Connect with us

Finance

Mortgage payments soar for prospective homeowners in swing states

Published

on

Housing payments have risen by 92% in swing states since 2020.  (iStock )

The housing affordability crisis is hitting swing states hard. These battleground states, which could potentially be won by either candidate, are especially focused on the issue of affordability in the upcoming election. About nine in 10 adult Gen Zers reported housing affordability is important when deciding who to vote for, Realtor.com found.

Housing payments in swing states have nearly doubled since the last election, rising by 92% to $2,161, on average. Rising home prices and mortgage rates have largely contributed to this jump in ownership costs. The average sales price in swing states increased by about 40% since 2020, and now sits at just over $316,000 in 2024. Mortgage rates have more than doubled to about 7% since the beginning of 2021, when they were 2.65%, on average.

Both red and blue states have faced similar fates, but red states have fared slightly worse, with median housing payments rising by 95%. Blue states saw an increase of 83% in average mortgage payments, according to Realtor.com.

These increases in housing costs have made it impossible for many residents in swing states to afford an average-priced home, based on the general rule that households shouldn’t spend more than 30% of their income on housing costs.

To afford the monthly costs of owning a home in a swing state, the average family income must be $86,421 to stick to the 30% rule. Just four years ago, the income required in these states was just over $45,000. To give some perspective, a household earning the median income in swing states would currently need to spend 32.8% of their income to comfortably afford a home versus the 21.8% they needed to spend back in 2020.

If you’re thinking of shopping around for a home loan, consider using Credible to help you easily compare interest rates from multiple lenders in minutes.

HOUSING BEGINS TO TIP IN FAVOR OF BUYERS; SELLERS SLASH PRICES TO ENTICE THEM BACK TO MARKET: REPORT

Lower-income groups struggle most in swing states

Housing costs have grown unaffordable for many families in swing states, but lower-income households and certain social groups have struggled the most under high home costs. Income growth simply isn’t keeping up with the more rapid growth of housing prices.

“Voters in swing states care about housing affordability because soaring home prices and mortgage rates, along with a shortage of homes for sale, have made homeownership feel impossible for some Americans. That’s especially true for young people who are earning low incomes and haven’t yet built up their savings, making them feel it would be an uphill battle to reach their parents’ level of financial success,” Redfin Senior Economist Elijah de la Campa said.

“While swing states have historically had lower housing costs than blue states — and most still do — markets in swing states have not been immune to the affordability crunch the country has been facing for the last several years. The inability to afford a home is making a lot of voters feel bad about the economy and their financial prospects,” said de la Campa.

Black and Hispanic households, in particular, face difficulties securing affordable housing. The average Black household in a swing state would have to spend 48.2% of their income to afford a typical home while the typical Hispanic family would spend 38.3% of their income. This is up for both of these groups compared to 2020.

Comparatively, white families would need to spend just 29.8% of their monthly earnings on a home to realistically afford it, so they’d be able to slide under the 30% spending mark suggested by experts. This is still up from 19.8% needed in 2020.

If you’re looking to purchase a home, consider visiting Credible to find the best mortgage rate for your financial situation.

THE AVERAGE DOWN PAYMENT FOR THE TYPICAL US HOME REACHES $127,750: ZILLOW

Rate cuts are expected later in the year

Rate cuts are expected in September, on the heels of a cooling inflation report. The Federal Reserve has been waiting on rate cuts until the economy shows more consistent signs of recovery, namely lowering inflation. This hold on rate cuts has led to increasing mortgage rates that have hovered in the 7% range for the better part of a year.

In anticipation of rate cuts, mortgage rates have fallen in recent weeks, landing at 6.78% recently. Although rate cuts would be welcome across the board, experts remain divided on just how much more mortgage rates would drop if the Fed chooses to cut rates in September.

Many believe that rates won’t drop by as much as prospective homebuyers would like. In fact, the first rate cut could have little effect on mortgage rates. Assuming the Fed continues to cut rates throughout the year and into 2025, then buyers could see more downward movement on rates.

Still, buyers have been waiting long enough for rates to drop, that any movement may lead to larger home sales.

Consumers that want to see what kind of loan term and rates would work for them can take advantage of Credible’s free online tools.

MANY HOMES ARE SITTING STAGNANT ON THE MARKET, CAUSING MORE FREQUENT PRICE DROPS

Have a finance-related question, but don’t know who to ask? Email The Credible Money Expert at [email protected] and your question might be answered by Credible in our Money Expert column.

Continue Reading

Finance

Morgan Stanley picks China stocks to ride out a worst-case scenario in U.S. tensions

Published

on

Continue Reading

Finance

Elon Musk endorses Trump’s transition co-chair Howard Lutnick for Treasury secretary

Published

on

Elon Musk at the tenth Breakthrough Prize ceremony held at the Academy Museum of Motion Pictures on April 13, 2024 in Los Angeles, California.

The Hollywood Reporter | The Hollywood Reporter | Getty Images

On Saturday, Elon Musk shared who he is endorsing for Treasury secretary on X, a cabinet position President-elect Donald Trump has yet to announce his preference to fill.

Musk wrote that Howard Lutnick, Trump-Vance transition co-chair and CEO and chairman of Cantor Fitzgerald, BGC Group and Newmark Group chairman, will “actually enact change.”

Lutnick and Key Square Group founder and CEO Scott Bessent are reportedly top picks to run the Treasury Department.

Musk, CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, also included his thoughts on Bessent in his post on X.

“My view fwiw is that Bessent is a business-as-usual choice,” he wrote.

“Business-as-usual is driving America bankrupt so we need change one way or another,” he added.

Musk also stated it would be “interesting to hear more people weigh in on this for @realDonaldTrump to consider feedback.”

Howard Lutnick, chairman and chief executive officer of Cantor Fitzgerald LP, left, and Elon Musk, chief executive officer of Tesla Inc., during a campaign event with former US President Donald Trump, not pictured, at Madison Square Garden in New York, US, on Sunday, Oct. 27, 2024.

Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

In a statement to Politico, Trump transition spokesperson Karoline Leavitt made it clear that the president-elect has not made any decisions regarding the position of Treasury secretary.

“President-elect Trump is making decisions on who will serve in his second administration,” Leavitt said in a statement. “Those decisions will be announced when they are made.”

Both Lutnick and Bessent have close ties to Trump. Lutnick and Trump have known each other for decades, and the CEO has even hosted a fundraiser for the president-elect.

The Wall Street Journal also reported that Lutnick has already been helping Trump review candidates for cabinet positions in his administration.

On the other hand, Bessent was a key economic advisor to the president-elect during his 2024 campaign. Bessent also received an endorsement from Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, according to Semafor.

“He’s from South Carolina, I know him well, he’s highly qualified,” Graham said.

Continue Reading

Finance

Protecting your portfolio against risks tied to Trump’s tariff plan

Published

on

Biggest Risks After the Rally: Trade & Top Valuations

Money manager John Davi is positioning for challenges tied to President-elect Donald Trump’s tariff agenda.

Davi said he worries the new administration’s policies could be “very inflationary,” so he thinks it is important to choose investments carefully.

“Small-cap industrials make more sense than large-cap industrials,” the Astoria Portfolio Advisors CEO told CNBC’s “ETF Edge” this week.

Davi, who is also the firm’s chief investment officer, expects the red sweep will help push a pro-growth, pro-domestic policy agenda forward that will benefit small caps.

It appears Wall Street agrees so far. Since the presidential election, the Russell 2000 index, which tracks small-cap stocks, is up around 4% as of Friday’s close.

Davi, whose firm has $1.9 billion in assets under management, also likes staying domestic despite the tariff risks.

“We’re overweight the U.S. I think that’s the right playbook in the next few years until the midterms,” added Davi. “We have two years of where he [Trump] can control a lot of the narrative.”

But Davi plans to stay away from fixed income due to challenges tied to the growing budget deficit.

“Be careful if you own bonds for sure,” said Davi.

Since the election, the benchmark 10-year Treasury yield is up 3% as of Friday’s close.

Continue Reading

Trending