Connect with us

Accounting

It’s never too late for year-end tax planning

Published

on

2024 brought a variety of ups and downs to the U.S. stock market, job market, and individuals’ pocketbooks and financial plans. 

The year started with volatility driven by inflation, interest rate adjustments by the Federal Reserve, economic uncertainty, and geopolitical issues. Yet the second half of 2024 has seen some stabilization as inflation receded and the Federal Reserve started to signal a pause in interest rate increases. 

However, what does not change is that we need to help our clients navigate their taxes and provide guidance for their financial future amidst the backdrop of uncertainty. 

As we approach 2025, now is an important time to sit down with clients to review their goals and do specific year-end planning to help them keep more of what they earn. We have put together a helpful guide to have productive conversations with clients about maximizing retirement contributions, considering tax-smart investment strategies to reduce their tax burden and more. 

Maximizing retirement contributions

Whether it is a 401(k) or a SIMPLE IRA, workplace retirement plans are a great option for clients to reduce their taxable income and save more of what they earn for their retirement. You should highly encourage your clients to participate in the employer-offered retirement plan. 

If the employer offers a retirement contribution match, clients should try to at least contribute enough to receive the full match. To harness the most tax-efficient elements of the plan, clients should max out the retirement plan, which reduces their overall taxable income. The 401(k)-employee contribution limit in 2024 is $23,000, but those 50 and older can contribute up to $30,500. The employee contribution limit for a SIMPLE IRA in 2024 is $16,000.   

Tax-smart investment strategies

End-of-year financial reviews should provide an outline of the gains and losses in your clients’ portfolios. This may identify opportunities for tax-loss harvesting. Tax-loss harvesting is when capital losses from one investment are used to offset taxes owed on capital gains from another investment or personal income. 

There are restrictions on the amount you can deduct from personal income taxes due to tax-loss harvesting; however, this could be something to consider if a client navigated several capital losses this year. 

Understanding their tax bracket

Work with your clients so they understand where they fall in their tax bracket to determine the most ideal strategies for them. For example, if your client is on the cusp of a higher tax bracket, are there tax-smart strategies that they should consider to stay below that higher tax bracket?

Questions to ask your clients:

  • Are they planning to sell an asset that would be subject to a capital gains tax? These are taxes that a client could pay on profits made from the sales of an asset like real estate or stock. If your client owned an asset for less than a year, they may owe a short-term capital gains tax depending on their tax rate. If this is the case, you can recommend that they hold onto the asset for longer to reduce their tax burden. On the other hand, if they owned something for more than a year, they may owe a long-term capital gains tax. You might consider investigating tax-loss harvesting opportunities. 
  • Are they invested in their employer’s health savings account or flexible spending account? These accounts set aside money from a client’s paycheck prior to taxes, which will lower their taxable income. 
  • Are there opportunities to defer a payment or a payout from a sale of an asset, collection of severance or other incoming money? If your client was laid off and is collecting a severance or sold a large asset of value (real estate, stocks, etc.), that income amount might push them into a higher tax bracket. It would be beneficial to decide now if they should split those payments between two years if it would lower the overall tax burden.
  • Do they expect to have income from investments? If so, they might be liable for a 3.8% net investment income tax on the lesser of their net investment income. Net investment income includes, but is not limited to interest, dividends, capital gains, rental and royalty income, and non-qualified annuities.

Consider opportunities to give back

This is a great time of year to discuss with clients causes that are important to them and if they want to provide a monetary contribution — whether financial, stocks, or a high-value item for donation. Open conversations about donations can uncover opportunities that may be eligible for a federal tax deduction. If your client is interested in donating directly to a charity of their choice in a donor-advised fund, it will only be deductible if they itemize and exceed the standard deduction. 

If your client is interested in donating directly to a charity, they may consider a qualified charitable distribution. This is a tax-free transfer of money from an IRA to a charity. Normally, a traditional IRA distribution is taxable; however, a QCD is tax-free as long as it is transferred directly to a charity. This option is available for individuals over 70½ years of age or older. The maximum amount that can be transferred through a QCD is $100,000. A QCD can provide several tax benefits. QCD can count toward required minimum distributions of a client’s IRA, therefore, reducing their taxable income. 

A donor-advised fund is a charitable investment account focused on supporting charitable organizations your clients care about. If your client contributes either cash or other assets to a DAF, they could take an immediate tax deduction. Keep in mind that some clients may want to start their own charitable fund, or support a 501(c)(3) organization’s DAF. In addition, as they decide on what organizations to support, those funds can grow tax-free and benefit the charitable organizations in the future. 

