The Internal Revenue Service is paying out more claims for the Employee Retention Credit program even as it gives the claims greater scrutiny, and is moving the moratorium on processing new claims from Sept. 14, 2023 to Jan. 31, 2024.
The IRS is continuing to issue denials of improper ERC claims, while intensifying its audits and pursuing civil and criminal investigations of potential fraud and abuse. The findings of an IRS review, announced in June, confirmed concerns raised by tax professionals and others that there was an extremely high rate of improper ERC claims in the current inventory of ERC claims.
In recent weeks, the IRS has sent out 28,000 disallowance letters to businesses whose claims showed a high risk of being incorrect. The IRS estimates these disallowances will prevent up to $5 billion in improper payments. Thousands of audits are underway, and 460 criminal cases have been initiated. The IRS has also identified 50,000 valid ERC claims and is quickly moving them into the pipeline for payment processing in the weeks ahead. These payments are part of a so-called low-risk group of claims.
IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel speaking at the AICPA & CIMA National Tax and Sophisticated Tax Conference in Washington, D.C.
Given the complexity of the ERC and to reduce the risk of improper payments, the IRS emphasized it is moving methodically and deliberately on both the disallowances as well as additional payments to balance the needs of businesses with legitimate claims against the promoter-fueled wave of improper claims that came into the agency.
“The Employee Retention Credit is one of the most complex tax provisions ever administered by the IRS,” said IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel during a press call Thursday. “It’s technically detailed and resource intensive, and our challenges grew exponentially with the flood of promoter claims that came pouring in well after the pandemic ended. Our teams have been working hard to navigate this complex landscape. We’ve been focused on balancing our efforts to protect taxpayers from improper claims while also working to speed more payments to qualifying businesses. It has been a time-consuming process to separate valid claims from invalid ones. By no means has this been a simple situation.”
He noted these are not simple 1040 forms that can be quickly reviewed and paid out by the IRS. “These claims span multiple tax law changes, multiple calendar year quarters and have differing payment amounts,” said Werfel. “These have to be worked individually, claim by claim, and they all come in on paper, adding even further to the complexity of sorting valid claims from invalid ones. During the past year, we maintained a slow, judicious cadence of both ERC approvals and disapprovals, but we are now taking important steps forward to intensify our pace and begin reducing the overall inventory of pending ERC claims. Today, we are moving forward with our long held plans to continue to deny claims when they appear improper, and also moving to pay out more legitimate claims. We’re doing this by moving a substantial group of claims into both categories.”
He pointed out that the Employee Retention Credit was created by Congress to help businesses weather the pandemic. “It served as a lifeline for struggling businesses trying to get through this unprecedented period, and as members of Congress have noted, the program worked as intended during the crisis period,” said Werfel. “But then aggressive promoters moved in. Last year, promoters intensified their marketing, bombarding the airwaves with ads and aggressive marketing. You couldn’t turn on the TV or radio without coming across an ERC ad. These promoters urged people to file what they called risk-free claims with the IRS for the ERC. At the same time, they charged a hefty percentage on the potential payouts. The program turned into a gold rush for promoters. These promoters and the taxpayers they pulled in swamped the IRS with incoming applications, clogging our processing centers and harming small businesses filing legitimate claims. Tax professionals sounded the alarm bells to me and others on this, sharing that the marketers were pulling in taxpayers that clearly didn’t qualify under the intricate program rules.”
To counter this torrent of activity, last fall he announced the IRS was putting in place a moratorium on processing new ERC claims filed after Sept. 14, 2023. “The moratorium has been without a doubt a success,” said Werfel. “It slowed the number of claims coming in, and the marketing on TV and radio dropped dramatically. It gave us time to focus on our compliance work, and importantly, it gave us time to analyze the massive inventory of ERC claims that came in. The moratorium has now been in place for almost a year. The goal of this moratorium was in part to protect taxpayers and small businesses from bad claims worth tens of billions of dollars.”
During this period, the IRS learned valuable information that will help guide the program down the tracks in the months ahead.
Faster pace
“Going forward, we will proceed at a faster pace on both approvals and denials than before. But it will remain a measured and responsible pace that won’t go off the rails, protecting both taxpayers and revenue,” said Werfel. “As we move ahead, we’re going to continue protecting taxpayers from improper claims. In the last few weeks, we’ve had about 28,000 letters go out, disallowing claims up to potentially $5 billion.”
However, the IRS has also heard concerns from some tax professionals that it may be disallowing legitimate ERC claims.
“With these recent disallowance letters going out, the IRS is aware of concerns raised by tax professionals about potential errors,” said Werfel. “While the IRS is still evaluating the results of this first significant wave of disallowances in 2024, our early indications show these errors appear to be isolated. The concerns flagged, which we are currently looking into, impact less than 10% of the disallowance letters sent. We are closely watching this, and it’s important to keep in mind, there was a wide range of businesses and claims that came in due to the heavy marketing. It’s a big sea of claims from a diverse set of taxpayers. Even then, it’s not surprising, given the complexity of this credit, that there are some questions. That’s why we’re not rushing to push out large volumes of these denials immediately. This is uncharted territory for the IRS, and we are navigating the landscape carefully.”
He pledged to continue to work with tax professionals. “As part of this, the IRS will stay in contact with the tax community,” said Werfel. “We will monitor the situation involving disallowances and make any adjustments to minimize burden on businesses and their representatives. Where we need to, the IRS will adjust its processes and filters for determining an invalid claim following each wave of disallowances. This is a responsible and judicious way of administering this complex tax law, and we need to be measured and not just rush to resolve claims.”
He noted that in cases where claims can be proven to have been improperly denied, the agency will work with taxpayers to get it right. The IRS is also reminding businesses that when they receive a denial of an ERC claim, they have options available to to file an administrative appeal with the IRS independent Office of Appeals.
“At the same time, we are announcing today that we’re sending 50,000 more claims out into processing for payment in the next few weeks,” said Werfel. “These claims will total up to $5 billion. This means more low-risk ERC claims will be paid out quickly. There are a couple of steps for the payments to go through. We have moved these claims into the processing pipeline, and after that, they will go into the payment process. The IRS projects the first of this group of payments will begin in September, with additional payments going out in subsequent weeks. As the IRS begins to process additional claims, the agency reminds businesses that they may receive payments for some valid tax periods, generally quarters, while the IRS continues to review other periods for eligibility.”
Moratorium update
Werfel also provided an update on the processing moratorium on new ERC claims. Previously, the agency was not processing claims filed after Sept. 14, 2023. As the agency moves forward, it will now start judiciously processing claims filed between Sept. 14, 2023, and Jan. 31, 2024. Like the rest of the ERC inventory, work will focus on the highest and lowest risk claims at the top and bottom end of the spectrum. This means there will be instances where the agency will start taking actions on claims submitted in this time period when the agency has seen a sound basis to pay or deny a refund claim.
“Of course, we will also be working older claims during this period as well,” Werfel added. “For any of these claims, whether the older ones or the ones covered by the new moratorium date, here’s what we will do. When we identify a claim as low risk, we will be taking steps to pay it, and when we see a high-risk claim, we will deny it. We will have more to say on ERC in the coming weeks. The IRS also continues to urge employers with pending ERC claims or ones with questions about previously approved claims to review eligibility requirements to make sure they meet the specific criteria.”
“Businesses with claims that show these red flags should review eligibility requirements and talk to a trusted tax professional about their claim,” said Werfel. “For businesses with concerns about pending claims, the IRS encourages them to consider the ERC claim withdrawal program. This allows them to remove a pending ERC claim, one the IRS has not processed yet they would. They can withdraw the claim and pay no interest or penalty.”
Already the claim withdrawal process for those with unprocessed ERC claims has led to more than 7,300 entities withdrawing $677 million worth of claims, he noted.
“Unfortunately, this route forward was made much more complicated by the flood of marketers and promoters pushing businesses to claim these credits,” said Werfel. “This created a perfect storm that added risk of improper payments for taxpayers and the government, while complicating processing for the IRS and slowing claims to legitimate businesses. Today, the tide is starting to turn on the Employee Retention Credit program. For the good of businesses with legitimate claims, and for the good of administering our nation’s tax laws, it’s critical we move forward to resolve this pandemic era program. This effort will continue and intensify in the months ahead.”
The accounting profession is undergoing a fundamental structural transition as enterprise finance departments shift from periodic month-end closes toward automated continuous accounting models. By integrating specialized machine learning algorithms directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, chief accounting officers are transforming financial reporting from a retrospective exercise into a real-time operational asset.
The Shift from Periodic Close to Continuous Financial Reporting
Traditional accounting workflows heavily relied on manual data reconciliation, spreadsheet calculations, and multi-week closing cycles at the end of each fiscal period. In contrast, continuous accounting frameworks utilize automated software agents to process, validate, and post transactional data in real time as business activities occur.
Automated bank reconciliation tools cross-reference incoming bank feeds, invoice records, and purchase orders automatically. By resolving transactional variances instantly throughout the month, corporate accounting teams eliminate the traditional workload spikes associated with quarterly and annual closes.
Machine Learning in Audit Trails and Anomaly Detection
Advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning tools are redefining internal audit and financial control environments. Automated systems analyze 100% of general ledger entries, identifying anomalous transactions, duplicate payments, and unauthorized journal entries in real time.
Rather than relying on random statistical sampling, corporate internal auditors can focus their attention on high-risk flags automatically surfaced by algorithmic monitoring platforms. This continuous risk assessment strengthens internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and significantly reduces fraud risk.
Evolving Roles for Accounting Professionals
As routine data entry and manual reconciliation tasks become fully automated, the skill set required for accounting professionals is shifting toward data analysis, system design, and strategic business advisory.
– Systems Governance: Accountants are increasingly responsible for monitoring algorithmic accuracy and managing data integration pipelines.
– Business Partnership: Finance professionals leverage real-time financial dashboards to advise operational leaders on margin management and working capital allocation.
– Regulatory Compliance Management: Accounting teams utilize automated platforms to ensure compliance with dynamic tax codes and international accounting standards.
Core Implementation Recommendations
1. Deploy Automated Reconciliation Tools: Integrate continuous transaction processing modules into existing enterprise ERP architectures.
2. Establish Algorithmic Governance Controls: Implement strict internal testing protocols to ensure automated accounting rules comply with GAAP/IFRS standards.
3. Reskill Accounting Teams: Invest in training finance staff on data analytics, workflow automation, and predictive financial modeling.
Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.
Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.
In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.
Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.
Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.
Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.
Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.
Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.
The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.
In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.
AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.
When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.
Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.
This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.
Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.