Connect with us

Accounting

IRS faces issues in crackdown on high-income non-filers

Published

on

The Internal Revenue Service has been conducting “sweeps” in recent years to uncover cases where high-income people have not been filing taxes, but the tracking data and training need to be improved, according to a new report.

The report, released last week by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, found that high-income nonfiler sweeps cases worked on by IRS revenue officers from fiscal years 2021 through 2022 were more impactful in terms of case closures and dollars collected than similar non-sweeps cases. As a percentage of the overall cases they worked on, revenue officers secured more returns under sweeps than non-sweeps and referred significantly more returns to the IRS’s Examination function. “For tax years 2014 through 2020, revenue officers consistently collected more per sweep case than non-sweep case,” said the report.

Sweeps are a strategy employed by the IRS to either address an increase in its unassigned high-priority inventory of tax cases in an understaffed location or to support a compliance initiative, such as egregious employment tax cases and high-income nonfilers. The IRS expanded the use of sweeps between fiscal years 2019 and 2022.

Last year, former IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel announced an initiative in which it began sending notices to high-income people who haven’t been filing tax returns since 2017.

“When people don’t file a tax return they’re required to, it’s not fair to those hardworking taxpayers who responsibly do their civic duty under the laws of our nation,” he said during a press call last year. “When people don’t file their taxes, they need to know there’s a consequence. And this is why I was particularly troubled to learn when I became commissioner that the IRS had to back off our core compliance work on non-filers. Due to severe budget and staff limitations, the IRS non-filer program has only run sporadically since 2016. This program pullback didn’t happen because of lack of information. The IRS knows who these non-filers are. The IRS has the third-party information, such as through Forms W-2 and 1099, indicating these people received significant income but failed to file a tax return. The IRS has known these people are out there, and they involved some very prosperous households.”

Sweeps were conducted throughout the U.S. and internationally, the TIGTA report noted, but there were several geographic areas in the continental U.S. that have a high number of high-income nonfilers where limited or no sweeps were done. The report suggested opportunities for more sweeps in places like eastern New Mexico, western Texas, northwestern Nevada and Wyoming. 

However, it’s unclear whether the IRS will be prioritizing such sweeps in the future, given the layoffs underway at the agency. On Monday, TIGTA reported that more than 11,000 IRS employees have been laid off so far this year, or about 11% of the workforce, under the Trump administration’s efforts to reduce the size of the federal workforce, with cuts especially heavily among revenue agents, where 31% have been laid off or agreed to participate in the voluntary buyout program. 

There were other areas where the sweeps could be improved. The review found that missing, incomplete, and/or inaccurate data were found in data fields such as the taxpayer’s name, address, revenue officer identifier and case assignment date. These errors were not identified and corrected before TIGTA’s review. 

TIGTA said it worked with the IRS to make corrections so the data reviewed for the audit were accurate and complete. However, it suggested the IRS would benefit from complete and accurate data to track the results of sweeps. 

The IRS’s Field Collection team is not always using sweeps to help train and develop employee skills, the report noted. And while the sweeps desk guide provides the IRS with many opportunities to develop employee skills, managers at the IRS’s Collection unit are not always taking advantage of them. Those kinds of activities have the potential to make sweeps an even more effective tool. 

TIGTA recommended that the IRS’s Small Business/Self-Employed Division’s director of Field Collection should continue to identify and perform sweeps of all types, including assessments of high-risk geographical areas as well as issue-based sweeps. The report also suggested the IRS should regularly review sweeps data to identify and correct errors and ensure it’s accurate and complete before using it for management reporting. The IRS should also capture more information in the tracking spreadsheet so management can better assess the productivity of each sweep, the report recommended. That should include information such as which delinquent tax return modules were secured, whether any of the returns had tax assessments, and the results of specific collection initiatives. In addition, the IRS should remind all levels of management of the sweeps desk guide procedures and provide refresher training on their responsibilities in the sweeps process, the report recommended. IRS management agreed with all of TIGTA’s recommendations.

“We appreciate the audit team’s efforts to understand Field Collection employees’ experiences with Sweeps through revenue officer and manager interviews,” wrote Lia Colbert, commissioner of the IRS’s Small Business/Self-Employed division, in response to the report. “Their experiences and feedback conveyed the positive impact of Sweeps, and the importance of raising awareness of tax laws and compliance for many taxpayers in communities across the country.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending