage to step beyond their comfort zones. The future of accounting is here, and it is firmly rooted in analytical, strategic and human-oriented perspectives. The 2026 curriculum is a clear indication of the changes underway. Those who fail to think critically and holistically will be left behind. 

In contrast, accountants who see the big picture, understand the ripple effects of their decisions, and actively contribute to the financial and ethical health of organizations will undeniably remain indispensable, anywhere in the world.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Republicans push Musk aside as Trump tax bill barrels forward

Published

on

Congressional Republicans are siding with Donald Trump in the messy divorce between the president and Elon Musk, an optimistic sign for eventual passage of a tax cut bill at the root of the two billionaires’ public feud.

Lawmakers are largely taking their cues from Trump and sticking by the $3 trillion bill at the center of the White House’s economic agenda. Musk, the biggest political donor of the 2024 cycle, has threatened to help primary anyone who votes for the legislation, but lawmakers are betting that staying in the president’s good graces is the safer path to political survival.

“The tax bill is not in jeopardy. We are going to deliver on that,” House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters on Friday.

“I’ll tell you what — do not doubt, don’t second guess and do not challenge the President of the United States Donald Trump,” he added. “He is the leader of the party. He’s the most consequential political figure of our time.”

A fight between Trump and Musk exploded into public view this week. The sparring started with the tech titan calling the president’s tax bill a “disgusting abomination,” but quickly escalated to more personal attacks and Trump threatening to cancel all federal contracts and subsidies to Musk’s companies, such as Tesla Inc. and SpaceX which have benefitted from government ties.

Republicans on Capitol Hill, who had —  until recently — publicly embraced Musk, said they weren’t swayed by the billionaire’s criticism that the bill cost too much. Lawmakers have refuted official estimates of the package, saying that the tax cuts for households, small businesses and politically important groups — including hospitality and hourly workers — will generate enough economic growth to offset the price tag.

“I don’t tell my friend Elon, I don’t argue with him about how to build rockets, and I wish he wouldn’t argue with me about how to craft legislation and pass it,” Johnson told CNBC earlier Friday.

House Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington told reporters that House lawmakers are focused on working with the Senate as it revises the bill to make sure the legislation has the political support in both chambers to make it to Trump’s desk for his signature. 

“We move past the drama and we get the substance of what is needed to make the modest improvements that can be made,” he said.

House fiscal hawks said that they hadn’t changed their prior positions on the legislation based on Musk’s statements. They also said they agree with GOP leaders that there will be other chances to make further spending cuts outside the tax bill. 

Representative Tom McClintock, a fiscal conservative, said “the bill will pass because it has to pass,” adding that both Musk and Trump needed to calm down. “They both need to take a nap,” he said.

Even some of the House bill’s most vociferous critics appeared resigned to its passage. Kentucky Representative Thomas Massie, who voted against the House version, predicted that despite Musk’s objections, the Senate will make only small changes.

“The speaker is right about one thing. This barely passed the House. If they muck with it too much in the Senate, it may not pass the House again,” he said.

Trump is pressuring lawmakers to move at breakneck speed to pass the tax-cut bill, demanding they vote on the bill before the July 4 holiday. The president has been quick to blast critics of the bill — including calling Senator Rand Paul “crazy” for objecting to the inclusion of a debt ceiling increase in the package.

As the legislation worked its way through the House last month, Trump took to social media to criticize holdouts and invited undecided members to the White House to compel them to support the package. It passed by one vote.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune — who is planning to unveil his chamber’s version of the bill as soon as next week — said his timeline is unmoved by Musk. 

“We are already pretty far down the trail,” he said.

Continue Reading

Trending