Start conversations about the TCJA sunset

The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act instituted significant Tax Code changes that reduced taxes for many individual investors; however, these tax cuts are only temporary. The TCJA is set to expire at the end of 2025 unless Congress decides to take action. 

Your clients may have seen tax cuts due to the TCJA and if they have, it will behoove you to have transparent conversations with them about how to navigate the TCJA expiring in 2025 and the potential tax increases they could see. 

The most significant tax cuts in the TCJA included: 

  • Federal individual income tax rates generally decreased;
  • Many itemized deductions were capped or disallowed;
  • The standard deduction doubled;
  • Changes to the Alternative Minimum Tax rules decreased the number of individual taxpayers subject to the AMT;
  • The gift and estate tax exemption doubled; and,
  • The qualified business income deduction was introduced.

Although how Congress will address the TCJA sunsetting in 2025 is unknown, it is critical for you to understand how the TCJA impacted your clients to help them determine how they will or will not be affected. As you have conversations with clients during year-end planning, here are areas to consider: 

  • Income tax planning: Take a look at your clients’ federal income tax rates now compared to 2017 and see if they were higher. Then review the AMT and check to see if your clients may qualify for that under pre-TCJA rules. Understanding if your clients will have a higher income tax or be subject to the AMT under pre-TCJA rules is important for them to know ahead of time and discuss potential income deferral strategies — especially for retirees who are navigating distributions or Roth conversions. 
  • Standard deduction: If your clients currently claim the standard deduction under TCJA, but they used to itemize, you may start flagging for them that they should consider itemizing for 2026 and the best ways to do that. 
  • Gift and estate planning: Currently, the enhanced gift and estate tax exemption is $13.61 million, but this will be cut in half after 2025 if the TCJA expires. You should have open discussions with your high-net-worth clients if they are considering making large gifts and if they want to use this exemption. Keep in mind, many wealth transfer strategies like the creation of trusts or real estate transfers require time to fully implement. If you have these conversations with clients now, they’ll be able to stay in front of potential changes and hopefully avoid any delays.

Help your clients keep more of what they earn

Having transparent and open year-end financial planning conversations now with your clients will help them get a head start on the coming year, identify goals, and determine the right strategies for their unique situation. It will also give you more opportunities to collaborate with financial advisors, estate attorneys, and other professionals to navigate the more complicated issues.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: Prep perps

Published

on

Bank job; the magic is gone; not a beautiful day in the Neighborhood; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

Washington, D.C.: CPA Timothy Trifilo has been sentenced to 20 months in prison for making a false statement on a mortgage loan application and for not filing an income tax return.

Trifilo worked in compliance for several large accounting and finance firms and recently was managing director at a tax firm where he specialized in transaction structuring and advisory service, tax compliance and tax due diligence.

For a decade, he did not file federal income tax returns nor pay taxes owed despite earning more than $7.7 million during that time. He caused a tax loss to the IRS of more than $2 million.

In February 2023, Trifilo sought to obtain a $1.36 million bank-financed loan to purchase a home in D.C. and was working with a mortgage company. After the company told him that the bank would not approve the loan without copies of his filed returns, Trifilo provided fabricated documents to make it appear as if he had filed federal returns for 2020 and 2021. On these returns and other documents, Trifilo listed a former colleague as the individual who prepared the returns and uploaded them for filing with the IRS. This individual did not prepare the returns, has never prepared returns for Trifilo and did not authorize Trifilo to use his name on the returns and other documents.

The bank approved the loan and Trifilo purchased the home.

Trifilo, who previously pleaded guilty, was also ordered to serve two years of supervised release and pay $2,057,256.40 in restitution to the IRS.

New York: Tax preparer Rafael Alvarez, 61, of Cortland Manor, New York, has been sentenced to four years in prison in connection with a decade-long, $145-million tax fraud.

Alvarez, a.k.a. “the Magician,” who previously pleaded guilty, oversaw the filing of tens of thousands of federal individual income tax returns that included false information designed to fraudulently reduce clients’ taxes. From around 2010 to 2020, Alvarez was the CEO, owner and manager of ATAX New York, also d.b.a. ATAX New York-Marble Hill, ATAX Marble Hill, ATAX Marble Hill NY and ATAX Corporation. This high-volume prep company in the Bronx, New York, prepared some 90,000 federal income tax returns for clients during this period.

Alvarez both prepared returns for clients and recruited, supervised and directed other personnel who in turn prepared returns. He oversaw what authorities called “a sweeping fraudulent scheme” where he and his employees submitted false information on clients’ returns. This information included, among other things, bogus itemized tax deductions, made-up capital losses, phony business expenses and fraudulent tax credits.

Alvarez recruited to ATAX and personally trained “impressionable, easily intimidated” workers. When some employees questioned Alvarez about his fraudulent tax prep, he threatened these employees about reporting his scheme.

He deprived the IRS of $145 million in tax revenue. 

He was also sentenced to three years of supervised release and ordered to pay the IRS $145 million in restitution and forfeit more than $11.84 million.

Philadelphia: Tax preparer James J. Sirleaf, 65, of Darby, Pennsylvania, has pleaded guilty to a multiyear scheme to help clients file false income tax returns to fraudulently increase their refunds, as well as to filing false personal income tax returns for himself.

Sirleaf, who previously pleaded guilty, was the sole owner and operator of Metro Financial Services; he prepared false and fraudulent 1040s for clients for at least tax years 2016 through 2019. On the returns he included false deductions, business expenses and dependent information.

He also filed false returns for himself for tax years 2017 through 2019, failing to fully report his income.

Sirleaf caused a tax loss to the IRS of $219,622.

Sentencing is Sept. 3.

jail2-fotolia.jpg

Summerfield, North Carolina: William Lamar Rhew III has pleaded guilty to wire fraud, money laundering, securities fraud, tax evasion and failure to file returns in connection with a $20 million Ponzi scheme.

From November 2017 to December 2023, Rhew defrauded at least 117 investors of at least $24 million. He induced victims to invest with his company, Chadley Capital, which would allegedly buy accounts receivable at a discount, sell them for a profit and provide consistently high rates of return. Rhew touted the company’s increasing deal flow and underwriting standards and claimed $300 million in transactions in 2023, consistent returns exceeding 20% per year and nearly 74% total growth over 24 months.

All Rhew’s representations were false. Instead of investing victims’ funds, Rhew used the money on personal expenses, including the purchases of a boat, a beach house and luxury cars, and to make “interest” and “withdrawal” payments to other victim-investors.

For 2018 through 2022, Rhew willfully failed to report nearly $9 million in income to the IRS.

He has agreed to pay almost $14.9 in restitution to the victims and $3,056,936 to the IRS.

Sentencing is Aug. 22. Rhew faces up to 20 years in prison, supervised release of up to three years and monetary penalties.

Miami: In related cases, three tax preparers have pleaded guilty to tax crimes connected to a scheme to prepare false returns.

Franklin Carter Jr., of Sanford, Florida, pleaded guilty to conspiring to defraud the U.S. and to not filing returns. Jonathan Carrillo, of St. Cloud, Florida, pleaded guilty to conspiring to defraud the U.S. and assisting in the preparation of false returns.

Diandre Mentor has pleaded guilty to conspiring to defraud the United States by filing false returns for clients.

From 2016 to 2020, Carter and Carrillo owned and operated Neighborhood Advance Tax, a tax prep business with a dozen offices throughout Florida. Mentor worked there between January 2017 and 2019. The conspirators inflated client refunds by fabricated deductions and held periodic training to teach Neighborhood employees how to prepare fraudulent returns.

In 2020, Mentor and his co-conspirators also started Smart Tax & Finance, which  expanded to 12 franchise locations throughout South and Central Florida. The next year, Carter, Carrillo and the co-conspirators started Taxmates, which operated out of the same offices that Neighborhood had used. Both firms prepared false returns for clients; many of those returns included false deductions.

The three also continued to teach franchise owners and employees how to prepare false returns for clients. In addition, Carter did not file personal tax returns for 2019 through 2021.

Carter and Carrillo caused a tax loss to the IRS exceeding $12 million. Mentor caused a tax loss to the IRS totaling $3,090,077.

Several co-conspirators have also pleaded guilty, including Abryle de la Cruz, Emmanuel Almonor, Adon Hemley and Isaiah Hayes.

Carter and Carrillo each face up to five years in prison for the conspiracy charge. Carter faces up to a year for each failure to file a return charge; Carillo faces a maximum of three years for each charge of assisting in the preparation of a false return; Mentor faces up to five years in prison. All three also face a period of supervised release, restitution and monetary penalties.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Small business wage growth slowed in May

Published

on

Hourly earnings growth for small business employees dropped to a four-year low at 2.77% in May, while job growth was flat, according to payroll company Paychex.

The Paychex Small Business Employment Watch, which tracks U.S. business with fewer than 50 employees, found that three-month annualized hourly earnings growth fell to its lowest level in May (2.45%) since December 2020, when it was 1.66%.

“There seems to be a very limited amount of dynamism in small businesses right now,” said Frank Fiorille, vice president of risk management, compliance and data analytics at Paychex. “We’re not seeing blockbuster or torrid hiring, but we’re also not seeing major layoffs either. They’re in a frozen state. They don’t want to take any risks.”

The Midwest has represented the strongest region for small business employment growth for the past year, while the West continues to lag all regions and reported an index level below 100 on Paychex’s Small Business Jobs Index for the 14th consecutive month in May. 

“The Midwest is doing well, and the coasts are lagging a little bit,” said Fiorille. 

Construction dropped 0.68 percentage points to a jobs index of 99.69 in May, marking its lowest level since March 2021. Job growth in the leisure and hospitality industry remained in last place among sectors for the fourth month in a row at 98.18 in May.

Uncertainty over tariffs and the massive tax bill in Congress seem to be holding back small businesses, and accountants should keep a close eye on developments to advise their small business clients. “That’s the ballgame right now for everybody to watch,” said Fiorille.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Tesla has $1.2B at risk from EV credits cut in Trump tax bill

Published

on

Tesla Inc.’s shares sank as Elon Musk and President Donald Trump’s simmering feud devolved into a public war of words between two of the world’s most powerful people.

Trump on Thursday said he was “very disappointed” by the Tesla chief executive officer’s criticism of the president’s signature tax policy bill. Musk fired back in several social media posts, saying in one that “without me, Trump would have lost the election.”  

The president later floated terminating federal contracts and subsidies extended to Musk’s companies and said that he had asked the Tesla and SpaceX leader to leave his administration, which Musk said was a “lie.” 

Tesla’s shares dropped 14% on Thursday in New York, the stock’s biggest decline since March 10. The rout erased about $150 billion from the electric-vehicle maker’s market value. 

The spectacle of the world’s richest person and the leader of the free world lobbing insults toward one another on social media marks a stunning breakup of a once formidable political alliance. 

Musk spent more than $250 million to help secure Trump’s return to the White House. Trump in turn deputized Musk to lead a sweeping effort to slash government spending and reshape the federal bureaucracy before the mercurial billionaire stepped back from that role last week.

At the same time, policies advanced by Trump and Republican lawmakers put billions of dollars at risk for Tesla, by far Musk’s largest business.

Trump’s massive tax bill would largely eliminate a credit worth as much as $7,500 for buyers of some Tesla models and other electric vehicles by the end of this year, seven years ahead of schedule. That would translate to a roughly $1.2 billion hit to Tesla’s full-year profit, according to JPMorgan analysts.

After leaving his formal advisory role in the White House last week, Musk has been on a mission to block the president’s signature tax bill that he described as a “disgusting abomination.” The world’s richest person has been lobbying Republican lawmakers — including making a direct appeal to House Speaker Mike Johnson — to preserve the valuable EV tax credits in the legislation.

Separate legislation passed by the Senate attacking California’s EV sales mandates poses another $2 billion headwind for Tesla’s sales of regulatory credits, according to JPMorgan. 

Taken together, those measures threaten roughly half of the more than $6 billion in earnings before interest and taxes that Wall Street expects Tesla to post this year, analysts led by Ryan Brinkman said in a May 30 report.

Tesla didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

The House-passed tax bill would aggressively phase-out tax credits for the production of clean electricity, and other sources years earlier than scheduled. It also includes stringent restrictions on the use of Chinese components and materials that analysts said would render the credits useless and limits the ability of companies to sell the tax credits to third parties.

Tesla’s division focused on solar systems and batteries separately criticized the Republican bill for gutting clean energy tax credits, saying that “abruptly ending” the incentives would threaten U.S. energy independence and the reliability of the power grid.

The clean energy and EV policies under threat were largely enacted as part of former President Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act. The law was designed to encourage companies to build a domestic supply chain for clean energy and electric vehicles, giving companies more money if they produce more batteries and EVs in the U.S. Tesla has a broad domestic footprint, including car factories in Texas and California, a lithium refinery and battery plants.

With those Biden-era policies in place, U.S. EV sales rose 7.3% to a record 1.3 million vehicles last year, according to Cox Automotive data.

Continue Reading

Trending