Connect with us

Accounting

IMA sees role for AI in accounting

Published

on

The Institute of Management Accountants is examining the possibilities of artificial intelligence in the accounting profession and how it will affect finance jobs now and in the future, as the organization itself recently went through a second round of staff cutbacks.

The IMA did not disclose the number of people laid off in February. The organization had an earlier round of reductions in force about two years ago.

“IMA recently implemented a strategic restructuring, which did impact headcount,” said a spokesperson. “Our focus is on positioning IMA for the future — aligned with the needs of our global members. IMA remains committed to our collective growth, and continues to invest in opportunities to advance our organization and profession.”

Institute of Management Accountants headquarters in Montvale, N.J.

The IMA released a report earlier this year on the impact of AI in accounting and finance as technologies like ChatGPT gain widespread acceptance. It points out how AI can automate accounting processes such as accounts payable and receivable, monthly and quarterly closing, expense processing, procurement and supplier management. AI can also help accounting and finance professionals get insights through data analytics to identify trends and strategies.

“Generally speaking, when people talk about AI, it tends to be very theoretical and high level, and what we have found is our members —those that are working in businesses and working with day-to-day processes and procedures and people — really want to understand what’s the practical implication of this new technology on the work that they’re doing,” said IMA president and CEO Mike DePrisco.

For the report, the IMA talked to about 40 finance leaders from around the globe to understand from their perspective, the main challenges, concerns and opportunities related to leveraging AI and emerging technology into finance and accounting. 

deprisco-mike-ima.jpg

Mike DePrisco

“We did a number of focus groups with this group of leaders, and they represent every region of the world,” said DePrisco. “A number of challenges surfaced that were really categorized around four areas: the human aspect, the technology data aspect, operational aspects and ethical and governance aspects.”

One of the worries about AI is the potential for layoffs. “I do think that is probably the biggest concern that many practitioners and organization leaders have as it relates to AI, and that is job displacement,” said DePrisco. “That’s another reason why stakeholders are sometimes hesitant to adopt AI technology in the workplace because of that. Everything that we see and hear suggests that AI will augment and not replace accounting and finance professionals, but the role of what people will do is different in the future than it is today.”

The most cited concern among 38% of the respondents to the IMA survey was the human aspect of working with AI. “The human aspect really is about getting the attention and support from top leadership to invest in and implement AI is a key challenge and a key opportunity for organizations,” said DePrisco. “Those organizations that have full support from leadership — those individuals that control the funding and the allocation of resources to certain projects — those organizations that have that support and alignment have a better chance of getting AI projects implemented successfully. The lack of that support, buy-in and alignment from top leadership was cited as a concern.”

Another concern relates to the skill gaps of individual employees who are required to work with AI. “Many individuals in accounting and finance may not have had exposure to this type of technology, and the challenge therefore in implementing these projects is how do you help upskill finance and accounting professionals and practitioners?” said DePrisco. “How do you give them the tools, skills and knowledge they need to work with the technology individuals and data scientists in the organization, so they are leveraging and building these algorithms, that they’re being built on practical applications or outcomes that the business needs to achieve.”

There’s also a challenge around stakeholder buy-in, with  employees accepting the idea that AI and machine learning are going to add value to the organization and not take away control or displace jobs. 

“Getting that buy-in is a critical challenge and an opportunity,” said DePrisco. 

There are also operational challenges with implementing AI, including cross-functional collaboration. “Implementing AI projects in an organization requires your finance and accounting business people working with your data people and your IT people to ensure that the data going into the machines represents the practical real-world scenarios that accounting and finance individuals are facing and what they need help in, so that when the machine spits out the information and data, it’s useful, reliable and suitable for the needs of the business,” said DePrisco. “Resource management is always a challenge and concern. Do we have enough resources to help ensure that this project is successful? It can’t be something that is just added to someone’s plate as another thing that they need to do and manage. AI projects are pretty complex projects. They’re time-consuming projects. Create space for your team to dedicate time to a successful implementation.”

Organizations may need to reengineer their processes to get good use out of AI. “If your processes are not good, layering in AI on top of bad processes is not going to get you a successful outcome,” said DePrisco. “The first step in implementing any AI project is to look at your processes, and to re-engineer processes in a way that’s going to be added value once you begin to implement the AI technology on top of it. Making sure that you’re rooting out bad processes, reengineering those processes, and taking the time at that point to do it is really the best practice as it relates to that.”

Choosing the right AI technology can also be a challenge. “It takes a lot of investment to bring in AI technology,” said DePrisco. “You have to look at what kind of technical depth you have. What’s needed from an integration perspective before you start making purchases, and starting to think about how you implement AI on top of that?”

Data integrity and maturity are important considerations as well. “Many organizations have data siloed throughout the organization,” said DePrisco. “It’s structured data and unstructured data. How are you bringing all that together and integrating that data and making sure that it’s reliable, clean and trustworthy, so that it can be leveraged and used to develop algorithms?”

Another challenge uncovered by the research centered around ethical and governance concerns. “These concerns are what you hear most about in mainstream media, the importance of data security,” said DePrisco. “How does AI technology impact an organization’s ability to maintain data security and data privacy? How are you governing the AI in your organization? Many organizations that implement these types of projects need to set up an AI Center of Excellence, for example, to ensure that people throughout the organization have visibility into how the AI is being used. What business outcome are you driving toward? What is the cost of implementation and maintenance? And data integrity. Is the data free of bias? Is it reflective of the business problems that you’re trying to solve?”

To help accounting and finance professionals adjust to the far-reaching changes emerging from AI, the IMA is planning to provide more training. “We need to ensure that we’re providing education, knowledge and certification training for practitioners who are moving to new roles,” said DePrisco. “These can be roles like compliance analysts, individuals that utilize AI to ensure the finance operations are adhering to laws and regulations. There are probably going to be new roles in risk assessment and management, that merge financial expertise with AI proficiency, for example, roles that identify bias in data and mitigating that bias.”

He noted that the IMA has long said that accounting and finance professionals are strategic business partners. “The more work is automated, the more opportunities individuals have to step away from some of those manual routine administrative types of tasks that accountants have done over the last 100 years and into that strategic business partner role,” said DePrisco. “That’s so critically important these days to help organizations achieve their outcomes.”

Many accountants are not sure whether it’s a good idea to trust AI systems yet with their clients’ data since programs like ChatGPT have a reputation for “hallucinating” or making up plausible-sounding information that turns out to be partly or wholly fictitious.

“You need knowledgeable accounting and finance people to question the data that comes out of the machines to ensure that it reflects the real-life scenarios that happen day to day and that reflect data that’s correct, accurate and with integrity.” said DePrisco. “That becomes an important role of accounting and finance people. That’s on the back end, but you also need that capability on the front end. And that’s why when I talk about the collaboration, you need experienced, qualified accounting and finance professionals to work with data scientists to build the algorithms that are being used to automate processes and automate a number of these financial processes that are going to create financial statements and other things that the organization is going to rely on. Making sure that the data that’s going in there is accurate, free from bias, and represents both unstructured and structured data that may exist in the organization. It’s the job of the accounting and finance professional to ensure that those algorithms are being built with the proper data. That’s how you mitigate the risk around hallucinations or information coming out that’s half baked.”

AI can be used for tasks like data analytics, to spot patterns and red flags, but it still requires the professional skepticism that an accountant can bring.

“The machines are proving to be very powerful technology that is creating new value, improving efficiency and productivity overall,” said DePrisco. “Like any new technology, there needs to be a healthy dose of skepticism and rigor applied to ensure that we’re not just relying on what a machine spits out, that we’re actually applying critical thinking, bringing our experience, judgment and curiosity to any data that becomes available through a machine. We’ve seen this throughout the years as new technology is adopted. There’s a maturity curve, and we’re still in the early stages of that maturity curve with AI. There will be a lot of learning that happens over time.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: Feeling entitled

Published

on

Custom-made; alter ego trip; super Genius; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

Cerritos, California: Customs broker Frank Seung Noah, of Corona, California, has pleaded guilty to defrauding importers out of more than $5 million, including after he had been indicted on fraud charges, and to committing more than $1 million in tax evasion.

Noah owned and operated Comis International, a logistics and supply-chain company that offered customs import brokerage services on behalf of businesses. From 2007 to 2019, Comis was an import broker for Daiso, a Japan-based variety and value store with stores in the U.S. Noah provided Daiso with false customs duty forms and invoices to support fraudulent requests for reimbursement for duty fees. These forms inflated the total amounts, resulting in Daiso overpaying Noah nearly $3.4 million.

After Noah was indicted for defrauding Daiso in 2022, he continued to defraud other clients out of more than $2 million using a different scheme. Noah defrauded two other client companies by invoicing and receiving funds from the two victim companies and then pocketing the money and later altering bank statements to cover his fraud.

Noah also evaded payment of federal taxes, resulting in a loss to the IRS of approximately $2.4 million, with penalties and interest continuing to accrue. After agreeing with the IRS that he owed more than $1 million in taxes in 2014, he dodged IRS attempts to collect, including by paying for two homes in his former girlfriend’s name, using check-cashing businesses to avoid IRS levies of his bank accounts, lying to IRS agents and spending thousands of dollars on country club memberships, travel and golf.

Sentencing is May 8. Noah faces up to 20 years in prison for each of two counts of wire fraud and up to five years for the tax evasion count.

Tampa, Florida: Terence Taylor has pleaded guilty to obstructing and impeding the administration of the internal revenue laws for actions seeking to defeat the collection of back taxes he owed to the IRS.

Taylor was sentenced in 2012 for failing to file his income taxes for several years while he lived in New York. He owed more than $810,000 in taxes and was required to pay the tax debt during the term of his sentence.

For more than seven years, continuing after he moved to Florida, Taylor engaged in a series of acts to defeat IRS collection. He hid assets, placed other assets and income in the names of alter egos or nominees such as his wife, and used money that he could have used to pay off his back taxes to buy assets including boats, jewelry and a home.

Taylor continued to earn income as a financial consultant during those years after 2012. He used that income for numerous personal purposes and expenses and only minimally paid his federal tax debt.

The IRS had made extensive efforts to collect Taylor’s debt between 2004 and 2008. Aside from contacting Taylor many times, IRS officers sent numerous forms for him to detail his financial situation. He responded with false or incomplete information about his assets, including boats, and about his business and its accounts and dates of operation. Taylor used his business income and bank accounts after 2012 to pay personal expenses, including marina and yacht club expenses, boat expenses and jewelry purchases.

Taylor also failed to file personal income tax returns for several years after his New York sentence had ended. 

He faces a maximum of three years in prison.

Hands-in-jail-Blotter

Pennsauken, New Jersey: Business owner Tri Anh Tieu, of Camden, New Jersey, has admitted to conspiring to defraud the IRS by concealing cash wages paid to employees.

Tieu owned Tri States Staffing, which provided temporary workers to local businesses. Between the third quarter of 2018 and the second quarter of 2022, Tri States received more than $2.5 million in payments from customers.

Tieu paid employees in cash and failed to pay over the payroll taxes on those wages. He spent at least some of the unpaid taxes on personal expenditures, including gambling.

He admitted that he caused a tax loss of some $305,332.

The count of conspiracy to defraud the U.S. carries a maximum of five years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000. Sentencing is June 26.

Charleston, South Carolina: Business owner Jonathan Ramaci, of Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, has been sentenced to 18 months in prison after pleading guilty to wire fraud and filing a false income tax return.

Ramaci defrauded the Small Business Administration in his application and receipt of some $214,000 in Paycheck Protection Program and Economic Injury Disaster Loan funds, submitting fraudulent tax documentation to the SBA for the PPP loan. For the EIDL loans, Ramaci falsely represented to the SBA the revenue and costs of goods sold for the businesses he was applying for.

From 2017 to 2021, Ramaci either failed to file or filed false income tax returns and owes the IRS $289,531. He paid personal expenses from a business he owned and operated, Elements of Genius, and did not report the expenses paid as income.

Los Angeles: Attorney Milton C. Grimes has been sentenced to 18 months in prison for evading more than $7.2 million in federal and state taxes over more than two decades.

He pleaded guilty late last year to one count of tax evasion relating to his 2014 taxes and admitted that he failed to pay $1,690,922 to the IRS. Grimes did not pay federal income taxes due for 23 years, 2002 through 2005, 2007, 2009 through 2011 and 2014 through 2023. The amount owed totaled $5,921,260, including tax, penalties and interest. Grimes also admitted he did not file a 2013 federal  return.

In addition to the federal tax evasion, Grimes admitted that he owed more than $1,313,231 in delinquent California taxes from 2014 to 2023.

Beginning in September 2011, the IRS attempted to collect Grimes’ taxes by issuing more than 30 levies on his personal bank accounts. From at least May 2014 to April 2020, he avoided payment by not depositing income he earned from his clients into his personal bank accounts. Instead, he purchased some 238 cashier’s checks totaling $16 million to keep the money out of the reach of the IRS. Grimes would also routinely purchase cashier’s checks and withdraw cash from his client trust account, his interest on lawyers’ trust accounts and his law firm’s bank account rather than pay the IRS.

Grimes was ordered to pay $7,236,556 in restitution, both to the IRS and to the California Franchise Tax Board.

Howey-in-the-Hills, Florida: Business owner Dorian Farmer has pleaded guilty to one count of failure to pay employment trust fund taxes and two counts of willfully failing to file returns. 

Farmer owned several area businesses and for years collected employment trust fund taxes from his employees. Rather than turning the money over to the IRS, Farmer took large, unreported cash distributions from one of his businesses. He also failed to file returns for himself and one of his businesses, Titleist Technologies, d.b.a. Summit Joint Performance, for tax year 2000.

