Connect with us

Accounting

IASB revises practice statement on management commentary

Published

on

The International Accounting Standards Board released a revised Practice Statement on management commentary to achieve better global alignment, while its parent, the IFRS Foundation, released guidance on an entity’s climate-related transition.

The IASB did a major overhaul of the practice statement after investors pointed out shortcomings in current practice and to offer a global benchmark for regulators to use in updating or developing their national requirements and guidance as well as provide a comprehensive resource for companies to help meet investors’ information needs.. 

The IASB worked closely with the International Sustainability Standards Board to align the two boards’ requirements and to facilitate connected information across a company’s financial reports. Both boards are overseen by the International Financial Standards Board Foundation. The IASB’s work on updating the Practice Statement also draws on innovations in narrative reporting, including the Integrated Reporting Framework.

Climate transition

In related news, the IFRS Foundation also published on Monday a new guidance document Disclosing information about an entity’s climate-related transition, including information about transition plans, in accordance with IFRS S2 as part of its commitment to supporting the implementation of IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards. The document builds on disclosure-specific material developed by the Transition Plan Taskforce, for which the IFRS Foundation took responsibility last year.

The guidance supports entities that are applying IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures. It’s designed to help entities provide high-quality information about their climate-related transition when applying IFRS S2; and covers disclosures about any “transition plan” an entity has, including both mitigation and adaptation efforts.

“This guidance document addresses the fragmentation of disclosures about transition plans—which is costly for both preparers of information and investors—and provides inspiration for entities who are applying IFRS S2 when making disclosures about their climate-related transition plans,” ISSB vice-chair Sue Lloyd in a statement. “This guidance aims to help preparers determine what information is relevant to disclose regarding their strategy and goals related to their climate-related transition.”

The IFRS Foundation is hosting a conference in the U.K. on Monday and Tuesday where officials are discussing the standards.

While IFRS S2 doesn’t require an entity to have a transition plan, it does require an entity to provide material information about the sustainability-related risks and opportunities that could reasonably be expected to affect its prospects. That includes information about its climate-related transition because it relates to how the entity mitigates and adapts to climate-related transition and physical risks.

The guidance document explains that an entity’s climate-related transition is a process through which the entity, in the context of its overall strategy, pursues targets, undertakes actions or deploys resources to respond to climate-related risks and opportunities. It also explains to entities the information that it is necessary to disclose when applying IFRS S2, if the entity has set a strategy for its transition to a lower-carbon and/or climate-resilient economy (for example, reducing its greenhouse gas emissions and adjusting its business model to become more resilient to climate-related physical risks). In addition, it spells out guidance on disclosures about entities’ climate-related transitions. The document complements materials provided by jurisdictions or others that set out requirements or recommendations to create transition plans and the content of such plans.

This guidance is supposed to be used by jurisdictions adopting or otherwise using ISSB standards. Jurisdictions can, if they wish, supplement the disclosures required by IFRS S2 with requirements for more information to meet the needs of a wider group of stakeholders or to address specific jurisdictional information needs, so the sustainability-related financial disclosures are clearly identifiable and not obscured by additional information.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending