Connect with us

Accounting

Is your firm overpaying for external hires?

Published

on

Research shows that only one in four CPAs (26%) feel their pay is “very competitive” today. That’s not trivial because if you drill into the data further, you’ll see that among respondents who say they are “highly satisfied” in their careers, two-thirds (63%) believe their pay is “very competitive.”

With accounting talent in short supply, many firms are paying a premium for external hires instead of promoting their internal talent. My firm’s compensation data, collected in 2024 and 2025, shows that accounting firms paid 7% more to bring in outside senior analysts in tax and audit than they paid internal staff in the same positions. And the spread grew to 8.6% for first-year managers. Sound familiar?

Just know that by paying such a premium for external hires, you may be getting talent in the door, but you’ve created a lose-lose system going forward. That’s because as a profession, we’ve created an incentive structure in which job hopping will result in higher compensation despite it often making employees and their firms worse off.

We’re sending a message to our talent, particularly high performers, that they need to leave their firms if they want to be paid competitively. In exchange for a bigger paycheck, however, candidates risk losing connections and relationships that may have paved their path to a partnership. They must also worry about having a “job hopper” label on their resumes, which can be a big turnoff for many employers. Constantly changing jobs is also stressful, exhausting and a huge mental burden. It consumes tons of energy that could be better used for building skills and relationships at one’s existing firm. 

Job hopping is burdensome for employers, too. There’s a substantial cost to hiring new employees constantly. With technology playing a greater role in firm productivity, the cost of training new employees keeps rising because there is more training to do for each piece of software. Losing staff also disrupts the culture of the firm. There’s a loss of institutional knowledge, a loss of relationships built with clients, and a loss in productivity from fully ramped employees. 

How do we fix this?

Despite the challenges described above, the solution is simple. Your firm just needs to stop treating external hires differently than you treat your internal talent. For starters, make sure the salaries you’re paying internally promoted employees are comparable to salaries you’re offering external hires for the same job.

I know this advice sounds simple, but I’ve found this pay (and morale) gap occurs because many firms don’t have a comprehensive plan for benchmarking salaries. They are often assuming a flat percentage increase based on the prior year. This causes them to drift away from what actual market compensation is. At the same time, they’re too willing to accept salary demands from external candidates because they need to fill the position and they don’t have hard data on real market-rate pay for certain jobs and locales. Compensation that’s in line with market rates should be available to all employees, with firms staying attuned to compensation benchmarking at all times in an employee’s tenure.

So, have some conviction in your numbers. Keep abreast of market rate compensation for each position that you have on your org chart (adjusted for your geographic location and cost of living) and then stick to your established salary ranges. This will also help you avoid pay inequities across gender and racial groups. 

By the way, these pay gaps are common at all size firms including the Big Four. Back when I was initially analyzing the data around the “loyalty tax,” I posted a chart breaking down this trend on a Reddit thread. The chart generated numerous comments from people who had similarly seen new hires get paid significantly more than internally promoted staff for the same position. In each of those cases, the proposed solution was that you’d have to leave the firm to get that desired salary elsewhere. In today’s world, employees have more access to salary information than ever. There’s just no hiding pay discrepancies. Again, the only solution is to keep on top of market rates for compensation and apply the same rates across the board for all employees. 

If you want to prevent your best employees from job hopping, create the right incentives to train, retain, develop, mentor and promote them. You’ll be glad you did. How is your firm handling the war for talent? I’d like to hear more.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending