Connect with us

Accounting

Inside the Senate version of the Trump tax bill OBBBA

Published

on

After a 50-50 vote — with Vice President J.D. Vance providing the tie breaker — the Senate passed its version of the budget reconciliation bill. The bill now goes back to the House where it faces an uncertain future. 

The Senate version differs in many respects from the House-passed version — and even in some respects from the Senate Finance version.

Below are some of the major provisions:

  • SALT limit. The state and local tax deduction limit was increased to match the House version with a $40,000 limit, adjusted for inflation, except it reverts to $10,000 in 2030. There is also a phase-down for modified adjusted gross incomes above $500,000, but never below $10,000. The provision to limit the pass-through entity workaround was dropped from the bill. It is not clear how this will be received by the House Republicans, who pushed for a permanent $40,000 limit.
  • Senior deduction. The senior deduction remained at $6,000 in the Senate version, through 2028, compared to $4,000 in the House version. It includes a phase-out at MAGI of $75,000, $150,000 for joint filers. This should not result in a large fight with the House except over the cost.
  • Child Tax Credit. The Senate bill raises the CTC to $2,200, indexed for inflation, and makes it permanent. The $1,400 refundable credit is made permanent. The $500 dependent credit is also made permanent. A Social Security number is required for the credit. This is not significantly different from the House version.
  • Moving expense deduction. The Armed Forces moving expense deduction is expanded to include members of the intelligence community.
  • Child and Dependent Care Credit. The Senate proposes to increase the maximum credit to 50% from 35%, while preserving a 20% minimum credit.
  • Charitable deduction for nonitemizers. The Senate bill proposes a larger deduction of up to $1,000 ($2,000 for joint filers). It also proposes a new 0.5% floor on itemized individual charitable contributions and a 1% floor on corporate contributions.
  • Excise tax on college endowments. The Senate proposes a smaller excise tax on the investment income of endowments of private universities and colleges than the House, with the current rate of 1.4% on endowments of$500,000 to $750,000; 4% on endowments of $750,000 to $2,000,000; and 8% on endowments over $2,000,000. Some House Republicans may push to retain the much higher tax rates in the House version.
Vice President J.D. Vance at the Capitol in June 2025
Vice President J.D. Vance at the Capitol

Aaron Schwartz/Bloomberg

  • Clean energy provisions. Like the House, the Senate version includes terminations of many of the clean energy provisions from the Inflation Reduction Act. The clean vehicle and energy efficient home provisions tend to terminate by the end of 2025. However, several of the industry focused provisions tend to have terminations more spread out than the House version. There may be some fight in the House over these longer terminations.
  • International provisions. The international provisions in the Senate bill are revised from the House version and also from the Senate Finance version in several respects. It is not clear that the differences will be a major problem in the House.
  • Direct File. In an interesting change, rather than just terminating Direct File, the IRS’s recently developed free tax-filing system, the Senate version proposes to fund a study on a private/public partnership to expand Free File to a larger percentage of taxpayers. This may be an issue with some House Republicans.
  • Deficit. The Senate used an unusual budget gimmick to take the position that making permanent provisions that are already in the Tax Code does not require that those extensions be paid for under budget reconciliation. This has left the Senate bill with a projected $3.3 trillion addition to the deficit. Some House Republicans are already raising objections to this result.
  • Medicaid. While not a tax provision, it appeared that the House Medicaid reductions would cause problems in the Senate. However, the Senate version also includes similar Medicaid deductions, so this may not be a major issue as the bill returns to the House. Some House Republican members wanted greater Medicaid cuts, others wanted fewer cuts. It may balance out in the final debate. 
  • Senate parliamentarian. The Senate parliamentarian rejected several of the provisions in the legislation, some of which had come from the House. This helped upset some of the funding balance and brought calls for replacement of the parliamentarian. However, many experts had predicted that some of the provisions would not pass muster under the budget reconciliation rules. The House will have to address the changes made by the Senate parliamentarian.
  • Other provisions. There are many other tax provisions included in both the House and Senate versions of the legislation. In addition to the differences highlighted herein, the House may want time to consider these many differences even though the differences have not been highlighted in the public discussions. Some of the House provisions may have had support from a particular House Republican who may object to changes to a provision that they had promoted.

Summary

Predictions are that the Senate bill may face significant hurdles in the House. However, it was expected to face significant hurdles in the House the first time around, and it was also expected to face significant hurdles in the Senate. Both versions passed by the narrowest of margins. 

All of the congressional Republicans want to extend the individual provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and none of them want to give up on budget reconciliation and be forced to negotiate with the Democrats. There will be a lot of pressure to not be the Republican who scuttles the legislation.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending