Internal Revenue Service commissioner Danny Werfel testified Tuesday at a hearing of the Senate Finance Committee to discuss this past tax season and the proposed budget for carrying out the agency’s future plans.
“I’m pleased to report the 2024 tax season opened on schedule on January 29, and we’ve seen a historic filing season unfolding since then,” Werfel said in his opening statement. “Through March 30, the IRS received more than 90.3 million individual income tax returns and issued more than 60.8 million refunds for more than $185.6 billion. Going into the final days of tax season, the Inflation Reduction Act funding has enabled the IRS to have one of its best filing seasons ever in terms of customer service.”
He noted that wait times and the level of service on the IRS’s main phone lines have improved, and the agency has dramatically expanded service in its walk-in sites, increasing hours and serving more taxpayers. However, one lawmaker grumbled that even if the IRS employees are answering the phone faster, that doesn’t mean constituents are getting the help they need.
IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel testifying before the Senate Finance Committee
Werfel noted that the new and expanded tools on IRS.gov are getting heavy use, and increased funding from the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 has enabled the IRS to begin making inroads in addressing the tax gap and tax evasion.
“Our compliance work includes focusing on delinquency and non-filing among high-income individuals, as well as leveraging artificial intelligence and hiring subject matter experts to find tax evasion among our largest and most complex partnerships and corporations,” Werfel said.
He asked for continued funding for the IRS after Congress rescinded approximately $20 billion of the $80 billion that was supposed to go to the IRS under the Inflation Reduction Act after a deal last year to avert a debt limit default.
The Biden administration’s fiscal year 2025 budget proposal would restore and maintain the full IRA investment in the IRS through 2034 to avoid funding cliffs that would dramatically degrade ability in many different areas, including taxpayer services beginning in 2026. Werfel argued that sustained funding would allow the agency to build on the successes of the 2024 filing season and make further phone service improvements. The IRS would also be able to provide additional digital tools for taxpayers, such as the Direct File pilot program for free tax filing that the IRS launched last month, while upgrading its data security to stay a step ahead of cyberattacks and disrupt tax scams.
Senate Finance Committee chairman Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, praised the Direct File pilot. “Anybody who denies that the Direct File pilot was a huge success must be living in another universe,” he said during his opening statement. “It was open to a fairly small percentage of taxpayers, but the reviews it got from its initial users were overwhelmingly positive. Frankly, it seems like a whole lot of people were pleasantly stunned that a federal agency — particularly one as frequently vilified as the IRS — was able to build a helpful website that works. The tens of thousands of taxpayers who used Direct File this year collectively saved millions on fees they would have paid to one of the tax software giants. The website was user-friendly. It was quick and easy to use. It didn’t hassle users with upcharges for add-on services they didn’t need.”
“In short, with Direct File, the IRS built a good tool that people like because it saves Americans time and money,” Wyden continued. “No surprise then that the people who oppose it are absolutely furious and doing everything they can to stop it from expanding. The detractors said it didn’t attract enough users, but tens of thousands of new users came in over the last week, and the IRS hit its goal of 100,000 taxpayers using the system. There’s no doubt this will become more popular every year.”
The ranking Republican on the committee, Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, criticized the Direct File program, and a number of other Republicans questioned why the IRS didn’t use the “off-the-shelf” tax prep software instead of developing its own program.
“An emblematic example of the ‘just spend more, no questions asked’ approach is the Direct File program,” Crapo said in his opening remarks. “Despite there already being multiple free filing programs offered by the IRS, the agency embarked on a redundant government-run tax preparation project, complete with all attendant inefficiencies and conflicts-of-interest.”
He pointed to a report last week from the Government Accountability Office that put the cost of the program as exceeding $100 million just through fiscal year 2024 while only serving 100,000 taxpayers this year.
“In contrast, the federal government spends less than $5 million a year to have two to three million taxpayers served in one of its free income tax preparation programs,” said Crapo. “Were the IRS to use this year’s Direct File spending to pay third-party providers to prepare and file returns instead, literally hundreds of times the number of taxpayers could file for free. The IRS spending hundreds of millions of its finite funding to simply ‘test’ the utility of doing something that can already be done more efficiently, with better outcomes and without very real conflicts, while simultaneously pleading for more funding calls for more oversight.”
Werfel defended the usefulness of the program, and he received support from Democrats on the committee, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Massachusetts, who has advocated for a free IRS tax-filing program for years. Werfel noted that tax season isn’t yet finished in Massachusetts because taxpayers receive an extra two days due to the Patriots Day holiday.
“Thousands of taxpayers already have successfully used the system, and users are giving the new option positive reviews,” said Werfel. “These early results from Direct File have shown taxpayers like the ease and convenience of the tool. It is important to note that a core part of the IRS’s mission is to meet taxpayers where they are and ensure they have options to fulfill their tax obligations that meet their needs. I want to emphasize that taxpayers will always have choices for how they prepare their taxes. They can file using a trusted tax professional, our Free File program, tax software, or free tax preparation services such as the Volunteer Income Tax Assistance and Tax Counseling for the Elderly programs, or they can file a paper return. We saw an extremely successful filing season involving all of those options. We continue to emphasize that taxpayers should use the filing option that works best for them and their personal financial situation. Direct File is designed to be an additional option for some taxpayers this year that is simple, secure, accurate, and free.”
He pointed out that there was a surge of use of the commercial tax software offered by the Free File members because of the additional publicity about Direct File.
Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.
Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.
In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.
Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.
Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.
Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.
Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.
Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.
The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.
In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.
AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.
When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.
Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.
This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.
Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.
Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.
Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.
Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.
Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.
This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.
Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.
By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.
Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.