Connect with us

Accounting

New Yorkers face likely tax hikes no matter who becomes mayor

Published

on

New York city street scene with Empire State Building

New York mayoral front-runner Zohran Mamdani’s pledge to fund free childcare and bus rides by taxing the rich faces steep odds in Albany. But tax hikes may be coming for New Yorkers anyway, regardless of who leads City Hall.

Several lawmakers say higher taxes are inevitable as the Empire State braces for billions in federal cuts to health and food aid under President Donald Trump’s new budget law. That could complicate Mamdani’s plan to get state lawmakers to fund his progressive agenda.

Mamdani, who won the Democratic nomination on a platform to make the city more affordable, wants to raise $9 billion from higher levies on millionaires and corporations, a plan rattling Wall Street and business leaders.

State Senator Liz Krueger, chair of the Finance Committee, said tax increases will probably be needed eventually but that any fresh revenue would have to go first to shore up Medicaid and food stamps, not the new city programs Mamdani is calling for. 

“Based on enormous cuts coming from the federal government, likely the first priority for the state would be to help reduce damaging cuts to the poorest New Yorkers statewide,” she said. “New asks for new programs for New York City will be tougher lifts.”

As of August, the state was projecting a cumulative three-year budget gap of about $34 billion. When some of the enacted federal cuts to health care and food stamps are added to the already-high projected deficits, it would swell to about $47 billion, according to state Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli.  

Any new taxes would need state approval, and Governor Kathy Hochul has made clear she won’t raise them — leaving Mamdani’s plans in the hands of the governor and the New York legislature.

Assembly Member Tony Simone, a supporter of taxing the wealthy, said Hochul, a fellow Democrat, is unlikely to acquiesce to new taxes before her reelection campaign next year. 

It’s “politically tough,” he said. “Morally, we’ll have to find some way of increasing revenues.”

The Assembly and state Senate have both supported increases to corporate and income taxes in recent years, though nowhere near the size of Mamdani’s proposal. Hochul invariably slammed the breaks on new broad-based duties. 

‘Very sensitive’

The last major increase occurred before her term in 2021 under former Governor Andrew Cuomo, who lost the Democratic mayoral primary to Mamdani but is running as an independent to lead the city. Hochul has, however, implemented a fee on cars entering Manhattan.

“I’m very sensitive to competitiveness with other states,” Hochul, who labeled herself a “staunch capitalist,” said in a Bloomberg Television interview last month. “I’ve said I don’t want to raise income taxes on high-net-worth people. I want them to know that New York is a place where we want to foster innovation.”

Nevertheless, she wants to roll out free childcare across the state, not just in New York City, and would need to do so over time to foot the bill of about $14 billion annually. 

“We’ve had conversations about specifics, but my view is, get to the election and then we’ll talk before the next session,” Hochul said in mid- September in response to questions about her support for Mamdani’s policies. 

Hochul, Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins and Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie, all fellow Democrats, have endorsed Mamdani to succeed Mayor Eric Adams. 

Mamdani wants to raise New York City’s income tax on anyone making more than $1 million a year by 2 percentage points, four times what former Mayor Bill de Blasio proposed in 2013 on earnings above $500,000 to pay for universal pre-kindergarten. (He did not get the tax increase). Mamdani also wants to raise the state corporate tax to 11.5%, the same as in New Jersey, from 7.25%.  

That would put New York at a big disadvantage to neighboring Connecticut, whose base corporate tax rate is 7.5%.

E.J. McMahon, an adjunct fellow at the conservative Manhattan Institute, said it’s unlikely that Mamdani’s tax agenda, whose scale is unprecedented in modern history, will pass. 

But the governor is facing a primary challenge from the left from Lieutenant Governor Antonio Delgado. And while Delgado’s primary campaign is a long shot, Hochul may not want to contend with a third-party challenge in the general election, which would divide the Democratic vote against a Republican candidate like US Representative Elise Stefanik, who is likely to run.

Hochul’s “strategy will be to attempt to placate the left and a Mayor Mamdani, if there is one, by dipping into her own reserves to spend on things they want, some of which she claims to also want,” said McMahon. “The question is can she do enough of that this year to stifle any serious political opposition in her own party.” 

Leading polls

Mamdani, a democratic socialist, is ahead in the polls for the Nov. 4 election, but his lead narrowed after Adams left the race. He has 46% support compared with 33% for Cuomo, according to a Quinnipiac University poll. Republican Curtis Sliwa is polling at 15%. 

Cuomo argues New York would never raise taxes statewide just to pay for benefits to New York City residents.

Mamdani said in an interview last month that while he’s confident he could push through his tax hikes, he’s “absolutely flexible” in regard to other revenue-raising possibilities to fund his marquee proposals.

He argues that the extension of Trump’s 2017 tax cuts benefited the rich and corporations, so wealthy New York City residents and companies can afford to pay more. Trump slashed corporate taxes to 21% from 35% and the highest income tax bracket to 37% from 39.6%.

State Senator John Liu said that should open the door to higher duties on the wealthy to help pay for cuts to health care. Every New York City mayor has taken office under challenging circumstances in recent years and has managed to get at least some of their pledges funded, he said. 

Hochul said Tuesday at an event with Mamdani that he is “eminently rational” and understands that he needs the backing of the governor and the legislature to implement his policies.

“I already invited him to talk about his priorities and my priorities and see how they’re aligned and how we can get to yes on many of them,” Hochul said.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending