Now may be the perfect time to start an accounting firm.
With client demand growing and many baby boomer CPAs hitting retirement age, there is certainly no shortage of work, and advances in technology have lowered the cost of launching a new business.
But experts say there is much to consider before accountants jump into the deep end, such as their personal financial bandwidth, whether they want to do the technical work in their firm or just manage it and where to find support. Perhaps the best place to start is figuring out why you want to start your own firm in the first place.
By and large, there are two kinds of firm founders, experts say: Those who are natural-born entrepreneurs, and those who become founders as a result of some professional or personal change that requires them to have greater flexibility.
The first group can look like accountants who have lots of ideas but who may not be able to implement them at their current firm. Or it could be an accountant who sees what their employer is doing but believes they could do it better.
The second group can look like accountants who are starting families or battling an illness, or accountants whose firms are undergoing a structural change like a merger.
Kirill Makarov/kirill_makarov – stock.adobe.com
Logan Graf, founder of the Graf Tax Co. in Austin, Texas, said, “You have to want it. I would not recommend starting a firm unless you have a burning desire for doing something on your own.”
He added that firm founders must be inquisitive—they need to be willing to test things out and experiment where things can be improved.
Miklos Ringbauer, treasurer and secretary for the California Society of CPAs and founder of MiklosCPA, recommends that firm founders work for someone else first, learning the ropes in another firm and determining what they want to do differently.
“You don’t know what you don’t know,” Ringbauer said.
Stephen Buller, founder of Buller Accounting in Tacoma, Washington, added, “Learn the ins and outs, the rights and wrongs, while getting paid for it.”
Will I have enough clients?
Before actually starting a business, any savvy founder should consider whether there is a market for their services. For accountants, that translates to whether there are enough clients.
The answer is “not only applicable for accountants, but for all startups – it’s an unknown,” according to Ringbauer.
That’s where professional experience and understanding comes into play, he said. Accountants should consider a couple of factors: their personal financial obligations—whether they have children, student debt or a mortgage—and their personal savings.
If you don’t have enough runway to sustain yourself for a year or two, then you may need to plan longer or save more, Ringbauer said.
One common practice among accountants is buying a book of business to secure an established set of clients. However, Angie Wood, founder of Wood CPA in Edina, Minnesota, advises against it.
“Don’t buy a book of business,” she said. “I learned that the hard way. You don’t need to.”
Many clients will make the switch to the new firm, Wood explained, “but a lot of them choose to leave shortly after because it’s a different process. It’s a different person, it’s a different relationship. Fees change. The relationship is so personal, so it’s just not worth buying a book of business because clients can leave. There’s no guarantee.”
How do I do this legally?
The legal requirements for setting up a CPA firm vary from state to state, and the requirements are different for a CPA firm versus a firm offering bookkeeping services. Ringbauer recommends that accountants do their due diligence and research on their state’s requirements, but he offered a few tips and tricks.
“Some states limit certain things,” he said. “For example, in the State of California a professional limited liability company, PLLC, is not allowed, domestic or foreign, to operate and offer services in the state. Versus in Texas, you can be an LLC. So understanding state rules and regulations is incredibly crucial.”
In addition, many state boards of accountancy have special language requirements that must be included in a firm’s bylaws or incorporation documents. He also reminds accountants that you can always incorporate later.
“Depending on the type of services you offer, you may not necessarily need to incorporate upfront for liability purposes,” Ringbauer explained, using his own experience as an example. “For a very long time, I was doing the self-employed Schedule C. Then when our clientele started to change — when things got more complicated, when I ended up doing offshore voluntary disclosures, very scary IRS compliance stuff with clients having hundreds of thousands of dollars of penalties because they were not right previously, filing their returns with their foreign assets — I decided that this was too much risk for me and incorporated.”
Ringbauer recommends hiring a lawyer, “so you understand what your requirements are and the pitfalls or benefits of the different entities. … A lot of people think that just because you are a CPA, you know the tax laws.”
Do I need to hire?
The next big question for firm founders to consider is if and when to hire.
Buller said it’s important for the firm owner to first decide whether they want to continue as the main service provider in their business. Do they love actually doing the technical work, or is their goal to manage a firm and its employees?
“You should hire your first employees when you have a good process and good systems in place to deliver the service that you can charge for and that will make it easy for you to train an employee to generate revenue for your business,” Buller said.
“If you’re going to hire somebody, it basically means you’re taking a pay cut and a bunch of your time is then going to be spent training this person,” he continued.
For most accountants, the easiest and most logical first hires are usually admin and a bookkeeper.
“Affordability is a factor, and then what are the tasks I wanted to get rid of?” Wood said. “Tax was my strong suit, so I held on to that for the longest and found somebody else to do the other things that I didn’t really enjoy doing as much.”
What if I’m not ready?
Founding a firm isn’t for everyone, of course. And there are those who start their firm but realize that it isn’t the right fit for them. But most people quit because of some personal circumstance, not because they weren’t making enough money, according to Ringbauer. Thankfully, accountants have a safety net in that they can always go back to being an employee.
“The most beautiful thing in accounting is that if you are fit to do the practice, you will always make enough money to put food on the table,” he said. “It’s a secure and very viable business.”
Throwing in the towel on a firm isn’t a mark of failure, either, Buller said.
“I think it’s a good idea to have this attitude of, ‘How could I replace myself in this business in the long run?'” He said. “And then you start thinking about all these systems and processes you need to create to make it so somebody else could do the work, and then immediately you have started to create some value that you could actually sell to somebody. That’s one exit plan.”
Do I have enough support?
There is a litany of resources available to accountants looking to start their own practice, including the American Institute of CPAs and state CPA societies, which host networking events, workshops and post reading materials. Even insurance companies have boilerplate engagement letters and guidance support.
Then there’s an accountants’ personal network, which can include friends, colleagues, partners and sole practitioners.
Wood said she experienced overwhelming support and advice when she told her network she was starting her own firm. “If I would have known how much support I would have gotten from people, I would have done this so much earlier,” she said.
Graf said he received support from other tax experts on Twitter when he was starting out. And in October, he created his own online community of firm founders called Counter, which now has over 200 members.
At the end of the day, for most accountants, there will never be a perfect time to start a firm, according to Buller—you need to just do it.
“It’s kind of like having a kid,” Buller said. “People can tell you there’s challenges. People can tell you how hard it’s going to be or various things you’re going to have to do. And you’re going to have to be ignorant about it, no matter what, to some degree, until you do it yourself.”
“That’s one of our biggest hurdles,” Ringbauer said. “We believe that we need to know everything, and we are afraid of reaching out for help. The best thing is, most accountants now are looking at each other as support rather than competition.”
He continued, “Of course there are articles and books, but the most important thing to understand is that books give you the basic idea, but your own unique life experience and circumstances will dictate what may work from it or what doesn’t.”
As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.
Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.
The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.
WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.
The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.
Untested Legal Mechanism
To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.
White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.
Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.
“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.
USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs
Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).
However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:
Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
Potash and critical minerals
Fish and seafood
Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)
Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.
Canadian Response and Market Reaction
Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.
With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.
The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.
The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.
Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.