Historically, being an accountant often involved little personal agency — most young accountants followed the career path laid before them by their firm, and that path looked much the same from firm to firm. But now with advancing technology propelling the profession forward, new service lines multiplying almost daily, and a labor shortage putting young talent in high demand, new career pathways and opportunities are opening.
The decisions start with picking a firm size and focus area, and continue throughout the career, from committing to the partner path, to going corporate or staying in public accounting, or even starting their own practices. Experts say young accountants should navigate this evolving profession by continually reevaluating their path with an open mind.
Oleksiy – stock.adobe.com
Picking a firm
As firms start shifting their recruiting focus to younger students, sometimes even extending internship offers to college sophomores, students have to choose a firm earlier than ever before. The most obvious factor to consider is firm size.
There are benefits and downsides to each. At small firms, young accountants can become jacks of all trades, have more opportunities to demonstrate entrepreneurship and the opportunity to work with clients faster. Meanwhile, big firms offer prestige, specialization, big-name clients, the opportunity to travel and connections. Many students choose the latter route and aim for one of the Big Four: Deloitte, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Ernst & Young or KPMG.
Jeff Phillips, CEO at Padgett Business Services and cofounder of recruiting firm Accountingfly, thinks the narrative that students receive in school too often skims over the benefits of working in small and midsized firms.
“Don’t buy into the myth that you must start your career at the Big Four,” he said. “They are excellent companies, but there are awesome firms in the Top 200. There are awesome local firms.”
The stereotype is a young accountant starts working in a big firm, grows tired of the grueling hours, and eventually leaves for the work-life balance of a small firm. Of course, in the same way that some students prefer the community and culture of a small college versus a big state school, some accountants will fare better going directly to a small firm.
But some experts warn that starting in a small firm may limit career mobility down the line.
“It’s always easier to go from big to small. It’s harder to go from smaller to big,” said Stan Veliotis, associate professor at Fordham University. “Both are possible, but it’s easier in one direction versus the other.”
He said that students risk giving the impression to future employers that they couldn’t get an offer from the big firms — not that they didn’t want to work there.
But Douglas Slaybaugh, a CPA career coach, disagreed: “I’ve seen it go both ways. I’ve got a client right now that’s moving from a smaller firm to a big firm. And there is such a need for resources in the industry right now that if that was ever a thing, it’s less of a thing now.”
Choosing a focus area
It’s difficult choosing a focus area—between tax, audit and accounting, or one of the new possibilities that are cropping—before having actually worked in a firm. Many students may feel they’re sealing their fates with the choice, but the reality is that they can always switch down the line. The best course of action is to just jump.
“Don’t worry too much about a focus area,” Veliotis said. “As long as you have some interest in it, take it, and then you will see over time what you gravitate towards.”
Slaybaugh encourages students to use internships and firm college programs to get a taste of the profession. “Start early and try lots of things,” he said. “You have to start, but you’re never stuck.”
How long to stay
The next question is how long to stay at your first firm. Traditionally, an accountant’s entire career would play out within a single firm — joining as an intern and climbing the ranks until they make partner.
Today, Veliotis says it’s easier for young accountants to leave their firm now that applying for a job can be as easy as clicking a button online. In the past, joining a new firm meant being headhunted or actually running from office to office looking. He recommends staying at least one year in a firm — ideally several years, but never less than one.
“One year is a magical number,” Veliotis said. “In accounting, almost all the disciplines in the accounting firms, all the client engagements, are cyclical, meaning every year, the year finishes and now you have to prepare the tax return, or now you have to prepare the audit or the financial statements. So if a person leaves within a year, it almost looks like something blew up or they couldn’t handle the second cycle.”
Remember, Veliotis said, firms are always taking a risk on young talent — they don’t know how much you know out of college. That’s why it’s important to at least get the first promotion.
From there on, Phillips suggests that accountants reassess their career every three to four years.
“As long as they’re pretty happy with the firm, stay until they’re around a manager level. Your options expand exponentially the longer you stay at that first employer,” he said. “As someone with a recruiting background, we don’t like to see candidates who have changed jobs every 18 months — we just feel like you’re going to change jobs in 18 months on us. So I think there’s a lot of wisdom in sticking something out for a chunk of time to learn how to exist in a firm.”
Slaybaugh thinks accountants should be reassessing more frequently: “Every year, once a year, you should decide whether you’re going to stay in the job you’re in or not. What that does is it removes planned continuation bias, in that we decide we’re going to be accountants based on the circumstances in which we made the decision. Well, times change. Circumstances change.”
Getting your CPA
Most experts agree that getting licensed as a CPA is still important. It provides more career mobility and is a symbol of trust and reliability. But do you really need your CPA?
Slaybaugh says it “depends on the day.” Some non-audit managers and partners don’t have their CPA, so it’s certainly possible to get promoted without it.
“The importance of it still exists. It’s still an important aspect of our society to be able to have that trust in the profession,” Slaybaugh said. He added that getting an MBA plus a CPA can help you become a CFO.
Committing to the partner path
The path to partner, which takes 10 to 20 years on average, is daunting. Luckily, even if an accountant jumps ship before they make partner, at least they’ve gained highly-sought-after experience.
“If you work until you’re about to become a partner and you decide that’s not for you, you have many options available to you, because every company in the world wants to hire somebody with that skillset,” Phillips said.
Experts also recommend interviewing your partners to investigate if the career is right for you. What would they do differently? What do they like and dislike about being a partner? What is the lifestyle like? What are the hours like?
Slaybaugh says if the partner path is for you, you should be yourself from the beginning. For example, don’t pretend you enjoy a niche more than you do, or commit to more hours than you’re actually willing to.
“It’s best to have consistency. Be yourself,” Slaybaugh said. “This has nothing to do with developing as a professional or becoming a better leader; this is about doing things that are against your core values or not resonating with your core values.”
Going corporate
It’s common for accountants to make the move from public accounting to corporate or industry accounting. Often they enter the industry their clients were in, Veliotis said.
“When you make the jump from an accounting firm—where you have a lot of diversified experiences, you’re learning about best practices, you have the stress of client delivery—and you go in-house, you’re very, very powerful on a resume because you know the area,” Veliotis said. “You proved yourself in the most stressful environment there is, which is serving many clients. And then you go to one company, in essence, you just have the one client.”
For those aiming to be a CFO, Slaybaugh recommends staying longer in public accounting to gain more experience. He also noted that you’ll likely experience an immediate pay bump going corporate, but said the salary will eventually be outpaced by what you could’ve made as a partner.
Joining up
Joining professional associations, like the American Institute of CPAs, the National Conference of CPA Practitioners or the National Association of Black Accountants, or state CPA societies, can be an excellent way to practice networking and communication skills. (Communication is an underestimated skill in the accounting profession.)
But while many of these organizations offer virtual meetings, Veliotis encourages young people to go in person for the full benefits and resources.
Owning your own firm
For some accountants, starting your own practice may be the dream, but no one actually teaches how to start a firm.
“If you’re entrepreneurial, the skillsets you’re going to need are that technical knowledge that you probably will not learn in college — you will probably learn working inside of a company,” Phillips said.
The most important soft skills for running a successful firm are a high degree of responsibility and ownership. “It starts and ends with you,” Phillips said.
It’s a great time to start an accounting firm, he added. Demand for services is growing, the economy is growing, there are more niches than ever, and firms that are scaling and shaking loose clients can be grabbed by an entrepreneur.
If you learned nothing else
What remains true for all young accountants — no matter what path they find themselves on, whether they become partners or quit their firms to start their own practices — the most important thing is remaining proactive about making their own choices because the profession will no longer do it for them.
Accounting firms are reporting bigger profits and more clients, according to a new report.
The report, released Monday by Xero, found that nearly three-quarters(73%) of firms reportedincreased profits over the past year and 56% added new clients thanks to operational efficiency and expanded service offerings.
Some 85% of firms now offer client advisory services, a big spike from 41% in 2023, indicating a strategic shift toward delivering forward-looking financial guidance that clients increasingly expect.
AI adoptionis also reshaping the profession, with80% of firms confident it will positively affect their practice. Currently, the most common use cases for AI include: delivering faster and more responsive client services (33%), enhancing accuracy by reducing bookkeeping and accounting errors (33%), and streamlining workflows through the automation of routine tasks (32%).
“The widespread adoption of AI has been a turning point for the accounting profession, giving accountants an opportunity to scale their impact and take on a more strategic advisory role,” said Ben Richmond, managing director, North America, at Xero, in a statement. “The real value lies not just in working more efficiently, but working smarter, freeing up time to elevate the human element of the profession and in turn, strengthen client relationships.”
Some of the main challenges faced by firms include economic uncertainty (38%), mastering AI (36%) and rising client expectations for strategic advice (35%).
While 85% of firms have embraced cloud platforms, a sizable number still lag behind, missing out on benefits such as easier data access from anywhere (40%) and enhanced security (36%).
Private equity firms have bought five of the top 26 accounting firms in the past three years as they mount a concerted strategy to reshape the industry.
The trend should not come as a surprise. It’s one we’ve seen play out in several industries from health care to insurance, where a combination of low-risk, recurring revenue, scalability and an aging population of owners create a target-rich environment. For small to midsized accounting firms, the trend is exacerbated by a technological revolution that’s truly transforming the way accounting work is done, and a growing talent crisis that is threatening tried-and-true business models.
How will this type of consolidation affect the accounting business, and what do firms and their clients need to be on the lookout for as the marketplace evolves?
Assessing the opportunity… and the risk
First and foremost, accounting firm owners need to be aware of just how desirable they are right now. While there has been some buzz in the industry about the growing presence of private equity firms, most of the activity to date has focused on larger, privately held firms. In fact, when we recently asked tax professionals about their exposure to private equity funding in our 2025 State of Tax Professionals Report, we found that just 5% of firms have actually inked a deal and only 11% said they are planning to look, or are currently looking, for a deal with a private equity firm. Another 8% said they are open to discussion. On the one hand, that’s almost a quarter of firms feeling open to private equity investments in some way. But the lion’s share of respondents — 87% — said they were not interested.
Recent private equity deal volume suggests that the holdouts might change their minds when they have a real offer on the table. According to S&P Global, private equity and venture capital-backed deal value in the accounting, auditing and taxation services sector reached more than $6.3 billion in 2024, the highest level since 2015, and the trend shows no signs of slowing. Firm owners would be wise to start watching this trend to see how it might affect their businesses — whether they are interested in selling or not.
Focus on tech and efficiencies of scale
The reason this trend is so important to everyone in the industry right now is that the private equity firms entering this space are not trying to become accountants. They are looking for profitable exits. And they will do that by seizing on a critical inflection point in the industry that’s making it possible to scale accounting firms more rapidly than ever before by leveraging technology to deliver a much wider range of services at a much lower cost. So, whether your firm is interested in partnering with private equity or dead set on going it alone, the hyperscaling that’s happening throughout the industry will affect you one way or another.
Private equity thrives in fragmented businesses where the ability to roll up companies with complementary skill sets and specialized services creates an outsized growth opportunity. Andrew Dodson, managing partner at Parthenon Capital, recently commented after his firm took a stake in the tax and advisory firm Cherry Bekaert, “We think that for firms to thrive, they need to make investments in people and technology, and, obviously, regulatory adherence, to really differentiate themselves in the market. And that’s going to require scale and capital to do it. That’s what gets us excited.”
Over time, this could reshape the industry’s market dynamics by creating the accounting firm equivalent of the Traveling Wilburys — supergroups capable of delivering a wide range of specialized services that smaller, more narrowly focused firms could never previously deliver. It could also put downward pressure on pricing as these larger, platform-style firms start finding economies of scale to deliver services more cost-effectively.
The technology factor
The great equalizer in all of this is technology. Consistently, when I speak to tax professionals actively working in the market today, their top priorities are increased efficiency, growth and talent. Firms recognize they need to streamline workflows and processes through more effective use of technology, and they are investing heavily in AI, automation and data analytics capabilities to do that. Private equity firms, of course, are also investing in tech as they assemble their tax and accounting dream teams, in many cases raising the bar for the industry.
The question is: Can independent firms leverage technology fast enough to keep up with their deep-pocketed competition?
Many firms believe they can, with some even going so far as to publicly declare their independence. Regardless of the path small to midsized firms take to get there, technology-enabled growth is going to play a key role in the future of the industry. Market dynamics that have been unfolding for the last decade have been accelerated with the introduction of serious investors, and everyone in the industry — large and small — is going to need to up their games to stay competitive.
The House-passed version of President Donald Trump’s massive tax and spending bill would deliver a financial blow to the poorest Americans but be a boon for higher-income households, according to a new analysis from the Congressional Budget Office.
The bottom 10% of households would lose an average of about $1,600 in resources per year, amounting to a 3.9% cut in their income, according to the analysis released Thursday. Those decreases are largely attributable to cuts in the Medicaid health insurance program and food aid through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
Households in the highest 10% of incomes would see an average $12,000 boost in resources, amounting to a 2.3% increase in their incomes. Those increases are mainly attributable to reductions in taxes owed, according to the report from the nonpartisan CBO.
Households in the middle of the income distribution would see an increase in resources of $500 to $1,000, or between 0.5% and 0.8% of their income.
The projections are based on the version of the tax legislation that House Republicans passed last month, which includes much of Trump’s economic agenda. The bill would extend tax cuts passed under Trump in 2017 otherwise due to expire at the end of the year and create several new tax breaks. It also imposes new changes to the Medicaid and SNAP programs in an effort to cut spending.
Overall, the legislation would add $2.4 trillion to US deficits over the next 10 years, not accounting for dynamic effects, the CBO previously forecast.
The Senate is considering changes to the legislation including efforts by some Republican senators to scale back cuts to Medicaid.
The projected loss of safety-net resources for low-income families come against the backdrop of higher tariffs, which economists have warned would also disproportionately impact lower-income families. While recent inflation data has shown limited impact from the import duties so far, low-income families tend to spend a larger portion of their income on necessities, such as food, so price increases hit them harder.
The House-passed bill requires that able-bodied individuals without dependents document at least 80 hours of “community engagement” a month, including working a job or participating in an educational program to qualify for Medicaid. It also includes increased costs for health care for enrollees, among other provisions.
More older adults also would have to prove they are working to continue to receive SNAP benefits, also known as food stamps. The legislation helps pay for tax cuts by raising the age for which able bodied adults must work to receive benefits to 64, up from 54. Under the current law, some parents with dependent children under age 18 are exempt from work requirements, but the bill lowers the age for the exemption for dependent children to 7 years old.
The legislation also shifts a portion of the cost for federal food aid onto state governments.
CBO previously estimated that the expanded work requirements on SNAP would reduce participation in the program by roughly 3.2 million people, and more could lose or face a reduction in benefits due to other changes to the program. A separate analysis from the organization found that 7.8 million people would lose health insurance because of the changes to Medicaid.