Farmer’s acts resulted in a total tax loss of $806,653.

He faces up to five years in prison for the employment trust fund offense and up to a year in prison for each offense of willful failure to file a return.

Continue Reading

Accounting

AICPA releases framework for stablecoin reporting

Published

on

The American Institute of CPAs published information on reporting on stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency, providing a framework to stablecoin issuers for presenting and disclosing information related to the tokens they issue, and to report on the availability of cash or other assets that back them.

Stablecoins are a kind of digital asset where the value is pegged to the assets backing them, such as U.S. currency, exchange-traded commodities like precious or industrial metals, or some other form of crypto.

The purpose of the AICPA’s Assurance Services Executive Committee document, 2025 Criteria for Stablecoin Reporting: Specific to Asset-Backed Fiat-Pegged Tokens, is to offer a framework for presenting and disclosing information about stablecoins to promote consistent reporting among issuers and boost trust in the stablecoin space.

The release comes as the Trump administration is taking a decidedly more welcoming attitude to the crypto industry, including announcing a crypto reserve and setting up a crypto task force at the previously skeptical Securities and Exchange Commission. 

Next month, as a second part of the stablecoin reporting criteria, the Assurance Services Executive Committee plans to release Proposed Criteria for Controls Supporting Token Operations: Specific to Asset-Backed Fiat-Pegged Tokens for public comment. As these control criteria are part of overall stablecoin reporting, they eventually will be incorporated into the 2025 Criteria for Stablecoin Reporting document once they’re finalized. 

“This is the first available framework for stablecoin issuers to report on stablecoins, and the AICPA is excited to be at the forefront of bringing transparency and consistency to the digital assets space,” said Ami Beers, senior director, assurance and advisory innovation at the AICPA & CIMA, in a statement Thursday. “These criteria will serve as the basis for evaluating the availability of redemption assets that back stablecoins in attestation services that practitioners provide to their clients, driving this dynamic practice area forward for the accounting profession.”

The 2025 Criteria for Stablecoin Reporting: Specific to Asset-Backed Fiat-Pegged Tokens can be found here. For more information relevant to stablecoins, practitioners can access the stablecoin reporting and assurance page.

Continue Reading

Accounting

CPA execs feel shakier about US economy

Published

on

CPA business executives’ outlook on the U.S. economy appears to be dimming, thanks to persistent inflation and growing worry over tariffs, according to a new survey from the AICPA & CIMA.

The quarterly survey found that the post-election jump in business executives’ optimism about the U.S. economy has moderated, dropping from a more than three-year high of 67% in the fourth quarter to 47% in the first quarter of this year. The survey polls chief executive officers, chief financial officers, controllers and other CPAs in U.S. companies who hold executive and senior management accounting roles.

The survey was conducted before the Trump Administration imposed tariffs this week on Canada, Mexico and China (and then delaying the tariffs today on Canada and Mexico for a month), but respondents were asked their general views about unspecified tariffs if they were put in place. Fifty-nine percent indicated that tariffs would have a negative effect on their businesses, while 85% said uncertainty surrounding the subject had influenced their business planning to some degree — nearly one in five (18%) described that impact as significant.

Inflation remained the top concern for CPA business execs, followed by issues related to staffing — employee and benefit costs (No. 2), availability of skilled personnel (No. 3), and staff turnover (No. 10). Domestic political leadership, which was absent from last quarter’s top 10 concerns, reemerged at No. 6.

“There are a lot of warning signs right now for business executives, particularly around inflation, payroll costs and consumer confidence, with tariffs adding another layer of uncertainty,” said Tom Hood, AICPA & CIMA’s executive vice president for business engagement and growth, in a statement Thursday. “That said, it’s important to recognize that economic optimism remains higher than at any point since mid-2021, aside from last quarter’s notable increase. Additionally, expansion plans have held steady from the previous quarter.”

The survey also found that business executives who said they were optimistic about their own organization’s outlook over the next 12 months dropped from 53% to 50%, quarter over quarter.

Revenue and profit expectations for the next 12 months both eased from the fourth quarter’s large increases. Revenue growth is now anticipated to be 3%, down from a 3.3% projection in the fourth quarter. Profit projections are now 2%, down from 2.2% last quarter.

Survey respondents who expect their businesses to expand over the next 12 months remained unchanged at 57%.

Some 39% of the business executives polled indicated they had too few employees in the first quarter, a 1% increase from the fourth quarter. One-in-five said they were ready to hire immediately, unchanged from last quarter.

Continue Reading

Trending