Connect with us

Accounting

New paths to CPA licensure

Published

on

The ongoing staffing shortage is forcing the accounting profession to do some soul searching. Numerous factors contribute to the pipeline problem, including declining birth rates, a decreasing emphasis on college education, and fewer students majoring in accounting, to say nothing of entry-level salaries that can’t compete with those on offer in a number of other careers.

But of all the factors, the 150-credit hour requirement for CPA licensure has become something of a flashpoint, and has come to be emphasized as particularly prohibitive, which is now raising questions regarding what it takes and means to be a CPA today.

Three primary issues arise with the 150-hour rule: cost, time and lack of structure.

For starters, the cost of the extra year of education isn’t worth the starting salary into which accounting students are graduating. Young accountants are effectively paying more to make less.

According to a 2023 study by the Center for Audit Quality, 61% of nonaccounting majors cited higher starting salaries with other majors as a reason for not choosing to study accounting. Additionally, 57% said they did not want to pursue the fifth year of education required for CPA licensure, and 52% said they could not afford 150 hours and needed to start earning immediately after graduation.

Accounting starting salaries have not kept pace with neighboring professions and industries, like finance and technology. Students can graduate into higher-paying jobs with the same level or education, or less, than is required to start a career in accounting.

Toy truck hold alphabet letter block in word CPA (Abbreviation o

“If you just took [the Consumer Price Index] and applied it to the starting salary back in 1982, you’re very close to the starting salary of what the fifth-year students were a year ago, so the profession really hasn’t caught up,” said Edward Wilkins, an accounting professor and former audit partner at a Big Four firm. “Did they ever really get credit for that fifth year if it was just a CPI adjustment?”

The second issue is time. Accounting students and young professionals say the top hurdles to becoming a CPA are the time commitments to study for and take the exam, according to a survey by the Illinois CPA Society. Not to mention the fact that the professions’ spring and fall busy seasons coincide with the busiest parts of college semesters.

Thirdly, within the current framework, the requirements for the final 30 credit hours are not standardized. While some states have specific (and sometimes confusing) credit requirements, others do not even require those credits to consist of accounting courses.

“States, at the end of the day, get to make the call about how they’re going to license people,” said Jennifer Wilson, partner and co-founder of ConvergenceCoaching, and facilitator of the National Pipeline Advisory Group. “That creates an inherent set of nuances and inconsistencies in the 150-hour program.”

And firms aren’t the only ones feeling the effects of the decreasingly popular fifth year.

“What was a boondoggle beginning for the schools has flipped around because the customer goes elsewhere,” said Stan Veliotis, associate professor and chair of accounting and tax at Fordham University. “At the beginning, the customer had to come to you because you were the only one selling this product. Then they realized, ‘You know what, I could just substitute this with something else,’ and that’s what’s happening.”

Alternatives to the 150-hour rule

As the pipeline problem has grown worse and worse, many solutions and initiatives have emerged to reduce the cost and time of education. These programs alone do not fill the pipeline; however, they do provide immediate relief to students, especially those from traditionally underrepresented populations.

One such program is the Experience Learn and Earn program from the American Institute of CPAs and the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy, which is designed to be cost-effective and flexible, and to offer transcript credits, according to Liz Burkhalter, associate director of CPA pipeline at the AICPA and head of the ELE.

The program lets students with four years of college start working at participating CPA firms while taking low-cost online courses from Tulane University to get the the extra credits they need to qualify for CPA licensure. Earning all 30 hours cost approximately $5,000 for the more than 100 students who participated in its pilot year in 2024, with 25 graduating the program.

A private company called CPA Credits provides another cost-effective route to 150 hours. Founded by Jeffrey Chesner in 2020, it offers around 80 self-paced courses costing $675 each. Students taking 10 courses receive a discount, meaning a student could pay around $6,000 to earn all 30 credits through CPA Credits.

“Students just really don’t know exactly what they need or how to fulfill the 150 credit requirements. There are certain state boards which are very difficult to understand,” Chesner explained, noting that the bureaucracy of state boards sometimes makes it hard for students to get their questions answered quickly.

For this reason, CPA Credits also offers free transcript evaluations to help students determine exactly what credits they need. The company provides about 50 evaluations per day, according to Chesner.

Some states have also developed similar initiatives. The Florida Institute of CPAs, in partnership with Nova Southeastern University and three accounting firms, launched the Bridge to CPA pilot program in May 2024.

Meanwhile, the New Jersey Society of CPAs offers numerous initiatives, including The CPA Pathway Apprenticeship with Withum and Seton Hall University, and a work-for-credit program with Saint Peter’s University and PwC.

NJCPA is hoping to draft legislation by spring and pass a bill by the summer to create alternatives to the 150 rule, according to its CEO and executive director, Aiysha Johnson.

“We’re not looking to get rid of 150 because we want to be additive — we want to add to the current framework,” Johnson said. “What we want to do is include an option where a student can graduate with 120 hours plus two years of experience, or a master’s plus one year of experience. That would lend three distinct pathways.”

“Work-for-credit could still be an option within this framework,” she added. But the main priority is “to ensure continued practice mobility, and we think the way to do that is through automobility with specific guard rails, which we would put in our legislation.”

New Jersey isn’t the only state on this wave. The Ohio Society of CPAs announced Jan. 9 that its state governor signed a bill that creates a second pathway to licensure, effective Jan. 1, 2026. The bill requires a bachelor’s degree, two years of work experience, and passing the CPA exam.

The Minnesota Society of CPAs introduced a similar bill in February 2023 that creates two additional pathways: 120 credits and two years of work experience, or 120 credits and both one year of work experience and 120 CPE credits earned concurrently.

Arkansas, California, Indiana, Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Utah are also at various stages of considering developing and proposing alternative licensure requirements.

However, the profession has mixed opinions on changing licensure requirements. Sixty-nine percent of stakeholders, responding to a survey by NPAG, said that they agreed that changes should be made to components for CPA licensure, while 60% said they were concerned about changes negatively affecting the profession’s reputation.

An image to maintain?

When the AICPA raised the education requirement from 120 to 150 credit hours in 1998, the thinking was that the extra year of education would boost the credibility of the profession and make for a more well-rounded accountant. Now, with talks of changing licensure requirements again, a major concern among some experts is maintaining the prestige of the CPA. Some critics argue that experience-based education may liken accounting to that of a trade apprenticeship.

“The question is, if we allow experience to count, does it make it less professional? And my answer is this: It doesn’t have to,” Wilson said. “Experiential learning delivered under the supervision or by university professionals through an employer is not really cutting corners. That’s different. You’re still getting transcript college credits. That’s not a corner-cutter — it just moves the cost of that education to the employer.”

She says the key is for states to prescribe consistent competencies — skills and abilities that can be demonstrated in measurable ways.

“The reality is that many of our experienced, talented, smart CPAs across the country were graduates when there was the requirement of 120 hours, so a bachelor’s plus two years of experience,” added New Jersey’s Johnson. “I think it’s hard to question the rigor when we have so many professionals out here, so many executives, doing great work to say that that’s something that we should not consider.”

The priority in making changes to CPA licensure is maintaining mobility. The 150-hour rule has been uniform across states for more than two decades, but the mobility and ease of interstate practice starts to fissure here: Inconsistencies are a challenge for employers to manage, especially when employing people in multiple states or serving clients in multiple states. Changes to licensure requirements at the state level mean employers will have to keep track of those differences, similar to how they track differences in CPE, Wilson said.

“We’re going to have some increased complexity back on the service providers and the employers and the CPAs themselves to figure out: What are the rules to practice in this state?” Wilson said.

New reasons to CPA

Beyond making the CPA less prohibitive, the profession also needs new ways to make the CPA appeal to the next generation of talent if it wants to boost the candidate pool. The old arguments just aren’t cutting it anymore.

“The old story was, ‘The fifth year is mandatory, starting salaries are fine, you’re going to make more than all those other business majors midcareer and above, so just wait till then, kid.’ But people don’t want to hear about midcareer,” Wilson said. “No, they want to be able to move out of their parents’ house. They want to be able to afford a car payment and housing and whatever loan payments they may have on college, immediately, and still have a good quality of life.”

But one aspect that has always pulled talent, and still does, is the stability and career mobility the profession offers. The skills an accountant learns are highly transferable and ultra-employable.

“You can gain deep expertise across industries. You can work for startups, government corporations, public accounting. There are so many opportunities that you can make your own,” Johnson said.

And the CPA remains a highly respected credential that displays discipline, rigor and trust. The credential is the third-most valued certification or degree considered when hiring chief financial officers, according to a study by the Pennsylvania Institute of CPAs.

“It’s almost like buying a piece of meat in the supermarket: It’s got the USDA stamp on it, versus a piece of meat that doesn’t have the stamp on it,” Veliotis said. “Maybe it’s still OK, but it doesn’t have the stamp, whereas if it does, it’s more likely that it’s reliable.”

“I don’t think that it’s all about the year-one or year-two experience,” Johnson said. “I think it’s really about the foundation that they can create for themselves, the success that they can have in their communities, and the legacy that they can build within their families.”

It’s important for the profession to communicate a strong message because the consequences of an accounting shortage don’t just impact one accounting firm or industry, she added: “We’re talking about overall threats to corporate governance and financial reporting. And we see that with government agencies and not being able to submit their filings on time. There’s a lot of risk associated.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

SEC’s Semiannual Reporting Proposal Faces Investor Pushback: What CFOs Need to Know

Published

on

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

A proposal from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to potentially shift some public companies away from quarterly financial reporting toward a semiannual model is drawing significant pushback from investors, even as it continues moving through the regulatory process. The debate has direct implications for corporate finance teams, auditors, and the broader transparency of U.S. capital markets.

What the SEC Proposed

According to a summary published by accounting advisory firm Cohen & Co., the SEC issued a proposed rule on May 19, 2026, aimed at simplifying financial reporting requirements for many U.S. public companies. The proposal would potentially reduce the frequency of certain mandatory disclosures from quarterly to semiannual, a structural change that has not been made to core U.S. reporting requirements in decades.

The proposal follows an extended debate within U.S. policy circles, with proponents arguing that reduced reporting frequency could lower compliance costs and free up management time for longer-term strategic planning rather than quarter-to-quarter results management.

Why Investors Are Pushing Back

Comment letters submitted in response to the proposal have been extensive, and according to Cohen & Co.’s review of the public record, investors “appear to be largely opposed” to the shift, viewing frequent interim reporting as a core benefit of U.S. capital markets relative to other jurisdictions.

Accounting and law firms have taken a more measured position, generally urging any changes to remain aligned with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), whose existing disclosure requirements and guidance are built around a quarterly reporting cadence. A shift to semiannual reporting without corresponding changes to FASB guidance could create friction between SEC filing requirements and GAAP-based disclosure expectations.

Lessons From the U.K. Experience

The debate is not without precedent. The United Kingdom moved away from mandatory quarterly reporting for listed companies in 2014, returning to a semiannual disclosure requirement. According to Cohen & Co.’s analysis, that experience offers a cautionary data point: there was no measurable increase in capital expenditure or R&D investment following the change, while analyst coverage of affected companies declined as reliable interim information became less available — a particular risk for smaller and newly public companies that rely on analyst coverage to maintain investor visibility.

Practical Implications for Finance Teams

Beyond the debate over disclosure philosophy, the proposal carries practical complications. Many companies have debt covenants and credit agreements structured around quarterly financial delivery; a shift to semiannual reporting could require renegotiating those terms. Reduced reporting frequency would also extend the “window of market silence” between disclosures, a factor that governance and investor-relations teams would need to manage carefully to avoid information asymmetry.

Separately, and unrelated to the reporting-frequency debate, the SEC and FASB have continued finalizing more routine updates this year. New Accounting Standards Updates are taking effect for December 31, 2026, fiscal year-ends covering income tax disclosures, credit loss measurement, induced debt conversions, and stock compensation, according to Eide Bailly’s review of 2026 ASU activity. Additional guidance on paid-in-kind dividends and environmental credits is also on the near-term horizon.

What to Watch Next

The semiannual reporting proposal remains in the comment and review phase, and no final rule has been adopted as of this writing. Finance leaders should monitor the SEC’s regulatory agenda for further movement, while treating the current quarterly reporting requirement as the operative standard until any final rule is issued and an effective date is set.

Given the extent of investor opposition documented in the comment file, a full shift to mandatory semiannual reporting appears more likely to result in either a scaled-back compromise or continued study rather than swift adoption — though the SEC’s ultimate direction remains uncertain.

 

Continue Reading

Accounting

AI-Driven Automation and Continuous Accounting Frameworks

Published

on

The accounting profession is undergoing a fundamental structural transition as enterprise finance departments shift from periodic month-end closes toward automated continuous accounting models. By integrating specialized machine learning algorithms directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, chief accounting officers are transforming financial reporting from a retrospective exercise into a real-time operational asset.

The Shift from Periodic Close to Continuous Financial Reporting
Traditional accounting workflows heavily relied on manual data reconciliation, spreadsheet calculations, and multi-week closing cycles at the end of each fiscal period. In contrast, continuous accounting frameworks utilize automated software agents to process, validate, and post transactional data in real time as business activities occur.

Automated bank reconciliation tools cross-reference incoming bank feeds, invoice records, and purchase orders automatically. By resolving transactional variances instantly throughout the month, corporate accounting teams eliminate the traditional workload spikes associated with quarterly and annual closes.

Machine Learning in Audit Trails and Anomaly Detection
Advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning tools are redefining internal audit and financial control environments. Automated systems analyze 100% of general ledger entries, identifying anomalous transactions, duplicate payments, and unauthorized journal entries in real time.

Rather than relying on random statistical sampling, corporate internal auditors can focus their attention on high-risk flags automatically surfaced by algorithmic monitoring platforms. This continuous risk assessment strengthens internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and significantly reduces fraud risk.

Evolving Roles for Accounting Professionals
As routine data entry and manual reconciliation tasks become fully automated, the skill set required for accounting professionals is shifting toward data analysis, system design, and strategic business advisory.
– Systems Governance: Accountants are increasingly responsible for monitoring algorithmic accuracy and managing data integration pipelines.
– Business Partnership: Finance professionals leverage real-time financial dashboards to advise operational leaders on margin management and working capital allocation.
– Regulatory Compliance Management: Accounting teams utilize automated platforms to ensure compliance with dynamic tax codes and international accounting standards.

Core Implementation Recommendations
1. Deploy Automated Reconciliation Tools: Integrate continuous transaction processing modules into existing enterprise ERP architectures.
2. Establish Algorithmic Governance Controls: Implement strict internal testing protocols to ensure automated accounting rules comply with GAAP/IFRS standards.
3. Reskill Accounting Teams: Invest in training finance staff on data analytics, workflow automation, and predictive financial modeling.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Trending