Connect with us

Accounting

IRS seeks to bolster rules for foreign trusts and gifts

Published

on

An IRS rule proposal could give tax professionals and clients who receive assets through foreign trusts and gifts answers to technical questions they’ve been posing for decades.

Last month, the agency held a public hearing on a proposal the IRS released in May that would alter the guidelines for the reporting of transactions involving foreign trusts and gifts reflected on Forms 3520 and 3520-A

The proposal is less controversial than another IRS proposal that would enforce new rules for donor-advised funds or the agency’s audit crackdown on tax avoidance methods used by wealthy households and won’t make as much of an impact as the expiration of many provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act at the end of next year. Still, financial advisors whose clients have offshore holdings may soon be dealing with new guidelines.

The IRS proposal would bring “more clarity or certainty on needing to report transactions,” said Brian Harvel, an Atlanta-based partner with the Alston & Bird law firm. 

“The key takeaway for me is that the IRS and Treasury want people to report more rather than less,” Harvel said in an email. “That is in line with what other countries are doing around the world, except that the U.S. places more emphasis on privacy and recognizes that there are a lot of legal and beneficial uses for trusts — asset protection, privacy, personal safety — compared to other countries who are gathering information on trusts and making it public or semi-public. Those types of disclosures defeat the purpose of a trust in the first place.”

READ MORE: 7 impactful tax strategies for HNW business clients

The proposal stems largely from a 1996 law, the Small Business Job Protection Act, which targeted “abusive tax schemes” that included that use of foreign trusts, according to a legislative history in the proposal. 

“In these schemes, foreign trusts were used to transfer large amounts of assets offshore, where it was much more difficult for the IRS to identify whether U.S. persons owned an interest in such trusts, and whether such persons were reporting and paying the required taxes on their income from such trusts,” the rule said. “Many of the foreign trusts were established in tax haven jurisdictions with bank secrecy laws.”

In rolling out the proposal earlier this year, the agency’s statement cited stakeholders who informed the IRS of “potential opportunities for improvement” of the penalty process relating to the forms and a new working group seeking to identify further changes that would reduce taxpayer burdens and “incentivize voluntary compliance.”

“The proposed regulations address potential uncertainty under current law, including the necessary requirements for complying with the foreign trust and gift provisions, and the relevant tax consequences and potential penalties for compliance failures,” according to the preamble to the rule.

The proposal would alter the regulatory definition of the terms “U.S. persons” and loans known as “qualified obligations,” and the treatment of indirect loans from foreign trusts that some taxpayers have used to bypass the rules, according to a guide to the potential rule written earlier this year by Ian Weinstock and Heather Fincher of the Kostelanetz law firm. 

In addition, the proposal expands reporting requirements to more kinds of transactions known as “constructive” transfers and distributions from trusts while filling in more details about exceptions to those guidelines and spelling out more rules for how to legally accept foreign gifts with proper notification to the IRS.

“For nearly thirty years, taxpayers have been waiting for the IRS to issue regulations related to foreign trusts and foreign gifts,” Weinstock and Fincher wrote. “Since 1996, when Congress enacted a myriad of provisions to prevent tax avoidance through the use of foreign trusts and gifts, taxpayers have had to rely on less formal guidance (e.g., Notice 97-34, Revenue Procedures 2014-55 and 2020-17) on those provisions.”

READ MORE: Trusts are useful but complicated. Here are some basics

In other words, tax professionals welcomed the codification of some highly specific policies, but they still asked the agency through more than 1,500 public comments and testimony at the Aug. 21 hearing to tweak the proposal further, according to a summary of the proceedings by Thomson Reuters Tax & Accounting.

For example, the American Institute of CPAs praised the May rule proposal, even as the organization called in July for shifts in at least 13 different sections of the guidelines.

“Practitioners have needed guidance in this area for more than 25 years,” Eileen Sherr, AICPA’s director of tax policy and advocacy, said in a statement at the time.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending