Connect with us

Accounting

IRS allows staking of crypto assets in trusts

Published

on

The Internal Revenue Service has provided a safe harbor for certain kinds of trusts enabling them to stake their digital assets without jeopardizing their tax status as investment trusts and grantor trusts for federal income tax purposes.  

Revenue Procedure 2025-31 describes the safe harbor, but offers a limited time period for an existing trust to amend its governing instrument to adopt the necessary requirements.

Staking is a way to lock digital assets to a particular blockchain network to earn rewards or interest. Proof-of-stake is a type of consensus mechanism in which validator node operators commit or “stake” digital assets to become eligible to be selected by the relevant protocol to validate a new block of data to, and update the state of, the network’s blockchain. While they’re staked, digital assets are “locked up” and cannot be transferred for a period of time under the terms of the protocol. Some protocols use specific criteria for selecting validators, such as the number of digital assets staked by the validator node operator. 

Digital asset owners can participate in staking in various forms, such as custodial staking, in which a third party known as the custodian takes custody of the owner’s digital assets and facilitates the staking of such digital assets on behalf of the owner. The custodian focuses on securely holding, storing, and safeguarding digital assets on behalf of digital asset owners. The custodian, acting on behalf of the owner, selects and enters into contractual arrangements with one or more validator node operators who engage in proof-of-stake activities for digital asset blockchains. In some cases, the legal entity that is the custodian also can act as the staking provider. 

The Treasury Department and the IRS have received requests for guidance on whether staking prevents a legal entity formed as a trust under state law from qualifying for federal income tax purposes as an investment trust under Section 301.7701-4(c) of the Tax Code and as a grantor trust; and if not, whether an existing trust agreement may be amended to authorize the staking of some or all of its digital assets without impairing qualification of the trust as an investment trust and as a grantor trust. 

“Now with Rev. Proc. 2025-31, an investment trust that is a grantor trust can stake assets and earn staking income,” wrote Jessalyn Dean, senior policy advisor of U.S. tax reporting at Ledgible, a crypto tax and accounting software company in a LinkedIn post. “Previously, earning staking income inside of a grantor trust would have caused it to lose its tax status as a grantor trust.”

Dean noted that Rev. Proc. 2025-31 doesn’t have any effect on Subchapter M Registered Investment Company status. To benefit from the new revenue procedure, exchange-traded products that want to stake relevant crypto assets will need to comply with a number of requirements, including some significant updates to their agreements and prospectus, she noted. 

“Staking must be directed through a custodian, though more analysis is needed as to whether the staking provider must be unrelated to the custodian,” she wrote. “The trust’s digital assets must be indemnified from slashing due to the activities of the staking providers. Staking rewards must be distributed quarterly to investors in-kind or as cash. Existing trusts have nine months beginning on Nov. 10, 2025 to amend their agreements to maintain their grantor trust status when offering staking activities to investors.”

However, she pointed out that Rev. Proc. 2025-31 doesn’t specify how tax information reporting requirements are affected. 

“The Rev. Proc. only addresses the status of the ETP as a grantor trust,” Dean wrote. “Because the Rev. Proc. requires distributions to investors, which was never a ‘thing’ in other similar structures (like commodity gold ETFs structured as grantor trusts), then this leaves open issues with tax withholding and Form 1099/1042-S reporting to US and non-US investors.”

Unaddressed complications can arise from distributing staking reward income as cash, including questions about their source and character, she noted. “There will also be incremental tax liability to investors who first have a taxable event from earning staking income but then potentially have a gain/loss to account for due to timing differences between the staking income value and the assets sold by the fund to pay out the distributions,” she added.

“Investors that are steering away from holding crypto directly and choose ETPs instead should talk to their investment and tax advisors to weigh the pros and cons of available options,” Dean wrote in a follow-up post. Each comes with its own tax efficiencies and tax compliance complications, with varied expense ratios to operate these funds.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending